THE ADVANCED DISTRIBUTED LEARNING (ADL) INITIATIVE

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
18 March 2004 Colin Milligan funded by. © RELOAD 2003, funded by Workshop Structure Session I Introduction: Interoperability and Reload Session II Content.
Advertisements

Learning Technology Standards A Layperson's Guide to Who s Who and What s What Updated November 25, 2002 by Jonathan Dean Oracle iLearning Product Management.
Learning Objects Network We see the e-knowledge market being the next major growth phase of the Internet Michael Moe, Merrill Lynch Tom Barefoot, Chief.
Slide 1 Learning Objects Network. 2 U.S. Dept. of Defense Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) Association of American Publishers 40.
Design and Implementation of WBT System Components and Test Tools for WBT content standard K. Nakabayashi, Y. Kubota(NTT-X,Inc./ Advanced Learning Infrastructure.
Mobile phones as a tool for learning by Mats Reinsby
Standardisation Issues in eLearning by Diptendu Dutta AUNWESHA Presented at IEEE Computer Chapter 19 th October, 2001.
A Standard and an eLearning Platform for LEMAIA: SCORM and Moodle Antonio De Nicola.
IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee Report to Plugfest 9 Prepared by Robby Robson Chair, LTSC February 23, 2005 LTSC This work.
Learning Content Standards Demos, Details, and De-mystification Robby Robson, Eduworks Chair, IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee
Trends & Issues: Breakout Session Robby Robson Standards Evangelist.
Reusable Learning Objects V i r t u a l C o l l e g e Kristi Lozano Director of Distance Education.
E-Learning: No Standards; No Coalitions - No Boom Ed Walker 7 December 2000.
Content Reusability in Learning Management Systems Priit Mägi DAP01s.
IM Lab NCCU 1 Introduction of SCORM: Sharable Content Object Reference Model Hao-Chuan Wang Computer Science Department National Chengchi University 2003.
OKI Focus Groups at Educause, October 2002 Page 1 Open Knowledge Initiative Educause Focus Group Geoff Collier and Robby Robson, Eduworks Educause 2002,
May 18, 2004SCORM/NSDL Technical Meeting SCORM/NSDL Technical Meeting Alexandria, Virginia May 18, 2004 Reusability & Persistence: Talking Points -Robby.
Efficient Development through SCORM Standards Paul F. Merrill Michael D. Bush Thor Anderson
Interoperability and API Open, standards based architecture Bruno Van Haetsdaele Chief Architect.
SCORM Ahmed I. Deeb Dr. Anwar Mousa  presenter  instructor University Of Palestine-2009 Presentation about.
Asst.Prof.Dr.Surasak Mungsing. By: Akshay Kumar Sharable Content Object Reference Model.
Wednesday, October 22, E-Learning Objects: The Value of SCORM and MPEG-7 Packaging for Digital Media Assets TRACK 3: TEACHING AND LEARNING Thursday,
Implementation Alternatives for Web-based Learning Architecture by Diptendu Dutta Anwesa ( Presented at IWDC 2001 Kolkata 28 th December,
Learning Resource iNterchange
Why E-Learning Standards?
Update: © Copyright 2002, Carnegie Mellon University All Right Reserved 1/59 ADL/SCORM - What Does it Mean for Developers of ICT Projects? Daniel.
IT Standards for Learning
SCORM By: Akshay Kumar. SCORM 2 What we want? What is SCORM? What is SCORM? Connection with e-learning Connection with e-learning Application of XML Technology.
Implementation Fest 2005 Mr. Paul JesukiewiczADL Co-Lab Mrs. Judy BrownAcademic ADL Co-Lab Dr. Xiangen HuWorkforce ADL Co-Lab Maj Dave KitchenCanada ADL.
Eduworks EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS Robby Robson Eduworks Corporation CELL:
Accelerating e-Learning Interoperability Introducing the CLEO Lab Tyde Richards IBM Mindspan Solutions Daniel R. Rehak Carnegie Mellon University.
IMS Europe Kevin Riley IMS, European Development
Federated Search for Learning Paul Jesukiewicz Director, ADL Initiative 11/18/2009.
New trends in Semantic Web Cagliari, December, 2nd, 2004 Using Standards in e-Learning Claude Moulin UMR CNRS 6599 Heudiasyc University of Compiègne (France)
Malaysian Grid for Learning October DC 2004, Shanghai, China. © 2004 MIMOS Berhad. All Rights Reserved Metadata Management System DC2004: International.
Publishing Digital Content to a LOR Publishing Digital Content to a LOR 1.
A TOUR OF LEARNING TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS Robby Robson, Chair, IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee The slides in this work are each separately licensed.
IMS Overview and ePortfolio Specification 3 Nov 2004 Steve Griffin Executive Dir. Int’l Developer and Adopter Support, Co-Founder IMS Global Learning Consortium.
Learning Technology Standards Status & Direction
Learning Technology Interoperability Standards Niall Sclater, and Lorna M. Campbell,
Computer-based Training.  Overview  Package Content  Manifest  Organization  Runtime Environment  Tools  Demo.
Creating a RLO (Reusable Learning Objects) strategy for the inter-agency Pharmacy Technician blended learning project Presenter: Dr. Carole Bagley, Ph.D.
IEEE Learning Technology Standards AICC MEETING – FEB 2004.
The SCORM Runtime Environment Chris Poole: Senior Content Developer The Scorm Runtime Environment An Overview By Chris Poole.
Standards, Reusability, and the Mating Habits of Learning Content Robby Robson Eduworks Corporation
Content and Learning Management Robby Robson Standards Evangelist.
LTSC Report 6 – February LTSC Status No significant change Next meeting (plenary): March co-located with ISO/IEC JTC1 SC36 and CEN/ISSS TC-Learning.
Metadata for e-Learning Objects Ya-ning Arthur Chen, Shu-jiun Sophy Chen Computing Centre, Academia Sinica APAN/PRAGMA 2003 Conference in Fukuoka 22 Jan.,
The Perfect SCORM Sharable Content Objects. Agenda  Welcome – Who Are We  History Of SCORM (RLOs)  SCORM Solution  The Need For SCORM  Do We Need.
SCORM Course Meta-data 3 major components: Content Aggregation Meta-data –context specific data describing the packaged course SCO Meta-data –context independent.
Overview of SC 32/WG 2 Standards Projects Supporting Semantics Management Open Forum 2005 on Metadata Registries 14:45 to 15:30 13 April 2005 Larry Fitzwater.
SCORM Status. 2 Stabilization, Clarification and Issue Resolution Bug Fixes, Corrections & Clarifications SCORM 2004 January 2004 SCORM nd Edition.
Advancing ADL Through Global Collaboration1 ADVANCING ADL THROUGH GLOBAL COLLABORATION COLLABORATION & STEWARDSHIP Robby Robson, Chair
LTSC Report to SAB1 Learning Technology Standing Committee Sponsor Report October, 2006.
IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee Sponsor report to the CS SAB March 28, 2008.
Macquarie University Library E-Learning Standards “Perfecting the Irrelevant”? Maxine Brodie CAUL Meeting Teaching & Learning Forum Hobart 2004.
School of Education Technology, Beijing Normal University Research on the Organization Model of Ubiquitous Learning Resource Shengquan Yu
Overview Collected learning resources Competencies Registry/ Authority Course Delivery system Student Pedagogy Tests/ assessment Activities Communication.
LEARNING STANDARDS UPDATE BAJA 2:45 PM TUESDAY SET YOUR RESPONSE DEVICES FOR CHANNEL 40.
March 8 -9, SAB Vice Chair's Report IEEE LTSC SPONSOR REPORT March 9, 2005.
Event 1 Learning Objects, Interoperability and Standards Hugh Davis.
SCORM conformance and authoring software Dr Tabetha Newman Information Transfer Tel. +44 (0) August 2002.
SCORM-kooskõlaliste õpihaldussüsteemide arendamisest Andres Mellik Tallinna Ülikool Veebruar 2006.
Learning Technology Interoperability Standards Lorna M. Campbell and Boon Low CETIS and the University of Strathclyde LMC, SURF Presentation, April 2002.
Third meeting of the Valkenburg Group  Informal network of EML implementers and developers.  Established following the “Developing an EML Authoring and.
Report to CETIS EC SIG Meeting
Il processo di standardizzazione della formazione in rete
LETSI Technical Roadmap WG
Presentation transcript:

THE ADVANCED DISTRIBUTED LEARNING (ADL) INITIATIVE Paul Jesukiewicz Director, ADL Co-Lab February 16, 2004

The “A” in ADL SCORM Air Force Industry Academia Army Publishers • Publishers Air Force CDC Dept of Labor Server K-12 Global Knowledge SCORM This slide returns to the vision of the future that guides and motivates the ADL initiative. We, along with many other stakeholders, envision a future focused on the integration of cooperatively created objects -- a future that replaces today’s private creation of objects intended for one-time-only use. As the slide suggests, accomplishment of this vision is keyed to the availability of courseware objects that are genuinely shareable. Such sharability does not now exist. We need capabilities that allow us to: - Move courses from one courseware system to any other, - Reuse content “chunks” across different courseware systems, and - Access searchable content or media repositories created by any courseware system. At present, we lack these enabling capabilities. We need to develop them. The technical capabilities emphasized by the ADL initiative are intended to do that -- to develop sharable courseware objects with the functional capabilities needed to fulfill our vision of the future of instruction -- a future that we are beginning to view as inevitable. The uncertainty lies in whether it will appear sooner or later. What, then, must be done to make courseware objects globally available to servers assembling material in real-time and on demand? Job Performance Shareable Content Objects from across the World Wide Web Assembled in real-time, on-demand To provide learning and assistance anytime, anywhere

Sharable Content Object Reference Model A software model that defines the interrelationship of course components, data models, and protocols such that content “objects” are sharable across systems that conform with the same model.

ADL Resulting in a World Wide Community for Learning Technology CEN/ISSS ISO/IEC JTC1 SC36 PROMETEUS LOM (metadata) is an approved IEEE standard. ARIADNE Dublin Core Singapore AICC API based on Appendix B in the AICC CMI document and widespread SCORM usage is now an approved IEEE standard. IMS Asia ALIC IMS Australia

ADL Model for Standards Evolution -SCORM is not a standard, rather it is a model that references standards. ADL Initiative works with a variety of organizations to coordinate the development and adoption of technical standards that enable Internet-based delivery of rich learning content. Among ADL’s greatest achievements has been the coordination with multiple global organizations to establish a unified standard process that is industry-based. With research and development efforts being feed into organizations including AICC, ARIADNE, Dublin Core, IMS, etc, these research and development efforts grow into e-learning specifications. When specification is mature enough and of interest, ADL provides testing and proof of concepts in the ADL Co-laboratories. ADL feeds lessons learned, deficiencies, and comments back into the specification groups. This will occur again and again before the document moves from specification to accredited standard.

ADL Certification and Adopters ADL Certified Products are certified through one of the ADL Certification Testing Centers. 28 LMS/LCMSs have been certified 10 Content products have been certified 94 products/vendors have become SCORM Adopters to include test logs and descriptions of SCORM products

Enterprise Exemplars Org Users Learning Content* Standards Usage Oracle 600k 450,000 objects SCORM, QTI, EP 6k/day UFI 900k 900 courses SCORM, LOM, CMI, QTI, LIP 50k/day Cisco 100k 1,400,000 objects SCORM, LOM MSFT 80k 1,000,000 objects SCORM, LOM, QTI, CP HP 160k 5,000 courses SCORM, QTI, AICC 5k/day Sun 30k SCORM, AICC * courses/objects – cataloged, tagged and searchable

SCORM 2004 SCORM Content Aggregation Model (CAM) 1.3 IEEE 1484.12.1-2002 Learning Object Meta-data IEEE P1484.12.3 – Draft Standard for XML Binding of LOM IMS Content Packaging Version 1.1.3 IMS Simple Sequencing Version 1.0 SCORM Run-Time Environment (RTE) 1.3 IEEE P1484.11.1 – Draft Standard for Data Model for Content Object Communication IEEE P1484.11.2-2003 –Standard for ECMAScript API for Content to Runtime Service Communication SCORM Sequencing and Navigation (SN) 1.3

SCORM 2004 Sequencing Benefits Predictable, consistent ordering and delivery of learning activities, in an instructionally meaningful manner, regardless of delivery environment Benefits Defines sequencing information and behaviors that enable SCORM 2004 content to reproduce standard CBT-Type sequencing in an interoperable manner. Code for sequencing learning resources no longer needs to be embedded within learning resources, reducing coupling and increasing reusability

SCORM 1.2 to SCORM 2004 Conversion ADL is developing tools to assist content conversion: Content Packaging Converter (for manifests) SCO Wrappers (two versions) Meta-Data Converter Sequencing Rule Examples

ADL – Future Directions Continuing commitment by ADL Sponsors Stabilize @SCORM 2004 and plan next generation Registration of objects and repositories Integration with other technologies

ADL – Integration and Research Areas Content Object Repositories Discovery and Resolution Architecture (CORDRA) Simulations and High Level Architecture (HLA) Job Performance Technology (S1000D) – Hand held, wireless Intelligent Tutoring Systems Massive Multiplayer Online Games Web-services or other messaging technologies as Integration Technology

Phases Of SCORM Evolution Expanded Scope: Integration With Other Architectures Simulation Performance Support Mobile Systems Intelligent Tutoring Knowledge Based Systems Others… SCORM “1.X” Stable and Complete at “2004” Maintain Extend New Architecture R&D Track evolution of the Web Web Services Semantic Web DAML+OIL New Knowledge Representation Approaches Determine “Next Generation” Platforms Today

Questions? www.adlnet.org