1 Status of SB2009 Rebaselining Proposal Document, Known to the Editor As of 20091202 vers.A N.Toge Check:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
N.Toge on SB20091 SB2009 Rebaselining Proposal Document - How do we get it done? /10/2 N.Toge (KEK) for SB2009 Efforts.
Advertisements

Linear Collider Positron Source and Central Integration Update N. Walker, J. Clarke, E. Paterson, V Kuchler, J. A. Osbourne, T. Lackowski, A. Wolski, S.
Positron Source Update Jim Clarke Deepa Angal-Kalinin James Jones Norbert Collomb At Daresbury Laboratory and Cockroft Institute 21/07/2009.
20/03/2011 Global Design Effort 1 ALCPG11 – Eugene Positron Source N. Collomb J. Clarke, D. Angal-Kalinin,
TLCC Themes BAW-2, SLAC, 19 January 2011 Ross Walker Yamamoto 1.
Baseline Configuration - Highlights Barry Barish ILCSC 9-Feb-06.
Experimental Psychology PSY 433
An updated Baseline Design for MICE From proposal to technical reference Paul Drumm, Dec 2003.
Status of Undulator-based Positron Source Baseline Design Leo Jenner, but based largely on a talk given by Jim Clarke to Positron DESY-Zeuthen,
Proceedings and Report of the Expert Meeting: Arrangements Proceedings and Report of the Expert Meeting: Arrangements.
The RDR Report Odyssey Nan Phinney SLAC for N^3 team of editors.
 Jennifer Sadowski & Kaati Schreier May 30, 2012.
SB2009 Triage B1 SB2009 Triage Summary B N.Toge.
J.C. Sheppard, SLAC Americas Region January 31, ILC Reference Design Report Status 2nd ILC Positron Source Collaboration Meeting IHEP, Beijing,
John Carwardine 1 TDR Editorial WG Summary Global Design Effort John Carwardine.
Proposed machine parameters Andrei Seryi July 23, 2010.
RDR Report Writing Nan Phinney SLAC for RDR team of editors.
Controls & LLRF ILC Controls Telecon August 17, 2006 John Carwardine RDR Report Writing.
Proposed TDR baseline LLRF design J. Carwardine, 22 May 2012.
Baseline Workshop Preparation At the close of each BAW, we would like to write down a summary that is based on our common understanding of the issues.
Nick Walker Marc Ross Akira Yamamoto 2010 (and beyond) Plans & Milestones.
RDR Report Writing Nan Phinney SLAC. 7/20/06 VLCW06 Global Design Effort 2 GLC Report Working model is the 2003 GLC Report ch 4-7
Date Event Global Design Effort 1 ILC UPDATE Vancouver to Valencia Ewan Paterson Personal Report to SiD Collaboration Oct 27, 2006.
Global Design Effort 1 Possible Minimum Machine Studies of Central Region for 2009 Reference, ILC Minimum Machine Study Proposal V1, January 2009 ILC-EDMS.
John Carwardine 22 June 2012 TEB webex meeting. Agenda Management items (John) –General updates, status of submissions –Principle Editor assignments for.
SB2009/ Low energy running for ILC International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010 Andrei Seryi John Adams Institute 19 October 2010.
Global Design Effort - CFS ILC Accelerator Design and Integration Meeting 1 ILC AD&I MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING GROUP UPDATE V.
AAP Review 横谷 LC 定例 Preparation of AAP Review General charge sets the frame Version of early November Rough structure of the meeting has been.
Global Design Effort DR Session Introduction S. Guiducci (LNF) ILC10, Beijing 27 March 2010.
BCD Status: Strengths and Weaknesses Tor Raubenheimer.
20 April 2009 AAP Review Global Design Effort 1 The Positron Source Jim Clarke STFC Daresbury Laboratory.
1 Status of SB2009 Rebaselining Proposal Document and Preview of Feedback from PMs + Editor Draft C N.Toge.
Introduction: Tasks of “Information for simulations”, hardware specs K.Kubo
AD & I 15 August 2012 Marc Ross R&D for TDR Summary of TDP R&D items and baseline changes to RDR – to be included and highlighted in TDR text
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
AS TAG Leaders Meeting PM Report. Topics R&D Plan release 4 ADI WebEx meetings (cost and design) Central region integration face-to-face meetings.
Project Management: Nick Walker Akira Yamamoto Marc Ross ILC AD&I: Introduction and Overview 02/12/2009.
Global Design Effort - CFS Damping Ring Baseline Technical Review 1 DAMPING RING BASELINE TECHNICAL REVIEW CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING.
CFS / Global – 04 Aug, 2010 PM Report: SB2009: –ADI meeting 23.07: Parameter tables with low energy / low power operation –BA Workshop Planning CFS participation.
Beam Dynamics WG K. Kubo, N. Solyak, D. Schulte. Presentations –N. Solyak Coupler kick simulations update –N. Solyak CLIC BPM –A. Latina: Update on the.
Global Design Effort - CFS DESY Accelerator Design and Integration Meeting 1 ACCELERATOR INTEGRATION AND DESIGN MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
On S1Global Writeup S1G Writeup Meeting Nobu Toge 1.
10/02/2011 Global Design Effort 1 Positron Source meeting J. Clarke, D. Angal-Kalinin, N. Collomb.
SCRF Cavity WebEx Meeting May 17, 2010 Reports from PM (10 min.) – Brief report from ILC-PAC – Industrialization workshop as IPAC satellite meeting, Kyoto,
Undulator based polarized positron source for Circular electron-positron colliders Wei Gai Tsinghua University/ANL a seminar for IHEP, 4/8/2015.
Tor Raubenheimer KEK Mtg Goals KEK January 19 th, 2006.
Top-Level Change Control (TLCC) Process by which specific themes from SB2009 will be developed and refined –Extension of established AD&I process Formal.
Simulations - Beam dynamics in low emittance transport (LET: From the exit of Damping Ring) K. Kubo
Accelerator Systems TAG Leaders’ Meeting PM Report –Planning for ALCPG –TDR preparations: Area System Baseline Technical Reviews –Recent e+ workshop experience.
LNF Frascati, July 8, 2011 DR Technical Baseline Rev. Global Design Effort 1 DR Technical Baseline Review INFN LNF · Frascati, Italy July 7 and 8, 2011.
28/03/20101 ILC – Central Integration SB 2009 Layout Interpretation of available data into CAD 3D virtual model to serve as true scale graphical representation.
29/10/09 Positron Workshop 1 Working Assumptions for Low Energy Operations Jim Clarke ASTeC & Cockcroft Institute Daresbury Laboratory.
1 Positron Source AD & I Report Jim Clarke ASTeC & Cockcroft Institute Daresbury Laboratory.
SB2009 Triage A1 SB2009 Triage Summary A N.Toge.
Global Design Effort - CFS ILC CFS and Global Systems Meeting 1 ILC CFS AND GLOBAL SYSTEMS MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING GROUP CFS.
TLCC Themes BAW-2, SLAC, 19 January 2011 Ross Walker Yamamoto 1.
1 Status of SB2009 Rebaselining Proposal Document and Feedback from PMs + Editor This version includes the touch ups applied during the AD/I webex meeting.
1 Status of the BCD GDE Area System Leaders Meeting (Jan.19-20, 2006) Nobu Toge (KEK)
CFS / Global – 09 June, 2010 PM Report: SB2009: –4 two-day workshops form the core of ‘TOP LEVEL CHANGE CONTROL’ –  as advised by AAP, PAC and etc –Written.
Main Linac Technology (MLT) Meeting To be held through WebEx July 13, 2007.
ML-SCRF: Monthly WebEx Meeting April 4, Reports from PMs (20 min.) GDE activity and meeting plan Summary document of SCRF-Baseline Technical Review.
AWLC14 - FERMILAB May 12-16, 2014 Conventional Facilities & Siting Working Group Summary V Kuchler, A Enomoto, J Osborne.
Global Design Effort Close-Out Points EDR time-scale (2010) –No demonstrations to ILC-like RF unit –3(?) CMs constructed at FNAL – not RDR baseline –2(?)
SCRF Monthly WebEx Meeting Jan. 12, 2010
BAW Prep S1 Global Status Pilot Plant Status
Yamamoto WG3: ML-SCRF Parallel Session,
Technical Design Report preparation
, A. Yamamoto SCRF WebEx Meeting.
Nick Walker for the Project Management
CDR2 – Injection System Injection system overview (Seeman) (2 pages)
Presentation transcript:

1 Status of SB2009 Rebaselining Proposal Document, Known to the Editor As of vers.A N.Toge Check:

2 ½. Introduction / Overview (PMs) Formatted Manuscript on the web? –Yes, although still partially in WIP by PMs Remarks –Intro needs minor clean-up –Overview List of what remains the same as RDR? Cavity performance “reserve” issue Classification –PROBABLY OK, IF PMs WORK HARDER

3 3. SB2009 Layout (PM + Paterson) Formatted Manuscript on the web? –Yes Author – Editor iteration? –Once Remarks –ML length needs to be stated. –One more critical editing, anyone? Classification –Worry but probably OK

4 X.X Parameters (PMs + Toge) Formatted Manuscript on the web? –No Remarks Classification –Given up. –Has been absorbed as part of 2.2.

5 4.1 Gradient Issues (Yamamoto) Formatted Manuscript on the web? –Yes, although still partially in WIP by PMs + Experts Remarks –Needs clean-up cavity performance summary –Needs sort out the statements to make in the cavity performance reserve issue Classification –Near the edge. Needs attention.

6 4.2/3 Electron and Positron Sources (Brachmann, Clarke) Formatted Manuscript on the web? –Yes Author – Editor iteration? –E- loop open –E+ iteration done Classification –Likely to be OK, pending authors’ timely response

7 4.4 Damping Rings (Guiducci) Formatted Manuscript on the web? –Yes Author – Editor iteration? –Done once Classification –Mostly OK, pending small fixes.

8 4.5 RTML (Solyak) Formatted Manuscript on the web? –Yes Author – Editor iteration? –Done once Classification –Mostly OK.

9 4.6 ML (Nantista, Fukuda) Formatted Manuscript on the web? –Yes Author – Editor iteration? –Done once Important Comment –Pulse length issue needs to be explained. Classification –Perhaps OK, pending one critical reading.

BDS (Seryi) Formatted Manuscript on the web? –Yes Author – Editor iteration? –Done once. –Minor open issues fixable on the spot. –But what about phys/det inquiry issues? Classification –Likely OK, pending addressing phys/det vs accelerator interaction issues.

CFS (Kuchler) Formatted Manuscript on the web? –Yes Author – Editor iteration? –Done once. Classification –Likely OK, pending small touch-ups.

12 5. Costing (Garbincius) Formatted Manuscript on the web? –Yes Author – Editor iteration? –Done once. –Final text / tables known to be in WIP by the author. Classification –Likely OK, pending guideline clarification by PMs and the work by the author.

13 6. Risk Analysis (Ross) Formatted Manuscript on the web? –No Author – Editor iteration? –No Classification –Major schedule threat

14 A. Availability Analysis (MCR/Avail) Formatted Manuscript on the web? –No Author – Editor iteration? –Authors known to be at it. ETA unclear. Classification –Major schedule threat

15 Critical Issues ML length –Path length matching known to be addressed –QWT compensation needs to be stated –Energy reserve needs to be stated ML alternate pulsing –Handling of lowE beam in highE in ML needs to be stated Costing Reference –“Starting point” needs to be stated –Summary statements need group-wide confirmation

16 Sections Recovering From Crisis (Still needs intense care) Intro / Overview SRF Gradient

17 Sections in Crisis Risk analysis Availability

18 To Do at DESY Face-to-Face Triage process –Critical open issues  Group-wide or semi-group wide discussion and surgery on the spot. With some follow-up work on subsequent days. –Semi-trivial touch-ups  Identify issues on the spot. Fixes be applied by the primary authors on the fly. With some follow-up work on subsequent days if needed. –~17 subsections x 30 min = 9 hrs.eqv. 1 Full Day + reserve –Time is limited: We need to-the-point and concise-efficient discussion and response. No digressing speech, no tangential commentary, no unproductive ranting, please. Prep and org for AAP –One quarter day