Regulatory Information Conference (RIC)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ways to Improve the Hazard Management Process
Advertisements

Implementing a Behavior Based Safety Process at Rockwell Automation
STREAM ANALYSIS Diagnosing Organizational Change Peg Lucky & Tom Kriesel HPRCT 2010.
(Project Name) Site Safety Orientation. Family of Companies.
MONTANA Department of Labor & Industry Employment Relations Division Occupational Safety & Health Bureau P.O. Box 1786 Miles City, Montana Fax:
Short Service Worker Program
Leadership May 29, 2013 Scotland
1 NRC’s Safety Culture Initiative Molly Keefe Human Factors Specialist Human Performance, Root Cause and Trending Conference June 23, 2010.
MOL GROUP CONTRACTOR HSE MANAGEMENT New Elements of Contractor Safety BÉLA CSEH – MOL Group HSE Director Supplier Forum - Budapest, 14 th November 2007.
The 2002 Davis Besse Event and Safety Culture Policy at the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Stephanie Morrow, Ph.D. Safety Culture Program Manager Office.
Participant Challenge Pilot Program Participant Stage One Assess, Learn and Develop.
Risk & Safety Presentation January 8, 2013 Bryan Sabari, CUSP Manager Corporate Safety
ORP Incorporating Human Performance Improvement Tools into DOE Processes Shirley J. Olinger, Deputy Manager, ORP Brian Harkins, ORP Facility Representative.
School Safety Training
Leadership in the Baldrige Criteria
Responsible CarE® Employee health and Safety Code David Sandidge Director, Responsible Care American Chemistry Council June 2010.
Building a Solid Safety Program Building a Solid Safety Program Lauro A. Garza Sr. Sr. Director, Enterprise Occupational Safety and Health August 15, 2013.
CHAPTER 2 – ROLES OF CONSTRUCTION PERSONNEL IN SAFETY AND HEALTH
© 2013 BOS Solutions Ltd. Revised: Mar 15,2013 Version 2 – BOS HSE MSpg. 1 The BOS HSE Management System Brad Whitaker, MSPH, CSP BOS Solutions HSE Director.
Industry Nuclear Safety Culture* Process Thomas C. Houghton Director, Safety Focused Regulation Nuclear Energy Institute March 12, 2009 *Nuclear Safety.
1 Overview Charlie Williams – Shell API Summer Standardization Conference 28 June
1 Safety Training for Supervisors. What We’ll Cover Safety program objectives The importance strong leadership The responsibility of management The role.
/0203 Copyright ©2002 Business and Legal Reports, Inc. BLR’s Safety Training Presentations Safety and Health Program.
2005 Engineering & Operations Technical Conference – April Memphis, TN Kerry Bruce Manager, Safety & Health Services Safety Programs That Work Kerry.
Health, Safety and Environment Policy. We are a SafeProduction organization At Vale, we are committed to sustainable development. Meeting the needs of.
Safety & Health Programs.
Stephen M. Sohinki Director Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement ASQ 2005 National Energy and Environmental Conference September 18-22, 2005.
Safety Culture (& ISM) Peter S. Winokur Thanks to Matt Moury, Doug Minnema, and Dan Burnfield Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board November 28, 2007.
Worker / Patient Safety: Steps in a Culture Change Mary Margaret Jackson Director, Performance Outcome Services Self Regional Healthcare.
ISMS Best Practices Workshop Initial Steps to Integrate HPI into ISMS Continuous Improvement CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc. September 12-13, 2006.
Barriers in Improving HSE Culture
SAFETY MANAGEMENT PROCESS Anne M. Bevington, Coors Brewing Company Safety Management Process – Proactive safety metrics that drive.
1 D D O C U M E N T A T I O N & I N F O R M A T I O N S E R V I C E S 1 Achieving and Maintaining High Reliability through Human Performance.
A Strategy for an Effective Accident Prevention Program
1 ASQ Energy and Environmental Conference Opportunities for Safety Performance Improvement in the DOE Complex Stephen M. Sohinki Director Office of Price-Anderson.
First Impressions and an Ethical Foundation
Introduction Research indicates benefits to companies who establish effective worker safety and health programs: –Reduction in the extent and severity.
Elements of Effective Behavior Based Safety Programs
Annual Supplier Forum - Energus Supply Chain Quality Date: 12 th June OFFICIAL – No Markings Applied.
ISM Annual Review and Declaration Lessons Learned CH2M HILL Hanford Group John McDonald.
Nuclear Security Culture William Tobey Workshop on Strengthening the Culture of Nuclear Safety and Security, Sao Paulo, Brazil August 25-26, 2014.
Division of Risk Management State of Florida Loss Prevention Program.
Prevention Of Catastrophic Events at Process Plants and Fossil Fuel Steam Plants.
Practice of HOF regulatory oversight E.G. Kudryavtsev Department of Safety Regulation of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities, Marine Nuclear Power Installations.
How to write… Effective Safety Plans (c) Geigle Communications, LLC - Developing Effective Written Safety Plans This material is for training use.
Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.
Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.
Safety and Health Program Don Ebert- Risk Manager (509)
Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.
Safety Leadership Defining a World Class Safety and Health Program – An Industry Perspective* *Special thanks to GE Global Nuclear Fuels – for the use.
DoD Lead Agent: Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and Environment) Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center.
Safety Management Systems Session Four Safety Promotion APTA Webinar June 9, 2016.
International Safety Rating System
DoD Lead Agent: Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and Environment) Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center.
Regulatory Information Conference (RIC)
First Impressions and an Ethical Foundation
CHAPTER 2 – ROLES OF CONSTRUCTION PERSONNEL IN SAFETY AND HEALTH
TRAINING YOUR EMPLOYEES FOR SUCCESS
KRŠKO NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, Slovenia
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Pete Davis EW Safety Team Manager
Branch Chief, Concerns Resolution Branch
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Environmental Health and Safety (EH&S) Supplier Awareness Training
TRAINING YOUR EMPLOYEES FOR SUCCESS
Safety Culture Traits Leadership Safety Values and Actions
From INPO AFI to Top Performer
AGA Operations Conference
Presentation transcript:

Regulatory Information Conference (RIC) Westinghouse Electric Company LLC Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility Safety Culture Programs/Activities Regulatory Information Conference (RIC) March 2009 3

Key Components of our Safety Culture Human Performance Corrective Action Program Learning from Operating Experience Management is fully accountable to establish the highest standards for safety performance!

Westinghouse Safety Culture Westinghouse began its Human Performance (HuP) journey in 2002 Benchmarking with Utilities and INPO in 2002 Pelleting area pilot in 2002 HuP Fundamentals Training in 2003 Site event clock in 2003 Site wide implementation of HuP tools in 2004 Local area learning clocks in 2004

HuP is a Way of Life Pathway to HuP Excellence HuP Training Event/Learning Clocks HuP Tool Application Observation Program HuP Event Investigations Precision Leadership (ABC)

HuP is a Way of Life Tools Handbook Personal Safety Assessment (2-Min Rule) Self Check Peer Check Pre-job Brief Questioning Attitude Time Out Procedure Use and Adherence

HuP and Safety Culture Go Hand in Hand Everyone is personally responsible for nuclear safety. Leaders demonstrate commitment to safety. Trust permeates the organization. Decision-making reflects safety first. Responsibility and authority for nuclear safety are well defined and clearly understood. Reporting relationships, positional authority, staffing, and financial resources support nuclear safety responsibilities. Corporate policies emphasize the overriding importance of nuclear safety Executive and senior managers are the leading advocates of nuclear safety and demonstrate their commitment both in word and action. The nuclear safety message is communicated frequently and consistently, occasionally as a stand-alone theme. Leaders throughout nuclear organization set an example for safety. A high level of trust is established in the organization, fostered, in part, through timely and accurate communication. There is a free flow of information in which issues are raised and addressed. Employees are informed of steps take in response to their concerns. Plant personnel are systematic and rigorous in making decisions that support safe, reliable plant operation. Operators are vested with the authority and understand the expectation, when faced with unexpected or uncertain conditions, to place the plant in a safe condition. Senior leaders support and reinforce conservative decisions.

HuP and Safety Culture Go Hand in Hand (continued) Nuclear technology is recognized as special and unique. A questioning attitude is cultivated. Organizational learning is embraced. Nuclear safety undergoes constant examination. The special characteristics of nuclear technology are taken into account in all decisions and actions. Reactivity control, continuity of core cooling, and integrity of fission product barriers are valued as essential, distinguishing attributes of the nuclear station work environment. Individuals demonstrate a questioning attitude by challenging assumptions, investigating anomalies, and by considering potential adverse consequences of planned actions. This attitude is shaped by an understanding that accidents often result from a series of decisions and actions that reflect flaws in shared assumptions, values, and beliefs of the organization. All employees are watchful for conditions or activities that can have an undesirable effect on plant safety. Operating experience is highly valued, and the capacity to learn from experience is well developed. Training, self-assessments, corrective actions, and benchmarking are used to stimulate learning and improve performance. Oversight is used to strengthen safety and improve performance. Nuclear safety is kept under constant scrutiny through a variety of monitoring techniques, some of which provide an independent “fresh look.”

Corrective Action Program - A Reporting Environment An important part of improving performance is knowing with certainty that openly admitting a mistake will be viewed as a positive behavior The base assumption is that everyone who comes to work desires to do a better job Self reporting is a desired behavior and is rewarded and Honest mistakes are not punished All employees can report issues via variety of systems, REDBOOK, CAPs “Hotline” or paper version, WEC Safety Concerns Hotline Management values learning from reported incidents

Operating Experience Overview Operating experience shared through the CAPs (formal evaluation of applicability/susceptibility) Site/area event clock reset communications Area pre-job briefs Site/area/other licensee/INPO/industry events communicated across the company Learning from operating experience is imperative to continuous improvement.

Fuel Manufacturing Peer Review Process All Westinghouse Fuel Manufacturing Facilities Based on INPO’s Performance Objectives and Criteria Each fuel manufacturing facility is fully evaluated every three years Interim review of all identified Areas for Improvement mid-assessments

Areas Assessed Healthy organizations are self critical! Organization & Administration Operations Maintenance/Work Management Engineering Radiation Protection Industrial Safety Operating Experience Human Performance Training Healthy organizations are self critical!

Safety Culture Summary We are operating the Columbia Plant more safely than ever Continuous Improvement in: Safety Quality Production Systematic programs in place to address key improvements Metrics are showing improvement and the journey continues Working Together The Target is Zero