PA School Performance Profile January 13, 2013 Superintendent Advisory Council 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mt. Diablo Unified School District
Advertisements

South Dakota Accountability System – Year 2 School Performance Index Guyla Ness September 10, 2013.
Educator Effectiveness System November 5, Agenda – Town Hall Meeting Community Builder/Video (OPTIONAL) Today, we will be presenting an overview.
PA School Performance Profile 1 WHITEHALL-COPLAY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Harbor Creek School District Superintendent Hawley October 10, 2013.
Essential Questions: What are the components of the (SPP)? How is PVAAS used as part of the calculation for the School Performance Profile (SPP)?
Texas State Accountability 2013 and Beyond Current T.E.A. Framework as of March 22, 2013 Austin Independent School District Bill Caritj, Chief Performance.
APAC Meeting | January 22, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of Performance.
Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC
Burton Secondary EOC/STAAR Data INDEX 1 STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT STARR SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE All Students=3-8 grades spring administration.
State Accountability Overview 1 Performance Index Framework: For 2013 and beyond, an accountability framework of four Performance Indexes includes a broad.
The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global workplace, ready for personal.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
Understanding the Pennsylvania School Performance Profile Introduction.
Understanding the Pennsylvania School Performance Profile Introduction.
School Progress Index 2012 Results Mary Gable- Assistant State Superintendent Division of Academic Policy Carolyn Wood - Assistant State Superintendent.
OCTORARA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT “CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES - MORE THAN PSSA AND AYP”
School Performance Index School Performance Index (SPI): A Comprehensive Measurement System for All Schools Student Achievement (e.g. PSSA) Student Progress.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
Measuring Charter Quality Eric Paisner, NAPCS Anna Nicotera, NAPCS Lyria Boast, Public Impact.
School Performance Profile and PVAAS.  Federal accountability and PA law dictate that school effectiveness must be measured looking at multiple.
Effectively Communicate PVAAS with your Board and Community Pennsylvania Value-Added Assessment System (PVAAS): Effectively Communicate PVAAS with your.
School & district accountability reporting Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 17, 2013.
PROGRESS MONITORING OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT Baldwin-Whitehall School District 2nd Quarter Data.
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
Understanding the SPP September 26, > Purpose The PA School Performance Profile is designed to:  Provide a building.
PA School Performance Profile June /3/13. Your Role: Communicate the purpose and design of the proposed PA School Performance Profile (SPP) Create.
UMASD CURRICULUM/TECHNOLOGY/STUDENT SERVICES COMMITTEE December 17, 2012.
1 Division of Public Schools (PreK -12) Florida Department of Education Florida Education: The Next Generation DRAFT March 13, 2008 Version 1.0 INSERT.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
1 Superintendents’ Quarterly Meeting A Next Generation Accountability Model March 25, 2010.
The elements of the proposed accountability model are subject to change.
Welcome to the AHS PCF! September 12, :00 a.m. Room 92 TOPIC: New State Report Card.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
PA School Performance Profile 1 Tamaqua Area Middle School.
Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.
Mohawk Jr-Sr High School PSSA/PVAAS Act 82 – New Teacher Evaluation Law Beginning in the school year, fifty percent (50%) of the evaluation.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
WHY? To transform teaching and learning.. Strategic Pillars Goal 1: Student Growth and High Academic Achievement – Develop and implement a comprehensive.
Boyertown Area School District Data Summary
Overview Plan Input Outcome and Objective Measures Summary of Changes Board Feedback Finalization Next Steps.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
Communication Webinar:
Future ready PA Index Update 5/23/17.
Teacher SLTs
PA School Performance Profile
Overview of the new State Accountability System
A Brief History Data-Based School & District Improvement
Driving Through the California Dashboard
Professional Learning – October 12, 2015
Release of PARCC Student Results
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
Accountability Update
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
PVAAS Update PAIU Curriculum Coordinators Meeting
ESSA Update “Graduation Rate & Career and College Readiness”
Pennsylvania’s ESSA Submitted Plan Review
Teacher SLTs
School Performance Measure Calculations SY
Birmingham City Schools Report Card Indicators
An Introduction to the Future Ready PA Index
Presented to the Octorara Area School Board on December 3, 2018
Starting Community Conversations
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Driving Through the California Dashboard
An Introduction to the Future Ready PA Index
Spencer County Public Schools
2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director
Presentation transcript:

PA School Performance Profile January 13, 2013 Superintendent Advisory Council 1

URL: Logon: paprofile Accessing the Video Segment 2

Introduction/Welcome PowerPoint Presentation*: Comprehensive Overview *Part I School Performance Profile Overview (10 min.) on Vimeo.mp4 Part II School Performance Profile Landing Page and District Fast Facts (11 min.) on Vimeo.mp4 Part III School Fast Facts (3 minutes) on Vimeo.mp4 *Part IV Data Elements (25 minutes) on Vimeo.mp4 *Part V View Calculation and Weighting Academic Performance Score (5 minutes) on Vimeo.mp4*Part V View Calculation and Weighting Academic Performance Score (5 minutes) on Vimeo.mp4 Part VI Compare School Feature (3 minutes) on Vimeo.mp4 Part VII Closing (3 minutes) on Vimeo.mp4 Review the Handouts: Understanding Academic Performance SPP Timeline Academic Performance Score Formula Achievement Gap Overview of SPP Agenda 3

Understanding the Pennsylvania School Performance Profile Proposed Introduction January 11, 2013

5 > Purpose The PA School Performance Profile is designed to:  Provide a building level academic score for teachers as part of the Educator Effectiveness System  Inform the public of the performance of each school, comprehensive career and technical center, cyber charter and charter school in Pennsylvania  Provide parents and taxpayers performance measures for the school/district of residence, neighboring schools/districts and schools/districts across the state 5

