Verification Precipitation verification (overestimation): a common view of the behaviour of the LM, aLMo and LAMI Francis Schubiger and Pirmin Kaufmann,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slide 1ECMWF forecast products users meeting – Reading, June 2005 Verification of weather parameters Anna Ghelli, ECMWF.
Advertisements

COSMO General Meeting Zürich, Sept Stefan Klink, Klaus Stephan and Christoph Schraff and Daniel.
QPF verification of the 4 model versions at 7 km res. (COSMO-I7, COSMO-7, COSMO-EU, COSMO-ME) with the 2 model versions at 2.8 km res. (COSMO- I2, COSMO-IT)
VERIFICATION Highligths by WG5. 9° General MeetingAthens September Working package/Task on “standardization” The “core” Continuous parameters: T2m,
COSMO Workpackage No First Results on Verification of LMK Test Runs Basing on SYNOP Data Lenz, Claus-Jürgen; Damrath, Ulrich
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Improving COSMO-LEPS forecasts of extreme events with.
QPF verification of DWD-LM and LAMI model using high resolution non-GTS data in Piedmont region and Northern Italy Working Group 5: Verification and Case.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss The Latent Heat Nudging Scheme of COSMO EWGLAM/SRNWP Meeting,
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss WG5-Report from Switzerland: Verification of COSMO in.
Eidgenössisches Departement des Innern EDI Bundesamt für Meteorologie und Klimatologie MeteoSchweiz Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre On the Value of.
COSMO General Meeting – Roma Sept 2011 Some results from operational verification in Italy Angela Celozzi – Giovanni Favicchio Elena Oberto – Adriano.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Quantitative precipitation forecasts in the Alps – first.
Verification of DWD Ulrich Damrath & Ulrich Pflüger.
COSMO General Meeting Zurich, 2005 Institute of Meteorology and Water Management Warsaw, Poland- 1 - Verification of the LM at IMGW Katarzyna Starosta,
COSMO General Meeting – Moscow Sept 2010 Some results from operational verification in Italy Angela Celozzi - Federico Grazzini Massimo Milelli -
Verification methods - towards a user oriented verification WG5.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss High Resolution Snow Analysis for COSMO
SEASONAL COMMON PLOT SCORES A DRIANO R ASPANTI P ERFORMANCE DIAGRAM BY M.S T ESINI Sibiu - Cosmo General Meeting 2-5 September 2013.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Final PP QPF meeting COSMO General Meeting, 18 September.
We carried out the QPF verification of the three model versions (COSMO-I7, COSMO-7, COSMO-EU) with the following specifications: From January 2006 till.
Radar in aLMo Assimilation of Radar Information in the Alpine Model of MeteoSwiss Daniel Leuenberger and Andrea Rossa MeteoSwiss.
Validation and Sensitivities of Dynamic Precipitation Simulation for Winter Events over the Folsom Lake Watershed: 1964–99 Jianzhong Wang and Konstantine.
PREVIEW - Sixth Framework Programme PREVention Information and Early Warning WP4340 “Very Short-Range Flash Flood Laboratory” Leader: MeteoFrance Start.
Latest results in verification over Poland Katarzyna Starosta, Joanna Linkowska Institute of Meteorology and Water Management, Warsaw 9th COSMO General.
The latest results of verification over Poland Katarzyna Starosta Joanna Linkowska COSMO General Meeting, Cracow September 2008 Institute of Meteorology.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Accounting for Change: Local wind forecasts from the high-
COSMO WG4 Actvities Concentrated mainly on COSMO LEPS  presentation by Andrea Montani The rest of the activities have been absorbed into the advanced.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Verification results of COSMO at MeteoSwiss in the year.
VERSUS2 – A new priority project for verification Pj Leader – Angela Celozzi.
Renata Gonçalves Tedeschi Alice Marlene Grimm Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná 1. OBJECTIVES 1)To asses the influence of ENSO on the frequency.
Priority project Advanced interpretation COSMO General Meeting, 18. September 2006 Pierre Eckert.
Verification Verification with SYNOP, TEMP, and GPS data P. Kaufmann, M. Arpagaus, MeteoSwiss P. Emiliani., E. Veccia., A. Galliani., UGM U. Pflüger, DWD.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss WG 3: Overview status report COSMO General Meeting, 19.
Deutscher Wetterdienst Fuzzy and standard verification for COSMO-EU and COSMO-DE Ulrich Damrath (with contributions by Ulrich Pflüger) COSMO GM Rome 2011.
Feature-based (object-based) Verification Nathan M. Hitchens National Severe Storms Laboratory.
Validation of Satellite-Derived Rainfall Estimates and Numerical Model Forecasts of Precipitation over the US John Janowiak Climate Prediction Center/NCEP/NWS.
General Meeting Moscow, 6-10 September 2010 High-Resolution verification for Temperature ( in northern Italy) Maria Stefania Tesini COSMO General Meeting.
Overview of WG5 activities and Conditional Verification Project Adriano Raspanti - WG5 Bucharest, September 2006.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Component testing of the COSMO model’s turbulent diffusion.
Verification A first attempt to WP Preliminary results of one test case Matteo Buzzi, Pirmin Kaufmann, Dominique Ruffieux, Francis Schubiger MeteoSwiss.
VERIFICATION Highligths by WG5. 2 Outlook Some focus on Temperature with common plots and Conditional Verification Some Fuzzy verification Long trends.
Progress in Radar Assimilation at MeteoSwiss Daniel Leuenberger 1, Marco Stoll 2 and Andrea Rossa 3 1 MeteoSwiss 2 Geographisches Institut, University.
Kain-Fritsch convection scheme: an update Marco Arpagaus MeteoSwiss.
COSMO General Meeting 2008, Krakow Modifications to the COSMO-Model Cumulus Parameterisation Scheme (Tiedtke 1989): Implementation and Testing Dimitrii.
Latest results in the precipitation verification over Northern Italy Elena Oberto, Marco Turco, Paolo Bertolotto (*) ARPA Piemonte, Torino, Italy.
COSMO WG3-WG5 workshop 9 March 2005, Langen. WG3-WG5 workshop, , Langen 1 Agenda for joint WG3-WG5 workshop (1) WP.
WG4 Oct 2006 – Sep 2007 plans COSMO General Meeting, 21 September 2006 Pierre Eckert.
Verification Priority Project ‘Quantitative Precipitation Forecast’ Progress report Task 1.1 and 1.2 Silke Dierer and Francis Schubiger MeteoSwiss.
VERIFICATION Highligths by WG5. 2 Outlook The COSMO-Index COSI at DWD Time series of the index and its DWD 2003.
WG5 COSMO General Meeting, Rome 2011 Authors: ALL Presented by Adriano Raspanti.
New results in COSMO about fuzzy verification activities and preliminary results with VERSUS Conditional Verification 31th EWGLAM &16th SRNWP meeting,
LEPS VERIFICATION ON MAP CASES
Current verification results for COSMO-EU and COSMO-DE at DWD
André Walser MeteoSwiss, Zurich
QPF sensitivity to Runge-Kutta and Leapfrog core
aLMo from GME and IFS boundary conditions: A comparison
Tuning the horizontal diffusion in the COSMO model
Verification of LAMI: QPF over northern Italy and vertical profiles
WG5-Report from Switzerland: Verification of aLMo in the year 2005
(Elena Oberto, Massimo Milelli - ARPA Piemonte)
Daniel Leuenberger1, Christian Keil2 and George Craig2
Workshop Results WG5 COSMO General Meeting
COSMO General Meeting 2009 WG5 Parallel Session 7 September 2009
Verification of COSMO-LEPS and coupling with a hydrologic model
The COSMO-LEPS cloud problem over the Alpine region
SRNWP-PEPS COSMO General Meeting September 2005
Some Verification Highlights and Issues in Precipitation Verification
Ulrich Pflüger & Ulrich Damrath
Some ideas on verification targeted to the use of the forecasters Pierre Eckert, MeteoSwiss, Geneva Some ideas on the presentation to the forecasters.
VERIFICATION OF THE LAMI AT CNMCA
Presentation transcript:

Verification Precipitation verification (overestimation): a common view of the behaviour of the LM, aLMo and LAMI Francis Schubiger and Pirmin Kaufmann, MeteoSwiss Uli Damrath, DWD Elena Oberto, Marco Turco, Paolo Bertolotto, ARPA Piedmont

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich, difference of mean monthly rain gauges in D and CH C. Schraff, DWD

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich, Verification of aLMo Winter 03/04 over Switzerland full line: obs (ANETZ); dashed: black: aLMo, red: LM

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich, Verification of aLMo Winter 02/03 over Switzerland full line: obs (ANETZ); dashed: black: aLMo, red: LM

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich, Verification of the cloud ice testsuite in aLMo from full line: obs (ANETZ); dashed: black: aLMo blue: aLMo-cloud ice, red: LM

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich, Verification of aLMo Winter 04/05 over Switzerland full line: obs (ANETZ); dashed: black: aLMo, red: LM

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich,

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich, Verification with raingauges in D and CH

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich, Verification with raingauges in CH

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich, Verification of aLMo Winter 04/05 SYNOP

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich, Precipitation: scores of aLMo Winter 00/01 verification with 12h-sums from SYNOP

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich, Precipitation: scores of aLMo Winter 01/02 verification with 12h-sums from SYNOP

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich, Precipitation: scores of aLMo Winter 02/03 verification with 12h-sums from SYNOP

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich, Precipitation: scores of aLMo Winter 03/04 verification with 12h-sums from SYNOP

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich, Precipitation: scores of aLMo Winter 04/05 verification with 12h-sums from SYNOP

Verification Latest results in the precipitation verification over Piedmont Elena Oberto, Marco Turco, Paolo Bertolotto (*) ARPA Piemonte, Torino, Italy Eyeball verification: seasonal cum maps of D+1 forecast Seasonal statistical indices Special focus over last winter (DJF’05): Statistical indices for increasing thresholds Scatter plot of daily precipitation over each basins: seasonal and monthly

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich,

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich, Prec (mm) ALMO LAMI LOKAL DJF 2004 OBSERVED

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich,

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich, Scale (mm)

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich, OBSERVED Prec (mm) aLMo 00 LM-DWD 00 LAMI 00 Verification over Piedmont ; winter 04/05

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich, Seasonal trend of BIAS and ETS Threshold=10mm/24h Forecast time: +00/+24. The error bars indicates 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of resampled distribution, applied to the "reference" model. Djf’05 too much dry  no statistic  in the next slides there is a special focus LoKal aLMo LAMI

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich, Seasonal trend of BIAS and ETS Threshold=10mm/24h Forecast time: +24/+48. The error bars indicates 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of resampled distribution, applied to the "reference" model. aLMo LAMI LoKal

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich, Conclusions a possible cause for the precipitation overestimation is the cloud ice scheme but another causes (masked by the precipitation variability) are also possible, because already before the introduction of cloud ice scheme we had seasons with precipitation overestimation we have regions (especially in southern Europe) with no changes in the yearly (seasonal) biases in the last years

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich, Outlook (1) more work necessary to fix the causes for precipitation overestimation scatter plots of daily precipitation sums 'LM vs raingauges, SYNOP-stations, RADAR areal mean’ : this helps to see if this overestimation is due to (some few) cases where the model gives (much) precipitation that is not observed, or whether overestimation of precipitation is a problem in all cases

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich, winter 2004 (djf) aLMo D+1 Scatterplot of mean daily precipitation over the Piedmont basins

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich, winter 2004 (djf) Lokal D+1 Scatterplot of mean daily precipitation over the Piedmont basins

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich, winter 2004 (djf) LAMI D+1 Scatterplot of mean daily precipitation over the Piedmont basins

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich, winter 2005 (djf) aLMo D+1 Scatterplot of mean daily precipitation over the Piedmont basins

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich, winter 2005 (djf) Lokal D+1 Scatterplot of mean daily precipitation over the Piedmont basins

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich, winter 2005 (djf) LAMI D+1 Scatterplot of mean daily precipitation over the Piedmont basins

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich, scatterplot daily precipitation Germany: August 2002

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich, Scatterplot daily precipitation Germany: December 2002

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich, Scatterplot daily precipitation Germany: December 2004

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich, Outlook (2) more work would be necessary to fix the causes for precipitation overestimation scatter plots of daily precipitation sums 'LM vs raingauges, SYNOP-stations, RADAR areal mean’ : this helps to see if this overestimation is due to (some few) cases where the model gives (much) precipitation that is not observed, or whether overestimation of precipitation is a problem in all cases set up a simple conditional verification by discriminating: between events of different (observed) vertical stability i.e., unstable = convective (?), stable = stratiform (?) convective/stratiform precip in the model. This would help to attribute the problem to the grid-scale precipitation scheme or the convection scheme, or something else.

Verification COSMO General Meeting, Zurich, Outlook (3) strong link to WG1-WG3 for sensitivity studies on a set of selected cases / episodes: analysis / data assimilation dynamics and numerics physics