HokieSat Introduction

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AMSAT-NA FOX Satellite Program Review, Status, and Future JERRY BUXTON, NØJY AMSAT VP-ENGINEERING.
Advertisements

Electrical Power Systems Overview Inhibits Sensors Before Inhibits Shunt Regulation SCBR Regulation DC-DC Converters Solar Cells Batteries Battery Box.
System Identification of a Nanosatellite Structure Craig L. Stevens, Jana L. Schwartz, and Christopher D. Hall Aerospace and Ocean Engineering Virginia.
May 17, Capabilities Description of a Rapid Prototyping Capability for Earth-Sun System Sciences RPC Project Team Mississippi State University.
Michael Lampton Overview of Space Sciences Laboratory 16 July 2003.
University Nanosat Program Nanosat-3 Kickoff Briefing 02 February 03 AFOSR Goddard Space Flight Center AIAA AFRL/VS.
Icarus Student Satellite Project Hannah Goldberg Dr. Brian Gilchrist BT Cesul Student Space System Fabrication Lab (S 3 FL) University of Michigan, College.
Surrey Space Centre, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH ESA Wireless Sensor Motes Study George Prassinos, SSC, University of Surrey.
Icarus Student Satellite Project
April 7, 2008University of Minnesota PDR Satellite Structure Subsystem Structural and Vibrational Stress Analysis Presented By: Chris Matthews.
Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
5 - 1 June 4, 2002 Earth Observing-1 GSFC Systems Engineering Seminar: EO-1 Results Section 5 Spacecraft Technologies.
Integrated Orbit and Attitude Control for a Nanosatellite with Power Constraints Bo Naasz Matthew Berry Hye-Young Kim Chris Hall 13th Annual AAS/AIAA Space.
Student Satellite Project University of Arizona Team Goals Design, Fabricate, and Analyze a Structure that will Support the Payload –Space Allocation of.
→ Potential ESA- Roscosmos Cooperation in Education Activities.
1 Formation Flying Shunsuke Hirayama Tsutomu Hasegawa Aziatun Burhan Masao Shimada Tomo Sugano Rachel Winters Matt Whitten Kyle Tholen Matt Mueller Shelby.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Integration and Test Joanne Baker GSFC Code 568 August 16-17, 2005.
1 Formation Flying Project Proposal 2/5/07 Rachel Winters (Team Lead) Aziatun Burhan Tsutomu Hasegawa Shunsuke Hirayama Matt Mueller Masao Shimada Shelby.
ReVeal Passive Illumination by Radar (PAIR). Overview Payload / Mission Communication Launch Orbit Power Thermal Attitude Propulsion Finance.
Tielong Zhang On behalf of the CGS Team in the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Science Spacecraft System and Payload China Geomagnetism.
DemoSat IV Critical Design Review Metropolitan State College of Denver April 21, 2006.
Space Grant Supported Student Space Hardware Programs in Alabama.
Space-Based Network Centric Operations Research. Secure Autonomous Integrated Controller for Distributed Sensor Webs Objective Develop architectures and.
Structures and Mechanisms Subsystems AERSP 401A. Introduction to Structural Estimation Primary Structure: load-bearing structure of the spacecraft Secondary.
DINO PDR 23 October 2015 DINO Systems Team Jeff Parker Anthony Lowrey.
Contractor 3. I. Launch III. Formation Alignment with Star Pictures Data downlink Stationkeeping II. Deployment IV. Deorbit.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Finite Element Analysis (FEA) for Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) Tim Rebold STRC [Tim Rebold] [STRC] [1]
1 Structure (STR) Subsystem Overview Jonah White – STR Co-Lead.
The University Nanosatellite Program: Oculus-ASR NASA Jet Propulsion Lab Summer Intern Cubesat Symposium July 31 st, 2013 Branden Ghena
University Nanosat Competition Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University: SWESat Team Presented by: Stephanie Lengyel AZ Space Grant Symposium April 17 and.
Electric Propulsion for Future Space Missions Part I Bryan Palaszewski Digital Learning Network NASA Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field.
SPHERES 0-G Autonomous Rendezvous and Docking Testbed Presented To DARPA Orbital Express December 2000 MIT Space Systems Laboratory David W. Miller (617)
PARKINSON-SAT EA 469 Spacecraft Design Joe Campbell Thomas Dendinger Greg Lewis Paul Lwin.
SPHERES Reconfigurable Control Allocation for Autonomous Assembly Swati Mohan, David W. Miller MIT Space Systems Laboratory AIAA Guidance, Navigation,
Space Systems LaboratoryMassachusetts Institute of Technology SPHERES Development of Formation Flight and Docking Algorithms Using the SPHERES Testbed.
NASA/Air Force Cost Model presented by Keith Smith Science Applications International Corporation 2002 SCEA National Conference June
Intelligent Distributed Spacecraft Infrastructure Earth Science Vision Session IGARSS 2002 Toronto, CA June 25, Needs for an Intelligent Distributed.
AA21301-DWG01Detail View of Isogrid AA21301-DWG02Top View of End Panel AA21301-DWG03Multiple Views of Side Panels AA21301-DWG04Front View of Side Panel.
March 2004 At A Glance autoProducts is an automated flight dynamics product generation system. It provides a mission flight operations team with the capability.
ST5 PDR June 19-20, Section 4.0 Future Status James A. Slavin Project Scientist 5 Space Technology “Tomorrow’s Technology Today” GSFC.
Goddard Space Flight Center High Earth Orbit GPS Flight Experiment AMSAT-OSCAR 40 (AO-40) Frank H. Bauer NASA Goddard Space Flight Center November 1, 2001.
1 Weekly Summary Weekly Summary Formation Flight AEM4332 Spring Semester March 7,2007 Masao SHIMADA.
August 2003 At A Glance The IRC is a platform independent, extensible, and adaptive framework that provides robust, interactive, and distributed control.
Space Systems Engineering Projects and Capabilities Christopher D. Hall Aerospace and Ocean Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute.
HokieSat Introduction
The Space in Aerospace and Ocean Engineering Courses HokieSat Labs Vomit Comet New Projects Chris Hall, Randolph 224D
BlackBox Sat Critical Design Review Colorado State University-Pueblo April 2, 2004 Greg Barela Jose Segovia Enrique Cornejo.
Predicting Ionospheric Densities and Scintillation with the Communication / Navigation Outage Forecasting System (C/NOFS) Mission Chin S. Lin 1, O. de.
Final Version Gary Davis Robert Estes Scott Glubke Propulsion May 13-17, 2002 Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF)
STEREO IMPACT SEP Critical Design Review 2002-Nov-21/22 TvR1 SEP Mechanical Design Sandy Shuman, GSFC ) Tycho.
Mini Autonomous Flying Vehicle CASDE is part of the National effort to develop a Micro Air Vehicle. CASDE has chosen a Mini Vehicle, in the short term,
Space-Related Undergraduate Research Opportunities Chris Hall Randolph 224D, Chris Hall Randolph 224D,
March 2004 At A Glance The AutoFDS provides a web- based interface to acquire, generate, and distribute products, using the GMSEC Reference Architecture.
ION-F Sensors USUSat –4 external accelerometers –8 internal thermocouples UW Dawgstar –3 external accelerometers –8 internal thermocouples VT HokieSat.
Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mechanical George Roach Dave Peters 17 May 2002 “Technological progress is like an axe in the.
1 Space Test Program - Houston 4 Payload Overview POIWG, 26 Jul 2012.
 From SmallSat to CubeSat: Reducing Mass Size and Cost Jeremy Straub 1, Ronald Fevig 2, Todd Borzych 2, Chris Church 2, Curt Holmer 2, Martin Hynes 2,
Utah State University - University of Washington - Virginia Tech.
Preliminary Platform Design for KuaFu-A
Overview 3 2 Introduction Design Analysis Fabrication Testing
Integrated Thermal Analysis of the Iodine Satellite (iSAT) from Preliminary to Critical Design Review October 20th 2016 Stephanie Mauro NASA Marshall Space.
CINEMA Orbit/Attitude? (looking down from top toward earth)
Spacecraft Structures
CUSat High Altitude Test (CHAT) Mission Briefing
Principal Investigator/University: PI: Elaine Hansen,
Systems Engineering Management
System Identification of a Nanosatellite Structure
Spring Teflon Fuel Bar Ultem 2300 Thruster Assembly Mica-paper / Foil
Structures March 13, 2004.
Systems Integration Christopher Bessette Alexander Reich
Presentation transcript:

HokieSat Introduction Daniel Pedraza Systems & Operations HokieSat dpedraza@vt.edu 22 August, 2002

Overview Introduction Mission & System Overview 3CS Mission ION-F Mission Design/Configuration Structure/Mass Propulsion Testing

Mission and System Overview Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) “TechSat-21” Investigate small, distributed spacecraft systems Missions of larger, single platforms University Nanosatellite Program (UNP) Purpose: help explore and implement technologies of small satellites 10 schools

Participating Universities Emerald Orion 3-Corner Sat ION-F Nanosat-1 Nanosat-2

Mission and System Overview VT-ISMM Virginia Tech Ionospheric Scintillation Measurement Mission Single satellite investigation Design quickly integrated with: Utah State University University of Washington VT-ISMM =====> ION-F

Mission and System Overview ION-F Formation Flying Mission NASA-Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) Many algorithms developed at GSFC Earth Observer 1 (EO-1) flies with Landsat 7 Three (3) satellites with propulsive capabilities Demonstrate more involved formation flying routines

Nanosat-2 Brief Milestone Schedule Mar01 Jun01 Sep01 Dec01 Mar02 04-06April 01 CDR 25 May 01 (est.) Phase 0/1 Safety Review Phase 2 Safety Package Development Phase 3 Safety Package Development 15 July 01 MSDS Fabrication 01 December 01 Nanosat Delivery Integration and Test

University Nanosatellite Program Overview University Nanosatellites DESCRIPTION Nine U.S. universities are producing nine nanosatellites. The nanosats will be deployed via 2 flight missions from Space Shuttle SHELS hardware (Nanosat-1 and Nanosat-2) The nanosats are organized into 3 subclusters for the purposes of demonstrating formation flying, inter-satellite collaborative processing/ communication, and autonomous control operations and data downlink Each nanosat cluster incorporates unique technology demonstrations and science measurement capabilities Sponsors: Air Force Research Labs, NASA’s Goddard Flight Center AFRL Multi-Satellite Deployment System (MSDS) NASA Shuttle Hitchhiker Experiment Launch System (SHELS)

3 CS Introduction/System Three Corner Sat Introduction/Systems Arizona State University New Mexico State University University of Colorado at Boulder

3CS Mission 3 universities working together to develop constellation of 3 identical satellites ~2 year development schedule Launched as stack on NASA Space Shuttle Each university emphasizing its past heritage Innovative, low-cost solutions & development encouraged

3CS Mission Objectives Inter-satellite Communications Virtual Formation Flying Distributed & Automated Operations Imaging Modular, Generic Design Micropropulsion Experiment Student Education

ION-F Introduction/System Introduction/Systems Virginia Tech University of Washington Utah State University

ION-F Mission Investigate satellite coordination and management technologies and distributed ionosphere scintillation measurements Coordinate on satellite design, formation flying, management mission development, science instruments, mission Design and implement internet-based operations centers, enabling each university to control its satellite from a remote location

Multiple Satellite Deployment System Mission 3CS Configuration: ION-F USUSat Dawgstar The MSDS is under concurrent development with the university nanosatellites, and serves to supports the TechSat-21 Program. HokieSat Scenario: Multiple Satellite Deployment System

Separation Scenarios With current separation rate, we will be in constellation mode for 8 days, after that we are on individual mode

