ICT Coalition Meeting and Stakeholder Forum November 26/27 Brussels.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Aberdeen City Council 2008 QUALITY IMPROVEMENT VISITS TO SCHOOLS GUIDANCE Alan Stewart.
Advertisements

To Halton Youth Service 
Child Safeguarding Standards
Inclusion Quality Mark for Wales
Barry G Holland – Consulting Psychologist
The Draft SEN Code of Practice November What the Code is Nine chapters Statutory guidance on duties, policies and procedures relating to Part 3.
Changes to the Special Educational Needs system Somerset’s Local Offer Education Health and Care Plans Annual Reviews and the transfer of statements to.
Guidelines for Industry on Child Online Protection
Module 8 The Optional Protocol.  Understand the main features of the communications and inquires procedures in the Optional Protocol  Identify the main.
Guidance Dealing with pupils/parents who cyberbully staff.
ICS 417: The ethics of ICT 4.2 The Ethics of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in Business by Simon Rogerson IMIS Journal May 1998.
Data-Sharing and Governance Consultation ANALYSIS OF RESPONSES.
Education, Health and Care Plans Conversions. Background  We currently have over 800 pupils with Statements in West Berkshire  We also provide funding.
IS Audit Function Knowledge
EEN [Canada] Forum Shelley Borys Director, Evaluation September 30, 2010 Developing Evaluation Capacity.
Getting it right for e ery child  Children & Young People (Scotland) Act 2014 Briefing on GIRFEC Provisions Scottish.
Date of Presentation Guidelines for Industry on Child Online Protection © UNICEF/NYHQ /OLIVIER ASSELIN.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Network security policy: best practices
School Improvement Service in Partnership with National and local approaches from England that raise the capacity of organisations to deliver careers advice.
FDA Recalls Risk Communication Advisory Committee David K. Elder Director, Office of Enforcement.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Respecting the Best Interests of Children in Transnational Child Protection Cases Jyothi Kanics, Advocacy & Policy Specialist Child Rights Advocacy & Education.
Evaluating the impact of careers guidance for continuous improvement
ICTS and VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN: MINIMISING RISKS AND RELEASING POTENTIAL EXPERT CONSULTATION Costa Rica, 9-10 June 2014 Renato Leite Monteiro Council.
The 0-25 Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Reforms (Children and Families Act 2014) School Governor Briefing September 23 rd 2014 Liz Malcolm.
The Heart of the Matter: supporting family contact for fostered children.
Creating a service Idea. Creating a service Networking / consultation Identify the need Find funding Create a project plan Business Plan.
Planning and submitting a shadow report Charlotte Gage Women’s Resource Centre.
The common inspection framework: education, skills and early years.
Dr E Kritzinger – UNISA SACSAW Cyber Awareness Implementation Plan (CAIP) for schools.
Records Managers’ Forum 28 February Draft standard on the appraisal and disposal of State records Catherine Robinson Senior Project Officer, Government.
3-MINUTE READ Draft SEN Code of Practice: for 0 to 25 years.
NAVCA Quality Award Andrea Allez Performance Improvement Manager Excellent service for local groups.
Framework for the Inspection of services for children in need of help and protection, children looked after and care leavers. Gani Martins Assistant Director.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
PG SE JS/CH1.  Introductions  Reflective Portfolio – expectations  Weekly Review meetings  Expectations on School Experience 3  Action planning.
Name Position Organisation Date. What is data integration? Dataset A Dataset B Integrated dataset Education data + EMPLOYMENT data = understanding education.
Proposed Review of the National Framework for Continuing Care.
COALITION OF COMMUNITY SCHOOLS CONFERENCE 2010 CHRIS JONES International Quality Standards for Community Schools 1.
E-Safety and the Law: How to Safeguard Your Learners 23 March 2010 Safeguarding Conference RSC Northern.
Transfrontier contact concerning children Regional Conference on the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction Belgrade,
SENJIT Code of Practice update and SEND Support Plans.
E-Safety THURSDAY 12 TH FEBRUARY. E-Safety  What are the risks?  Jenny’s Story  The Byron report  Evaluation of resources  Planning an e-safety lesson.
Luxembourg 12 September Information Day 12 September 2003 Richard Swetenham European Commission Safer Internet
Richard Swetenham Head of Unit of eContent and Safer Internet European Commission, General Directorate Information Society and Media Safer Internet Programme:
Intervention and Support Inclusion Questions. Early and Strategic  How does the school provide purposeful early intervention and support to lift the.
Shaping Solihull – Everything We Do, Everyone’s Business Meeting Core Objectives for Information, Advice, Advocacy and Support Services in Solihull Partners'
Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy (MNE Declaration) Multinational enterprises and social policy.
SEVESO II transposition and implementation: Possible approaches and lessons learned from member states and new member states SEVESO II transposition and.
Council of Europe Child Participation Assessment Tool Agnes von Maravic Children’s Rights Division Council of Europe Based on slides prepared by Gerison.
Department of Health The Australian Charter of Healthcare Rights in Victoria Your role in realising the Australian Charter of Healthcare Rights in Victoria.
Triple Crown Centre SEND School Offer (SEN Information Report) February 2016 To be read in conjunction with the SEND policy March 2016.
Protecting Children from Bullying and Cyberbullying: Awareness Raising and Public Policies: Some examples from Ireland Brian O’Neill Dublin Institute of.
Friday 1 st December 2006 Careers & Employment Workshop Group B: Policy.
Child Safe Standards How effective is your leadership team in promoting a child safe culture in your organisation? 2 June 2016.
Civil Society Participation and Contribution to the UNCAC Review Process Towards Transparency – TI National Contact Vietnam UNCAC Self Assessment Process:
Victorian Child Safe Standards
Acceptable Use Policy (Draft)
Care Act and young people with Sensory Impairments
E-Safety Briefing
Establishing the Infrastructure for Radiation Safety Preparatory Actions and Initial Regulatory Activities.
A Better Internet for Kids through Industry collaboration Pat Manson –Inclusion, Skills & Youth Directorate General Communications Networks, Content.
Helpful Hints for action to prevent elder abuse
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
The ICT Coalition Manufacturers of connected devices
The Optional Protocol Module 8.
Gem Complete Health Services
Overview of the Children and Families Act 2014
Brian O’Neill Dublin Institute of Technology 9/10 May Florence
Presentation transcript:

ICT Coalition Meeting and Stakeholder Forum November 26/27 Brussels

My Background

Role of the Honest Broker Independent assessment of company self-declaration reports Implementation phase – from self-declaration statements to reporting, end of 2013) Inviting stakeholder input Brokering discussion between companies and stakeholders, NGOs and civil society Mediating in disputes Final overall assessment of companies’ implementation

Project Plan  Collation of reports from individual Coalition members based on an agreed template for reporting;  Stakeholder consultation, inviting and facilitating comments from third parties on the submitted reports;  Facilitation of dispute resolution, where applicable, between companies and stakeholders, with regard to implementation of Principles, prior to finalisation and publication of the assessment report;  Presentation and publication of the final assessment report of how companies have implemented their commitments under the ICT Coalition Principles including an account of emerging industry and usage trends relevant to the area of online safety.

Four Steps Document Review Assessing relevant data/ documents for each of the providers Reporting Template Assessing self- statements against the Principles Stakeholder Feedback Assessing third party comments against the Principles Testing and Evaluation Assessing against what has been observed on their service

Evaluation of Principle 1 – Content Key elements Indicate clearly where a service they offer may include inappropriate content for children Display prominently options which are available to control access to certain content Display clear AUP / relevant Terms of Service Ensure reporting options are in the relevant areas of the service. Company reporting responses Group/Corporate level or different solutions in EU Markets Mechanism to provide feedback, report an issue or file a complaint about the appropriateness of content Options to block, restrict or manage access to content Information, educational resources or advice for users Content labelling Acceptable Use Policy/ Terms of service /Community guidelines Consequences of violations of ToS Other solutions for child safety relating to content

Evaluation of Principle 2 – Parental Controls Key elements Assist parents to minimise children’s exposure to potential risks Provide necessary tools and guidance to enable parents to set appropriate level of control on devices Make the necessary tools and settings available across their services to enable parents to set appropriate level of control Company reporting responses Group/Corporate level or different solutions in EU Markets What kinds of parental controls – devices, networks, content and services Features offered in parental controls Education and information resources on parental controls Educational material for parents – internal and external

Evaluation of Principle 3 – “Dealing with abuse/misuse” Key Elements Provide a clear and simple process to report inappropriate content / conduct/contact Implement procedures for responding to reports of abuse/ misuse Provide clear information on all available report and review procedures Place and review reporting options in appropriate areas of the service Place links to relevant child welfare organizations or specialist providers of advice Ensure that moderators who review user reports are properly trained Company reporting responses Group/Corporate level or different solutions in EU Markets Company policy relating to abuse and misuse Process or mechanism available for users to report abuse/misuse Accessibility and user-friendliness of reporting mechanisms Procedures for reviewing user reports Information available to users on report and review procedures Location of reporting options Guidance on what to report External links

Evaluation of Principle 4 – “Child Sexual Abuse or illegal contact” Key Elements Cooperate with law enforcement authorities and other agencies on child sexual abuse content or unlawful contact Facilitate the notification of suspected child sexual abuse content Ensure the prompt removal of illegal child sexual abuse content Provide relevant additional information about appropriate agencies or organisations Company reporting responses Group/Corporate level or different solutions in EU Markets Procedures to be followed if illegal content is discovered Arrangements for sharing reports of illegal content or conduct with law enforcement Arrangements for prompt removal of illegal child sexual abuse content once notified (NTD) External links to hotlines, expert advice etc.

Evaluation of Principle 5 – “Privacy and Control” Key elements Manage privacy settings appropriate for parents, children and young people Offer a range of user-friendly, privacy setting options for children and young people to make informed decisions Raise user awareness Raise awareness of industry good practice Company reporting responses Group/Corporate level or different solutions in EU Markets Company policy in relation to access, collection, sharing and further use of data from minors under the age of 18 Availability of privacy setting options Are privacy options supported by information Different privacy settings for parents, children and young people Accessibility and user-fiendliness of privacy options

Evaluation of Principle 6 – “Education and Awareness” Key elements Educate children and young people to manage their access and settings in a safe way Offer appropriate advice and technical tools to allow children and parents protect themselves and their children Offer advice and supports to encourage parents, teachers to talk to their children/ pupil about the opportunity and risk arising from the use of the internet Company reporting responses Group/Corporate level or different solutions in EU Markets Provision of education in relation to content, services and applications Educational resources to manage access and settings from a safety perspective Technical tools for safety Advice and supports for parents and teachers External links to relevant advice for parents and carers, teachers, and for children? Partnerships with other industry or NGO groups

Challenges Full spectrum across the ‘value chain’ Manufacturers of desktop and laptop computers, mobile phones, tablets, TV set top boxes and gaming consoles Network operators and connectivity providers Online content providers and online service providers

Challenges Overarching Principles Building on existing self-regulatory initiatives Different applicable laws and frameworks across EU markets Some relate to compliance, legal and otherwise, e.g. Child abuse material, data protection Principles such as Content / Parental Controls not equally applicable to all Education and awareness-raising are open-ended

Challenges High expectations from stakeholders for verification of successful implementation National and cultural variance Understanding/communicating of detail of implementation Need for better evidence and data on child safety progress

Key Dates DateMilestone July 2013 July 3: Pre-consultation with ICTC and third parties on reporting format July 22: Send template and detailed plan to Andrea Parola End July: Agreed Template for reporting sent to companies August – September Companies forward any relevant policy documents Companies prepare reports for submission Assessment team review company statements and conduct desk review October-November 2013 Companies submit reports Interviews with company contacts November - January 2013 Stakeholder Forum Third parties invited to submit comments on company reports Testing and evaluation of company reports Interviews with companies February 2014 Draft report to ICTC March 2014 Final Report – Stakeholder Forum

Contact Details Brian O’Neill Independent Assessor for ICT Principles Tel: Thuy Dinh Centre for Social & Educational Research Dublin Institute of Technology Tel: