PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS IN OUR SCHOOLS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Outcomes At the end of the training session, participants will have an in-depth knowledge of state and local student accountability standards, understand.
Advertisements

Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
Jonathan Gibson & Kulwadee Axtell Nevada Department of Education.
Civil Rights and English Learners Melanie Manares Kansas State Department of Education.
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network.
Bilingual Education Programs
Cristina Hudgins Middle Tennessee State University
Implementation of Amended CR Part 154
1 Alternative Language Services (ALS) November 10, 2008.
Local Control Funding Formula and English Learners Flexibility Amid Federal and State Regulations and Laws California Latino School Boards Association.
Legal Obligations of the Juvenile Justice System for Limited English Proficient Youth Sam Jammal Legislative Staff Attorney MALDEF.
Overview of Florida Consent Decree
Language Proficiency Assessment Commitee (LPAC)
Language Proficiency Assessment Commitee (LPAC)
What is the purpose of bilingual education ?
TITLE VI OF THE 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT 42 U.S.C § 2000d No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded.
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network 1.
No Child Left Behind The Basics Of Title 1 Every Child - Now! Focus on the critical nature of doing what’s right and what’s needed – today - to help every.
 Federal Laws Related to English Learners. Video – How Not to Register EL Students.
Texas Administrative Code (TAC), Title 19, Part II Chapter 89. Adaptations for Special Populations, Subchapter BB. Commissioner's Rules Concerning State.
Title III: Language Instruction for Limited English Proficient and Immigrant Students Serving English Language Learners – It’s the Law VAFEPA: October.
IDENTIFICATION 1 PROPOSED REGULATORY CHANGECOMMENTS Implement a four step ELL identification process to ensure holistic and individualized decisions can.
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
Education 330 Teaching English Language Learners: Issues in Policy, Leadership, and Instruction 3/27/2011ASCD: San Francisco Spring, 2012.
Module 1: PERA Illinois Administrative Code Part 50
1 Office for Civil Rights U.S. Department of Education This presentation provides general information and does not represent a complete recitation of.
Summary of the District English Language Learner (ELL) Plan The ESOL Program Lee County School District
Certification and HQT Christina Linder, Director Certification and Professional Standards Teacher Quality
PREPARED BY DR. HAROLD SMITH EDAD 5399 Bilingual/ESL Education.
Language Proficiency Assessment Commitee (LPAC)
Michael Toole Southwest Plains Regional Service Center.
U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights (OCR) Title VI, Section 504, Title II – Special Education and Limited English Proficient Students.
Section III: Legislation & Supreme Court Rulings in Support of ELLs
ESOL Hopkins Elementary Presenter: Yanira Alfonso, EDS ESOL Teacher Hopkins Elementary School.
State Laws, Recommendations, & NCLB How research becomes policies Janice Kroeger, Ph.D. Associate Professor, TLC, ECED.
Serving English Language Learners with ESEA Title III, Part A Funds.
 ESL program is one that “provides instruction in the English language and other courses of study using teaching techniques for acquiring English, and...
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network.
PROGRAMS AND SERVICES TO ELL Students District One Schools Special Services Department.
Access to Learning Section E STANDARDS & INDICATORS Council of International Schools New England Association of Schools & Colleges.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
10/12/20151 Fillmore Middle School Fillmore Unified School District School Site Council (SSC)
Bilingual Students and the Law n Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 n Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act - The Bilingual Education.
From Lau to Unz: An Anatomy of the Debate over Bilingual Education. Kenji Hakuta Stanford University University of La Verne.
ESL LEGISTLATION ELS Language Centers Daiva Berzinskas Contact Information:
META CONSENT DECREE Cecilia Diaz Student # May 27, 2014.
1 ESL Legislation and its effects on society. 2 Why is ESL education so important? Question -Why is there a need to implement laws and policies to mandate.
October 2009 Oregon Department of Education 1 Diploma Options 2009.
English Language Learners and the Law Gema Sieh Highland Rim.
Laws Governing ESL Programs in the US Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI prohibits discrimination on the grounds of race, color,
ALBERTVILLE CITY SCHOOLS Enrollment, Identification and Education of EL Students
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network September 17, 2010 Margaret.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title.
2013.  Familiarize staff with parent involvement requirements  Learn process to involve parents in the development of activities and policies  Learn.
Title III: 101 Jacqueline A. Iribarren Ph.D. Title III, ESL & Bilingual Ed. Consultant October 20, 2011.
English Language Proficiency Standards  The English Language Proficiency Standards (ELPS), as required by 19 Texas Administrative Code, Chapter 74,
English Mastery Council Update District Policy Criteria Recommendations to the Nevada State Board of Education Dr. Magdalena Martinez, Chair - English.
English Learners at MPS January Who are our students? O MPS currently has 398 EL students enrolled K-12 O Current EL students speak 10 different.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Agenda Review Public Comments Election of Chair NDE ELL Program Professionals: Jane Splean – Program Supervisor Kulwadee Axtell Jonathan Gibson Blakely.
ELL 101 Stephanie Johnson, LPSD38 ELL Coordinator.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
December 4, 2009 State Board of Education adopted:  Oregon Diploma  Modified Diploma  Extended Diploma  Alternative.
Federal Title III Monitoring Visit Educational Equity Charlene Lui, Paul Ross, Cheryl Pietz, Nathan Moore, Sara Moore.
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
TERY J. MEDINA, ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR THE SOUTHEASTERN EQUITY CENTER 800 E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 400 Fort Lauderdale, FL Telephone:
ESL in Wisconsin and the United States: Presented by Suzy Klein
The Michigan Merit Curriculum (MMC), Personal Curriculums (PC) and Certificates of Completion (COC): Addressing the Needs of Students with ASD.
Introduction to English learners and Related Federal and State Rules
Title I Annual Meeting Pinewood Elementary, August 30, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS IN OUR SCHOOLS

DEMOGRAPHICS There are over 5.1 million students identified as Limited English Proficient (LEP) or English language learner’s or (ELL) in the U.S. There are over 5.1 million students identified as Limited English Proficient (LEP) or English language learner’s or (ELL) in the U.S. LEP/ELL students are 10.5% of total public school enrollment. There has been a 56% increase in the enrollment of LEP/ELL students since LEP/ELL students are 10.5% of total public school enrollment. There has been a 56% increase in the enrollment of LEP/ELL students since Florida has the fourth largest number of LEP students in the U.S. Florida has the fourth largest number of LEP students in the U.S. Spanish speaking students represent approximately 73% of all LEP students. Spanish speaking students represent approximately 73% of all LEP students.

FEDERAL PROTECTIONS Lau v. Nichols, 414 U.S. 563 (1974): “There is no equality of treatment merely by providing students with the same facilities, textbooks, teachers, and curriculum; for students who do not understand English are effectively foreclosed from any meaningful education…Basic English skills are at the very core of what these public schools teach. Imposition of a requirement that before a child can effectively participate in the educational program, he must already have acquired those basic skills is to make a mockery of public education. We know that those who do not understand English are certain to find their classroom experiences wholly incomprehensible and in no way meaningful.” ( Id at 566) “There is no equality of treatment merely by providing students with the same facilities, textbooks, teachers, and curriculum; for students who do not understand English are effectively foreclosed from any meaningful education…Basic English skills are at the very core of what these public schools teach. Imposition of a requirement that before a child can effectively participate in the educational program, he must already have acquired those basic skills is to make a mockery of public education. We know that those who do not understand English are certain to find their classroom experiences wholly incomprehensible and in no way meaningful.” ( Id at 566)

FEDERAL PROTECTIONS The Equal Educational Opportunities Act of U.S.C.§1703 (f): The Equal Educational Opportunities Act of U.S.C.§1703 (f): “No State shall deny equal educational opportunity to an individual on account of his or her race, color, sex, or national origin, by […] “No State shall deny equal educational opportunity to an individual on account of his or her race, color, sex, or national origin, by […] (f) the failure by an educational agency to take appropriate action to overcome language barriers that impede equal participation by its students in its instructional programs.” (f) the failure by an educational agency to take appropriate action to overcome language barriers that impede equal participation by its students in its instructional programs.”

FEDERAL PROTECTIONS Castañeda v. Pickard, 648 F.2d 989 (5 th Cir. 1981). Castañeda v. Pickard, 648 F.2d 989 (5 th Cir. 1981). “ A school district must provide programming through which LEP students can acquire the English language skills necessary to compete academically with their English speaking peers; and “ A school district must provide programming through which LEP students can acquire the English language skills necessary to compete academically with their English speaking peers; and “A school district must ensure that these same students do not suffer academic deficits because of their English language limitations (Id at 1011). “A school district must ensure that these same students do not suffer academic deficits because of their English language limitations (Id at 1011).

FEDERAL PROTECTIONS The Castañeda Framework: 1. Is the school district “pursuing a program informed by an educational theory recognized as sound by some experts in the field, or at least, deemed a legitimate experimental strategy? (Id at 1009) 2. Are the programs and practices actually used by a school system “reasonably calculated to implement effectively the educational theory adopted by the school?” (Id at 1010). 3. When based on a legitimate theory and properly implemented, is the program achieving its intended goal which should result in language barriers being overcome? (Id at 1010).

STATE LAW PROTECTIONS Florida Constitution Art. IX §1 (2008) “The education of children is a fundamental value of the people of the State of Florida. It is therefore, a paramount duty of the state to make adequate provision for the education of all children residing within its borders. Adequate provision shall be made by law for a uniform, efficient, secure, and high quality system of free public schools that allows students to obtain a high quality education…” “The education of children is a fundamental value of the people of the State of Florida. It is therefore, a paramount duty of the state to make adequate provision for the education of all children residing within its borders. Adequate provision shall be made by law for a uniform, efficient, secure, and high quality system of free public schools that allows students to obtain a high quality education…”

STATE LAW PROTECTIONS STATE LAW PROTECTIONS LULAC et al. v. Florida Department of Education, S.D. Fla. (1990). Consent Decree. All LEP students are entitled to equal access to all programs that are appropriate for their academic needs. Including compensatory, exceptional, vocational, adult, or early childhood education as well as dropout prevention and other support services without regard of their level of English language proficiency.

STATE LAW PROTECTIONS Authority to implement the consent decree: Florida Statutes § Florida Statutes § Florida Administrative Code Rules 6A to 6A Florida Administrative Code Rules 6A to 6A

STATE LAW PROTECTIONS LULAC CONSENT DECREE Section I: Identification and Assessment: All LEP students must be appropriately identified and assessed. The assessment must measure not only the student’s level of English language proficiency but also the student’s level of proficiency in basic subject areas. All LEP students must be appropriately identified and assessed. The assessment must measure not only the student’s level of English language proficiency but also the student’s level of proficiency in basic subject areas. Classification and Reclassification: English proficiency shall be determined by reassessing the student utilizing the same or comparable assessment instruments, procedures and standards for initial assessment adjusted for grade and age. Classification and Reclassification: English proficiency shall be determined by reassessing the student utilizing the same or comparable assessment instruments, procedures and standards for initial assessment adjusted for grade and age. Post Reclassification Monitoring: Former LEP students’ performance shall be reviewed at the first report card and semi-annually during first year after exiting and at end of second year after exiting. Post Reclassification Monitoring: Former LEP students’ performance shall be reviewed at the first report card and semi-annually during first year after exiting and at end of second year after exiting.

STATE LAW PROTECTIONS LULAC CONSENT DECREE Section II: Equal Access to Appropriate Programming: Must include both access to intensive English language instruction & instruction in basic subject areas of math, social studies, computer literacy which is: Must include both access to intensive English language instruction & instruction in basic subject areas of math, social studies, computer literacy which is: 1) Understandable to the LEP student given his level of English language proficiency. 1) Understandable to the LEP student given his level of English language proficiency. 2) Equal and comparable in amount, scope, sequence and quality to that provided to English proficient students. 2) Equal and comparable in amount, scope, sequence and quality to that provided to English proficient students.

STATE LAW PROTECTIONS LULAC CONSENT DECREE Section II: Equal Access to Appropriate Programming: 1) Each District must submit a District LEP Plan to Fl. DOE describing its proposed procedures and methodologies for serving LEP students. 2) The District LEP Plan must include standards, for entry, exit, and post reclassification monitoring; instructional and categorical services; Evidence of consultation with the Parent Leadership Council or other advisory board representing LEP Parents. 3) District LEP Plans must be updated and reviewed by Fl. DOE every three years.

STATE LAW PROTECTIONS LULAC CONSENT DECREE Basic ESOL programs shall include instruction to develop skills in speaking, listening, reading and writing English. Basic ESOL programs shall include instruction to develop skills in speaking, listening, reading and writing English. LEP students must be classified according to their level English language proficiency, academic achievement, and special needs. LEP students must be classified according to their level English language proficiency, academic achievement, and special needs. LEP students must be provided Basic ESOL instruction for the minimum number of hours specified in their LEP Plan. LEP students must be provided Basic ESOL instruction for the minimum number of hours specified in their LEP Plan. A students ESOL teacher, parent or parent’s designee, or other school personnel may request the convening of the LEP committee to identify any special problems which may be hindering a student’s progress in ESOL. The LEP committee shall make appropriate recommendations to modify the student’s LEP Plan. A students ESOL teacher, parent or parent’s designee, or other school personnel may request the convening of the LEP committee to identify any special problems which may be hindering a student’s progress in ESOL. The LEP committee shall make appropriate recommendations to modify the student’s LEP Plan.

STATE LAW PROTECTIONS LULAC CONSENT DECREE ESOL Instruction in Basic Subject Areas: A district that provides understandable instruction through ESOL strategies shall assure and be able to document that: a) Each course has been structured in conformity with ESOL strategy for teaching LEP students basic subject matter. b) Each course is taught by qualified personnel and appropriate materials are available. c) Students are learning and progressing towards completion of the district’s pupil progression plan.

STATE LAW PROTECTIONS LULAC CONSENT DECREE LEP students in basic subject area classrooms shall have access to an individual proficient in their language in addition to a trained ESOL subject area teacher. LEP students in basic subject area classrooms shall have access to an individual proficient in their language in addition to a trained ESOL subject area teacher. Schools with at least 15 students speaking in the same language shall provide at least one aide or teacher proficient in the same language trained to assist in ESOL basic instruction. Schools with at least 15 students speaking in the same language shall provide at least one aide or teacher proficient in the same language trained to assist in ESOL basic instruction.

STATE LAW PROTECTIONS LULAC CONSENT DECREE Parental Involvement in LEP student programming and academic achievement shall be promoted by establishing a Parent Leadership Council at each school or at district level. Parental Involvement in LEP student programming and academic achievement shall be promoted by establishing a Parent Leadership Council at each school or at district level. Parents of LEP students shall be provided Leadership training and orientation. Parents of LEP students shall be informed of the opportunity to be represented on existing school and district advisory committees. Parents of LEP students shall be provided Leadership training and orientation. Parents of LEP students shall be informed of the opportunity to be represented on existing school and district advisory committees.

STATE LAW PROTECTIONS LULAC CONSENT DECREE Home School Communications: All communications (written and oral) between school district boards and personnel and parents of current or former LEP students must be undertaken in the parents’ primary language or other mode of communication commonly used by the parents unless clearly not feasible.

STATE LAW PROTECTIONS LULAC CONSENT DECREE Personnel Training and Certification Teachers of basic ESOL, teachers of primary English, Language Arts, Reading or ESE need ESOL endorsement by 300 master plan points or 15 college semester hours through a series of approved Fla. DOE courses. Teachers of basic ESOL, teachers of primary English, Language Arts, Reading or ESE need ESOL endorsement by 300 master plan points or 15 college semester hours through a series of approved Fla. DOE courses. Content Area Teachers teaching LEP students in areas of math, science, social studies, and computer literacy using home language strategies need 60 in-service points or 3 college semester hours. Content Area Teachers teaching LEP students in areas of math, science, social studies, and computer literacy using home language strategies need 60 in-service points or 3 college semester hours. Content Area Teachers teaching LEP students in math, science, social studies, and computer literacy using ESOL strategies need 60 in service points or 3 college semester hours of an Fla. DOE approved course. Content Area Teachers teaching LEP students in math, science, social studies, and computer literacy using ESOL strategies need 60 in service points or 3 college semester hours of an Fla. DOE approved course. Other subject areas (art, music, physical education etc) need 18 in- service points or 3 college semester hours. Other subject areas (art, music, physical education etc) need 18 in- service points or 3 college semester hours. Guidance counselors must have 60 in-service points in ESOL strategies or 3 college semester hours. Guidance counselors must have 60 in-service points in ESOL strategies or 3 college semester hours.

STATE LAW PROTECTIONS LULAC CONSENT DECREE 2003 Modifications to Consent Decree: Certified teachers may obtain ESOL subject area coverage by passing a state approved ESOL certification exam. A teacher certified through this option must obtain 120 hours of in-service training or continuing education within 3 years. Certified teachers may obtain ESOL subject area coverage by passing a state approved ESOL certification exam. A teacher certified through this option must obtain 120 hours of in-service training or continuing education within 3 years. School Administrators and Guidance Counselors must obtain 60 hours of in service training or continuing education within 3 years. School Administrators and Guidance Counselors must obtain 60 hours of in service training or continuing education within 3 years.

STATE LAW PROTECTIONS LULAC CONSENT DECREE Monitoring and Outcome Measures Fla. Department of Education is required to monitor districts for 1) Program compliance; 2) Equal access under the Florida Educational Equity Act; 3) Program Effectiveness. Fla. Department of Education is required to monitor districts for 1) Program compliance; 2) Equal access under the Florida Educational Equity Act; 3) Program Effectiveness. Any interested person may file a complaint with the Florida Dept. of Education alleging violations by a school district. DOE has 60 days to investigate and report findings. Any violations shall result in a corrective action plan. Any interested person may file a complaint with the Florida Dept. of Education alleging violations by a school district. DOE has 60 days to investigate and report findings. Any violations shall result in a corrective action plan.