Philosophy Series.  In this age, we have lost the confidence that statements of fact can ever be anything more than just opinions. The word "truth" now.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Higher RMPS Lesson 4 Kantian ethics.
Advertisements

The Challenge of Cultural Relativism
The Case for God: Knowing God Exists Kedron E. Jones Apologetics Research Society
The Lie of This Age Postmodernism on the College Campus.
Don McClain 1 W. 65th St church of Christ / March 23, 2008.
John 8:1,2 (ch 7:53 Everyone went to his home.)
Moral -Introduction -“Right and wrong as clue to the meaning of the universe.” C.S. Lewis (Mere Christianity) -If there is a moral “law”, then there is.
The Myth of Moral Relativism
ETHICS BOWL kantian ETHICS.
Phil 160 Kant.
Moral Relativism, Cultural Differences and Bioethics Prof. Eric Barnes.
Memory Verse for today “From that time Jesus began to preach and to say, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.”” (Matt 4:17 NKJV) Let’s get ready.
What do you think? As all ethics is relative and/or, we can never agree on any objectively valid principles Strongly Disagree.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 9 The Challenge of Cultural Relativism By David Kelsey.
Bumper Sticker Ethics S Wilkens Cultural relativism: when in Rome do as a Romans do From one culture to another, and from one of time to another within.
Love Thy Neighbor As Thyself What is the real problem? Mark 12:28-34.
Michael Lacewing Emotivism Michael Lacewing
Is Christianity the Way of God?. Joint Effort High Purpose.
The Problem of Knowledge. What new information would cause you to be less certain? So when we say “I’m certain that…” what are we saying? 3 things you.
The Importance of the Truth And what happens when it is ignored.
“… the conspiracy to torture Jesus to death should not be read in too much of a hurry, with too much eagerness to get the body into the tomb – or beyond.
Kenneth Balibalos Kevin Eugenio. What is a Worldview? The Essential Questions Why it Matters? Common Worldviews.
Defending The Faith Series
In Defense of Absolute Truth Relative Vs Absolute Truth.
AS Philosophy & Ethics Mrs Sudds What are your expectations?
Subjectivism LO: I will know what Subjectivism is Hmk: Exam practice. Explain the view that Ethics are relative (25). Spend about half an hour writing.
Ethical Theory: Absolute & Relativist theory L.O: Be able to understand the concepts of absolutist & relativist morality Explain the characteristics of.
The New Evangelization. What is Christ’s mandate? What does mandate mean?
66 As soon as it was day, the elders of the people, both chief priests and scribes, came together and led Him into their council, saying, 67 “If You are.
Philosophy and Ethics Is lying always wrong? Is conscience a reliable guide? Are all values relative?
What Christianity explains that Naturalism cannot Naturalism (materialism) and Christianity (theism) are considered the two possible positions or worldviews.
By 12:1-2.
Did Jesus Really Say That? Matthew 5–7. Did Jesus Really Say? “Judge not, that you be not judged.” Matthew 7:1(ESV)
Truth Living The story our life choices really tell to the world.
Title Slide: The Moment of Truth…
AIT, Comp. Sci. & Info. Mgmt AT02.98 Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues in Computing September Term, Objectives of these slides: l What ethics is,
Kantian ethics (& suicide): Kantian ethics (& suicide): Immanuel Kant ( ). A German philosopher. Ought implies Can Maxims Categorical Imperative.
READING #1: “What This Book is About” Chapter One from The Ethics of Teaching.
From Failure to Action October 28. Think About This … What are some big mistakes a person can make in the work place? Some failures can make us want to.
Egoism Plato: “The Myth of Gyges” from The Republic.
Rivermont Presbyterian Church P. Ribeiro 1 Mere Christianity C.S. Lewis Book I Right and Wrong As A Clue To The Meaning Of The Universe Summary of Chapters.
P. Ribeiro 1 Mere Christianity C.S. Lewis Right and Wrong As A Clue To The Meaning Of The Universe A Flow-Chart Approach.
By Arunav, Aran, Humza.
The Relationship Between Morality and Religion. Lesson Intentions I can describe the relationship between morality and religion. I have went over my homework.
Morality in the Modern World. Where does morality come from?
Is There Truth? John 18:38. Acting Ethically John Leo, in an editorial for U. S. News & World Report, July 22, 2002, wrote, “A Zogby International poll.
Bible Doctrine: Essential Teachings of the Christian Faith Wayne Grudem.
Ethics 160 Moral Arguments. Reasons and Arguments Different claims have different uses in our language. Sometimes, a claim or claims are used as a reason.
Ethics Overview: Deontological and Teleological ( Consequentalist) Systems.
Absolutism and the Euthyphro dilemma LO: I will know what is meant by absolutism I will attempt to resolve the Euthyphro dilemma Hmk: Come up with some.
The Four Agreements By Don Miguel Ruiz. About the Author  “Don Miguel Ruiz was born into a humble family with ancient traditions in rural Mexico, the.
Inter-relationships Religion and Morality. Relationships Is it true that morality depends on religion, even that it cannot be understood in the context.
Apologetics WEEK 2- JANUARY 13 TH, How can you think your religion is the only true one?  Remember, we live in a world that has a Postmodern Worldview.
The New Evangelization. What is Christ’s mandate? What does mandate mean?
Kant. The Good Will and Duty Kant did not believe that any outcome was inherently good. Pleasure or happiness could result out of the most evil acts.
Lesson Objective Key Words Lesson outcomes Hypothetical Categorical Imperatives Freedom To evaluate the differences between the Hypothetical and Categorical.
Mere Christianity C. S. Lewis. The Law of Human Nature Chapter 1 Two basic points: –Human beings, all over the earth, have this curious idea that they.
ETHICS Shawnna Burchfield HU Table of Contents Analytical Skill Building  Critical Reading Skills  Writing Skills  Thinking Skills Knowledge.
4/10/ DOES GOD EXIST?  THE MORAL ARGUMENT Objective realities Objective realities Objective (definition) Objective (definition) expressing or dealing.
Relativism, Divine Command Theory, and Particularism A closer look at some prominent views of ethical theory.
 As an exercise, assume that Jesus did survive the crucifixion and his resurrection appearances were just the man Jesus meeting his followers. What problems.
Lesson 3. Aim: What does God teach us in the Bible?
Part II Pro-Life Christians Establish a Foundation for the Debate.
Ethics and Values for Professionals Chapter 2: Ethical Relativism
What is ethics?. What is ethics? “Ethics is about my feelings” Agree or disagree?
“Man is the measure of all things.”- Protagoras
Relativism Three Basic Forms: Cognitive – all truth is relative
01 4 Ethical Language 4.1 Meta-Ethics.
Make a list of 5 things that you would say might be wrong in certain situations Compare your list with the person next to you and come up with a common.
The rights and wrongs about morals
Presentation transcript:

Philosophy Series

 In this age, we have lost the confidence that statements of fact can ever be anything more than just opinions. The word "truth" now means true for me.  Whether we realize it or not, this concept - Moral relativism - is the air we breathe, the background noise in our culture today. In this sort of cultural climate the only heresy is telling someone else that they are wrong. Tolerance has become the ultimate virtue, not "truth".  According to the Barna Research Group, 81% of young Americans have adopted a view that "all truth is relative to the individual and his/her circumstances". 1

Definition  We can all decide what is right for ourselves. You decide what's right for you, and I'll decide what's right for me. Moral relativism says, "It's true for me, if I believe it.“  Moral relativism asserts that morality is not based on any absolute standard. Rather, ethical “truths” depend on variables such as the situation, culture, one's feelings, etc.  Moral Relativism says that there is more than one right answer or way. More than one absolute truth.  Truth is not objective or universal but relative to the specific group, culture, time.

Definition  there is no universal moral standard by which to judge others, we ought to tolerate the behavior of others even when it runs counter to our personal or cultural moral standards. [ [

Definition Pleasure as Ethics  When morality is reduced to personal taste, people exchange the moral question, what is good? For the pleasure question, what feels good?  Instead of morality constraining pleasure (I want to do that but I really should not), the pleasure defines morality (I want to do that and I am going to find a way to rationalize it).  William McGuffey, author of the McGuffey's Readers, which were the mainstay of America's public school system from 1836 till the 1920's, wrote: "Erase all thought and fear of God from a community, and selfishness and sensuality would absorb the whole man." Where do you think the world is heading today?

What do you think? True or False?  The claim to objective, absolute, universal knowledge leads to intolerance.  The sincerity of religious believers means they cannot be wrong.  Having individual rights means I can determine my own truth.  Humility requires relativism; otherwise dogmatism and bigotry.  Relativism leads to tolerance.

Tolerance

 The main argument relativists appeal to is that of tolerance. They claim that telling someone their morality is wrong is intolerant, and relativism tolerates all views.  First of all, evil should never be tolerated. Should we tolerate a rapist's view that women are objects of gratification to be abused?  Second, it is self-defeating because relativists do not tolerate intolerance or absolutism.  Third, relativism cannot explain why anyone should be tolerant in the first place. The very fact that we should tolerate people (even when we disagree) is based on the absolute moral rule that we should always treat people fairly—but that is absolutism again! In fact, without universal moral principles there can be no goodness.

There is an inherent logical fallacy in it, any guess ? HHow can there be a way to determine if absolutism is “wrong” if everything is relative!? IIf tolerance is the right thing to do because everything is relative then there is a logical contradiction inherent in this because that would propose the “right” moral scheme—the one we all ought to follow: Tolerance. But this itself is absolutism.

It comes down to how we view the world, our “WORLD VIEW”  Essentially, moral relativism says that anything goes, because life is ultimately without meaning. Words like "ought" and "should" are rendered meaningless. In this way, moral relativism makes the claim that it is morally neutral.  In a 2002 column from Fox News analyst Bill O'Reilly, who asked "Why is it wrong to be right?" In his article, O'Reilly cites recent Zogby poll findings regarding what is being taught in American universities. Studies indicate 75% of American college professors currently teach that there is no such thing as right and wrong. Rather, they treat the questions of good and evil as relative to "individual values and cultural diversity." The problem with this, according to O'Reilly, is that "they see the world not as it is, but as they want it to be. And annoying questions about moral absolutes and unacceptable behavior are usually left unanswered."

To determine for yourself which position to hold where morality is concerned, you must first determine what you believe about the origin of life. Do you believe life evolved or do you believe life was created? Evolution and moral relativism go hand-in-hand, for evolution teaches that life is accidental, without meaning or purpose.

 Absolutism claims that morality relies on universal principles (natural law, conscience). Christian absolutists believe that God is the ultimate source of our common morality, and that truth, therefore, is unchanging as He is.  The Golden Rule, where did it originate? C.S. Lewis points to the nature of most quarrels as a clue to what we truly believe. Inherent in those quarrels is a concept of fairness, as in "how would you like it if someone did that to you?" When we make that statement, we are appealing "to some kind of standard of behavior [we] expect" the other person to know about. Where do you think that standard originates?  even so-called relativists reject relativism in most cases. They would not say that a murderer or rapist is free from guilt so long as he did not violate his own standards.  Going above tolerance, doing what’s good and right: Bishop Abraam of Fayoum and Giza Love of enemies - Even gave to the hostile Arabs in the region.

The premise of this world is that there is no God – If there is no God, there is no Absolute Truth. If there is no God, there is only the individual…. Each individual can, then, make up his own truth. We want, if we may, to construct our own reality. We don't want to be compelled to submit to a reality that lies beyond us We ask Our Heavenly Father to help us overcome this monstrous challenge that is rooting itself in the fabric of our society. We ask Him to help us “buy the truth and do not sell it” (Pro 23:23) so that we can walk in the Truth (Ps 86:11, 3 John 1:4) for we “belong to the truth" (1 John 3:19). Our Father is the Truth (John 14:6) and our Mother is the pillar and ground of truth. (1Tim 3:15).—GLORY BE TO GOD FOREVER AMEN