V-1 A New Satellite Time Service Enhancing and Extending LORAN-C Al Gifford National Institute of Standards and Technology James Doherty Institute for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to the Global Positioning System
Advertisements

Lecture 1: Logical, Physical & Casual Time (Part 2) Anish Arora CSE 763.
Where do precise orbits and clocks come from? Kristine M. Larson ASEN 6090 Spring 2010.
GN/MAE155B1 Orbital Mechanics Overview 2 MAE 155B G. Nacouzi.
Space Engineering I – Part I
1 1 COMPASS Satellite Navigation System Development Nov. 26 th -28 th, 2008, Beijing China Satellite Navigation Project Center SIDEREUS 2008.
Prince William Composite Squadron Col M. T. McNeely Presentation for AGI Users Conference CIVIL AIR PATROL PRESENTS The CAP-STK Aerospace Education Program.
Pseudolite Network for Space Users A GPS Augmentation Study for NASA Headquarters Code M-3 Thomas R. Bartholomew Kevin L. Brown Al Gifford.
Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) E. Douglas Aguilar CAPT, USAF.
Background Accessibility Popularity of GPS and INS –Cell phones Apple iPhone, Blackberry, Android platform –Nintendo Wii Wii Remote, MotionPlus.
GTECH 201 Session 08 GPS.
Presented by Rehana Jamal (GIS Expert & Geographer) Dated: Advance Applications of RS/GIS in Geo-Environmental Conservation Subject Lecture-6.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 14 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
1 What is GPS?. The Global Positioning System Constellation GPS is a global navigation satellite system developed by the U.S. Department of Defense, managed.
Know the Earth…Show the Way NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Approved for Public Release NGA Case # NGA’s Role in GPS Barbara Wiley.
Geographic Information Systems
Aviation Considerations for Multi-Constellation GNSS Leo Eldredge, GNSS Group Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) December 2008 Federal Aviation Administration.
How Global Positioning Devices (GPS) work
Tough Engineering Challenges Radar -Phase noise degrades sensitivity -Need to simulate range of return signals RF/Microwave Comms Systems -Higher order.
Technical Forestry GPS and GIS Systems Shawn Linder 7/29/02.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room
USNO Report CGSIC Timing Subcommittee April 19, 2002 Lisa Nelson Time Service Department ; DSN
V-1 Common-View LORAN-C for Precision Time and Frequency Recovery Tom Celano, Timing Solutions Corp LT Kevin Carroll, USCG Loran Support Unit Michael Lombardi,
Satellite Engineering Research Corporation Practical Relativistic Timing Effects in GPS and Galileo Robert A. Nelson Satellite Engineering Research Corporation.
SVY 207: Lecture 4 GPS Description and Signal Structure
GLONASS Government Policy, Status and Modernization
GPS Status and Modernization 3 rd International Satellite Navigation Forum Moscow, Russia 12 May 2009 Lt Col Tim Lewallen, US Air Force Acting Chief, PNT.
Report From the U.S. Naval Observatory Dr. Demetrios Matsakis CGSIC Timing Session September 16, 2008.
Earth Science Applications of Space Based Geodesy DES-7355 Tu-Th 9:40-11:05 Seminar Room in 3892 Central Ave. (Long building) Bob Smalley Office: 3892.
NGS GPS ORBIT DETERMINATION Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic.
O n t h e T r a c k o f M o d e r n P h y s i c s Equation of motion to post-Newtonian order In 1918 J. Lense and H. Thirring, noted from the general relativity.
Space Geodesy (1/3) Geodesy provides a foundation for all Earth observations Space geodesy is the use of precise measurements between space objects (e.g.,
10/7/ Innovative Solutions International Satellite Navigation Division ION NTM 01 Capabilities of the WAAS and EGNOS For Time Transfer SBAS, an Alternate.
