The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson
Advertisements

The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson
C Domain Teaching for Student Learning. The focus in the C Domain is on the act of teaching and its overall goal of helping students connect with the.
Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
Focus on Instructional Support
Model Of Explicit Instruction
Teacher Excellence and Support System
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson 2d. Managing Student Behavior 1.
Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol
Domain 3: Instruction. ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished Expectations for learningTeacher’s purpose in a lesson or unit is unclear to.
1 © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH 1 Using the content-focused Coaching® Model to Support Early childhood Literacy and Language Development How to Teach.
The “Highly Effective” Early Childhood Classroom Environment
For Use by DPS and Blueprint Only. Standards of Mathematical Practices 1 & 3 Math Fellow Training 2013.
Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
Marzano Art and Science Teaching Framework Learning Map
Enhancing SIOP Assisting, Collaborating, and Training ESL Secondary Content Teachers ACT-ESL Post-Seminar April 21, 2009 Hosted by VCU School of Education.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson
Planning Value of Planning What to consider when planning a lesson Learning Performance Structure of a Lesson Plan.
NePF (Nevada Education Framework)
The Framework for Teaching An Overview of the Danielson Model.
7/14/20151 Effective Teaching and Evaluation The Pathwise System By David M. Agnew Associate Professor Agricultural Education.
Lesson Planning Educ 3100.
Domain 2: The Classroom Environment
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
Obtaining reliable feedback from students about teaching
Stages of Second Language Acquisition
The Framework for Teaching Introduction to the Concepts Charlotte Danielson
The Framework for Teaching
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
Educational Performance Incentive Compensation
New Teacher Preparation: Compass Teacher Evaluation
SIOP Overview Shelter Instruction Observation Protocol
Domain 1: Preparation and Planning. ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished Knowledge of content and the structure of the discipline In planning.
The Danielson Framework and Your Evaluation AK Teaching Standard DP_8c: Engages in Instructional Development Activities Danielson Domain 4e: Growing and.
The Framework for Teaching Domain 1 Planning and Preparation.
COMPONENT 3A: COMMUNICATING WITH STUDENTS Framework for Teaching Domain 3: Instruction.
DEVELOPING ART LESSONS WITH AT-RISK YOUTH AND ELLS IN MIND Delanie Holton Art Teacher Fletcher Primary and Intermediate Aurora, CO.
INSTRUCTION DOMAIN #3. GROUP WORK How it works: 1.Look at your assigned group and move to the corresponding table. Everyone will take their materials.
General Instructions 1. Save the Power Pt template to your desktop and a flashdrive used only for your portfolio. Using SAVE AS rename the portfolio with.
What is Open response?.  A Situation Reading Open Response will have a story, a poem, or an article to read.  A Task Set of questions/prompt to answer.
Your Name Teaching Portfolio (Begin Year-End Year)
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 10/12/2015pbevan 1.
Once referred to as ESL and ELL. Level 1 Starting Level 2 Emerging Level 3 Developing Level 4 Expanding Level 5 Bridging English Learners can (understand/use):
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
SIOP The Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP)
Module 8 Teaching English Learners
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
Unit 3: Looking at Student Work Learning Objectives Become aware of key components of quality classroom assessment aligned with on CCSS-ELA Literacy in.
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Roxanne M. Williams Ed.D. Michelle Hellman. How many years of teaching experience do you have? 1. Pre-service over.
Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.
SIOPSIOP #8: Review and Assessment. Assessment & Review Content Select techniques for reviewing key content concepts Incorporate a variety of assessment.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Numeracy classes.  ces.com/Home+Page ces.com/Home+Page  Feel free.
Refining Student Assessment Effective strategies for assessing student understanding.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
PGES Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Advanced Preparation Sample Prompt
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 7/8/2016pbevan 1.
Domain 1: Preparation and Planning
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Teaching strategies/skills Questioning
Setting Instructional Outcomes
Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member
Bellwork: Student Engagement Chart
Presentation transcript:

The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson 4/18/2013 Domain 3: Instruction 3a: Communicating with Students The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson

Objectives 3a: Communicating with Students 4/18/2013 Objectives 3a: Communicating with Students Understand the elements of 3a Distinguish the difference in levels of performance Review examples of 3a behavior Identify my level of performance on 3a Incorporate strategies to improve my level of performance on 3a

Communicating with Students Why is this an important component? 4/18/2013 Communicating with Students Why is this an important component? Teachers communicate with students to: Convey that teaching and learning are purposeful activities. Make the purpose clear to students. Provide clear directions for classroom activities. Make presentations that are clear, accurate, imaginative. Present complex concepts in ways that provide scaffolding and access to students.

4/18/2013 Communicating with Students Why is this an important component? (continued) Teachers communicate with students: To embellish their explanations with analogies or metaphors linking them to student interest and prior knowledge. By occasionally withholding information to encourage students to think on their own. By using vivid, rich, error free language for students to hear language used well and to extend the students’ vocabularies.

Expectations for learning 4/18/2013 Expectations for learning Goals for learning are communicated clearly to students. Goals may be communicated during the lesson to help students clarify what they are learning. How does this tie to Domain 1?

Directions and procedures 4/18/2013 Directions and procedures Students are clear about expectations during the lesson—especially during independent or group work without direct teacher supervision. Directions may be provided orally, in writing, or a combination of the two. How does this tie to Domain 1?

Explanations of content 4/18/2013 Explanations of content Skilled teachers use vivid language and imaginative analogies and metaphors to connect explanations to students’ interests and lives beyond school. Explanations are clear with appropriate scaffolding. The teacher anticipates possible student misconceptions. How does this tie to Domain 1?

Use of oral and written language 4/18/2013 Use of oral and written language Teachers’ use of language represents a student’s best model of accurate syntax and rich vocabulary. Teachers’ modeling of language enables students to emulate language, making their own language more precise and expressive.

Communicating with Students Indicators 4/18/2013 Communicating with Students Indicators Clarity of lesson purpose Absence of content errors and clear explanations of concepts Clear directions and procedures Correct and imaginative use of language Students’ comprehension of content

4/18/2013 Relevant because… By the end of today’s lesson, you’re going to be able to factor different types of polynomials. Relevant: The teacher announces what students can expect to learn during the day’s lesson—evidence for “expectations for learning.” The teacher mispronounces the word phonemes. Relevant: By mispronouncing a term, the teacher is not modeling proper use of language— “use of oral and written language”—suggesting a lower level of performance.

4/18/2013 Relevant because… Many questions are of the recitation type, such as “How many members of the House of Representatives are there?” Not Relevant: While this could be evidence of teacher communication with students, this piece of evidence is more relevant when thinking about the quality of questions, Using Questioning/Prompts and Discussion Techniques. A student asks, “What are we supposed to be doing?” and the teacher clarifies the task. Relevant: Because the student had to ask the question, the directions and procedures were not communicated clearly suggesting a lower level of performance on “Directions and Procedures”.

4/18/2013 Relevant because… The teacher uses technical terms without explaining their meanings. Relevant: By using unfamiliar terms and not explaining them, the teacher’s explanations of content are not clear – low level for “Explanations of Content”. The teacher greets students by name as they enter the class or during the lesson. Not Relevant: This particular piece of evidence is not related to one of the elements for Communicating with Students. It is more relevant for Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport.

4/18/2013 Levels of Performance A. Proficient (Level 3) B. Basic (Level 2) C. Distinguished (Level 4) D. Unsatisfactory (Level 1) Show after the participants have worked on activity on p. 2, slide 13, of the Faciliatator’s Guide.

Level 3: Proficient Critical Attributes 4/18/2013 Level 3: Proficient Critical Attributes The teacher states clearly, at some point during the lesson, what the students will be learning. If appropriate, the teacher models the process to be followed in the task. Students engage with the learning task indicating that they understand what they are to do. The teacher makes no content errors.

Level 3: Proficient Critical Attributes (continued) 4/18/2013 Level 3: Proficient Critical Attributes (continued) The teacher’s explanation of content is clear and invites student participation and thinking. Vocabulary and usage are correct and completely suited to the lesson. Vocabulary is appropriate to students’ ages and levels of development.

Level 2: Basic Critical Attributes 4/18/2013 Level 2: Basic Critical Attributes The teacher refers in passing to what the students will be learning, or it is written on the board with no elaboration or explanation. The teacher must clarify the learning task so students can complete it. The teacher makes no serious content errors but may make a minor error.

Level 2: Basic Critical Attributes(continued) 4/18/2013 Level 2: Basic Critical Attributes(continued) The teacher’s explanation of the content consists of a monologue or is purely procedural with minimal participation by students. Vocabulary is too advanced or juvenile for students. Vocabulary and usage are correct but unimaginative.

Level 1: Unsatisfactory Critical Attributes 4/18/2013 Level 1: Unsatisfactory Critical Attributes At no time during the lesson does the teacher convey to the students what they will be learning. Students indicate through their questions that they are confused about the learning task. The teacher makes a serious content error that will affect students’ understanding of the lesson.

Level 1: Unsatisfactory Critical Attributes(continued) 4/18/2013 Level 1: Unsatisfactory Critical Attributes(continued) Students indicate through body language or questions, that they don’t understand the content being presented. The teacher’s communications include errors of vocabulary or usage. The teacher’s vocabulary is inappropriate to the age or culture of the students.

Level 4: Distinguished Critical Attributes 4/18/2013 Level 4: Distinguished Critical Attributes In addition to the characteristics of Proficient: The teacher points out possible areas for misunderstanding. The teacher explains content clearly and imaginatively, using metaphors and analogies to bring content to life. All students seem to understand the presentation.

Level 4: Distinguished Critical Attributes(continued) 4/18/2013 Level 4: Distinguished Critical Attributes(continued) In addition to the characteristics of Proficient: The teacher invites students to explain the content to the class or to classmates. The teacher uses rich language, offering brief vocabulary lessons where appropriate.

4/18/2013 Discussion After reviewing Performance Levels for Domain 3 Component a: Communicating with Students, are there any elements that you need to revise in your classroom for future excellence in your performance as a teacher and your students’ performance?

Review Objectives 3a: Communicating with Students Describe the elements of 3a. Distinguish the difference in levels of performance. What are some examples of 3a behavior? Based on your classroom communication, identify your level of performance on 3a. What are some strategies you could utilize to improve your level of performance on 3a? 4/18/2013