Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 1 Process Development and Integration for the Six-Year Program and the Statewide Transportation Improvement Plan Progress Summary James H. Lambert (434) Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems and Department of Systems and Information Engineering University of Virginia September 10,
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 2 Preface SYIP/STIP business process spans many divisions and activities across VDOT Need to focus and bound SYIP/STIP business process modeling that is supportive of current FHWA-VDOT initiatives IDEF documentation should provide a basis for action and remedies to current process deficiencies
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 3 Abstract The capstone team will develop business process models of Virginia’s highway and transit construction program with the integrated definition (IDEF) standard that is used across diverse applications of systems engineering. The team will interact with agency managers who are involved in process reengineering. The team will test and evaluate commercial software including Process Modeler ™ of Computer Associates, Inc. The effort of the team will have impact to the financial management of over 1500 construction projects and over a billion dollars of annual investment in transportation.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 4 Process Modeling Methodology - IDEF3 Capture description of a process and the network of relations that exists between processes Record the raw data resulting from fact-finding interviews in systems analysis activities Document the decision procedures affecting the states and life-cycle of critical shared data, particularly manufacturing, engineering, and maintenance product definition data Manage data configuration and change control policy definition Make system design and design trade-off analysis
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 5 Background – IDEF0 Example
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 6 Data Needs for IDEF3 Activities Objective Title of responsible department/s Inputs Controls - consist of legislation, regulations, and policies related to the system Mechanisms - refer to the elements that accomplish the actions of the process, such as people, manual or automated tools, established procedures for holding hearings, etc Outputs Key decisions Impacted activities Estimated duration Related models/diagrams
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 7 Background – IDEF3 Example Source:
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 8 Task 1 BPWin* Process Model of SYIP and STIP Development * Software Application of IDEF
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 9 IDEF Workbook
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 10 Discussion of Process Models Created Several Process Models –Used IDEF3 –Merged into one large process model –Some of activities had sub-activities Above: STIP Process Model Left: IDEF3 Description
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 11 STIP Development Process – Flow Diagram Source: Development and Financial Constraint of Virginia's STIP (2002). Joint FHWA/FTA/VDOT/VDRPT Process Review
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 12 STIP Development Process: IDEF Example - Tree Diagram View 1 2
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 13 STIP Development Process – IDEF Example – Sub-Process View
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 14 Revenue Forecasts – Flow Diagram Source: Development and Financial Constraint of Virginia's STIP (2002). Joint FHWA/FTA/VDOT/VDRPT Process Review
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 15 Revenue Forecasts: IDEF Example – IDEF View
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 16 Other Processes Modeled –STIP Development Process –Revenue Forecast –Highway Maintenance and Operating Fund –Transportation Trust Fund/Priority Transportation Fund –Planning and Engineering Estimates –Drafting of the SYIP –Tentative Program –Secondary Roads ** –Urban Programs ** –MPO Process ** **Done by previous capstone group. Cannot find at moment.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 17 Task 2 Case Study of Public Involvement
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 18 Mapping the Public Involvement Process Using the joint process review by FHWA, FTA, VDOT, and VDRPT entitled Development and Financial Constraint of Virginia’s STIP, the processes central to public involvement are identified –November 2002 Each road system has a differing process of public involvement –Tentative SYP Program –Secondary Roads –Urban Programs –MPO Planning –STIP Development Process
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 19 STIP Development Process Source: Development and Financial Constraint of Virginia's STIP (2002). Joint FHWA/FTA/VDOT/VDRPT Process Review
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 20 Tentative Program Source: Development and Financial Constraint of Virginia's STIP (2002). Joint FHWA/FTA/VDOT/VDRPT Process Review
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 21 Secondary Roads Source: Development and Financial Constraint of Virginia's STIP (2002). Joint FHWA/FTA/VDOT/VDRPT Process Review
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 22 Urban Programs Source: Development and Financial Constraint of Virginia's STIP (2002). Joint FHWA/FTA/VDOT/VDRPT Process Review
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 23 MPO Planning Source: Development and Financial Constraint of Virginia's STIP (2002). Joint FHWA/FTA/VDOT/VDRPT Process Review
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 24 Public Involvement Workbook
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 25 Public Involvement Toolkit VTRC’s Proposed Toolkit Minnesota’s Public Involvement Toolkit A Public Involvement Toolkit should be implemented for the selection of Public Outreach techniques. Source: VDOT and VTRC 2003 Phase II Report
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 26 Task 3 Case Study of STIP Amendments
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 27 Tracking of STIP Amendments Hundreds of amendments are processed each year to revise a current project in the STIP or to add a new project The amendment process has no documented structure We developed an IDEF model and associated flowchart to document all activities
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 28 Amendment Process Workbook
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 29 Flowchart of Amendment Process
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 30 Task 4 IDEF Placement at VDOT
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 31 Data Management Division According to the Data Administration website, under Data Modeling Requirements for COTS Systems there is a requirement for what Business Process Models would be acceptable into the Data Management Division –Business Process Model Business process models (BPM) provide a framework for identifying, defining, and organizing the functional strategies, rules and activities needed to manage and support the way an organization does, or wants to do business. It provides a graphical and textual framework for organizing activities into manageable groupings to facilitate their shared use and control throughout the agency. The BPM is required by PMLG “Redesign Core Business Process 2.5”. The Computer Associate’s AllFusion program would fulfill these requirements and is an acceptable Business Process Model to be used by the Data Management Division
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 32 Management Services Division The Concurrent Engineering Process Flowchart to the right shows how the IDEF modeling could be used in the Management Services Division Found in Instruction and Information Memorandum on the fifth page at: – locdes/electronic%20pubs/iim/IIM22 6.pdfhttp:// locdes/electronic%20pubs/iim/IIM22 6.pdf
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 33 Progress since Initiation of Contract Built hypertext Excel workbook according to IDEF standard UVa extended the standard to accommodate additional graphical types of data that we are obtaining Populated the above workbooks with text, timelines, interview transcripts, organizational charts; with initial focus on public involvement and amendment activities
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 34 Progress since Initiation of Contract (Cont.) Loaded BPWin software (IDEF) to a UVa workstation, entered sample of data from hypertext spreadsheet Interviewed Ben Mannell in Richmond, obtained STIP timeline and his description of activities Interviewed Rob Walters at Biotech Center, obtained his description of certain activities Interviewed Gene Wells in Richmond, obtained his description of the STIP amendment process Attended Ben Mannell’s training session for VDOT employees and MPO staff, morning and afternoon sessions
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 35 Made phone interview with Utah DOT staff who developed process model of interaction with MPO’s on their STIP, learned that they benefited from negotiated agreement of what activities would be performed by whom and by what calendar dates In related activity, met with Chad Tucker (VDOT staff) et al. in Charlottesville regarding prioritization system for state highway plan Interviewed Craig Ahlin, obtained his description of different controls on STIP amendments Progress since Initiation of Contract (Cont.)
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 36 Made phone interview with Deborah Grant. Discussed the FMIS system and project approval. Deborah Grant sent templates for the narratives of the STIP process and forms for the FMIS system, which have been posted to our website. Conducted interview with Donald Silies, Administrator for the Scheduling and Contract Division with respect to the Advertisement Schedule. Presented project at SIEDS Conference on April 16, 04 Interviewed Jennifer DeBruhl in Richmond, obtained her experience with the November 2002 document Jennifer DeBruhl sent the Financial Planning and Programming Sections from the National Highway Institute/National Transit Institute class Progress since Initiation of Contract (Cont.)
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 37 Progress since Initiation of Contract (Cont.) Interviewed Ahmet Anday and Amy Costello in Richmond, obtained their description of the STIP Environmental Process Amy Costello sent the VDOT Project Level Air Quality Study Program and the VDOT Transportation/Air Quality Conformity Process Amy Costello also mailed the Richmond, Virginia Ozone Maintenance Area Transportation Conformity Analysis Interviewed Michael Hester, obtained his description of the STIP Environmental Process Michael Hester sent the Transportation & Mobility Planning Division STIP schedule as of June 1, 2004 Meet with John Nahm, Dick Jones, Ellett Pollard, and Rob Walters at BioTech in Richmond, VA to discuss the project to date and its relevance to BioTech’s work.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 38 Progress since Initiation of Contract (Cont.) Interviewed Frank Dunn via phone on Project Development Dick Jones ed Data Modeling Requirements for COTS Systems Interviewed Dick Jones via phone on how to navigate the Data Administration's website Interviewed Bill Pulkowski via phone on document tracking systems used by SCC that might be useful for VDOT Created a draft of the final report
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 39 Ongoing Future Efforts Develop recommendations to improve the current modeled processes Continue data collection for IDEF model Model more of the STIP/SYIP processes Integrate IDEF model with data models of IT Division
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 40 Project Website ( Source:
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 41 Updated Final Report for this Project ( ) - RKJ DRAFT of the Final Report for this Project ( ) - RKJDRAFT of the Final Report for this Project ( ) - RKJ *Updated AllFusion Program Screenshots ( ) - RKJ DCC Work Flow Diagram sent by Bill Pulkowski ( ) - RKJ Bill Pulkowski Phone Interview and from SCC ( ) - RKJ Concurrent Engineering Process Flowchart for Capstone Team to turn into IDEF ( ) - RKJ Original Document Data Modeling Requirements for COTS Systems ( ) - RKJ Project Development Chart created from Dick Jones 8/13 Interview ( ) - RKJ Dick Jones Phone Interview ( ) - RKJ Action Items to do after Monday August 23rd ( ) - RKJ Dick Jones , Data Modeling Requirements for COTS Systems ( ) - RKJ Amy Costello , Project Life Cycle, Links ( ) - RKJ Frank Dunn Interview on Project Development ( ) - RKJ Progress Since Initiation of Contract ( ) - RKJ Action Items from July 21st Meeting with BioTech ( ) - RKJ Progress Report presented to BioTech ( ) - RKJ Notes from meeting with BioTech ( ) - RKJNotes from meeting with BioTech ( ) - RKJ *Updated Process Development and Integration for the Six-Year Program and the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program Materials
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 42 Process Development and Integration for the Six-Year Program and the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program Materials (Cont.) Transportation & Mobility Planning Division STIP schedule as of June 1, 2004 (Draft) ( ) - RKJ STIP Development Process in AllFusion Program ( ) - RKJSTIP Development Process in AllFusion Program ( ) - RKJ *Need CA AllFusion Program to open document Ahmet Anday and Amy Costello Interview ( ) - RKJ IDEF Worksheet Questions asked during Interviews ( ) - RKJ Financial Planning Section from the National Highway Institute/National Transit Institute class taught by Jennifer DeBruhl ( ) - RKJ Programming Section from the National Highway Institute/National Transit Institute class taught by Jennifer DeBruhl ( ) - RKJ Jennifer DeBruhl Interview ( ) - RKJ IDEF Worksheet Update - Compilation of Previous Worksheets ( ) - RKJIDEF Worksheet Update - Compilation of Previous Worksheets ( ) - RKJ *Updated Success with CA AllFusionSuccess with CA AllFusion- Document describing SRAs success with the AllFusion Program ( ) - RKJ Example of AllFusion ProjectExample of AllFusion Project - Created by Voluntary Interindustry Commerce Standards ( ) - RKJ Information on AllFusion Process ModelerInformation on AllFusion Process Modeler - ( ) - RKJ IDEF Worksheet Update - Construction Process - RTS - 5/6/04 Craig Ahlin Interview ( ) Progress Report Presentation - April 27th meeting ( ) SIEDS Conference Presentation ( )
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 43 Notes from Deborah Grant Interview - 4/14/04 - ELI Deborah Grant Interview - Federal Aid FMIS ( ) - ELI Deborah Grant Interview - Right of Way Template ( ) - ELI Deborah Grant Interview - Preliminary Engineering Estimate Template ( ) - ELI Deborah Grant Interview - Team District Assignments ( ) - ELI Deborah Grant Interview - Blank Construction FMIS Document - ( ) - ELI Deborah Grant Interview - Blank PE-1 Template - ( ) - ELI Deborah Grant Interview - Blank RW-201 Template - (4/13/04) - ELI SIEDS Conference Poster ( ) SIEDS Conference Paper ( ) Notes from March 24th meeting with VDOT (4-4-04) Progress Report Presentation - March 24th meeting ( ) Vision for Integrated STIP - Charlie Rasnick Transcript ( ) Supplementary s Explaining the Vision for an Integrated STIP ( ) Progress Report, University of Virginia ( ) IDEF Worksheet - STIP Process ( ) IDEF Worksheet - STIP Process ( IDEF Worksheet - STIP Process ( ) IDEF Worksheet - Amendment Process ( ) IDEF Worksheet - Amendment Process ( ) Process Development and Integration for the Six-Year Program and the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program Materials (Cont.)
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 44 Progress Report, University of Virginia ( ) Progress Report, University of Virginia ( ) Revised STIP Proposal ( ) Materials from Joint FHWA,VTRC and VDOT meeting ( ) STIP Procedures Memorandum of Agreement Evaluation of Public Participation in Virginia, Review by FHWA, 2002 Public Involvement Techniques for Transportation Decision-making-1996 (FHWA site) Assessment of VDOT's Public Involvement Practices -- Final Report, June 2003 Materials from STIP Committee Meeting ( ) STIP-04 TimeLine FY04-06 STIP FY04-09 SYIP Meeting with Mr. Murali Rao (Current STIP Poster, Current STIP Sub-Processes, Recommended STIP ) ( )Current STIP PosterCurrent STIP Sub-ProcessesRecommended STIP Culpeper Public Hearing Meeting ( ) Six Year Program - Report on Development, Monitoring, Implementation and Best Practices ( ) STIP - Massachusetts ( ) Lynchburg Public Hearing Meeting ( ) Presentation by James H. Lambert ( ) Changes In Work Plan ( Changes In Work Plan ( ) Process Development and Integration for the Six-Year Program and the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program Materials (Cont.)
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 45 VDOT Home VDOT Organization Chart Projects and Plans Public Hearings Meetings and Events Fall 2003 Hearing Schedule SYIP SYIP Public Hearings Powerpoint SYIP Report SYIP Update Public Hearings Fall 2003 Information Projects in the SYIP STIP Citizen's Guide STIP Amendment Process Draft Letters (provided by Gene Wells ) CAPSTONE Team Readings STIP FY-05 Timeline STIP and TIP Development Process, Utah DOT - Coordination with MPO, UTA, FHWA and UDOT, September 2001STIP and TIP Development Process, Utah DOT AllFusion Process Getting Started Guide AllFusion Process Modeler Methods Guide FAQ on TIP Development and Financial Constraint of Virginia's STIP - Joint FHWA/FTA/VDOT/VDRPT Process Review, November 2002Development and Financial Constraint of Virginia's STIP Process Development and Integration for the Six-Year Program and the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program Materials (Cont.)
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 46 Interviews Conducted since Initiation of Contract Interviewed Ben Mannell in Richmond, obtained STIP timeline and his description of activities Interviewed Rob Walters at Biotech Center, obtained his description of certain activities Interviewed Gene Wells in Richmond, obtained his description of the STIP amendment process Attended Ben Mannell’s training session for VDOT employees and MPO staff, morning and afternoon sessions Made phone interview with Utah DOT staff who developed process model of interaction with MPO’s on their STIP, learned that they benefited from negotiated agreement of what activities would be performed by whom and by what calendar dates In related activity, met with Chad Tucker (VDOT staff) et al. in Charlottesville regarding prioritization system for state highway plan Interviewed Craig Ahlin, obtained his description of different controls on STIP amendments Made phone interview with Deborah Grant. Discussed the FMIS system and project approval.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 47 Conducted interview with Donald Silies, Administrator for the Scheduling and Contract Division with respect to the Advertisement Schedule. Interviewed Jennifer DeBruhl in Richmond, obtained her experience with the November 2002 document Interviewed Ahmet Anday and Amy Costello in Richmond, obtained their description of the STIP Environmental Process Interviewed Michael Hester, obtained his description of the STIP Environmental Process Meet with John Nahm, Dick Jones, Ellett Pollard, and Rob Walters at BioTech in Richmond, VA to discuss the project to date and its relevance to BioTech’s work. Interviewed Frank Dunn via phone on Project Development Interviewed Dick Jones via phone on how to navigate the Data Administration's website Interviewed Bill Pulkowski via phone on document tracking systems used by SCC that might be useful for VDOT Interviews Conducted since Initiation of Contract (Cont.)
