Use of Establishment Surveys to Estimate Non Resident Travel in Urban Areas Chris Simek Ed Hard David Pearson Stacey Bricka Stella Nepal Columbus, Ohio.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INTRODUCTION TO THE WORLD KLEMS CONFERENCE By Dale W. Jorgenson, Mun S. Ho, and Jon D. Samuels Harvard.
Advertisements

SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting FDOT Systems Planning Office
Johnson City Economic Overview – July Johnson City Demographic Makeup Summary Population1,6561,7211,852 Households Families
Surveying and Modeling Long Distance Trips Stacey Bricka, TTI Erik Sabina, DRCOG Catherine Durso, University of Denver Julie Paasche, PTV NuStats Presented.
In-Demand Occupations 1. 2 JobsOhio Network - Cleveland (Northeast Ohio) Industry Employment Projection Report: EmploymentProjected Change.
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2014 Lecture 07
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to MTF Data Committee presented by Capton Siluvairajan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Date: 10/17/2008.
An Investigation of the Transferability of Trip Generation Models Dr. Jerry Everett, University of Tennessee - CTR Dr. Fred Wegmann, University of Tennessee.
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
Development of a New Commercial Vehicle Travel Model for Triangle Region 14 th TRB Planning Applications Conference, Columbus, Ohio May 7, 2013 Bing Mei.
SOIC Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting Sector Employment Momentum Track (NAICS 11) ImprovingLeading LaggingSlipping Source: Oklahoma.
- (302) L. Jay Burks What is a NAICS Code The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)
Updated Louisiana 2018 Employment Occupational Forecast Louisiana Workforce Commission Division of Economic Development Louisiana State University.
June 23, 2011 SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Recognition Programs In collaboration with and commissioned by Globoforce.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
GEOG 111/211A Transportation Planning UTPS (Review from last time) Urban Transportation Planning System –Also known as the Four - Step Process –A methodology.
Museums in the Neighborhood: evaluating the socio-economic impact of museums Stephen Sheppard, Williams College and C 3 D American Association of Museums.
July 7, 2009 SHRM Poll: Credibility of Online Degrees.
Regional Travel Modeling Unit 6: Aggregate Modeling.
Comparison of Cell, GPS, and Bluetooth Derived External Data Results from the 2014 Tyler, Texas Study 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Conference.
KY 4/22 Module 1b Chapter 3 in the TS Manual Main Survey Types.
The implementation of tools to support the data quality of the survey frame Mario Ménard November 2008.
New Partners for Smart Growth 11th Annual Conference San Diego February 2, 2012 New Parking Standards for Affordable Housing.
Microsimulation of Intra-Urban Commercial Vehicle and Person Movements 11th National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Session 11: May 8,
LAURENCE E. GOSS, PHD INSTITUTE FOR NEW HAMPSHIRE STUDIES PLYMOUTH STATE UNIVERSITY JANUARY 10, 2011 TOURISM AND THE ROOMS AND MEALS TAX.
United States Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Community College Alliance September 25, 2014.
 Matt Gates. 
SHRM Poll, December 2, 2009 | ©SHRM 2009 December 2, 2009 SHRM Poll: Transitioning to a Virtual Organization.
Talking Freight: Establishment Surveys State and Local Experience Johanna Zmud Mia Zmud Chris Simek.
UrbanFootprint Module 3: Base Data Preparation and Updating Materials prepared with funding support from the California Governor’s Office of Planning and.
Trip Generation Review and Recommendations 1 presented to MTF Model Advancement Committee presented by Ken Kaltenbach The Corradino Group November 9, 2009.
SHRM Poll, November 2, 2009 | ©SHRM 2009 November 2, 2009 SHRM Poll: Assistance Organizations Offer to Help Employees Manage Their Financial Resources.
January 22, 2010 Background Checking: Conducting Reference Background Checks.
Dangerous Jobs in Indiana October Executive Summary The most dangerous jobs in Indiana Where fatalities occur:  Truck drivers  Farmers  Construction.
Yavapai College Regional Economic Development Center.
National Household Travel Survey Statewide Applications Heather Contrino Travel Surveys Team Lead Federal Highway Administration Office of Highway Policy.
An Integrated Tour-based Truck Travel Forecasting Model Ian Harrington Central Transportation Planning Staff Boston, Massachusetts.
Background on LMI Concepts Rod Fortran, August 6, 2008.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Daniel Beagan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. February.
August 11, 2009 SHRM Poll: Education Assistance Benefits.
Jessica Horning, Kevin J. Krizek, & Ahmed El-Geneidy University of Minnesota Parcel Level Land Use & Determining Motorized and.
Draft Report – Morro Bay Economic Development Program 2012/13 April 22, 2013 Presented by John DiNunzio, MBA 1.
Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.
Size Standards Analysis: SBA Methodology Presented to: The Council on Federal Procurement of Architectural & Engineering Services (COFPAES) By: Khem R.
January 29, 2010 SHRM Poll: Workplace Policies for Office Pools.
Measuring the blue economy ad-hoc Member States' Expert Group 29 September 2015.
August 16, 2011 SHRM Poll: Managing Employee Absences.
September 17, 2010 SHRM Poll: Organizations’ Response to Health Care Reform—Senior Management’s Requests.
How Does Your Model Measure Up Presented at TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference by Phil Shapiro Frank Spielberg VHB May, 2007.
Weighting Household Surveys By David F. Pearson, Ph.D., P.E. April 2007.
June 6, 2011 SHRM Poll: Succession Planning. Succession Planning ©SHRM 2011 Key Findings 2  What percentage of organizations currently have succession.
January 22, 2010 Background Checking: Post-hire Background Checks.
January 22, 2010 Background Checking: General Background Checks.
December 1, 2011 SHRM Poll: 2011Holiday Parties Holiday Parties ©SHRM 2011 Key Findings 2  Do organizations plan to have a 2011 end-of-year or.
Sectors of Industry BDI3C. Industry Sector Make-up  Canada’s system of sectioning industry is production-oriented.  Establishments using similar production.
TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL UPDATE
Johnson City MPO Travel Demand Model
Draft ISIC Rev.4 structure
Quality Aspects and Approaches in Business Statistics
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting, Ch. 8 (152054A)
Transportation Demand Analysis
The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)
Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries CFOI, Bureau of Labor Statistics
THE GREATER ROCHESTER, NEW YORK REGION
Trip Distribution Review and Recommendations
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2016 Lecture 07
Data Report: Orillia January 2018.
Trip Generation I Meeghat Habibian Transportation Demand Analysis
THE GREATER ROCHESTER, NEW YORK REGION
Longview 2020 Forum by the Hibbs Institute Wednesday, March 6, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Use of Establishment Surveys to Estimate Non Resident Travel in Urban Areas Chris Simek Ed Hard David Pearson Stacey Bricka Stella Nepal Columbus, Ohio May 7, 2013

2 Purpose Collect information on the destination or attraction end of trip – Resident and non-resident Develop attraction rates for trip generation – Attraction rate = attractions per employee – Stratified by area type (6) and employment type (4)

3 Design Considerations Sampling Data collection process Fielding Processing

4 Sample Development Drawn from list of WPs Possible sources – State employment data – Dun & Bradstreet – infoUSA Sorted by Basic, Service, Retail and Education employment types – Based on NAICS code Type*NAICSIndustry Group Basic 11Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting 21Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction 22Utilities 23Construction 31-33Manufacturing 42Wholesale Trade 48-49Transportation and Warehousing (except 491) 5111Newspaper Publishers/Book Publishers/Directory Publishers 5112Software Publishers 512Motion Picture and Sound Recording (except 51213) 5151Radio and TV Broadcasting 5152TW Cable 5173Telecommunications Resellers 5174Satellite Network 5175Cable and Other Program Distribution Retail 44-45Retail 51213Motion Picture Theaters 71Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 722Food Service and Drinking Places 491Post Offices * Service and Education not included

5 Sample Size and Stratification Sample size = what you can afford – Small to medium MPOs ( surveys) – Large MPOs ( surveys) Stratification – By employment type for small/medium areas – By employment and/or area type, WP size in larger areas Ratio of full to partial surveys varies – Generally 1/3 to 2/3 Employment TypeFull SurveyPartial Survey Basic2030 Retail3070 Service3070 Education2030 Totals Example Workplace Sample Matrix

6 Data Collection Process Randomized list of WPs contacted for recruitment General survey of participating WPs Pre survey site assessment CAPI of visitors and employees – Collect information regarding travel to/from WP Vehicle or person counts

7 Fielding Survey team comprised of surveyors and counters – Size of team dependent on size of establishment, number of access points, etc. Interviews and counts conducted on same day

8 Data Processing Geocoded data assigned to study area TAZs and area types – Texas MPO area types based on pop. & employment densities – CBD, CBD Fringe, Urban, Sub-Urban, Sub-Urban Fringe, Rural Data processed and expanded at each site to vehicle or person control total – Visitor and employee data expanded separately – Trips assessed by trip purpose

9 Development of WP Attraction Rates Attraction rates developed by trip purpose – HBW; HBNW-Retail; HBNW-Education; HBNW-Other; NHB; EXT; NON- RES – Person and auto driver trips per employee CV attraction rates also developed – CV trips per employee Results compiled by employment and area type

10 Comparing Productions and Attractions Attraction rates applied to total employment to estimate total attractions – Compared to total productions from HHTS – Compared to total CV trips from CVS Texas Practice: Modelers have latitude to use estimate they consider most appropriate in model calibration – WPS Attractions balanced to HH productions – WPS CV attractions balanced to CVS CV productions

11 Waco MPO - 1,042 Miles k persons - 89k households - 14 th largest TX MSA - 5,000 establishments - 99,000 employees

12 Waco MPO Trip Purpose WP AttractionsHousehold ProductionsExternal ProductionsCV Productions PersonVehiclePersonVehiclePersonVehicle HBW 165,562158,841125,778103,769 HBNW-Retail 587,311489,398135,09988,329 HBNW-Other 220,756184,583189,631111,546 HBNW-School 166,285133,398132,94546,708 NHB-D 126,316106,581246,479161,761 NHB-O 181,659153,984 EXT-D 3,7663,169 63,95152,419 EXT-O 7,1726,044 63,95152,419 NON-RES 53,51245,520 CV 50,586 21,730111,658

13 Waco MPO Trip Purpose WP Attractions HH Productions External Productions CV Productions Vehicle HBW158,841103,769N/A HBNW807,379246,583N/A NHB260,565161,761N/A EXT9,213N/A104,838N/A NON-RES45,520N/A CV50,586N/A21,730111,658 TOTAL1,332,104512,113126,568111,658

14 Non Resident Travel Captured in external survey and work place survey – Most of the time not captured in HHTS WP best estimate of internal NON-RES travel – Person and vehicle counts provide control totals External survey best estimate of external NON-RES travel Missing link in NON-RES travel – Internal NON-RES residential travel (Traveling salesman example) Rule of Thumb → WPS estimates of NON-RES trips are about 5- 10% of total HHTS productions – 45,520 NON-RES attractions/ 512,113 total productions =.088 ≈ 8.8%

15 Questions? Chris Simek (512) Ed Hard (979)