A Guide To Texas School Finance Module #2. Sources of Revenue Funding for Texas public school district budgets comes from 3 sources: local funds, primarily.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Capital Improvement Funding. State of the District Facilities 50% of Aiken County Public Schools are between 40 and 60 years old Leavelle McCampbell Middle.
Advertisements

Joint Task Force on Local Effort Assistance Staff Presentation June 13, 2002 Bryon Moore, Senate Ways and Means Committee Staff Denise Graham, House Appropriations.
Chapter 70 FY14 Preliminary House 1 Proposal Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1/23/2013.
1 MFP 101 Understanding the Minimum Foundation Program Formula FY
School Finance –A Region One Overview Synopsis of Finance Update by Lynn Moak at Region One By Jesus Amezcua, CPA, LISD CFO.
Copyright©2007 Education Service Center Region XIII 1 Region 17 Summer School Finance Conference School Finance Update Presented by Omar Garcia Region.
School Finance 101 Midland Independent School District December 10, 2008.
Dan Casey. General Structure of HB 1 Tax Relief Program Adopted in 2006 Compression of 2005 M&O rate is the major vehicle : 88.67% ($1.33 for most.
Session V – February 26,  Texas ranks second behind California in the number of students enrolled in public schools.  With a 21.6% increase over.
1 State Aid to School Districts in New York State: An Overview Based on the Laws of 2004 State Aid Work Group New York State Education Department August.
School Finance 101 by Ben Irwin Business Manager Parkview School District.
Kansas Legislative Research Department SCHOOL FINANCE BASICS 1 January 2013.
School Finance: A Framework School Finance: A Framework, Attachment 1.
Lincoln-Woodstock Cooperative School District Public Forum Regarding the School Funding Formula October 29, 2013.
Budget Study Session Berryessa Union School District April 23, 2008.
Wisconsin Public Schools Equalized (General) Aid.
Piecing It All Together 82 nd Legislative Regular and Special Session Review Moak, Casey & Associates July Moak, Casey & Associates.
AUSTIN Independent School District Overview AISD Budget Challenges  Unprecedented and permanent state cut to AISD revenue of nearly $50 million net of.
Introduction to School Finance Main source for the content Odden and Picus, School Finance, 4 th edition.
Minnesota Rural Education Association Fall 2009 Truth in Taxation Information on changes to school property taxes.
Joint Task Force on Local Effort Assistance July 16, 2002 Bill Freund, Consultant To The Task Force.
Special Education Funding Education Service Center, Region 20 Sherry Marsh 1.
1 State Aid to School Districts in New York State: An Overview Based on the Laws of 2007 State Aid Work Group New York State Education Department April.
Welcome to Your State School Fund 1 Michael Elliott State School Fund Coordinator Oregon Department of Education.
Arizona School Finance The Equalization Formula. How many parents? Does treating your kids fairly mean: Spending equally on them? Spending equally on.
1 DeLeon Independent School District Facility Committee Organizational Meeting July 20, 2006.
HARLINGEN CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT HARLINGEN CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 1.
Biennial Budget Update State Superintendent’s Advisory Council on Rural Schools, Libraries, and Communities April 22,2015 Erin Fath, Policy & Budget.
Texas Association of School Boards School Finance Plan October 2010.
Welcome to Your State School Fund 1 Michael Elliott State School Fund Coordinator Oregon Department of Education.
Joint Task Force on Local Effort Assistance September 25, 2002 Bill Freund, Consultant To The Task Force.
District Planning And Advisory Committee Budget and Financial Overview Tuesday, May 20, 2014.
Chapter 70 Massachusetts School Funding Formula. Massachusetts School Revenues FY00-FY12 (in billions) 1/23/ School spending is primarily a local.
1 LISD Budget & Tax Hearing August 23, 2004 Presentation by: R.J. Barber, Ed.D. Superintendent Jesus J. Amezcua, CPA Chief Financial Officer Rudy Sanchez,
2011 Tax Levy Hearing Board of Education Meeting December 19,
And now…. 84 th Legislature Public Education Video 2 Presented by Doug Karr 1 hour, 10 minutes.
Texas Association Of Rural Schools 1 SCHOOL FINANCE FUNDAMENTALS An overview that determines the state and local revenue of a typical small/rural school.
Cost-of-Education Index Study Presentation to the Joint Committee on Public School Finance January 24, 2002.
HARLINGEN CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT HARLINGEN CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 1.
Module # 1 Basic Orientation to Texas School Finance.
Joint Task Force on Local Effort Assistance August 20, 2002 Bill Freund, Consultant To The Task Force.
Property Tax Relief and Reform: Special Session 2007-B Overview Presentation to the Florida Taxation and Budget Reform Commission June 26, 2007.
Thursday, March 07, 2002 School Finance Update- Series V – Revenues by Program Intent.
HARLINGEN CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 1.
Chapter 70 Aid FY14 Budget 7/12/2013. FY14 Chapter 70 Summary Aid 73 districts receive foundation aid to ensure that they do not fall below their foundation.
Budget Message Fiscal Year Presented by Kelly Muzzey.
Impact of Private School Vouchers on Wisconsin Public Schools Kim Kaukl, Executive Director, Wisconsin Rural Schools Alliance Sue Schnorr, Director Business.
School Finance 101 Your Name Your School District Contact Information Date:
Public School Finance Seminar David Anderson Lisa Dawn-Fisher Texas Education Agency.
College Community School District 4 Budget Calculations for General Fund Budget Year.
School Finance 101 NALEO Education Leadership Initiative March 8, 2014 San Diego, California.
School Finance Update TASA / TASB Mid-winter Conference January 27, 2015 Amanda Brownson, Director, State Funding Amy Copeland, FSP Operations Manager,
School Finance 101 Your name Your school district Date Contact Information.
Copyright, 1996 © Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc.Copyright, 1996 © Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc.
Tax Increment Financing (TIF) and Iowa K-12 Public School Finance Larry Sigel, Partner Iowa School Finance Information Services (ISFIS) 1.
Budget Workshop Date: 02/26/2015 Presenter: Kenneth Huewitt Chief Financial Officer.
Texas School Finance Johnny W. Hill, CPA Asst
RECAPTURE ON MAY 6 BALLOT
The 85th Legislative Session
Upcoming Millage Election Byron Area Schools
Proposed Budget August 21, 2017.
FACTS ABOUT SCHOOL FINANCE
The Basics of School Finance
School Finance and Small Schools
SPECIAL EDUCATION FUNDING OVERVIEW House Ways and Means Committee
School Funding 101 St. Clairsville-Richland City School District
HARLINGEN CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #883
Business Manager and CFO Roundtable Discussion
Region I School finance update
Presentation transcript:

A Guide To Texas School Finance Module #2

Sources of Revenue Funding for Texas public school district budgets comes from 3 sources: local funds, primarily local property tax revenues; state funds from a variety of revenue sources, and federal funds.

For the school year $24.9 billion was used for public education. $12.6 billion or 50.5% came from local sources

For the school year: $11.5 billion or 46.1% came from state funds $850 million or 0.3% came from federal sources.

Biennial Appropriation $32.16 Billion Foundation School Fund: $17.89 billion Available School Fund: $2.37 billion State Textbook Fund: $806 million

Biennial appropriations (cont’d) Lottery Proceeds: $1.61 billion Appropriated Receipts: $1.47 billion Additional State Funds: $2.08 billion

Biennial Appropriations (cont’d) TIF: $37.80 million General Revenue: $424 million Federal Funds: $5.40 billion Total:$32.16 billion

Determination of School District Funding Structure of the Foundation School Program (FSP): State and local funds for public ed. In Texas are distributed through a system of formulas known as the FSP.

(cont’d) TEA uses FSP formulas to calculate the foundation program allotment for each of the 1,041 school districts that levy a property tax.

cont’d The school funding system consists of two tiers to fund M & O, including a number of adjustments and weights designed to distribute funding according to the characteristics of the school district and its students.

Tier 1 Tier 1 is the base or “foundation” funding level in the Texas FSP. This funding begins with the Basis Allotment, (The base level of funding for each student in average daily attendance (ADA).

