Collaboration The Université de Montréal: F. Aubin, M. Barnabé- Heider, M. Di Marco, P Doane, M.-H. Genest, R. Gornea, R. Guénette, C. Leroy, L., Lessard,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Questions and Probems. Matter inside protoneutron stars Hydrostatic equilibrium in the protoneutron star: Rough estimate of the central pressure is: Note.
Advertisements

Gamma-Ray Spectra _ + The photomultiplier records the (UV) light emitted during electronic recombination in the scintillator. Therefore, the spectrum collected.
Ion Beam Analysis techniques:
Neutrino oscillations/mixing
DMSAG 14/8/06 Mark Boulay Towards Dark Matter with DEAP at SNOLAB Mark Boulay Canada Research Chair in Particle Astrophysics Queen’s University DEAP-1:
The PICASSO experiment - searching for cold dark matter
Light. Photons The photon is the gauge boson of the electromagnetic force. –Massless –Stable –Interacts with charged particles. Photon velocity depends.
Bubble Chambers: Old Tools In New Searches For Dark Matter Geoffrey Iwata Physics /16/10.
Neutral Particles. Neutrons Neutrons are like neutral protons. –Mass is 1% larger –Interacts strongly Neutral charge complicates detection Neutron lifetime.
Path Towards A Large Scale Ilan Levine Indiana University South Bend For the PICASSO collaboration Detector Workshop on Next Generation Dark Matter Detectors.
Particle Interactions
30 Ge & Si Crystals Arranged in verticals stacks of 6 called “towers” Shielding composed of lead, poly, and a muon veto not described. 7.6 cm diameter.
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
Stopping Power The linear stopping power S for charged particles in a given absorber is simply defined as the differential energy loss for that particle.
Dark Matter Facts Baryonic Matter is only 20% of the Universe 80% is Dark Matter Dark Matter doesn’t interact with light or ordinary matter very frequently.
October 8th, 2009 Sujeewa Kumaratunga 1/27 Recent Progress in PICASSO Sujeewa Kumaratunga for the PICASSO collaboration.
Form Factor Dark Matter Brian Feldstein Boston University In Preparation -B.F., L. Fitzpatrick and E. Katz In Preparation -B.F., L. Fitzpatrick, E. Katz.
I. Giomataris NOSTOS Neutrino studies with a tritium source Neutrino Oscillations with triton neutrinos The concept of a spherical TPC Measurement of.
A Direction Sensitive Dark Matter Detector
Dark Matter Search with Direction sensitive Scintillator Ⅱ Department of Physics, School of Science The University of Tokyo Y. Shimizu, M. Minowa, Y. Inoue.
August 15-17, 2005 SNOLab Workshop #4 1 The PICASSO Dark Matter Search Experiment: Tony Noble Queen’s University The PICASSO Detector Technique Overview.
Annual Modulation Study of Dark Matter Using CsI(Tl) Crystals In KIMS Experiment J.H. Choi (Seoul National University) SUSY2012, Beijing.
Applications of Micro-TPC to Dark Matter Search 1. WIMP signatures 2. Performance of the Micro-TPC 3. WIMP-wind measurement 4. Future works 5. Conclusions.
Physics Modern Lab1 Electromagnetic interactions Energy loss due to collisions –An important fact: electron mass = 511 keV /c2, proton mass = 940.
APS April meeting Jacksonville, 2007 WIMP Search With SNOLAB Chris Jillings SNOLAB Staff Scientist For the DEAP-1 Collaboration.
Neutron Monitoring Detector in KIMS Jungwon Kwak Seoul National University 2003 October 25 th KPS meeting.
Neutron scattering systems for calibration of dark matter search and low-energy neutrino detectors A.Bondar, A.Buzulutskov, A.Burdakov, E.Grishnjaev, A.Dolgov,
SUNYAEV-ZELDOVICH EFFECT. OUTLINE  What is SZE  What Can we learn from SZE  SZE Cluster Surveys  Experimental Issues  SZ Surveys are coming: What.
Neutral pion photoproduction and neutron radii Dan Watts, Claire Tarbert University of Edinburgh Crystal Ball and A2 collaboration at MAMI Eurotag Meeting.
1 dE/dx  Let’s next turn our attention to how charged particles lose energy in matter  To start with we’ll consider only heavy charged particles like.
Calorimeters Chapter 21 Chapter 2 Interactions of Charged Particles - With Focus on Electrons and Positrons -
PICASSO, COUPP and PICO - Search for Dark Matter with Bubble Chambers
What temperature would provide a mean kinetic energy of 0.5 MeV? By comparison, the temperature of the surface of the sun  6000 K.
The Tokyo Dark Matter Experiment NDM03 13 Jun. 2003, Nara Hiroyuki Sekiya University of Tokyo.
Underground Laboratories and Low Background Experiments Pia Loaiza Laboratoire Souterrain de Modane Bordeaux, March 16 th, 2006.
A Lightning Review of Dark Matter R.L. Cooper
Some aspects of reaction mechanism study in collisions induced by Radioactive Beams Alessia Di Pietro.
Radiochemistry Dr Nick Evans
I. Giomataris NOSTOS a new low energy neutrino experiment Detect low energy neutrinos from a tritium source using a spherical gaseous TPC Study neutrino.
The EDELWEISS-II experiment Silvia SCORZA Université Claude Bernard- Institut de Physique nucléaire de Lyon CEA-Saclay DAPNIA/DRECAM (FRANCE), CNRS/CRTBT.
KPS Chonbuk University 2005/10/22 HYUNSU LEE Status of the KIMS dark matter search experiment with CsI(Tl) crystals Hyun Su Lee Seoul National.
Nucleon Decay Search in the Detector on the Earth’s Surface. Background Estimation. J.Stepaniak Institute for Nuclear Studies Warsaw, Poland FLARE Workshop.
Searching for Dark Matter with a Bubble Chamber Michael B. Crisler Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory 14 February, 2009.
Project SIMPLE for Dark matter search FRANCE G. Waysand (CNRS) D. Limagne (CNRS) PORTUGAL T. A. Girard (CFN) T. Morlat (CFN) F. Giuliani (CFN) M. Felizardo.
Dark Matter Search with Direction Sensitive Scintillators The10th ICEPP Symposium February 16, 2004, Hakuba H. Sekiya University of Tokyo.
Daily Modulation of the Dark Matter Signal in Crystalline Detectors Nassim Bozorgnia UCLA TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you.
Vergados DSU11 29/09/11 Direct Dark Matter Searches- Exploiting its Various Signatures J.D. Vergados J.D. Vergados University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
WIMP search Result from KIMS experiments Kim Seung Cheon (DMRC,SNU)
? At Yangyang beach, looking for something in the swamp of particles and waves. 1 The recent results from KIMS Seung Cheon Kim (Seoul National University)
Kamioka Kyoto We feel WIMP wind on the earth NEWAGE Direction-sensitive direct dark matter search with μ-TPC * 1.Dark.
Dark Matter Search Results from the COUPP 4kg Bubble Chamber Russell Neilson for COUPP ICHEP 2012, Melbourne July 7, 2012.
DARK MATTER SEARCH Carter Hall, University of Maryland.
P Spring 2002 L18Richard Kass The Solar Neutrino Problem M&S Since 1968 R.Davis and collaborators have been measuring the cross section of:
September 10, 2002M. Fechner1 Energy reconstruction in quasi elastic events unfolding physics and detector effects M. Fechner, Ecole Normale Supérieure.
PyungChang 2006/02/06 HYUNSU LEE CsI(Tl) crystals for WIMP search Hyun Su Lee Seoul National University (For The KIMS Collaboration)
Submergible Acoustic Transducers for Superheated Fluid Dark Matter Experiments Abstract: Abstract: Submergible Acoustic Transducers for the PICASSO Dark.
A RUNAVA B HADRA AND B HAKTA K UNWAR High Energy & Cosmic Ray Research Centre, University of North Bengal, Siliguri, WB, India Scattered radiation from.
18-20 May 2015, Underground Science Conference, SDSM&T 1John Harton, Colorado State University Recent Results from the DRIFT Directional DM Experiment.
The PICASSO Dark Matter Search Experiment (Results and status) Ilan Levine Indiana University South Bend for the PICASSO Collaboration The 2006 Joint Meeting.
From Edelweiss I to Edelweiss II
M. Sc Physics, 3rd Semester
A Bubble Chamber for Dark Matter Detection
Dark Matter Search With an Ultra-low Threshold Germanium Detector proposed by Tsinghua University Seoul National University Academia Sinica Qian Yue.
UK Dark Matter Collaboration
Direct Detection of Dark Matter
Dark Matter Search with Stilbene Scintillator
Yue, Yongpyung, Korea Prospects of Dark Matter Search with an Ultra-Low Threshold Germanium Detector Yue, Yongpyung, Korea
Davide Franco for the Borexino Collaboration Milano University & INFN
The Estimated Limits For A 5g LE-Ge Detector
Dark Matter Detection,Models and Constraints
Presentation transcript:

Collaboration The Université de Montréal: F. Aubin, M. Barnabé- Heider, M. Di Marco, P Doane, M.-H. Genest, R. Gornea, R. Guénette, C. Leroy, L., Lessard, J.P. Martin, U. Wichoski, V. Zacek Queens University: K. Clark, C. Krauss, A.J. Noble IEAP-Czech Technical University in Prague: S. Pospisil, J. Sodomka, I. Stekl University of Indiana, South Bend: E. Behnke, W. Feigherty, I. Levine, C. Muthusi Bubble Technology Industries: R. Noulty, S. Kanagalingam

Introduction ■ Evidence for Cold dark matter (CDM): the Universe → Cosmic background radiation: WMAP,… Ω Λ = 0.73, Ω baryon = 0.04, Ω non-baryon = 0.23 in terms of the critical density Ω 0 = 1

■ Evidence for Cold Dark Matter: The Galaxy → Rotation curves: velocity as a function of radial distance from the center of Galaxy F g = GMm/r 2 = F c = m (v rot ) 2 /r V rot = (GM/r) 1/2 Inside Galaxy kernel (spherical): M = 4/3 π r 3 ρ → v rot ~ r Outside Galaxy kernel: M = constant → v rot ~ 1/√r Rotation curve measured (using Doppler shift) → v(r) = constant for large r → M~r => existence of enormous mass extending far beyond the visible region, invisible optically

What is it ? The neutralino – χ of supersymmetry could be an adequate candidate: ■ Neutral (and spin ½) ■ Massive (10 GeV/c 2 – 1 TeV/c 2 ) ■ R-parity ((-1) 3B + L + 2S ) conserved → stable (LSP) ■ Interact weakly with ordinary matter

Cold Dark Matter: Neutralinos Neutralino are distributed in the halo of Galaxy with local density ρ ~ 0.3 GeV/cm 3 -- suppose neutralinos dominate dark matter in the halo Each neutralino follows its own orbit around the center of the Galaxy Maxwellian distribution for χ velocity in Galaxy –P(v) = (1/π ) 3/2 v 2 exp(-v / ) dv –v = χ velocity, = average quadratic velocity – related to rotation velocity of Sun around the center of Galaxy – = (3/2) v rot 2 = (3/2) (220 ± 20) 2 km/s – ~ 270 km/s

Expected count rate dR/dE R = N T (ρ ϰ /m ϰ )∫ vf(v) dσ/dE R (v,E R )dv ρ ϰ = local dark matter density = 0.3 GeV/cm 3 M ϰ = neutralino mass V max = escape velocity (~600 km/s) E R = v 2 μ 2 χA (1 –cos θ*)/m A ; μ χA = m χ m A /(m χ + m A ) f(v) = velocity distribution of CDM –ϰ N T = number of target nuclei = N A /A dσ/dE R = neutralino-nucleus cross section (for 19 F, isotropic in CM) = dσ SI /dE R + dσ SD /dE R vf(v) induces an annual effect (5 to 6%) v min v max

Observable rate

R 0 is the total rate assuming zero momentum transfer A T = atomic mass of the target atoms ρ χ = mass density of neutralinos σ= neutralino cross section = relative average neutralino velocity = mean recoil energy = 2M A M 2 χ /(M A +M χ ) 2 F 2 (E R ) = nuclear form factor ~ 1 for light nucleus ( 19 F) and for small momentum transfer For σ ≈ 1 pb only a fraction of event per kg and per day

The PICASSO detector Use superheated liquid droplets (C 3 F 8, C 4 F 10 … active medium) Droplets (at temperature T > Tb) dispersed in an aqueous solution subsequently polymerized (+ heavy salt (CsCl) to equalize densities of droplets-solution) By applying an adequate pressure, the boiling temperature can be raised→ allowing the emulsion to be kept in a liquid state. Under this external pressure, the detectors are insensitive to radiation. By removing the external pressure, the liquid becomes sensitive to radiation. Bubble formation occurs through liquid-to-vapour phase transitions, triggered by the energy deposited by nuclear recoil Bubble can be recompressed into droplet after each run

The Superheated Droplets

Droplets diameter distribution

Principle of Operation When a C or F-nucleus recoils in the superheated medium, an energy E R is deposited through ionization process in the liquid WIMPS are detected through the energy deposited by recoiling struck nuclei A fraction of that energy is transformed into heat A droplet starts to grow because of the evaporation initiated by that heat; as it grows, the bubble does work against the external pressure and against the surface tension of the liquid

The bubble will grow irreversibly if the energy deposited exceeds a critical energy E c = (16π/3)σ 3 /(p i – p e ) 2 p i = internal pressure (vapour pressure in the bubble) p e = externaly applied pressure σ = the surface tension σ(T) = σ 0 (T c -T)/(T c -T 0 ) where T c is the critical temperature of the gas, σ 0 is the surface tension at a reference temperature T 0, usually the boiling temperature Tb. Tb and T c are depending on the gas mixture. T b = C, T c = 92.6 C for a SBD-100 detector (loaded with a mixture of fluorocarbons: 50% C 4 F % C 3 F 8 ) T b = -1.7 C, T c = C for SBD-1000 detectors (loaded with 100% C 4 F 10 )

Bubble formation and explosion will occur when a minimum deposited energy, E Rth, exceeds the threshold value E c within a distance: l c = aR c, where the critical radius R c given by R c = 2 σ(T)/(p i - p e ) If dE/dx is the mean energy deposited per unit distance→ the energy deposited along l c is E dep = dE/dx l c The condition to trigger a liquid-to-vapour transition is E dep ≥ E Rth Not all deposited energy will trigger a transition → efficiency factor η = E c /E Rth (2<η<6%)

Piezoelectric sensor Frequency spectrum Droplet burst A 1-litre Picasso Detector

Nuclear recoil thresholds can be obtained in the same range for neutrons of low energy (e.g. from few keV up to a few 100s keV) & massive neutralinos (10 GeV/c 2 up to 1 TeV/c 2 ) Recoil energy of a nucleus of Mass M N hit by χ with kinetic energy E = ½ Mχ v 2 scattered at angle θ (CM): E R = [M χ M N /(M χ + M N ) 2 ] 2E (1 – cos θ) for M χ ~ 10 –1000 GeV/c 2 ( β ~ ) gives recoil energy E R ~ 0 → 100 keV i.e the same recoil energy obtained from neutrons of low energy with freon-like droplets (C 3 F 8, C 4 F 10, etc) – elastic scattering on 19 F and 12 C if E n < 1 MeV Detection of CDM with superheated liquids

Results for 200 keV Neutrons

Results for 400 keV Neutrons

Neutron Threshold Energies

The probability that a recoil nucleus at an energy near threshold will generate an explosive droplet-Bubble transition is: –0 if E N R (or E dep ) < E N R,th –increases gradually up to 1 if E N R (or E dep ) > E N R,th The probability is: P(E dep,E N R,th )= 1 – exp(-b[E dep - E N R,th ]/ E N R,th ) b is to be determined experimentally

For E n < 500 keV, collisions with 19 F and 12 C are elastic and isotropic (dn N /dE N R ~ 1) → ε N (E n,T) = 1-E N th /E n - (1-exp(-b[E-E N th (T)]/E N th (T))E N th (T)/bE n ) b, E N th (T), ε N (E n,T) are obtained from fitting the measured count rate (per sec) as a function of the neutron energy for various temperatures R(E n,T) = Φ(E n ) [N A m/A] ∑ i N i σ i n (E n )ε i (E n,T) Φ(E n ) = the flux of neutrons of energy E n N A = Avogadro number, m = active mass of the detector, A = molecular mass of the fluid N i = atomic number density of species i in the liquid σ i n (E n ) = neutron cross section Count Rates for 19 F and 12 C

Fit gives an exponential temperature dependence for E N th (T) and b = 1.0 ± 0.1 (ε N (E n,T) obtained)

The minimum detectable recoil energy for 19 F is extracted from E N th (T) The interaction of neutralino with the superheated carbo- fluorates is dominated by the spin-dependent cross section on 19 F E F R,th (T) = 0.19E F th = (keV) exp[-(T- 20 o )/5.78 o ] The phase transition probability as a function of the recoil energy deposited by a 19 F nucleus is At T = 40 o C, E F R,th (T) = 4.87 keV (α = 1.0) → P(E R, E F R,th ) = 1 – exp[-1.0(E R keV)/4.87 keV] Sensitivity curve shows detectors 80% efficient at 40 0 C for E R ≥35 keV and at 45 0 C for E R ≥15 keV recoils

Neutralino detection efficiency Neutralino detection efficiency ε(M χ,T) obtained from - Combining 19F recoil spectra from χ-interaction : dR/dE R ≈ 0.75 (R 0 / )e -0.56E R / -The transition probability P(E R,E N R,th )= 1 – exp(-[1.0±0.1][E R - E N R,th ]/ E N R,th ) with E F R,th (T) = (keV) exp[-(T- 20 o )/5.78 o ]

The minimum detectable recoil energy for 19 F is extracted from E N th (T) → sensitivity vs recoil energy

Recoil Spectra of Neutralino

Counting efficiency of neutralino

Dark Matter Counting Efficiency Efficiency Mass (GeV)

The Backgrounds

background count rate as a function of the detector fabrication date [ from no purification before fabrication until all ingredients were purified]

α- background (measured from 6 o C to 50 o C) 241 Am spiked 1 litre detectors ■ SBD-1000 ● SBD-100 Sensitivity for U/Th contamination !(mainly from CsCl) S ≡ reduced superheat T b =boiling temp T c =critical temp

Sensitivity to  - and X-rays BD100 Efficiency curve fitted over more than 6 orders of magnitude by sigmoid function: T 0  40 0 C,   C  max = 0.7  0.1% In plateau region droplets are fully efficient to MeV  ’s and 5.9 keV X-rays

SBD-1000 sensitivity to 

PICASSO at SNO Detectors installed at SNO consisted of 3 1-litre detectors produced at BTI with containers specially designed for the setup at SNO (low radon emanation). Since the Fall of 2002 Picasso has a setup in the water purification gallery of the SNO underground facility at a depth of 6,800 feet ~20g of active mass Main advantage of SNO: very low particle background

Present Picasso Installation at SNO Picasso detectors are in here!

Neutralino response efficiency (T)  - response recoil spectra

Type of interaction of χ with ordinary matter The elastic cross section of neutralino scattering off nuclei has the form: σ A = 4 G F 2 [M χ M A /(M χ +M A )] 2 C A G F is the Fermi constant, M χ and M A the mass of χ and detector nucleus Two types: coherent or spin independent (C) and spin dependent (SD) C A = C A SI + C A SD i) Coherent: σ A (C) ~ A 2 >> for heavy nuclei (A > 50) C A SI = (1/4π)[ Z f p + (A-Z)f n ] 2 with f p and f n neutralino coupling to the nucleon

ii) Spin Dependent: σ A (SD) C A SD = (8/π)[ a p + a n ] 2 (J + 1)/J with and = expectation values of the p and n spin in the target nucleus a p and a n neutralino coupling to the nucleon J is the total nuclear spin and are nuclear model dependent

From the χ-nucleus cross section limit, σ A lim, directly set by the experiment, limits on χ-proton (σ p lim (A) ) or χ- neutron (σ n lim (A) ) cross sections, are given by assuming that all events are due to χ-proton and χ-neutron elastic scatterings in the nucleus: σ p lim (A) = σ A lim (μ p 2 /μ A 2 ) C p /C p(A) and σ n lim (A) = σ A lim (μ n 2 /μ A 2 ) C n /C n(A) µ p and µ A are the χ-nucleon and χ-nucleus reduced masses (mass difference between neutron and proton is neglected) C p(A) and C n(A) are the proton and neutron contributions to the total enhancement factor of nucleus A C p and C n are the enhancement factors of proton and neutron themselves

The ratio R p ≡ C p(F) / C p = and R n ≡C n(F) / C n = from the values = and = → A.F.Pacheco and D.D. Strottman, Phys. Rev. D40 (1989) 2131 C p(F) and C n(F) factors are related to a p and a n couplings: C i(F) = (8/π)a i 2 2 (J+1)/J

Model dependence of enhancement factors R p ≡ C p(F) / C p R n ≡C n(F) / C n R p R n Ref Pacheco Strottman x10 -6 EOGM g A /g V = EOGM g A /g V = Divari et al. PRC61(2000)

Enhancement factors (favors 19 F) [ From Pacheco and Strottman] Nucleus J C p(A) /C p C n(A) /C n 19 F 1/ x x Na 3/ x x Al 5/ x x Si 1/ x x Cl 3/ x x Ge 9/ x x I 5/ x x Xe 1/ x x Xe 3/ x x10 -1

limit of σ p = 1.3 pb for mχ= 29GeV/c 2

Limit of σ n = 21.5 pb for mχ= 29GeV/c 2

a p -a n plane From the χ-proton and χ-neutron elastic scattering cross section limits one finds the allowed region in the a p -a n plane from the condition: relative sign inside the square determined by the sign of / In our experiment, a p and a n are constrained, in the a p -a n plane, to be inside a band defined by two parallel lines of slope - / = ( = and = ) :

If one takes into account: σ p lim(A) /σ n lim(A) = C p /C n C A n /C a p = 2 / 2 One finds two lines: a p ≤ - / a n + (π/24G F 2 µ p 2 σ p lim(A) ) 1/2 a p ≤ - / a n - (π/24G F 2 µ p 2 σ p lim(A) ) 1/2 Note: C A SD = K [ a p + a n ] 2 Γ = B 2 – 4AC = K K =0

Example σ χp = 1 pb (= σ p lim(F) ) and Mχ = 50 GeV/c 2 Which corresponds to σ χF = 160 pb ► σ χn = 16.4 pb (= σ n lim(F) ) ► two exclusion boundary limits: a p = a n and a p = a n

4.5 L Detector Modules: 32 Total net detector volume: ~ 150 L Total active mass (C4F10): ~ 2 kg (each detector loaded with 60 g of active mass bubble size around µm) Acoustic channels: 288 (9 channels per detector) 8 independent TPCS To be installed at the same site (SNO underground Lab) Data taking starts in November 2005 Expected exposure: ~280 Kg∙day (Six- month period) PICASSO NEXT PHASE

PICASSO 2006

PICASSO shows that the superheated droplet technique works. Data from 3 detectors with 19.4±1.0 g of active mass ( 19 F) installed underground at SNO for an exposure of 1.98 ±0.19 kgd. No positive evidence for χ induced nuclear recoil Upper limit of 1.3 pb for σ χp and 21.5 pb for σ χ n for m χ = 29 GeV/c 2 next step: 2 kg active mass by early 2006 (32 modules of 4.5 litres each, Expected exposure: ~280 Kg∙day (Six-month period)) clean room facility for production of larger modules ready at Montreal (LADD) purification work to reduce alpha- background ongoing envisage 10 kg to 100 kg during 2005/6 → best limit to be achieved (could reach ϰ detection zone) Conclusions