How Does GPS Work ?. Objectives To Describe: The 3 components of the Global Positioning System How position is obtaining from a radio timing signal Obtaining.
GPS(Global Positioning System) -An Introduction. What is the GPS? Orbiting navigational satellites Transmit position and time data Handheld receivers.
WIRELESS REVOLUTION Robert Boyd Robert Wall Wanda Mattie.
High Accuracy Nationwide Differential Global Positioning System (HA-NDGPS) UPDATE Jim Arnold September, 2009.
Global Positioning System
James T. Doherty Institute for Defense Analyses 16 October 2007
By Andrew Y.T. Kudowor, Ph.D. Lecture Presented at San Jacinto College.
Guidance and Navigation
1 The Global Positioning System (GPS). 2 nd USAF Space Operations Squadron.
CGSIC Timing Subcommittee March 11, 2004 USNO Report U.S. Naval Observatory Washington, DC Francine Vannicola
Demetrios Matsakis and Harold Chadsey
CRGIS Global Positioning Systems The Basics CRGIS National Park Service.
GPS: Everything you wanted to know, but were afraid to ask Andria Bilich National Geodetic Survey.
Harry Williams, Cartography1 Surveying Techniques II. GPS Despite the fact that Global Positioning Systems use very modern technology, the basic concept.
Extending the GPS Paradigm to Space Exploration
Space platform and Orbits Introduction to Remote Sensing Instructor: Dr. Cheng-Chien LiuCheng-Chien Liu Department of Earth Sciences National Cheng Kung.
UNCLASSIFIEDUNCLASSIFIED Lesson 2 Basic Orbital Mechanics A537 SPACE ORIENTATION A537 SPACE ORIENTATION.
Goddard Space Flight Center High Earth Orbit GPS Flight Experiment AMSAT-OSCAR 40 (AO-40) Frank H. Bauer NASA Goddard Space Flight Center November 1, 2001.
Precision Agriculture: GPS and Differential Corrections.
Flight Planning and Navigation GPS Navigation © 2011 Project Lead The Way, Inc.Aerospace Engineering.
Global Positioning System Overview
What exactly is a satellite? The word satellite originated from the Latin word “Satellite”- meaning an attendant, one who is constantly hovering around.
West Hills College Farm of the Future. West Hills College Farm of the Future Precision Agriculture – Lesson 2 What is GPS? Global Positioning System Operated.
Chapter 2 GPS Crop Science 6 Fall 2004 October 22, 2004.
Satellite Engineering Research Corporation Precise Time Synchronization Throughout the Solar System Robert A. Nelson Satellite Engineering Research Corporation.
March /5/2016 At A Glance STARS is a real-time, distributed, multi-spacecraft simulation system for GN&C technology research and development. It.
View on GPS and Galileo ‘From across the Atlantic…’ Ruth E. Neilan International GNSS Service (IGS) Central Bureau Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California.
From you host … Dr. H. Introduction Communications design requires us to think about the following issues: Communications design requires us to think.
GPS Status and Modernization Munich Satellite Navigation Summit Munich, Germany 3 March 2009 Colonel David Buckman, US Air Force PNT Command Lead Air Force.
Kenneth Johnston US Naval Observatory Presented by Jules McNeff International Committee on GNSS Provider’s Forum Bangalore, India 4 September 2007 GPS.
CGSIC Meeting – March 11, 2004 EUROPEAN COMMISSION GPS / Galileo Time Offset ICD Development presented by Jörg Hahn (ESA), E. Powers (USNO)
Revised 10/30/20061 Overview of GPS FORT 130 Forest Mapping Systems.
Younis H. Karim, AbidYahya School of Computer University Malaysia Perlis 1.
AE Review Orbital Mechanics.
TRANSMISION LINE PROTECTION USING GPS PRESENTED BY:- KAJAL MOR M.TECH(PS)
Off-Road Equipment Management TSM 262: Spring 2016
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 14
Presentation transcript:

V-1 A New Satellite Time Service Enhancing and Extending LORAN-C Al Gifford National Institute of Standards and Technology James Doherty Institute for Defense Analysis Tom Bartholomew Northrop Grumman TASC

V-2 Overview The basic idea presented is the measurement of time differences between LORAN stations using a two-way-time-transfer device on NASA satellites A new LORAN S-band 2ns time service is proposed The technology, devices and development process will be discussed Projected performance goals of the enhanced and upgraded LORAN services are presented

V-3 Basic Idea LORAN-C is upgrading the three elements of timekeeping –Clocks upgraded to Agilent 5071s (approximately 100) –Clock measurement capability upgraded to state-of-the-art; includes and GPS receiver for cross-site measurement –Clock management will include ensembling of site clocks and a possible calculation of a system wide distributed time scale (steering to UTC(USNO) is the current plan) LORAN navigation and time services will be significantly enhanced This paper proposes an extension of these LORAN services Utilizing the LORAN state-of-art distributed timekeeping system, an Ultra High Precision (UHP) global time service operation at S-band from NASA satellites could be realized

V-4 Enhanced and Extended Services Regional Services Navigation Time (50-500ns) GPS Augmentation Global Services Time (<2ns) Ephemeris Upgraded LORAN-C Satellite Time Service

V-5 Why? UHP Time users with global applications are dependent solely on GPS USNO’s primary time transfer vehicle is GPS and its alternate to UHP users (Two-way Satellite Time & Frequency Transfer) is operated from only a single location A Backup to the DOD Positioning-Navigation-Timing (PNT) infrastructure is required DOD Instructions require backup for some applications (e.g. C4ISR) LORAN is a UHP user that would benefit from an alternate UHP time transfer service

V-6 Why Extend LORAN Services? LORAN has invested a significant amount in a distributed timekeeping system in order to provide a robust regional navigation and time service –Internally, time will be managed to the 15ns level via GPS direct broadcast There is a potential of utilizing GPS common view measurements to compute an independent time scale –The broadcast LORAN signals will provide UTC <500ns –This service meets Stratum I frequency requirements but is not suitable for UHP users –Time service will gradually degrade in the absence of GPS service The LORAN infrastructure could provide the basis for a UHP satellite service utilizing its distributed clock assets as a flywheel time scale –This LORAN capability coupled with recent technology developments in communications based time-transfer devices could enable a 2ns global time transfer system

V-7 How it could work LORAN would compute a distributed time scale with the cross-station measurements of clocks Using the GPS timekeeping model, LORAN system time would be steered to UTC through USNO or directly to UTC(BIPM) NASA would provide a time-based-comms device on several satellites which would be accessible to multiple users LORAN operators would schedule the collection times for satellite and ground assets and upload these schedules The comm devices would initiate the measurements and provide these clock time differences to the operators in real-time A Low Earth Orbiting (LEO) satellite would require an atomic clock in order to flywheel between station measurements A Geosynchronous (GEO) satellite could provide continuous regional measurements between sites

V-8 Satellite Time Service A LORAN/NASA Operated System LEO GEO A LEO Implementation would require an atomic clock of the type that is flown on GPS IIR. LEO coverage is global. A GEO Implementation would not require an atomic clock and could provide service continuously. GEO coverage is regional

V-9 The Technologies Metrology: independent verification of time transfer –Flight verification of metrology in DARPA AT3 program Two-way Time Transfer measurement Understanding and implementing physical principles –Handbook and simulator for relativistic time transfer –Relativistic transformation of satellite proper time to coordinated time The hardware devices –NASA/Goddard Low Power Transceiver (LPT) (supporting manned missions) –NASA/JPL BlackJack receiver (supporting science missions) The test and evaluation –Current aircraft testing underway Flight opportunities –LPT to fly on shuttle in early 03; time transfer mods to be complete in 04 –BlackJack is currently flying on NASA science missions –Both devices will be utilized for time transfer on the Space Station

V-10 Clock offset data for the entire test period. The AT3 PVTF risk-reduction flight tests were conducted on a T-39 aircraft flown by the 412 Test Wing at Edwards AFB, CA. Verification of Metrology

V-11 The estimated relativity effects during flight test 1 were: Gravity: 9.4 ns (fast) Velocity:-1.63 ns (slow) Sagnac:-0.1ns (slow) Total:7.66 ns (fast) Measured:5.97 ns (fast) Delta:1.69 ns The estimated relativity effects for flight test 3 are: Gravity: 5.83 ns (fast) Velocity:-1.19 ns (slow) Sagnac: 0.0 ns Total:4.64 ns (fast) Measured:7.29 ns (fast) Delta: ns Looking across all three flight tests, the relativity prediction error statistics were: The estimated relativity effects during flight test 2 were: Gravity: 8.96 ns (fast) Velocity:-1.64 ns (slow) Sagnac:-0.11 ns (slow) Total:7.21 ns (fast) Measured:5.2 ns (fast) Delta:2.01 ns

V-12 Satellite orbital properties Satellite ISSTOPEXGPSMolniyaGEOTundra Semimajor axis km Eccentricity Inclination deg Argument of perigee deg Apogee altitude km Perigee altitude km Ascending node altitude km Period of revolution s Mean motion mrad/s rev/d Mean velocity km/s Clock effects Secular time dilation  s/d Secular redshift  s/d Net secular effect  s/d Amplitude of periodic effect due to eccentricity ns Peak-to-peak periodic effect due to eccentricity ns Secular oblateness contribution to redshift ns/d Amplitude of periodic effect due to oblateness ps Peak-to-peak periodic effect due to oblateness ps Amplitude of periodic tidal effect of Moon ps Amplitude of periodic tidal effect of Sun ps Signal propagation Maximum Sagnac effect ns Gravitational propagation delay along radius ps Amplitude of periodic fractional Doppler shift 10  Excerpt from Handbook on Relativistic Time Transfer

V-13 NASA/Goddard LPT

V-14 Enhanced and Extended LORAN Three Levels of Configuration and Performance Core/GPS: LORAN station timing systems interoperating with direct GPS and GPS common view between stations Core/GPS/STS: Interoperating via STS satellite(s) with TWTT and direct GPS and common view Core/STS: Operation using only LORAN system time-scale as reference input to STS; time-scale available via LORAN-C and STS

V-15 Predicted Performance of Enhanced and Extended LORAN System Conf Time Transfer WRT UTC Frequency Transfer “UTC” Recovery without GPS Flywheel (F w ) Independent of GPS Comments CORE/ GPS ns1x ns + RSS F w Time <1 μs (days) Freq< (forever) CORE/ GPS/ STS <5ns (STS) <200ns (Loran) 2x x <15ns (STS) + RSS F w <200ns (Loran) + RSS F w Time < 100ns (years) Freq <1x (forever) STS implemented on LEO CORE/ STS (no GPS) <5ns (STS) <200ns (Loran) 2x x <15ns (STS) + RSS F w <200ns (Loran) + RSS F w Time < 100ns (years) Freq <1x (forever) STS implemented on LEO

V-16 Summary The basic idea presented in this presentation was the measurement of time differences between LORAN stations using a two-way-time-transfer device on NASA satellites A new LORAN time service would provide backup to GPS in UHP applications (including LORAN) The technology is mature enough to support this proposed Satellite Time Service

V-17 CLOCK 1 Time = T CLOCK 2 Time=T MEAS 2 = T 2 - (T 1 +T D ) MEAS 1 = T 1 - (T 2 +T D ) Desired Measurement: T 2 - T 1 =.5*(MEAS 2 - MEAS 1 ) Basic Two-Way Time Transfer Measurement Measurement Requirements 1) Event (pulse) to measure 2) Low noise measurement of event 3) Mechanism to exchange data between locations 4) Reciprocal Delay (over measurement interval) Where: T 1 = Time of Clock 1 T 2 = Time of Clock 2 T D = Propagation Delay Backup

V-18 Cross-Site Data via GEO  Daily data sets color coded  Standard Deviation of measurement noise is < 1ns  Long term variation in curve can be attributed to clock steering at RUNWAY and REGIME Higher Noise due to lower bandwidth REGIME Clock beginning to fail REGIME Clock degraded REGIME Clock replaced REGIME timing deviation due to new clock Backup

V-19 Two-way time transfer using Fiber Data collected in the lab from SONET fiber optic timing equipment (best case scenario) –17 ps rms over 12 hours Backup