6 > Purpose For LEAs, the School Performance Profile will serve multiple purposes:  Inform and guide goal setting, resource allocation, and targets for improved student achievement  Communicate performance to various constituencies  Compare performance to other schools  Encourage implementation of best practice 6

7 > Data  No new data will be collected  Baseline year is reported as data  Demonstration site displays 2010 – 2011 data:  14% of schools scored 90 or higher.  64% of schools scored 70 to 89.9  15% of scores are between 60 and 60.9  7% scored below 60  All data is public  All data now in a single repository

District and School (Data not used in formula calculations.) –Demographics –Career and Technical Center –Supporting Intermediate Unit –Percent Enrollment by Ethnicity (Percentage of enrollment is listed, but is not in the SPP for calculating academic performance score. Economics determines factors of student success, not ethnicity.) –Percent Enrollment by Historically Low Performing Students (This group and All Students evaluated in the formula.) –Link to Supplemental Reports (Ex. Sp. Ed Report) asi 9 > Demographic Fast Facts 9

10 > Academic Performance Score The score for a school is based upon multiple measures which define high performing schools. (classroom observations, teacher specific data, elective data, and building level data) (Educator Effectiveness System Act 82 of 2012; beginning school year, 15% of each teacher and principal evaluation – building level data) Many data elements are combined to create the academic score (Derived from the SPP). These elements are categorized into five areas shown on the next slide. (Refer to Understanding Academic Performance Score Handout.) 10

100% Data Components 100% Indicators of Academic Achievement (40%) Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap – All Students (5%) Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap – Historically Low Performing Students (5%) Indicators of Academic Growth – PVAAS (40%) Other Academic Indicators (10%) Extra Credit for Advanced Achievement (up to 5 %) (Credit for advanced achievement based upon advanced performance in PSSA and industry assessments.) (Refer to Understanding Academic Performance Score Handout.) 11 > Building Level Score 11

Indicators of Academic Achievement 40% (n=11 or more) PSSA Performance Industry Standards-Based Competency Assessments Grade 3 Reading Proficiency Advanced Placement Achievement SAT College Ready Benchmarks 12 > Building Level Score 12

13 > Closing the Achievement Gap 13 All Students (5%) Based upon progress in moving all students to proficiency (defined as 100%) Historically Low Performing Students (5%) (Refer to Understanding Academic Performance Score Handout.) Based upon progress in moving historically low performing students to proficiency (defined as 100%) Students with Disabilities English Language Learners Economically Disadvantaged

14 > Closing the Achievement Gap 14 Sample Calculation: Proficient/Advanced = 40% Gap between 40% and 100% is 60% Must close one-half of gap over a 6-year period Gap closure = 30% over 6-years Annual goal = 5% per year (cumulative)

Indicators of Academic Achievement Indicators of Academic Growth / PVAAS 40% PVAAS Growth Index Math Reading Science Writing (Growth measure is the change of the achievement level for a group of students across grades divided by the standard error.) 15 > Building Level Score 15

16 > Indicators of Academic Growth -PVAAS 16 Growth IndexScore 3 or higher or lower50

Indicators of Academic Achievement Other Academic Indicators 10% Cohort Graduation Rate Promotion Rate Attendance Rate Advanced Placement or International Baccalaureate Diploma, or Dual Enrollment PSAT Participation 17 > Building Level Score 17

18 > Other Academic Indicators 18 Cohort Graduation Rate (1 to 1 basis Ex. If 92.1, then 92.1) Promotion Rate (1 to 1 basis Ex. If 95.6, then 95.6) Attendance Rate (1 to 1 basis Ex. If 96.7, then 96.7) Advanced Placement (100, 75, 50, 25, 0) or International Baccalaureate (Maximum Score) or Dual Enrollment (Maximum Score) PSAT Participation (12 th Grade Cohort; Being reviewed; 2012 – 57.2% took the PSAT.)

Indicators of Academic Achievement Credit for Advanced Achievement (up to 5%) Percent PSSA Advanced – Math Percent PSSA Advanced – Reading Percent PSSA Advanced – Science Percent PSSA Advanced – Writing Percent Advanced – Industry Standards-Based Competency Assessments 19 > Building Level Score 19

School Configuration: K-8 School K-12 School Secondary Schools Comprehensive Career and Technology Centers (Full Time) (Refer to Final Academic Performance Score Calculations.) 20 > School Configurations and Calculations 20

Maximum Overall Score = 100 –Maximum possible points may be reduced based upon Insufficient Sample or Not Applicable Credit for Advanced Achievement (up to 5 points in addition to maximum score) 21 > Scoring Protocols 21

22 > Let’s go to the SPP site! 22

Log on to the SPP site: Look at a sample school profile. Demonstration 23

Vimeo: Data Elements: /Download.ashx?hash=2.2http://files5.pdesas.org/ /Download.ashx?hash=2.2 Vimeo:Calculating and Weighting /Download.ashx?hash=2.2http://files5.pdesas.org/ /Download.ashx?hash=2.2 Video Presentations 24

Do you understand the purpose of the School Performance Profile? Did you gain background on the proposed SPP website? Are you able to define data elements to calculate SPP? Do you understand that data matters? Update EDNA and keep PIMS correct? Did you know you will see your SPP prior to going public in April of 2013? Did you know the SPP is still evolving and is a work in progress? PDE has developed an easily accessible website that is a fair, comprehensive, and transparent repository. SPP materials are being developed for reaching out to your communities to help support your communication. Where the goals reached?

For more information on the PA School Performance Profile, log onto and register as a member of the PA School Performance Profile Professional Learning Community (PLC). PLC includes PP, handouts, links to SPP video segments, and archived SPP webinar. Address questions to 26 >26 For More Information