Bellringer: The astronomer Carl Sagan said “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence” What did he mean by this? Do you agree?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
It Takes More Faith to be an Atheist.
Advertisements

Anselm On the Existence of God. “Nor do I seek to understand so that I can believe, but rather I believe so that I can understand. For I believe this.
Chapter 8 How Good is the Evidence: personal experience, testimonials & appeals to authority?
© Michael Lacewing Scepticism Michael Lacewing
Theory of knowledge Lesson 2
© Michael Lacewing Hume’s scepticism Michael Lacewing
The Problem of Knowledge – vocabulary terms  Ways of knowing- Per our TOK class, the 4 ways of knowing are Language, Perception, Reason, and Emotion.
The Problems of Knowledge
The Burnet News Club THE SEVEN ‘C’S TRUTH CHECKER The Seven ‘C’s Truth Checker.
© Cambridge University Press 2011 Chapter 1 The problem of knowledge.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 9 The Challenge of Cultural Relativism By David Kelsey.
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Open-Mindedness and related concepts.
Descartes on scepticism
Epistemology: the study of the nature, source, limits, & justification of knowledge Rationalism: we truly know only that of which we are certain. Since.
The Problem of Knowledge. What new information would cause you to be less certain? So when we say “I’m certain that…” what are we saying? 3 things you.
W HAT IS K NOWLEDGE ? Q: A window cleaner is cleaning the windows on the 25th floor of a skyscraper, when he slips and falls. He is not wearing a safety.
Defending The Faith Series
 According to philosophical skepticism, we can’t have knowledge of the external world.
“The Problem of Knowledge” Chapter 1 – Theory of Knowledge.
THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE LESSON 1 The Problem of Knowledge 1.
Theory of Knowledge. Assessment Presentation (Teacher assessed) Essay (1200 – 1600 words) (externally assessed)
What is Knowledge?. “organised common sense” Imagine a mental map of reality: your ideas of true and false, right and wrong, reasonable and unreasonable,
EGOISM AND CRITIQUE 8.5 Forensic Philosophy December 16, 2013.
ToK - Truth Does truth matter?.
Conclusion Chapter 14 TOK II. 3 Theories Regarding Truth (1) Correspondence Theory – truth is as it appears to be – facts are facts. (1) Correspondence.
What is Knowledge?.
Lecture 4: The nature and value of truth. What is truth? Like the questions “What is knowledge?” and “What turns a true belief into knowledge?” asked.
TaK – Knowledge Claims What is a Knowledge Claim? If prefaced with “I think that….”, it is a personal opinion; If prefaced with “I believe that…”, it.
Knowledge Claims By now, after many years of full-time education and life- experience, you can, perhaps, claim to know many things. You should be able.
THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE. K IS A JUSTIFIED TRUE BELIEF JUSTIFIED:Justify belief in the right kind of way to be reliable. TRUE: Beyond reasonable doubt ( objective.
AIT, Comp. Sci. & Info. Mgmt AT02.98 Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues in Computing September Term, Objectives of these slides: l What ethics is,
The Problem of Knowledge 2 Pages Table of Contents Certainty p – Radical doubt p Radical doubt Relativism p Relativism What should.
Much of what passes for common sense consists of little more than vague and untested beliefs that are based on such things as prejudice, hearsay, and blind.
ToK style. Knowledge as organized common sense A mental map of reality, includes True vs false Reasonable and unreasonable Right and wrong.
Introduction to Critical Thinking Developing Critical Thinking Skills.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
9/20/12 BR- Who are the 3 Argument Brothers (from yesterday) Today: How to Argue (Part 1) MIKVA!!
In this course we will cover: Why believe in God? What do Catholics believe about God What is the source of these beliefs What do others believe about.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 9 The Challenge of Cultural Relativism By David Kelsey.
Thinking in College UI100-First-Year Seminar Theresa Haug Belvin Most information taken from “Your College Experience: Strategies for Success” by John.
© Michael Lacewing Hume and Kant Michael Lacewing co.uk.
The Problem of Knowledge 1 Pages 3-9. Table of Contents Quotes p. 3 Quotes Introduction p. 4 Introduction Common sense p. 4-7 Common sense Certainty p.
An Introduction to Critical Thinking
© Michael Lacewing Kant on conceptual schemes Michael Lacewing osophy.co.uk.
Lesson 2: Common Misconceptions. Misconception 1 “Christianity must be proven scientifically; I’ll accept Christianity when you prove it with the scientific.
Logic and Persuasion AGED 520V. Logic and Persuasion Why do scientists need to know logic and persuasion? Scientists are writers and must persuade their.
The Nature of Knowledge. Thick Concept When a short definition is not enough, it is called a thick concept word. It can only be understood through experience.
And the search for truth. Knowledge. Knowing: Introduction to a classification scheme In ToK we may treat knowledge as falling into 3 categories. These.
R. Moyer Fall Justified True Belief… …but, what does that mean? R. Moyer Fall 2008.
Personal Power 5: Value and belief system
Certainty and ErrorCertainty and Error One thing Russell seems right about is that we don’t need certainty in order to know something. In fact, even Descartes.
Epistemology (How do you know something?)  How do you know your science textbook is true?  How about your history textbook?  How about what your parents.
Recognizing Perspectives Constructing Knowledge. The Mental Map: What does knowledge look like?  Goal: To understand why people believe so many different.
THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE The nature of knowledge. Knowledge  What is it?  A “Thick Concept”?  How is it different from belief?
1 Prolegomena: Knowledge versus Opinion ~ Adapted from Mortimer J. Adler’s How to Think About The Great Ideas Caravaggio, “Doubting Thomas"
Understanding Science 14. Skepticism © Colin Frayn,
CAS Managebac update CAS opportunity for someone with a scanner. Cambodia?
INTRODUCTION TO REASON What is it? Truth, Relativism, & Skepticism Do we really use reason? How is ‘Reason’ different from ‘Reasons’?
Relativism, Divine Command Theory, and Particularism A closer look at some prominent views of ethical theory.
Religious language: cognitive or non-cognitive?
Course Introduction. Course Introduction Prior Notions What do you know about TOK? What type of questions characterize TOK skills?
What do we mean by the word “knowledge?”
How do humanists decide what to believe?
10/28/09 BR- What is the most important factor in winning an argument
Theory of Knowledge.
Michael Lacewing Hume and Kant Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Issues in bioethics Is there “objective truth” in ethics? By
Issues in bioethics Is there “objective truth” in ethics? By
Conclusion – Truth and wisdom
Problems with IDR Before the holidays we discussed two problems with the indirect realist view. If we can’t perceive the external world directly (because.
Presentation transcript:

Bellringer: The astronomer Carl Sagan said “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence” What did he mean by this? Do you agree?

Chapter 1 Overview The world is a confusing and contradictory place. How do we make sense of all the confusing and contradictory beliefs? The world is, in fact, far larger than our personal “worlds”

3 Possible Solutions to the Problem of Knowledge Common Sense Certainty Relativism

Common Sense Our “common sense” probably contains inaccuracies and biases that we are not aware of. Common sense” consists of beliefs that can be based on prejudice, hearsay and blind appeals. Hearsay: unverified, unofficial information gained or acquired from another and not part of one’s direct knowledge. (Examples: gossip or rumors)

Our Mental Map Mental Map: our ideas of what is true and what is false, what is reasonable and what is unreasonable, what is right and what is wrong, etc… Our mental maps may give us a distorted picture of reality Our ideas and beliefs come from many sources… our own experience, parents, friends, teachers, books and the media… It is possible that there are inaccuracies in some of this knowledge, since we don’t always have the chance to check up on some information.

Paradox of Cartography There is no such thing as a “perfect map.” A perfect map would be useless, because it would be life- sized.

Certainty It has often been thought that certainty is what distinguishes knowledge from mere belief. Certainty: The idea here is that when you know something you are certain that it is true and have no doubts about it. Belief: When you merely believe it, you may think it is true, but you are not certain.

Looking at 4 Ways of Knowing Language I know because somebody told me, but maybe…. Perception I know because my 5 senses inform me, but maybe… Reason I know because it is logical, but maybe… Emotion I know because my heart/moral compass guides me, but maybe… * We acquire knowledge about the world through language, perception, reason and emotion, but none of these ways of knowing can give us certainty.

Radical doubt Do we truly exist? What is the utility of radical doubt? Are some areas of knowledge more certain than others?

Relativism there is no such thing as absolute truth that exists in an objective way independent of what anyone happens to believe is true. truth is relative (truth may be different for different individuals or for different cultures) * According to relativism, truth is relative to the individual; but the fact that we take seriously the idea that someone may be wrong in their beliefs suggests that relativism is false. E.g. Is the earth flat?

Judgement Since we live in a world with few black and white certainties, we must rely more on judgement than proof in deciding what to believe. Good judgement is the ability to balance scepticism with open-mindedness E.g. Aliens visiting Earth at some point

Gullibility “We should cultivate a healthy scepticism as an antidote to intellectual—and financial—gullibility If you are too gullible, you will find plenty of charlatans and hucksters out there who will be only too willing to relieve you of your money

Gullibility scenario: Someone approaches you asking for some change for bus fare. What do you do?

The Danger of Scepticism If we’re too sceptical, then we run the risk of halting intellectual progress and knowledge will stagnate E.g Continental drift first proposed in 1912, guffawed at, resurrected in 1960s

Reasonable Knowledge In determining if a knowledge claim is reasonable, we need… Evidence There should be some positive evidence supporting the claim Also we need to look for counterevidence

Reasonable Knowledge, cont’d. Coherence Does the claim fit in with our current understanding of things? We must examine our doubts of a belief one at a time “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence”

argument ad ignorantiam The fact that you can’t prove that something isn’t true, doesn’t make it true Examples: Since you cannot prove that ghosts do not exist, they must exist. Since scientists cannot prove that global warming will occur, it probably won't. Fred said that he is smarter than Jill, but he didn't prove it, so it must be false.

Why do beliefs matter? Do people have the right to believe what they want to believe? Are some beliefs more worthy of respect than others?

Why do beliefs matter, cont’d.? Our beliefs define who we are Our beliefs can affect our actions, or what others do to us (e.g. being executed for heresy or witchcraft) Some beliefs are misguided and dangerous, e.g. cigarettes and gummy bears What other examples can you think of?

Chapter 1 Conclusion Knowledge is not static; it has a history and is ever evolving Three possible solutions to the problem of knowledge that each have limitations Common Sense Certainty Relativism Problem of knowledge has no easy solution, so we must use judgement in trying to decide what to believe