Multiple Satellite Deployment System (MSDS) 1. MSDS is released from SHELS 2. 96 hours later stacks separated from MSDS 3. 102 hours later satellites separated from each other. Nanosat-1 is an unpowered bus while it is mounted in the payload bay Differentiate between safety inhibits that prevent power from being available to to recontact hazards versus non-recontact hazards (i.e., T2 vs T1). Identify examples of recontact and non-recontact hazards Four day delay between Nanosat-1 ejection and Stack Ejection is provided in order to allow the shuttle to land, thus eliminating the potential for recontact. Recommended time between stack separation (T3) and intersatellite separation (T4) is approximately 1 hour

Leader / Follower Formation Orbit Ground Track

Same Ground Track Formation Orbit Ground Track

Design HokieSat 18.25” (~ 45 cm) major diameter hexagonal prism 12” tall (30 cm) 39 lbs (~18 kg) Isogrid Structure Composite Side Panels 0.23” isogrid 0.02” skins

External Configuration GPS Antenna Crosslink Antenna Solar Cells LightBand Pulsed Plasma Thrusters Data Port Camera Downlink Antenna Uplink Antenna Science Patches

Internal Configuration Crosslink Components Cameras Power Processing Unit Torque Coils (3) Magnetometer Camera Pulsed Plasma Thrusters (2) Camera Battery Enclosure Downlink Transmitter Electronics Enclosure Rate Gyros (3)

VT Structures Overview

HokieSat Structure Panel 6 Panel 5 Panel 4 Nadir/Zenith Panel Panel 1

Hardware Description: Nadir and Zenith Heritage: None Ø0.190x3 Thru Description: Nadir and Zenith Heritage: None Manufacturer: In-House/Techsburg Properties: Al 6061 T-6, Class 3 Irridite (MIL-C-5541-E) Mass: 1.70 lbm (0.773 kg) Status: Prototype Complete

Mass Total Mass = 16.6 lbm (7.57 kg)

Mass Breakdown (Stack) Total Mass = 118.8 lb (54 kg)

Propulsion Propulsion subsystem requirements Schematic VT thruster arrangement System parameters Operations summary

Propulsion Subsystem Requirements Provide thrust required for the formation flying mission (phase 1) 22 m/s DV required Orbit raising to extend life (phase 2) Remaining propellant Augment torque coils for yaw attitude control

VT Thruster Arrangement Top View 1 2 3 4

Schematic Spring Ultem 2300 Teflon Fuel Bar Thruster Assembly Mica-paper / Foil Capacitor Ultem Isolator Cathode Boron Nitride Insulator Anode Thruster mount

System Parameters Power

Interfaces Structural Power 4 thruster nozzle holes, sized and placed as defined in drawings 2 thruster mounts, attached directly to isogrid nodes Power Requires 13 watts at 28 volts for translation System can tolerate a decrease in voltage to 16.5 volts No power required when system not in use Approximate duty cycle: 3% for formation keeping 10% for formation maneuvering

Solar Cell Tecstar Triple-Junction 24% Cascade cells Heritage on DS-1, MightySat, SMEX, TRACE, others Cell Dimensions: 2.497” x 1.522” (6.25 x 3.75 cm) 0.030” spacing between cells Cells supplied kitted Cover glass Diode on each cell Interconnects

Fabrication Composite structure comprised of 0.23” isogrid and 0.02” skin

Static Testing Strength & stiffness test of structure without skin panels Strength & stiffness test of loading fixture

Static Testing Strength & stiffness test of structure with skin panels Experiment demonstrated a 32% gain in stiffness in the cantilever mode due to addition of skins Skins added less than 8% to the total mass

Modal (tap) Testing of Side Panels Dynamic Testing Modal (tap) Testing of Side Panels Hammer provides impulsive input Accelerometer measures accelerations used to characterize natural frequencies Tap testing with and without skins Verification of predictions of finite element analysis

Up-Link Antenna Pictures

Clean Room Pictures

Research Projects Agency Acknowledgements Air Force Research Laboratory Air Force Office of Scientific Research Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency NASA Goddard Space Flight Center NASA Wallops Flight Facility Test Center University of Washington Utah State University Virginia Tech Professor A. Wicks Professor B. Love Members of ION-F AFOSR Goddard Space Flight Center STP Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency