The Dynamics of Information Bernardo A. Huberman Information Dynamics Laboratory HP Labs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Market Analysis Learning Unit 3.
Advertisements

Complex Networks Advanced Computer Networks: Part1.
Mobile Communication Networks Vahid Mirjalili Department of Mechanical Engineering Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology.
LEARNING INFLUENCE PROBABILITIES IN SOCIAL NETWORKS Amit Goyal Francesco Bonchi Laks V. S. Lakshmanan University of British Columbia Yahoo! Research University.
Back to Table of Contents
May 5, 2015 Strategies for Evaluation Data Collection Eric Graig, Ph.D.
School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University 1 The dynamics of viral marketing Jure Leskovec, Carnegie Mellon University Lada Adamic, University.
Transactions Costs.
Rational Expectations and the Aggregation of Diverse Information in Laboratory Security Markets Charles R. Plott, Shyam Sunder.
Eliminating Public Knowledge Biases in Information-Aggregation Mechanisms Kay-Yut Chen, Leslie R. Fine, Bernardo A. Huberman Hewlett-Packard Laboratories,
Empirical analysis of social recommendation systems Review of paper by Ophir Gaathon Analysis of Social Information Networks COMS , Spring 2011,
Performance Evaluation in the Decentralized Firm
Are You moved by Your Social Network Application? Abderrahmen Mtibaa, Augustin Chaintreau, Jason LeBrun, Earl Oliver, Anna-Kaisa Pietilainen, Christophe.
Introduction and Overview “the grid” – a proposed distributed computing infrastructure for advanced science and engineering. Purpose: grid concept is motivated.
Understanding Networked Applications: A First Course Midterm one review by David G. Messerschmitt.
1 Information Markets & Decision Makers Yiling Chen Anthony Kwasnica Tracy Mullen Penn State University This research was supported by the Defense Advanced.
Outline  In-Class Experiment on Security Markets with Insider Information  Test of Rational Expectation Hypothesis I: Plott and Sunder (1982)  Can market.
© 2002 McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., McGraw-Hill/Irwin TURNING MARKETING INFORMATION INTO ACTION.
Information Aggregation: Experiments and Industrial Applications Kay-Yut Chen HP Labs.
September 2001Ch 11: Collaborative Commerce1 Collaborative Commerce  Questions answered in this chapter: –What is collaborative commerce? –What is buy-side.
Recommender systems Ram Akella November 26 th 2008.
Network analysis and applications Sushmita Roy BMI/CS 576 Dec 2 nd, 2014.
SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Success Factors for Collaboratories Gary M. Olson Collaboratory for Research on Electronic Work School of.
Lecture 3: Arrow-Debreu Economy
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Chapter The Future of Training and Development.
3-1 Chapter Three. 3-2 Secondary Data vs. Primary Data Secondary Data: Data that have been gathered previously. Primary Data: New data gathered to help.
Investment Options Part 1.
Business Strategy and Policy Lecture Recap INTENSIVE STRATEGIES – Market Penetration A market-penetration strategy seeks to increase market share.
Assessment of Innovative Environment
Descriptive and Causal Research Designs
Topic 13 Network Models Credits: C. Faloutsos and J. Leskovec Tutorial
INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS BUSINESS MOTIVATION BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE M. Gams.
1 Knowledge and Learning PG Diploma in Hospitality Management Customer Service and Quality Systems – Session 3.
Today’s Goal Equip and inspire you to participate more fully in the Investment Club Evaluate companies for Stock Reports –Post reports on the website Valuation.
Decision Analysis (cont)
McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter Eighteen Using Advanced Information Technology to Increase.
1 Networks The Internet may be described as part technology and part human interaction. To describe it as one or the other is not quite accurate. Unlike.
CHAPTER 2 Supply Chain Management. SCM (CSCMP Definition) The integration of key business processes from end user through original suppliers, that provides.
8 th edition Steven P. Robbins Mary Coulter PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook Copyright © 2005 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Dynamics of Viral Marketing Jure Leskovec Lada Adamic Bernardo A. Huberman Stanford University University of MichiganHP Labs Presented by Leman Akoglu.
Some Analysis of Coloring Experiments and Intro to Competitive Contagion Assignment Prof. Michael Kearns Networked Life NETS 112 Fall 2014.
Computational Challenges in E-Commerce By Joan Feigenbaum, David C.Parkes, and David M.Pennock Presented by Wu Jingyuan.
School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University 1 The dynamics of viral marketing Jure Leskovec, Carnegie Mellon University Lada Adamic, University.
3 Organizing for Advertising and Promotion: The Role of Ad Agencies and Other Marketing Communication Organizations McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2004 The McGraw-Hill.
Aemen Lodhi (Georgia Tech) Amogh Dhamdhere (CAIDA)
Blekinge Institute of Technology SE Karlskrona MARKETING MANAGEMENT Chaudhry Muhammad Nadeem Faisal Cell:
Data Mining Algorithms for Large-Scale Distributed Systems Presenter: Ran Wolff Joint work with Assaf Schuster 2003.
Tests of Revenue Equivalence in Internet Magic Auctions David Lucking-Reiley “I have never considered the lab to be a substitute for field empirical work.”
1 Technical & Business Writing (ENG-715) Muhammad Bilal Bashir UIIT, Rawalpindi.
Harvesting Social Knowledge from Folksonomies Harris Wu, Mohammad Zubair, Kurt Maly, Harvesting social knowledge from folksonomies, Proceedings of the.
Investment Options Part 1. Three reasons to invest Investing helps beat inflation Investing increases wealth Investing is fun and challenging –Opportunity.
With each device or application that expands the bandwidth of available information, the computer ’ s understanding of us remains unchanged.
Distributed Computing Systems CSCI 4780/6780. Scalability ConceptExample Centralized servicesA single server for all users Centralized dataA single on-line.
How to Build an Investment Portfolio The Determinants of Portfolio Choice The determinants of portfolio choice, sometimes referred to as determinants of.
 An Information System (IS) is a collection of interrelated components that collect, process, store, and provide as output the information needed to.
Or How to Gain and Sustain a Competitive Advantage for Your Sales Team Key’s to Consistently High Performing Sales Organizations © by David R. Barnes Jr.
An Effective Method to Improve the Resistance to Frangibility in Scale-free Networks Kaihua Xu HuaZhong Normal University.
1 Friends and Neighbors on the Web Presentation for Web Information Retrieval Bruno Lepri.
Promotional Methods For Target Markets. How are Marketers Grouping You? People share things in common and are often times segmented into groups by these.
Conclusions and Future Prospects Van Den Bulte Wuyts.
Chapter 7 Event Marketing
FELICIAN UNIVERSITY Creating a Learning Community Using Knowledge Management and Social Media Dr. John Zanetich, Associate Professor Felician University.
Office 365 is cloud- based productivity, hosted by Microsoft. Business-class Gain large, 50GB mailboxes that can send messages up to 25MB in size,
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Chapter 28 Data Mining Concepts.
Management Mustangs Strategic Brand Management Module - 5.
Business Economics (ECO 341) Fall Semester, 2012
Sofus A. Macskassy Fetch Technologies
INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS BUSINESS MOTIVATION BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE
Organizational Structure and Controls
The Diffusion of Innovations
Presentation transcript:

The Dynamics of Information Bernardo A. Huberman Information Dynamics Laboratory HP Labs

tapping tacit knowledge within social networks discover informal communities determine how information flows through these communities use that knowledge to discover what people are about and harvest their preferences and knowledge

discovering communities Bruegel, Peter the Younger. Village Feast traditional methods accurate but laborious

informal communities communities that form around tasks or topics –scientific and technical communities (ziman, crane) –bureaucracies (crozier) –how they grow and evolve to solve problems (huberman & hogg) –how information flows within organizations (allen) the measurement problem: interviews and surveys are accurate but time consuming. worse, they don’t scale

uncovering communities with tyler,huberman and wilkinson, in Communities and Technologies, Kluwer Academic (2003) is a rich source of communication data –virtually everyone in the “knowledge economy” uses it –It provides data in a convenient format for research

hp labs network

our goal decompose an organization’s network (dense and jumbled) into communities of practice (clean and distinct)

a graph has community structure if it consists of groups of nodes with many more links within each group than between different groups find communities using betweenness centrality betweeness of an edge: number of shortest paths that traverse it

a problem betweeness centrality is slow (scales as the cube of the number of nodes (Brandes, Girvan and Newman, Wilkinson and Huberman) we have designed an algorithm that runs much faster (linearly in the number of nodes (Wu and Huberman, Eur. Phys. Journal B38, (2004).

a different method wu and huberman Eur. Phys. Journal, B38, 331 (2004)

rragan HPL Advanced Studies olmos HPL Advanced Studies samuels HPL Advanced Studies saifi HPL Advanced Studies zhiyong HPL Advanced Studies gunyoung HPL Advanced Studies laradeHPL Advanced Studies penrose Mobile & Media Systems Lab mistyr HPL Advanced Studies vinayd HPL Advanced Studies seroussi HPL Advanced Studies tsachyw HPL Advanced Studies reedrob University Relations carterpa University Relations sbrodeur University Relations pruyne Internet Systems & Storage Lab bouzon University Relations lmorell University Relations marcek University Relations venkyMobile & Media Systems Lab dohlbergHPL Advanced Studies kvincent Hardcopy Tech Lab pmccUniversity Relations trangvu HPL Communications marksteiHPL Advanced Studies hollerb HPL Research Operations krishnavHandheld HQ babcock REWS Americas gita Solutions & Services Tech Cntr bgeeHPL - Research Operations meisiHPL - Research Operations henzeInformation Access Lab kuekesHPL Advanced Studies thoggSystems Research Lab kychenIntelligent Enterprise Tech Lb lfineSystems Research Lab akarpIntelligent Enterprise Tech Lb examples

organizational hierarchy

correspondents scrambled

actual correspondence

earlier documents are blue, later ones are red. size of node reflects the number of users accessing the document. document similarity by usage similarity: overlap in users accessing documents l. adamic

HPS-mining knowledge briefs

a new people finder there is a trove of information in power point presentations, public repositories within the organization, and the internal website of the enterprise peoplefinder 2 allows you to find out what people are about, as opposed to where in the organization they belong it also discovers who is working on what e. adar and l. adamic

information flow how does information flow in a community or organization? does the structure of the social network affect it? how far does it spread? Wu, Adamic and Huberman

recommendation networks 15 million recommendations and 4 million customers j. leskovec, l.adamic and b.a. huberman

does receiving more recommendations increase the likelihood of buying? BOOKS DVDs

so, how effective is viral marketing? recommendations do not propagate very far (on average) but there are rare instances where the information chain is long they are not very effective at eliciting purchases

forwarded URLs forwarded message an experiment with forwarding messages

short term expense control ads at the bottom of hotmail & yahoo messages average = 1.1 for attachments, and 1.2 for URLs results

the future we all care about it. and invest resources in finding out about it. Caravaggio,The Fortune Teller,

“it is hard to predict anything, especially the future” Niels Bohr

how do organizations predict? they ask the experts (and consultants) have meetings (lots of them) designate someone as forecaster take a vote (not very good)

an alternative: markets markets aggregate and reveal information (hayek, lucas, etc.) to predict outcomes, use markets where the asset is information (rather than a physical good) example: –iowa electronic markets

markets within organizations - problematic- low participation illiquidity information traps hard to motivate easily manipulated

a new mechanism (with kay-yut chen and leslie fine) it identifies participants that have good predictive talents, and extracts their risk attitudes it induces them to be truthful while avoiding the pitfalls of small groups it aggregates information in nonlinear fashion Information Systems Frontiers, Vol. 5, (2003) Management Science, Vol. 50, (2004)

people are not all the same –think of the information in peoples’ heads as the assets and use portfolio theory –use a market mechanism to determine a individual’s risk attitudes and performance then, ask people to forecast and perform a nonlinear aggregation of their results taking into account their risk characteristics the information gathering process is simple, decentralized in time, and inexpensive to implement what is it based on?

two stages stage 1: a market for contingent securities. it provides behavioral information, such as risk attitudes –synchronous- stage 2: participants generate predictions on outcomes, which are then aggregated. incorporates behavioral information -asynchronous-

stage 2 - forecasting participants are given 100 tickets to be allocated among 10 securities this determines probabilities true state pays according to the number of tickets allocated to it

aggregating predictions the probability of event S occurring, conditioned on I, is given by with β an exponent that denotes behavioral attitudes >1 risk averse <1 risk seeking =1 risk neutral

what determines the exponent? i =r(V i / i )c holding value/risk - measures relative risk of individuals normalization constant ~sum of prices/winning payoff It measures market risk

experiments human subjects in the laboratory (hp labs) each group receives diverse information run the two-stage mechanism and measure its performance

Kullback-Leibler = comparison to omniscient probability Experiment 4, Period 17 No Information results

Kullback-Leibler = comparison to omniscient probability Experiment 4, Period 17 1 Player results

Kullback-Leibler = comparison to omniscient probability Experiment 4, Period 17 2 Players Aggregated results

Kullback-Leibler = comparison to omniscient probability Experiment 4, Period 17 3 Players Aggregated results

Kullback-Leibler = comparison to omniscient probability Experiment 4, Period 17 4 Players Aggregated results

Kullback-Leibler = comparison to omniscient probability Experiment 4, Period 17 5 Players Aggregated results

Kullback-Leibler = comparison to omniscient probability Experiment 4, Period 17 6 Players Aggregated results

Kullback-Leibler = comparison to omniscient probability Experiment 4, Period 17 7 Players Aggregated results

Kullback-Leibler = comparison to omniscient probability Experiment 4, Period 17 8 Players Aggregated results

Kullback-Leibler = comparison to ominiscient probability Experiment 4, Period 17 9 Players Aggregated results

overall performance better than the best!

predicting in the real world (as opposed to the laboratory) we ran a pilot test with one of hp divisions 15 managers distributed worldwide goal: to predict monthly revenues and profits

one more case: future component prices

it is all about the power of the implicit for more information go to: