Introduction to the Institutional Review Board (IRB): Minnesota State University, Mankato Patricia M. Hargrove, Ph.D. IRB Coordinator Anne Blackhurst,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Is it Research?. Is It Research? 2 Elements –The project involves a systematic investigation –The design (meaning goal, purpose, or intent) of the investigation.
1 © 2009 University of Wisconsin-Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Human Subjects Protection (HSP)
University Research Ethics Committee Workshop on procedure and data protection issues 30th May 2008.
Human Subjects Protections, Concepts, and Procedures Office of Research and Sponsored Programs Tom Lombardo, Ph.D., Director, Research Integrity & Compliance.
Research Involving Human Subjects All research involving the participation of human subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB (Institutional Review.
TODAY’S TOPIC: Ethics – deconstructing consent and participation with “vulnerable” populations.
DO NO HARM IRRB Presentation Purposes Responsibilities Processes NLU IRRB Home page.
 Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D Barry Gribbons, Ph.D RP Conference: April 2, 2013.
Exempt Research Mary Banks BS, BSN IRB Director CRC IRB and BUMC IRB.
Use of Children as Research Subjects What information should be provided for an FP7 ethical review?
Protecting Human Participants in Research syr
Ethical Guidelines for Research with Human Participants
Ethics in Research The Ethical Standards of the American Psychological Association (2002 Ethics code, to be effective June 1,
Human Subjects Research Dr. John S. Irvine Chairperson, NMSU Institutional Review Board for Human Subjects Research
THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.
ETHICAL RESEARCH © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Is this Research? Exempt? Expedited?
1 Psychology 2020 Unit 1 cont’d Ethics. 2 Evolution of ethics Historic Studies Tuskegee Syphilis Study ( ) Milgram’s Obedience Study (1960s)
Human Subject Research by Students at William Paterson University May 2011.
Cornell Evaluation Network The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance ~ May 14, 2007.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
The Goals and Principles of Human Participant Protection Part 4: Vulnerable Populations.
The IRB Approval Process Michael Bingham, JD Assistant Director, University of Wisconsin-Madison Education IRB
Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Human Subject Protections: Working with the IRB Erin McClure, PhD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD HISTORY AND ETHICS. 2 Ethical History : Holocaust : Nuremburg Trials 1964: Declaration of Helsinki :
Teaching Research Methods (Classroom Protocols) Boston University Charles River Campus Boston University Medical Center Mary A. Banks BS, BSN IRB Director.
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
The Linguistics Department Institutional Review Board Committee Silvina Montrul, chair Fred Davidson Irene Koshik Ryan Shosted September 22, 2008.
Human Subject Research View from the IRB Anthony J. Filipovitch Minnesota State University Mankato.
Human Subjects Protections Research Ethics. Basic Assumptions about How Research Should be Conducted Subjects should be protected from harm. Subjects.
Adam Mills Human Subjects Office September 18, 2015 IRB Basics.
A step-by-step guide to help you determine if your research protocol is required to be reviewed by the Lindenwood University IRB INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.
Education Research and Social & Behavioral Science IRB.
Dustin Yocum, MA Institutional Review Board University of Illinois HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.
ETHICS OF NEONATAL RESEARCH John L. Sever, MD, PhD. Children’s National Medical Center George Washington University Medical Center Washington, DC.
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) School of Professional Studies April 18, 2013
Regulations 201: Thorny Issues What is Research? Exempt and Expedited Reviews.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
Donna B. Konradi, DNS, RN, CNE GERO 586 Understanding the Ethics of Research.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
Joni Barnard IRB Information Session: EHE Workshop 10/13/2015.
Paul Hryvniak MS, CIP Alyssa Speier, MS, CIP September 30, 2014 Student Human Research Education Session Tel:
Human Subjects Research at Mines Colorado School of Mines New Faculty Orientation November 20, 2015.
Human Research Protection Program 101 March 20, 2007 Cincinnati, OH.
Created by Steve Martin, PA-C IRB Application Received Exempt Complete Yes No Mississippi College IRB Application Process Determine Review Category Expedited.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Human Subject Protections: Working with the IRB Erin A McClure, PhD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
Protecting Human Subjects Overview of the Issues Applications to Educational Research The IRB Process.
Research ethics.
Investigator Initiated Research Best Practices for IRB: SBER Corey Zolondek, Ph.D. IRB Operations Manager Wayne State University.
Back to Basics – Approval Criteria
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. CIP President HRP Associates, Inc.
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Institutional Review Board
What types of research are exempt and ohrp guidance on exemptions
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP)
Ethics Review Morals: Rules that define what is right and wrong Ethics: process of examining moral standards and looking at how we should interpret and.
What the IRB is looking for when reviewing your protocol
Human Participants Research
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Research with Human Subjects
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to the Institutional Review Board (IRB): Minnesota State University, Mankato Patricia M. Hargrove, Ph.D. IRB Coordinator Anne Blackhurst, Ph.D. Dean/IRB Administrator

IRB Framework National Research Act –1978--National Commission for Protection of Human Subjects Belmont Report * Common Rules and FDA

1978: The Belmont Report Principle 1: Respect for Persons Principle 2: Beneficence Principle 3: Justice

Respect for Persons MAJOR COMPONENTS: Right to autonomy and self- determination Protecting vulnerable subjects

Respect for Persons IRB REQUIREMENTS: Avoid coercion or undue influence versus voluntary actions Provide informed consent. Maintain privacy and confidentiality. Insure the right to withdraw from participation without penalty.

Beneficence MAJOR COMPONENTS: It is important to insure the well-being of research participants. There are trade-offs between individual and societal benefits to research.

Beneficence IRB REQUIREMENTS: The risks of research are justified by the potential benefits to subjects and/or society. The study is designed so that risks are minimized. Conflicts of interest are managed adequately.

Justice MAJOR COMPONENTS: Distribute the risks and potential benefits of research equally among those who may benefit from the research.

Justice IRB REQUIREMENTS: Vulnerable subjects are not targeted for convenience. People who are likely to benefit from research participation are not systematically excluded.

Purpose of the Minnesota State Mankato IRB Safeguarding the rights and welfare of subjects in research and related activities. Assisting faculty and staff engaged in relevant research from unknowingly committing unethical acts.

Steps in Applying to the IRB: Paper Application 1.The PI must be MSU faculty or staff. 2.Go to the IRB webpage ( and review the IRB Proposal Guidelines and IRB Information.

Steps in Applying to the IRB: Paper Application 3.Complete the application (IRB Proposal Guideline). 4. Submit the application. - Graduate Office - AH 103 (Speech & Hearing Clinic) 5. Wait until you receive approval to begin data collection.

Steps in Applying to the IRB: Online Submission 1.The PI must be MSU faculty or staff. 2.Go to the IRB webpage ( 3. Click on “Online Proposal Submission.”

Steps in Applying to the IRB: Online Proposal 4.Student be sure to click on “Special Note for Students Submitting Online Proposal.” be sure to get advisor’s (PI’s) support. 5.Complete the application (IRB Proposal Guideline). 6.Submit the application. 7. Wait until you receive approval to begin data collection.

Steps in Applying to IRB: Online Submission HINTS: –Make start date about a week out –If student submits, he/she must notify advisor that he/she needs to Go online Access the proposal Submit and notify Provide permission

IRB Levels IRB is concerned with 3 levels of research BUT Classroom activity, laboratory courses, or field assignments are normally not classified as research and typically are not reviewed by the IRB. –These are considered to be exempt at MSU.

Level I See Level I Review Checklist – Children – Standardized educational tests, surveys, interviews, observations of public behavior Cannot identify participants Disclosure does not put participant at risk Public officials –Pre-existing data –Wholesome food

Level I Research involves less than minimal research.

Level II Proposals which involve minimal or less risk and are not eligible for Level I review. Recordings of identifiable information with minor risks. See IRB Manual

Level II Moderate exercise by healthy volunteers. Research on individual or group behavior or characteristics of individuals (e.g., as studies of perception, cognition, game theory, or test development.)

Level II (some examples) Recording of data from subjects 18 years of age or older using non- invasive procedures routinely employed in clinical practice. Collection of blood samples in amounts not exceeding 450 milliliters in an eight-week period and no more often than two times per week.

Level III Involves the most serious risks.

Characteristics of a Consent Form Purpose provided. Procedures clearly described. Risks and discomforts disclosed. Potential benefits provided. In intervention research, describe alternative treatments. Confidentiality provisions detailed.

Characteristics of a Consent Form (continued) Note that the research is voluntary. Assent form for minors or vulnerable adults Provide contact information for –Student investigator (optional) –Principal investigator –IRB Administrator and explain why they are resources

Hints Remember to include signature(s) in all paper versions. Number pages on paper versions. The PI has to be a faculty member or a staff member. Consent forms must be held by PI.

CASE A researcher wants to investigate the social experiences of elementary school children from migrant families. To obtain consent to interview the children, she sends a consent form home to their parents.

Case A researcher wants to investigate the career aspirations of inner city youth. She advertises her study by posting fliers in several community centers. The fliers state that participants will be given an iPod in exchange for their participation.

Case A researcher wants to study the effects of a stress reduction technique. She contacts a local halfway house and requests permission to recruit residents to participate in her study.

Case A graduate student in English wants to compare the composition skills of high school students who are English language learners with students for whom English is their first language. She contacts a local high school teacher and requests access to students’ writing assignments. The assignments will not include students’ names.

Case A researcher wants to study the social networks that often form in assisted living facilities and long-term care facilities for older adults. She plans to obtain informed consent from the residents before conducting individual interviews and focus groups to explore the role of social networks in their lives.

Case A researcher wants to investigate the effectiveness of an employee assistance program for chemically dependent employees. She contacts a local corporation and obtains permission to implement the program at their corporate headquarters. She plans to obtain informed consent to collect data on substance use and absenteeism from employees who voluntarily participate in the program.

Case A researcher is interested in how teen girls make decisions about contraception and STD protection. She plans to recruit girls who seek contraception or pregnancy counseling at a local Planned Parenthood clinic and interview them about their sexual histories and sexual decision making.

References Amdur, R. J., & Bankert, E. A. (2007). Institutional Review Board: Member handbook (2nd ed.) Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.

MSU Contact Information