Socio-Economic Benefits of Austin’s Tree Canopy Final report presented by: Kyle Fuchshuber (Project Manager) Jerad Laxson (Asst. Project Manager) Megan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The demolition-foreclosure-equity connection Michael Schramm Research Associate, Center on Urban Poverty and Community Development, Case Western Reserve.
Advertisements

Evaluating Suitable Locations for the Development and Preservation of Affordable Housing in Florida: The AHS Model Andres Blanco, Ph.D. Jeongseob Kim Hyungchul.
2011 Peer City Review. MID/DSA Dashboard LiveWorkShopPlay.
Social Welfare gains from Community Forests In Orissa, India By, Jon Barnes.
Integrating Land Use in a Hedonic Price Model Using GIS URISA 2001 Yan Kestens Marius Thériault François Des Rosiers Centre de Recherche en Aménagement.
Socio-Economic Benefits of Austin’s Tree Canopy A proposal for analysis presented by: Kyle Fuchshuber (Project Manager) Jerad Laxson (Asst. Project Manager)
Potential Sites in Virginia For Red Wolf Re-introduction Picture courtesy of NPCA.
SPATIAL DATA ANALYSIS Tony E. Smith University of Pennsylvania Point Pattern Analysis Spatial Regression Analysis Continuous Pattern Analysis.
Urban Patterns AP Human Geography. Urban Geography Urban refers to highly developed areas where businesses, people, and industry cluster. Not limited.
Effect of Urbanization on Runoff in the Whiteoak Bayou Watershed in Houston, Texas Francisco Olivera Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering.
Equity of Green Infrastructure Arlington, VA Source: Arlington, VA County Website.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY VALUES: EVIDENCE FROM QUANTILE REGRESSION Velma Zahirovic-Herbert Swarn Chatterjee ERES 2011.
THE COSTS OF SUBURBAN SPRAWL AND URBAN DECAY. What is Suburban Sprawl? Sprawl is unsustainable development that wastes tax dollars, destroys farmland.
Border Effects in Suburban Land Use BENOY JACOB UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO – DENVER DANIEL McMILLEN UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN.
THE VITAL TILLAMOOK INDICATOR PROJECT Tillamook County: 2020 Strategic Vision 2009 Indicator Assessment.
Conditions of Use & Acknowledgement This information may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any reselling or sub-licensing is.
Land Use Impacts of Bus Rapid Transit: The Boston Silver Line Victoria Perk, Senior Research Associate National Bus Rapid Transit Institute Center for.
Poverty, Inequality, Terrorism The Wealth of Villages -coauthor is John S. Felkner (post doc, NORC) Robert M. Townsend University of Chicago.
Market Analysis for Shopping Centers Demand, Supply and Equilibrium Analysis Wayne Foss, MBA, MAI, CRE Foss Consulting Group
Understanding Consumers’ Housing Preferences and Aspiration: A comparative review of two research approaches and application in urban China research Yizhao.
SPATIAL DATA ANALYSIS Tony E. Smith University of Pennsylvania Point Pattern Analysis Continuous Pattern Analysis Spatial Regression Analysis.
Kaelyn Wilke Analysis of Urban Structure in Minnesota’s Twin Cities: Accessibility and Land Use Bolobilly at
The Effects of Different Land Uses in Missouri on Local Fiscal Conditions – Cost of Community Services Project Update – 4/12/02.
Low-Density Urbanization and Southern California Critical Habitats Steven Guerry UP206a Final Project Winter 2011.
Student Population Forecasting Valley Center School District Hugo Wall School of Urban and Public Affairs February 11, 2007.
Meagan Hatton Department of Geography POVERTY AND HIV/AIDS IN EAST TEXAS.
2004 Budget Presentation City Commission Budget Study Session July 2, 2003.
A Policy Evaluation of Planting Street Trees in Morgantown, West Virginia: A Spatial and Benefit-Cost Analysis GIS Conference and Workshop 2004 Vishakha.
Site Location.
Lecture 9 Managing a GIS project. GIS analysis Collect and process data to aid in decision making  Use the data to make decisions  Identify alternatives.
Agenda Background Model for purchase probability (often reffered to as conversion rate) Model for renewwal probability What is the link between price change,
ENVISION TOMORROW UPDATES AND INDICATORS. What is Envision Tomorrow?  Suite of planning tools:  GIS Analysis Tools  Prototype Builder  Return on Investment.
Results of a Hedonic Regression Model That Estimates the Impact of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Stations on Surrounding Residential Property Values Along the.
ACWQ Austin Canopy & Water Quality Progress Report: Austin Tree-Canopy Resource, Phase II Spring 2012, Geography 4427, Texas State University April 2,
Assessing the Benefits of Levees: An Economic Assessment of U.S. Counties with Levees Ezra Boyd Geography Graduate Student Louisiana State University Research.
PPT th Edition. PPT 8-2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Levy/Weitz: Retailing Management, 5/e Copyright © 2004 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
T.E.E.G.S Transportation, Emergency, and Environmental GIS Services Matt Smith Project Manager Lauren Bender GIS Analyst Amanda Magera GIS Analyst Aaron.
Socio-Economic Benefits of Austin’s Tree Canopy Progress report presented by: Kyle Fuchshuber (Project Manager) Jerad Laxson (Asst. Project Manager) Megan.
Thinking About Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behavior 2e Charles T. Blair-Broeker Randal M. Ernst.
1 January 25, Nebraska Profile 2011 NEBRASKA PROFILE Ninth Edition  State, 8 Regions, 93 Counties, plus 18 Cities – Three Volumes  Demographic.
Green Infrastructure Network Design Analysis Beaufort County, North Carolina.
1 January 27, Nebraska Profile 2010 NEBRASKA PROFILE Eighth Edition  State, 8 Regions, 93 Counties, plus 18 Cities – Three Volumes  Demographic.
Measuring the Effects of Light Rail Plans in Portland: A Trilogy Gerrit Knaap Professor and Director National Center for Smart Growth University of Maryland.
Hill Country Associates Pedernales River analysis Team: Kelly Blanton, Erica Tice, William Weldon, and Paul Starkel.
Spectators of Finnish baseball: comparing women’s and men’s games Seppo Suominen.
Mitigation of the Urban Heat Island Effect via NeighborWoods Tree Program Project Manager-Clancy Taylor GIS Analyst/Web Designer-Will Johnston GIS/Remote.
New York City Million Trees Initiative By: Arthur Knapp, Thomas Murray, and Colleen Reynolds.
Clear title: What, Where, When. Clear, readable, neat labels. Good progression of colors. “Balanced” map. Legend labels. Legend includes units. No abbreviations.
The Geography of HIV in Harris County, Texas,
An Analysis of the Geographic Incidence of Social Welfare Factors as they Relate to School Performance of Early Elementary School Children Purpose This.
Chapter 9 The Urban World. Population and Urbanization  As of 2008, half of the world’s population lives in urban areas.
Chapter 13 Achieving our Preferred Future Environment.
Land Cover Classification and Monitoring Case Studies: Twin Cities Metropolitan Area –Multi-temporal Landsat Image Classification and Change Analysis –Impervious.
Encouraging a healthy, thriving community. Supporting a strong local economy. Providing water that is safe to drink and air that’s healthy to breathe.
POPULATION GROWTH Specifically, population growth rate refers to the change in population over a unit time period, often expressed as a percentage of the.
Unit 5: Regression & Correlation Week 1. Data Relationships Finding a relationship between variables is what we’re looking for when extracting data from.
Psychology’s Statistics Appendix. Statistics Are a means to make data more meaningful Provide a method of organizing information so that it can be understood.
Socio-Economic Impact Analysis: Rehabilitation of the Sherman Theater UEDA Community Development Summit October 16, 2014 Lisa Heuler Williams Policy Analyst.
Walkable Urbanism Kenneth Ray Belton, Brittany Tegeler, Joseph Lephew, Nick Umosella Austin, Texas Baltimore, Maryland.
CITY AND COUNTY OF BROOMFIELD 2015 CITIZEN SURVEY PRESENTATION OF RESULTS.
Relationship of vegetation to socioeconomic status in Austin, Texas Kimberly Nichter, Department of Geography and the Environment This study observes the.
Chapter 10 The Urban World. Overview of Chapter 10 o Population and Urbanization Characteristics of Urban Population Characteristics of Urban Population.
Chapter 10 The Urban World
In consultation with the Cleveland Restoration Society.
A Science Sisters Presentation.
North Belle Vernon Community Bank Park
Neighborhood Planning Area
Hill Country Associates Pedernales River analysis
9 The Urban Environment.
Solar Trees in San Francisco
Presentation transcript:

