M AXIMIZING F LEXIBILITY IN THE A DMINISTRATION OF F EDERAL G RANTS July 17, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Newport News Public Schools Information on Title I Funding
Advertisements

Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
Newport News Public Schools Information on Title I Funding E.S.E.A. (Elementary And Secondary Education Act)
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Title I, Part A Schoolwide and Targeted Assistance.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines Sheldon ISD.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
The 10 Components of a Schoolwide Title I Program Presented by: Dr. Denise Ellis Director State and Federal Programs Dr. Ken Wagner Principal Rancho Mirage.
Title I, Part A Campus Improvement Plan Comprehensive Needs Assessment 10 Components of a Schoolwide Program Nerissa Erickson Toni Garrett Title I/NCLB.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers.
BARROW COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM NEEDS ASSESSMENT ANNUAL PLANNING FY 2016 Title I Title II-A Title III Professional Learning.
Schoolwide Planning, Part III: Strategic Action Planning
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
1 “Changing Performance” Nashville, Tennessee February 2, National Title I Conference M aximizing the I mpact of S choolwide P rograms on I mproving.
Title I Iowa Department of Educatio n Sandy Johnson Title I Consultant November 2009.
ARRA Title I: The chance of a lifetime to address our most vexing challenges Reform and Restore: Implementing the ARRA Michigan Institute for Educational.
Provided by Education Service Center Region XI 1 Title I, Part A Overview Provided by Education Service Center Region XI
Federal Programs Fall Conference Title I and the ACIP Logan Searcy and Beth Joseph.
Title I Schoolwide Ray Draghi and Rasha Hetata October 2014.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Title I Schoolwide Programs (SWP). Why Schoolwide? Flexibility Purpose : to provide schools with high percentages of at-risk children* the flexibility.
Understanding Title I. Title I Defined A federal allocation of funds for schools classified as low income for the purpose of assisting students to demonstrate.
Title I Schoolwide Program Proposal for Change. What is Title I  Title I — A Federal Program with the goal of Improving The Academic Achievement Of the.
Title I Parent Meeting at Back-to-School Night Tri-Community Elementary School September 2, 2015.
Virginia Department of Education Division Leadership Liaison Meeting January 7, 2013.
WELCOME Please come inPlease come in Find a seatFind a seat Download your SIP on the computerDownload your SIP on the computer 10 School Wide Components.
What is a Title I? Title I is Part A of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of This program provides financial assistance to states.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines.
University Park Creative Arts School Title I Annual Parent Meeting Title I 101 September 12, :00 pm.
July 18, Glover Marietta, Georgia 1.  Federally funded program which provides resources to schools, based on the poverty percent at that school.
Schoolwide Programs – New Guidance Karen Seay, Director Federal Policy and ESEA Research Division New Directors’ Training September 17-18, 2015
Title I, IDEA Part B and IDEA Part C September 2, 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Use of Funds Guidance 1.
Title I-A 101 Karen Seay, Director Federal Policy and ESEA Research Division New Directors’ Training September 17-18, 2015
MEGA Title I and the ACIP Logan Searcy and Beth Joseph.
Schoolwide Funding Flexibility – Extended Training Karen J.M. Seay, Director Federal Policy and ESEA Research Data September 21, 2015.
School-Wide Plans Presented by: Marlon Cousin, Title I Coordinator East Baton Rouge Parish School System Cheryl Landry, Title I Coordinator Lafourche.
WELCOME Title I School-wide Open House EWING PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
Schoolwide Programs Under the No Child Left Behind Act David Gray Region VII Comprehensive Center University of Oklahoma
Title I, Part A Program Title I, Part A provides educational services to schools with high percentages of children from low-income families by providing.
1 46th Annual PAFPC Conference May 5, 2015 MARIA GARCIA Schoolwide Program Manager DIVISION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Title I Schoolwide Programs.
Major Cheney Elementary  As a Title I School, our students now have many additional educational opportunities!  These opportunities will.
TARGETED ASSISTANCE SCHOOLS 2010 Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education Julia B. Keleher, Ed. D, PMP April 13, 2010.
SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT TESTS District Level: Maintenance of Effort School Level: Comparability of Services Child Level: Educational.
No Child Left Behind Application 1 Title I, Part A Part 1.
1 Implementing the New Title I, Part A, Schoolwide Guidance Title I University Lynn Sodat, Title I Coordinator Office of Program Administration and Accountability.
1 MARIA GARCIA Schoolwide Program Manager DIVISION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Title I Schoolwide Programs.
1 Monitoring and Revising the Title I, Part A, Schoolwide Plan Title I University March 11, 2015 Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration.
What are the Differences Between Targeted and Schoolwide Title I Programs?
WHAT A GREAT IDEA!! Focusing on Results and Using IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) Part D Investments to Support Improved Outcomes for.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Larry Fazzari Program Supervisor k12.wa.us 1 TITLE I, PART A PROGRAMS SCHOOLWIDE VS. TARGETED
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
Administering Federal Programs-A Charter School Perspective Dr. Vanessa Nelson-Reed Federal Program Administrator NCDPI.
[Name of your School] Title I Annual Meeting
MIDDLETOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act and the Tile I, Part A Program
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
[Name of your School] Title I Annual Meeting
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools.
Studio School Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools Federal and State Education Programs Branch.
Constructing High Performing Schoolwide Programs
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
The Alabama Continuous Improvement Plan ACIP
Title I, Part A Virginia Department of Education
Developing and Revising Schoolwide Plans
ESSA Schoolwide 2017.
Presentation transcript:

M AXIMIZING F LEXIBILITY IN THE A DMINISTRATION OF F EDERAL G RANTS July 17, 2013

U.S. Department of Education 2 OVERVIEW 1.Purpose of Title I, Part A 2.Refresher on Schoolwide Programs 3.Use of Funds for Implementation of College and Career Ready Standards 4.Questions

U.S. Department of Education TITLE I, PART A Title I, Part A (Title I) Provides Supplemental Federal funds to ensure all students have fair, equal, and significant opportunities to obtain a high-quality education and reach at minimum proficiency on challenging state academic achievement standards and state academic assessments. Focused on improving the academic achievement of low-achieving students in schools with high concentrations of children from low-income families and is governed by statuary and regulatory requirements of Title I, Part A of ESEA. 3

U.S. Department of Education Was initiated in 1965 as part of the War on Poverty. Serves more than 18 million students nationwide. Serves students Pre-K through 12 th grade. Is the single largest pre-college Federal education program with over $14 billion allocated in recent years. In school year, there were 66,646 schools receiving Title I funds, 48,900 of which operated schoolwide programs. FAST FACTS ON TITLE I 4

RESULTS FOR STUDENTS 5 THE HIGHEST HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION RATE IN DECADES

RESULTS FOR STUDENTS MILLION FEWER STUDENTS ATTENDING DROPOUT FACTORIES

OUR UNFINISHED TASK: 7 MANY LOW-INCOME STUDENTS FAIL TO COMPLETE HIGH SCHOOL

OUR UNFINISHED TASK: 8 DISPARITIES IN HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION

OUR UNFINISHED TASK: 9 ONLY 29% OF LOW-INCOME STUDENTS GO TO COLLEGE

OUR UNFINISHED TASK: 10 ONLY 9% OF LOW-INCOME STUDENTS COMPLETE COLLEGE

U.S. Department of Education Title I is a distinct Federal program with specific purposes. Program flexibilities contribute to opportunity for partnership with SEAs, LEAs, and schools. These flexibilities generally apply regardless of whether an SEA has received ESEA flexibility. 11 IMPROVING BASIC TITLE I PROGRAM OPERATED BY AN LEA

U.S. Department of Education Targeted Assistance – Supplemental education services to eligible students with the greatest need. Schoolwide – Comprehensive program designed to upgrade the entire educational program in order to improve achievement of the lowest-achieving students. a school with poverty percentage of 40% or more. TWO TYPES OF TITLE I PROGRAMS 12

U.S. Department of Education SCHOOLWIDE PROGRAMS A Schoolwide Program: Maximizes flexibility in using Federal funds. Serves as a vehicle for whole-school reform with focus on improving achievement of lowest-achieving students. Allows for easier leveraging of non-Federal and Federal funds to work together to improve educational performance of the entire school. Addresses student needs through a schoolwide plan based on a comprehensive needs assessment. 13

U.S. Department of Education 1.Comprehensive needs assessment of entire school 2.Comprehensive schoolwide plan a.Incorporates whole school reform strategies that-- i.Strengthen the core academic program ii.Increase the amount of quality learning time to help provide enriched and accelerated curriculum iii.Meet the needs of historically underserved students iv.Provide services the meet the needs of low-achieving students b.Focuses on ensuring Highly Qualified Teachers in schools c.Incorporates high-quality ongoing professional development d.Identifies strategies to attract Highly Qualified Teachers 10 COMPONENTS 14

U.S. Department of Education e.Incorporates parent engagement strategies f.Assists pre-school children transition to elementary school g.Includes teachers in Data-Driven Decision-making h.Provides low-achieving students with effective, timely additional assistance i.Focuses on the coordination and integration of funds 3.Annual evaluation, with revisions as necessary 10 COMPONENTS CONT’D 15

U.S. Department of Education Title I, Part A funds may be used for any activity that supports the needs of students, particularly the lowest- achieving students, in the school that are identified through a comprehensive needs assessment and included in the schoolwide plan. IMPORTANCE OF THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT 16

U.S. Department of Education Will the proposed use of funds: Drive results for students who are failing, or most at risk of failing, to meet State academic achievement standards? Increase educators’ long-term capacity to improve results for Title I students? Accelerate reform and advance SEA, LEA, or participating Title I school improvement objectives and reform goals? Foster continuous improvement and include approaches to measure and track implementation and results and create feedback loops to modify or discontinue strategies that evidence indicates are ineffective in improving achievement of Title I students? ASKING THE RIGHT QUESTIONS 17

U.S. Department of Education Supplement not Supplant. Federal funds must supplement, and not supplant, non-Federal funds. Supplement not supplant applies differently in different programs; within Title I, it applies differently in a schoolwide vs. a targeted assistance school. Necessary and Reasonable. Federal funds must support activities that are necessary and reasonable to accomplish the federal program’s purpose. KEY REQUIREMENTS 18

U.S. Department of Education COLLEGE- AND CAREER-READY (CCR) STANDARDS AND ASSESSMENTS 19

U.S. Department of Education A WORD OF CAUTION… The examples in this presentation illustrate ways that Title I funds may be used by SEAs and LEAs to support key areas of reform in a schoolwide program. Because they are merely examples, however, they do not take into account the specific context in which these funds would be used at the State or local levels. Thus, an SEA, LEA or school should ensure that such use is consistent with relevant programmatic requirements. 20

U.S. Department of Education USE OF FUNDS SEAs may: Develop standards and assessments for all students (Title I/Consolidated ESEA State administrative funds). Provide professional development to implement CCR standards and assessments (ESEA Section 6111 – State assessment funds). 21

U.S. Department of Education USE OF FUNDS SEAs may: Provide technical assistance to low-performing schools and LEAs. Use the school improvement reservation for their State system of support and establish eligibility criteria to determine the schools that receive this support and the amount of funds. 22

U.S. Department of Education USE OF FUNDS LEAs may: Prepare low-achieving students to participate successfully in advanced coursework aligned with CCR standards. Provide intensive summer programs to low-achieving high school students to prepare them to take advanced classes. Ensure the educational needs of low-achieving students in highest- poverty schools are met. 23

U.S. Department of Education LEAs may: Provide educators with professional development, and materials and supplies, to implement the schoolwide plan. Hire outside data experts to work with the staff of Title I schools to build their capacity to analyze student data more effectively to improve instruction and identify appropriate academic interventions. Hire mathematics and reading coaches to work with teachers where the data indicate a need for improved instruction or to help science teachers in a Title I school operating a schoolwide program to implement interdisciplinary strategies to promote literacy across the curriculum. USE OF FUNDS 24

U.S. Department of Education Title I schoolwide schools may: Increase participation of low-achieving students in advanced coursework. Provide intensive summer school classes for low-achieving students, including high school students to prepare them for the rigor of taking advanced courses. Provide afterschool tutoring. Develop and use formative and interim assessments to track progress of low-achieving students and train teachers in their use. Purchase or develop supplemental instructional materials aimed at improving achievement of low-achieving students, including Student with Disabilities and English Learners. USE OF FUNDS 25

U.S. Department of Education Title I schoolwide schools may: Conduct needs assessments Upgrade the curriculum for the entire school Implement an early warning system to identify low-achieving students or students at risk of dropping out Extend the school day or school year Reorganize class schedules to increase teacher planning time Revamp the school’s discipline process to improve achievement of low-achieving students Hire additional teachers to serve Title I students Hire specialist to coach teachers in how to better serve low- achieving students USE OF FUNDS 26

U.S. Department of Education Title I schoolwide schools may: Reorganize classes to promote personalized learning for low- achieving students Implement career academies to assist low-performing students prepare for college and careers Implement school safety programs to improve the achievement of low-achieving students Provide professional development to ensure effective teachers and leaders to serve low-achieving students Engage in activities to improve school climate designed to improve the achievement of low-achieving students USE OF FUNDS 27

U.S. Department of Education Turning Around Low-Achieving Title I Schools. Implementing rigorous interventions to turn around low-achieving schools – Assessing strengths and weaknesses of school leaders, teachers, and other school staff – Recruiting principals – Screening and identifying external partners – Multipronged strategies for changing school’s culture and improving teaching and learning USE OF FUNDS 28

U.S. Department of Education DISCUSSION 29