Kathryn Knapp Environmental Protection Specialist U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office 2011 CEMP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ways to Improve the Hazard Management Process
Advertisements

Project: Participate! Decide! Win! “Improving the Practices of Public Participation: Next Steps in Implementing the Aarhus Convention in Albania, Bosnia.
Sejkora: What is RETS-REMP?
PUBLIC DOSES ESTIMATION BASED ON EFFLUENTS DATA AND DIRECT MEASUREMENTS OF TRITIUM IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES AT CERNAVODA E. Bobric, I. Popescu, V. Simionov.
UNIVERSITA’ DEGLI STUDI DI PALERMO DIN DIPARTIMENTO DI INGEGNERIA NUCLEARE CHERNE th Workshop on European Collaboration for Higher Education and.
RETS – REMP Workshop NRC Activities June 25, 2007 Presented by Steve Garry.
RADIOACTIVE DISCHARGES CONTROL JE Jan Horyna State Office for Nuclear Safety Czech Republic September 2009 Vienna.
Perspectives on USNRC Study Request Nuclear & Radiation Studies Board April 26, 2010 Ralph Andersen, CHP Senior Director – Radiation Safety & Environmental.
Community Air Monitoring Argentine/Turner Kansas November 2013-July 2014 Richard Mabion, Green Czar and Sierra Club Leticia DeGaigny, Global Community.
Vermont Yankee VSNAP Presentation February 22, 2011 Mike Romeo Director NSA.
US NRC Protective Action Recommendation Study National Radiological Emergency Preparedness Conference April 10, 2008 Las Vegas, NV Randy Sullivan, CHP.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
1 NOTES This presentation is an outline of some of the most important aspects of DOE O 440.1B For completeness, copies of the Order should accompany this.
NUCLEAR ENERGY What is it? David J. Diamond Energy Sciences & Technology Department February 2009.
THE FUTURE OF FUKUSHIMA Can nuclear energy overcome its bad rap? CHAPTER 27 NUCLEAR FUTURE.
Northwest Area Committee Meeting June 29, 2011 C. Terada, EPA Japan 2011 US National Radiation Monitoring.
Jed Harrison Office of Radiation & Indoor Air.  Review the Incident – What Happened  Describe the EPA Response  Review EPA’s RadNet Monitoring System.
EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency Mike Boyd, Senior Health Physicist EPA/Office of Radiation & Indoor Air Presented at 2011 OAS Annual.
NRC Decommissioning Activities for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Bruce A. Watson, CHP Chief, Reactor Decommissioning Branch Division of Decommissioning,
Process Safety Management
Emergency Management Working Group January
Radiological Monitoring of Air and Drinking Water in British Columbia Following the Fukushima Nuclear Incident Environmental Health Services (EHS) British.
Radiological Health Advisory Board Meeting May 25, 2011.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency EPR-Public Communications L-011 Good Practices for PIOs.
American Nuclear Insurers Glastonbury, Connecticut USA
Jhon Carilli Low-Level Radioactive Waste (LLW) Activity Lead
P-1 Nuclear Power Plant Shut Down. P-2 Most Dangerous Reactors: A Compendium of Reactor Risk Assessments Units 1 & 2 “Reactors remain unstable and difficult.
Safety Analysis Working Group FY2010 EFCOG Semi-Annual Meeting Brad Evans, Chair Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Rob McKeehan, Vice-Chair Oak Ridge.
GIFTED PROGRAM EVALUATION LONG BEACH SCHOOL DISTRICT DEBORAH HOLT LBSD GIFTED COORDINATOR JUNE 25, 2013.
Radiation in Your Environment. Radiation Around You Nature –Cosmic (direct and cosmic-produced radioactivity –Terrestrial (including radon) Medical Consumer.
Tom Enyeart Senior Nuclear Engineer NNSA Nevada Site Office Community Environmental Monitoring Program Workshop July 25, 2011 Radiation Sources and Isotopes.
Section 3 Nuclear Changes Where is Radiation? 〉 We are continually exposed to radiation from natural sources, such as the sun, soil, rocks, and plants.
NRC Leadership Expectations and Practices for Sustaining a High Performing Organization NRC Commissioner William C. Ostendorff FR/SSO/FS Workshop U.S.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Management System and the Interface with Nuclear Security (IRRS Modules 4 and 12) BASIC IRRS TRAINING.
Ronald Warren Ecological & Environmental Monitoring National Security Technologies, LLC Community Environmental Monitoring Program Workshop July 26, 2011.
James A. FitzPatrick NPP Ingestion Pathway Exercise May and June 21-23, 2011 and LHD Radiological Plan Template Kevin Kraus Associate Radiological.
Annual Site Environmental Report (ASER) Calendar Year 2011 West Valley Demonstration Project Presented by: John Rendall, Regulatory Strategy.
PENNSYLVANIA’S ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM AROUND NUCLEAR FACILITIES Tonda Lewis.
RESPONSIBLE CARE ® POLLUTION PREVENTION CODE David Sandidge Director, Responsible Care American Chemistry Council June 2010.
Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) Nevada Field Office (NFO) FY 2015 Status Report Milinka Watson-Garrett Analytical Services Manager U.S. Department.
What is a Public Health Assessment? “The evaluation of data and information on the release of harmful substances into the environment in order to assess.
AIR MONITORING GROUP (AMUG) FOUNDED 1989 MEETS TWICE ANNUALLY COORDINATOR-MORGAN COX, CHP WEB PAGE BEING REVISED.
New Nuclear Power and Climate Change: Issues and Opportunities Dr. Tom Sowdon Manager of Emergency Preparedness Entergy.
Nuclear Waste Disposal By: Tierra Simmons. Nuclear Waste Disposal Controversy Nuclear energy provides enough efficient sources of energy than all fossil.
HPT Rev. 0 Page 1 of 52 TP-1 TVAN Technical Training Health Physics (RADCON) Initial Training Program Radiological Environmental Monitoring Programs.
Nuclear Safety & Nuclear Security Synergy By Dr. Lucian BIRO Director General ROMANIA National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control International.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Leveraging the Management Review Process of ISO and OHSAS for Facility-level and Institutional-level.
DOE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP BIOTA PROTECTION Stephen L. Domotor (202)
Delivering the Message Public Notification vs. Public Involvement Strategic Communication Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of.
Program Manager’s Review 06/25/2004 Overview of the Radiation Protection (RP) Department Five- Year Goals (From the 50,000-Foot Level)
Monitoring the Long-Term Effectiveness of Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) Implementation Through Use of a Performance Dash Board Process Mike.
Pete Sanders Lead, Environmental Protection Team U.S. Department of Energy, NNSA Nevada Site Office Community Environmental Monitoring Program Workshop.
Ukraine. Background On April 26, 1986, a sudden surge of power during a reactor systems test destroyed Unit 4 of the nuclear power station at Chernobyl,
ISFSI Environmental Monitoring at SONGS. San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.
Library Role in Global Health Survey Global Health Vision Task Force April
Short how nuclear plant works how nuclear power works.
Nuclear Radiation Today Chapter 10.3 Notes. Where is radiation? Radiation is everywhere—the form of nuclear radiation that occurs naturally is called.
IT platform development of the FNRBA website IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, Austria 25–26 February 2013 M. Youssif Safety and Security Section Department of.
By Annick Carnino (former Director of IAEA Division of Nuclear Installations Safety) PIME, February , 2012.
HCS 320 Week 5 Individual Communication and Crisis Paper To purchase this material click below link 320-Week-5-Individual-Communication-and-Crisis-
Low-Level Radioactive Waste (LLW) Disposition at the
The Path Forward for WIPP: A State and Local Perspective
Environmental Monitoring at the Necsa Pelindaba site
Nuclear Power Public safety concerns and the costs of addressing them have constrained the development and spread of nuclear power in the United States,
ORION University of Alaska Fairbanks Fairbanks, Alaska
Case Study: INEEL Reactor Release
Allen Chan U.S. Government Accountability Office October 2, 2018
Cherokee Concerned Citizens Pascagoula, MS
NUCLEAR ENERGY What is it?
Presentation transcript:

Kathryn Knapp Environmental Protection Specialist U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office 2011 CEMP Workshop July 26, 2011 Community Environmental Monitoring Program (CEMP): Then and Now

Page 2 Page 2Title 86FY11 – 07/26/2011 – Page 2 Log No Inception of CEMP In 1981, Offsite Environmental Monitoring Program expanded to include community involvement –Based on success of program developed in response to the accident at the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant Designed to detect potential offsite radiological releases from underground nuclear detonations conducted at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS), formerly the Nevada Test Site –Radiation monitoring included pressurized ion chambers (PICs) for total gamma and high-energy beta radiation, thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs), and particulate air samplers for total suspended activity and radioactive particles Held town hall meetings to provide an opportunity for public to meet directly with DOE and to increase public knowledge

Page 3 Page 3Title 86FY11 – 07/26/2011 – Page 3 Log No Historic Monitoring Results Underground nuclear detonations and reactor experiments from 1964 to 1972 –Most detonations were contained –Events which released radioactivity detected offsite:  30 detonations, 1 re-suspension,14 reactor experiments and 6 rocket engine tests Noble Gas and Tritium Surveillance Network results from 1972 to 1992 –Detonations were contained but continuous low-level release of noble gases (xenon and krypton) and tritium were detected offsite

Page 4 Page 4Title 86FY11 – 07/26/2011 – Page 4 Log No CEMP Results (continued) Post-testing period –From 1992 to present:  CEMP has not detected man-made radioactivity from NNSS  Results typical of natural background

Page 5 Page 5Title 86FY11 – 07/26/2011 – Page 5 Log No CEMP Goals 1.Monitor offsite environmental conditions and communicate environmental data relevant to past and continuing activities at the NNSS 2.Engage the public hands-on in monitoring environmental conditions in their communities relative to activities at the NNSS 3.Communicate environmental monitoring data to the public in a transparent and accessible manner 4.Provide an educated, trusted, local resource for public inquiries and concerns regarding past and present activities at the NNSS

Page 6 Page 6Title 86FY11 – 07/26/2011 – Page 6 Log No CEMP Goals (continued) 1.Monitor offsite environmental conditions and communicate environmental data relevant to past and continuing activities at the NNSS 2.Engage the public hands-on in monitoring environmental conditions in their communities relative to activities at the NNSS 3.Communicate environmental monitoring data to the public in a transparent and accessible manner 4.Provide an educated, trusted, local resource for public inquiries and concerns regarding past and present activities at the NNSS

Page 7 Page 7Title 86FY11 – 07/26/2011 – Page 7 Log No CEMP Goals (continued) 1.Monitor offsite environmental conditions and communicate environmental data relevant to past and continuing activities at the NNSS –Comprehensive monitoring efforts being conducted in support of the NNSS –Data indicates site conditions do not pose potential for offsite dose to public from air or direct exposure from past or present activities  Are data and risks being effectively communicated?  Is the monitoring addressing community’s concerns?  If designing a program today, what would it look like?

Page 8 Page 8Title 86FY11 – 07/26/2011 – Page 8 Log No CEMP Goals (continued) 1.Monitor offsite environmental conditions and communicate environmental data relevant to past and continuing activities at the NNSS 2.Engage the public hands-on in monitoring environmental conditions in their communities relative to activities at the NNSS 3.Communicate environmental monitoring data to the public in a transparent and accessible manner 4.Provide an educated, trusted, local resource for public inquiries and concerns regarding past and present activities at the NNSS

Page 9 Page 9Title 86FY11 – 07/26/2011 – Page 9 Log No CEMP Goals (continued) 1.Monitor offsite environmental conditions and communicate environmental data relevant to past and continuing activities at the NNSS 2.Engage the public hands-on in monitoring environmental conditions in their communities relative to activities at the NNSS 3.Communicate environmental monitoring data to the public in a transparent and accessible manner 4.Provide an educated, trusted, local resource for public inquiries and concerns regarding past and present activities at the NNSS

Page 10 Page 10Title 86FY11 – 07/26/2011 – Page 10 Log No Engage the public hands-on in monitoring environmental conditions in their communities relative to activities at the NNSS –Use of Community Environmental Monitors (CEMs)  ~90 CEMs involved in CEMP over 30 years –Setting up station at Las Vegas high school  Do we need to engage the public beyond the CEMs? CEMP Goals (continued)

Page 11 Page 11Title 86FY11 – 07/26/2011 – Page 11 Log No CEMP Goals (continued) 1.Monitor offsite environmental conditions and communicate environmental data relevant to past and continuing activities at the NNSS 2.Engage the public hands-on in monitoring environmental conditions in their communities relative to activities at the NNSS 3.Communicate environmental monitoring data to the public in a transparent and accessible manner 4.Provide an educated, trusted, local resource for public inquiries and concerns regarding past and present activities at the NNSS

Page 12 Page 12Title 86FY11 – 07/26/2011 – Page 12 Log No CEMP Goals (continued) 1.Monitor offsite environmental conditions and communicate environmental data relevant to past and continuing activities at the NNSS 2.Engage the public hands-on in monitoring environmental conditions in their communities relative to activities at the NNSS 3.Communicate environmental monitoring data to the public in a transparent and accessible manner 4.Provide an educated, trusted, local resource for public inquiries and concerns regarding past and present activities at the NNSS

Page 13 Page 13Title 86FY11 – 07/26/2011 – Page 13 Log No Communicate environmental monitoring data to the public in a transparent and accessible manner –CEM workshops –Website –Annual Report –Monitoring Stations –DRI CEMP booth at community events –DRI CEMP monthly updates –Environmental Management News Flash updates  Are we effectively communicating the data?  Should DOE have a more active role?  Should town hall meetings be re-considered?  Hold workshops in local communities and invite public? CEMP Goals (continued)

Page 14 Page 14Title 86FY11 – 07/26/2011 – Page 14 Log No CEMP Goals (continued) 1.Monitor offsite environmental conditions and communicate environmental data relevant to past and continuing activities at the NNSS 2.Engage the public hands-on in monitoring environmental conditions in their communities relative to activities at the NNSS 3.Communicate environmental monitoring data to the public in a transparent and accessible manner 4.Provide an educated, trusted, local resource for public inquiries and concerns regarding past and present activities at the NNSS

Page 15 Page 15Title 86FY11 – 07/26/2011 – Page 15 Log No CEMP Goals (continued) 1.Monitor offsite environmental conditions and communicate environmental data relevant to past and continuing activities at the NNSS 2.Engage the public hands-on in monitoring environmental conditions in their communities relative to activities at the NNSS 3.Communicate environmental monitoring data to the public in a transparent and accessible manner 4.Provide an educated, trusted, local resource for public inquiries and concerns regarding past and present activities at the NNSS

Page 16 Page 16Title 86FY11 – 07/26/2011 – Page 16 Log No Provide an educated, trusted, local resource for public inquiries and concerns regarding past and present activities at the NNSS –DRI –Educate CEMs and rely on them to be a resource within their communities –Posters in local libraries  Do we need to extend beyond the CEMs?  Is the public interested?  Should DOE have a more active role? CEMP Goals (continued)

Page 17 Page 17Title 86FY11 – 07/26/2011 – Page 17 Log No

Page 18 Page 18Title 86FY11 – 07/26/2011 – Page 18 Log No DOE committed to supporting a monitoring program that: –Involves stakeholders with a meaningful role in the process of monitoring, data collection, and represents DOE in their communities –Adds value to the community and the DOE DOE is looking to CEMs in helping DOE be successful –This workshop is your opportunity to help us define CEMP for the future