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 48 IDEF Worksheet Questions Webpage
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 49 IDEF Worksheet Questions Coding IDEF Worksheet Questions IDEF Worksheet Questions The purpose of this document is to describe what parameters we need from you about each of your activities and/or roles that go into the STIP/SYIP integration. Please complete one of these forms for each of your activites and/or roles. Each row on the worksheet represents a new IDEF0 (Integrated Definition for Function Modeling) activity. IDEF0 is the technique that breaks down the activities or functions of the organization or system into its component parts. It is a graphical language that assists in identifying the functions that are performed, the various elements needed to perform those functions, and what is efficient and inefficient about the system under study. (i.e. What are the roles you have in generating the STIP?)
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 50 For more information on IDEF please go to Figure 1: IDEF0 Description - Description of IDEF0 Format of Mapping The columns contain the IDEF0 standards as well as supplementary material. Your name: First Last Your address: Title of your position: Field 1: Name of Activity Name or title for activity or function. IDEF Worksheet Questions Coding (Cont.)
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 51 Field 2: Inputs Something consumed or modified in the process. (i.e. schedules, costs, drafts) Field 3: Controls A constraint on the operation of the process. Represents the objects that govern the manner in which inputs are transformed yet are not themselves transformed by the activity. Consists of legislation, regulations, and policies related to the system. (i.e. codes, restrictions) Field 4: Mechanisms Something used to perform the process, but is not itself consumed. The elements that accomplish the actions of the process, such as people, manual or automated tools, established procedures for holding hearings, etc. (i.e. software applications, exchange, etc.) Field 5: Outputs Something resulting from the process. Shows what an activity produces or creates. IDEF Worksheet Questions Coding (Cont.)
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 52 Field 6: Objective The goal of the function or activity. Field 7: BPwin Diagrams Link to the activity in BPwin format. Field 8: Title of Responsible Person(s) Person(s) in charge of the function or activity. Field 9: Key Decisions Possible choices for the outcome of the activity or function. IDEF Worksheet Questions Coding (Cont.)
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 53 Field 10: Duration Time/length of the activity. Field 11: Transcripts/Interviews Link to a document that shows an outline description of the activity, interview, or a memo on the activity. Field 12: External Links Links to sites outside the CRMES website that are pertinent to the activity. Field 13: Diagrams/Models Diagram showing detail of the activity. IDEF Worksheet Questions Coding (Cont.)
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 54 Field 14: Reviews Notes or reports available on the activity. Field 15: Potential Recommendation Any recommendations on how to improve the activity. Field 16: Miscellaneous Any other information or files available on the activity that did not fit into the fields above. IDEF Worksheet Questions Coding (Cont.)
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 55 Please contact Professor Lambert with any further questions: Office Phone: Office Assistant Phone: IDEF Worksheet Questions Coding (Cont.)
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 56 Using the IDEF Model to Improve Business Processes of the Transportation Agencies: Methodology for Transferring the Six-Year Improvement Program (SYIP) into the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) on the State Level: A continuation of the Development and Financial Constraint of Virginia’s STIP Outline (DRAFT) Abstract: A quick review of what the document is presenting. Introduction: A review of Development and Financial Constraint of the Virginia’s STIP and the role that the University of Virginia plays in this project by transferring the previous document into IDEF format. Background on IDEF: A detailed review on the literature written on IDEF modeling and a review on other projects that have used the IDEF modeling for their business. Development of Methodology: IDEF Worksheet: A description of the IDEF worksheet and its purpose. AllFusion Program: Description of the program created by CA and its purpose in this project. Application: Description of the project and how VDOT will apply this project to their STIP. Review of Jennifer DeBruhl’s interview: A detailed description of why the Development and Financial Constraint of the Virginia’s STIP was written and for what purpose. Focus on Sub-Processes (Environmental, Construction, etc.) Conclusions: Overall review of what this document presented. Recommendations: Recommendations for VDOT. References: Any documents, websites, or books used in this document. Appendix A: Methodology of Web-Page: Description of how the IDEF Worksheet Questions webpage was created and the code that went into creating it. Appendix B: IDEF Worksheet: Print out of the worksheet used. Appendix C: AllFusion Program: Print out of the IDEF models created.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 57 IDEF Worksheet Worksheet.xls
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 58 Action Items Upload of Computer Associate’s AllFusion program onto Capstone computers Learn the AllFusion program Continue to take activities both from the IDEF Worksheet and from the November 2002 report and inserting them into IDEF models Create IDEF models for the project development in the STIP Possible action: Simulate, using Arena or similar software, the project development in the STIP