Tier 1 The lower the district property values, the greater the amount of state aid in Tier 1. The combination of state and local funds provides access to the same level of educational resources at the same tax rate.

Tier 1 Adjusting the Basic Allotment by the district adjustments results in the Adjusted Allotment. Instructional program weights are applied to the Adjusted Allotment, based on the numbers of students enrolled in or served by various special programs.

Tier 1 Instructional Program Weights in FSP Regular Education: no weight Special Ed.: weight ranges from 1.1 for mainstreaming to 5.0 for certain restrictive settings. Comp. Ed.: 0.20 and 2.41 for pregnant students

Tier 1 Weights (cont’d) Career and Technology: 0.37 Bilingual: 0.10 Gifted and Talented: 0.12 PEG: 0.10

Tier 2 Tier 2 provides additional funds to school districts beyond the base funding level in Tier 1. Districts may levy a tax rate up to $0.64 in Tier 2, but they are not required by law to do so.

Tier 2 Tier 2 tax rate generates resources for education in the form of a guaranteed yield.

Tier 2 Tier 2 provides substantially equal access to resources at substantially equal tax rates. In other words, the state provides additional funding to school districts with low property values to equalize the revenue per WADA available at a given tax rate.

Chapter 41 Wealth Sharing Districts with wealth above $300,000 per WADA in 2002 and $305,000 per WADA in 2003 are subject to wealth reduction provisions of Chapter 41 of the Texas Education Code.

Options for Wealth Equalization (Chapter 41) To equalize district ability to generate revenue, the FSP requires Chapter 41 districts to reduce their wealth by choosing one of the five wealth-sharing options. The options are as follows and are laid out in Chapter 41 of the TEC.

Option 1: Consolidation by Agreement: The school boards of two or more districts may agree to consolidate in order to create a new district with wealth per pupil of less than the statutory wealth threshold.

Option 2 Detachment and Annexation by Agreement: The school boards of two or more districts may agree to detach property from one school district and attach it to one or more school districts

Option 3 Purchase of Attendance Credits: A district with wealth per WADA above the statutory threshold may purchase attendance credits from the state. One attendance credit is equal to one student in WADA. In effect, the district sends a check to the state.

Option 4 Contract for Education of Non- resident Students: A district with wealth above the equalized level may enter into an agreement with a qualifying district to pay the cost of educating students in that district.

Option 5 Tax Base Consolidation: The school boards if two or more districts may agree to conduct an election to create a consolidated taxing district for the Maintenance and Operations of the two school districts.

Chapter 41 Option 3, the purchase of attendance credits and Option 4, education of non-resident students are the options chosen by the 101 school districts that are identified as Chapter 41 districts. Some people refer to this as the “Robin Hood Plan.”

Facilities Funding Since , districts have been able to receive funds from a guaranteed yield program for facilities.

Cont’d Funds may be used either for construction or lease-purchase of new instructional facilities under the Instructional Facilities Allotment (IFA).

Cont’d For the biennium, $1.09 billion has been appropriated for this program.

School Property Taxes Districts must collect maintenance taxes at an M & O tax rate of $0.86 per $100 valuation in Tier 1.

School Property Taxes Districts may levy M & O taxes up to an additional %0.64 (For a tax rate not exceeding $1.50 for M & O) in Tier 2.

School Property Taxes School districts may also adopt a debt service fund tax rate (the I & S rate). These taxes must be used only to pay for debt service.

Lagged Tax Rates A confusing aspect of tax rates used in FSP calculations of state aid is the use of tax rates from a prior year (also called “lagged” tax rates).

Lagged Tax Rates FSP calculations for each state fiscal biennium are based on the district tax rate in the second year of the preceding biennium.

Property Tax Rollback Rollback is a taxpayer relief mechanism that permits local voters within each school district to overrule the decision of the school board in setting the tax rate.

Property Tax Rollback If the board adopts a tax rate that exceeds the rollback tax rate, the district must call an election so that voters can determine whether or not to ratify the adopted tax rate.