Socio-Economic Benefits of Austin’s Tree Canopy Final report presented by: Kyle Fuchshuber (Project Manager) Jerad Laxson (Asst. Project Manager) Megan Thomas (Editor & Researcher) Eric Tijerina (Graphic Designer & Researcher) Zachary Dye (GIS Specialist & Researcher)

Introduction Urban Tree Canopy and Socio-Economic Benefits: ◦ Carbon sequestration ◦ Reduce Storm Water Runoff ◦ Energy Reduction ◦ Higher Quality of Life ◦ Less $$ (United State Environmental Protection Agency) Benefits of our study ◦ COA legislative decisions ◦ Green future that is economically feasible for Austin, TX

Primary Areas of Study Crime rates ◦ Lower crime = less costs and happy citizens Property values ◦ Higher property value = higher property taxes and affluent citizens

Property Values Research Twin Cities ◦ Increasing tree cover w/in 250 meters = 60% gain in home sale prices Comparison Model ◦ How do external factors relate? (Sander 2010)

Crime Rates research Baltimore ◦ Strong negative relationship Portland ◦ Moderately negative in old growth forests (Donovan, Prestemon, 2010)

Methodology – Tree Canopy and Property Values Single-family residences extracted from parcel data Averages of tree canopy percentages and property market prices per square foot joined to relative census tract area

Apparent patterns… Census tracts are assigned average market price of single- family parcels within tract area Percent tree canopy is assigned to census tracts in same manner

◦ Geographically Weighted Regression  Explanatory variables:  Percentage of tree cover  Texas Education Agency ranked schools  Proximity to parks/natural attractions  Proximity to Cultural Attractions (Theatres, Shopping, Nightlife) Methodology – Tree Canopy and Property Values

= Property Value Geographically Weighted Regression

Ranking of Parks/Natural Areas - Ranking census tracts a. Rank parks by size b. Assign Value by Parks Number Range c. Rank Census Tract by Value of Parks in Individual Tract Parks Ranking - Hot Spot Isolation a. CoA Data Used b. Buffer c. Clip with Study Area d. Intersect Findings for Final

Ranking Schools Most Important Areas: ◦ Shopping Centers/Malls ◦ Cinemas/Theaters ◦ Nightlife Each venue/area was then weighted: ◦ No venues = 0 ◦ Theater, performing arts center, or cinema = 1 ◦ Nightlife area = 1 ◦ Regular shopping center =1 ◦ Major shopping center or mall = 2. If more than one venue exists in a census tract, the values are added up, for a total of up to 5. Values ranged from 0 to 5.

Ranking Schools Schools located by points Each school given Texas Education Agency ranking: ◦ No ranking/data: 1 ◦ Academically unacceptable: 2 ◦ Academically acceptable: 3 ◦ Recognized: 4 ◦ Exemplary: 5 Schools then joined to census tracts ◦ Rank averages calculated Census tracts ranked by: ◦ Number of schools ◦ Average ranking ◦ Most reoccurring school ranking within tract

Tree Canopy’s Effects upon Property Values: Results

Prediction follows High Value = High Tree Coverage pattern Tree Cover and Property Value are directly correlated with no explanatory variables Prediction follows hypothesis: higher percentage of tree cover is associated with higher property values

Prediction with considerations Property value is correlated to tree cover as well as other explanatory variables Areas closer to central business districts and proximity to parks also have an influence on property values

Direct Correlation Tree Cover and Property Value are directly correlated with no explanatory variables Darker hues of red indicate that the area’s property values are more sensitive to tree cover

Explanatory Variables give closer look of reality Property value’s sensitivity to tree cover is correlated with tree cover as well as other explanatory variables Area of highest positive correlation represents 23% of Austin’s singe family homes.

Conclusions 23% of all single-family parcels will benefit greatly from tree coverage. Tree canopy has a positive correlation to property values in the City of Austin

Data TCAD Parcels – Percent Tree Canopy and Property Market Prices US Census Tracts TEA – School Rankings CAPCOG – City of Austin Border Google Earth – Cultural Attractions City of Austin - Parks

Tree Canopy’s Effects upon Crime Rates: Results

Results Figure 1A:

Results Figure 1B:

Results Figure 2A:

Results Figure 2B:

Results Figure 3A:

Results ◦ Figure 3B:

Results Figure 4A:

Results Figure 4B

Results Figure 5A

Results Figure 5B

Discussion Correlation is not particularly significant. More variables need to be considered. Model could have been more confident in its prediction.

Conclusion Increase in tree canopy decreases crime. Greater relationship near downtown.

Data TCAD Parcels – Percent Tree Canopy and Property Market Prices US Census Tracts TEA – School Rankings CAPCOG – City of Austin Border Google Earth – Cultural Attractions City of Austin - Parks

GIS DATA DescriptionFile_NameFeature TypeSource Street CenterlinesSTREETS.zipLine ftp://ftp.ci.austin.tx.us/GIS- Data/Regional/coa_gis.html City of Austin Parkscoa_parks.zipPolygon ftp://ftp.ci.austin.tx.us/GIS- Data/Regional/coa_gis.html 2010 Census census2010_blocks_uscensu s.zipPolygonhttp://txsdc.utsa.edu/ City Limit Boundarycapcog_city_limits.zipPolygonCAPCOG CrimeIncident_Extract.csvPointAustin Police Department Austin Tree and Tax DataTCAD_parcels_2010/zipPolygon ftp://ftp.ci.austin.tx.us/GIS- Data/PARD/Regina/ DescriptionAttributes Used 2010 CensusIncome data Tracts Austin Tree and Tax Data Percent tree canopy/ Land use tax codes Single family use and commercial use Market value of parcels Acreage

Sources Donovan, Geoffrey H., Jeffrey P. Prestemon. (2012)The effect of trees on crime in Portland, Oregon. Environment and Behavior. 44(1): Sander, H., Polasky, S. & Haight, R. G. (2010). The value of urban tree cover: A hedonic property price model in Ramsey and Dakota Counties, Minnesota, USA. Ecological Economics 69(2010), pubs/jrnl/2010/nrs_2010_sander_001.pdf United States Environmental Protection Agency, (2008).Reducing urban heat islands: Compendium of strategies (Chapter 2: Trees and Vegetation). Retrieved from website: