A Sourcebook for Monitoring and Evaluating Agricultural and Rural Development Measuring Results in less-than-ideal Conditions Global Donor Platform for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact Evaluation and Property Rights and Land Policy at MCC March 5, 2009.
Advertisements

February Dakar, Senegal
UNDP Global Programme Mr. Magdy Martinez-Soliman Director a.i., Bureau for Development Policy New York - 3 September 2014 United Nations Development.
Lesson 2: Project: Evaluation, Monitoring, Auditing Macerata, 22 nd October Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
Building a knowledge platform for agriculture and rural development: Evidence-based learning and results based management in Myanmar. Livelihoods and Food.
MINISTRY OF DEVOLUTION AND PLANNING. M&E DEPARTMENT WELIME Using Technology in Monitorin g and Evaluation (e-ProMIS)
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
Pillar 4a Information management
M&E Issues: RAFIP and REP Kaushik Barua Accra, 12 Dec
Comprehensive M&E Systems
Monitoring and Evaluation in GEF International Waters Projects Dr. Juha I. Uitto GEF Monitoring and Evaluation
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
Role of Result-based Monitoring in Result-based Management (RBM) Setting goals and objectives Reporting to Parliament RBM of projects, programs and.
Key Elements, Emerging Trends and Promising Practices in Monitoring and Evaluation of Development Results Lawrence S. Cooley, President Management Systems.
1 Designing a Monitoring and Evaluation System for a Rural Travel and Transport Project Michael Bamberger Gender and Development Group The World Bank RTTP.
Pestalozzi Children‘s Foundation emPower 2012 Monitoring & Evaluation Lecturers: Beatrice Schulter.
EuropeAid’s today’s quality framework and the Results agenda
HOW TO WRITE A GOOD TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR FOR EVALUATION Programme Management Interest Group 19 October 2010 Pinky Mashigo.
Framework for Planning PARIS21 Future Principal Outcomes Sought, and Possible Targets, for World Community.
Monitoring & Evaluation in World Bank Agriculture and Rural Development Operations SASAR Monitoring & Evaluation Workshop New Delhi; June 20, 2006.
EVALUATION IN THE GEF Juha Uitto Director
Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in Asia Bangkok, Thailand 7-8 April 2009 Tracking national portfolios and assessing results.
ISTEP: Technology Field Research in Developing Communities Instructor: M. Bernardine Dias CAs: Sarah Belousov and Ermine Teves Spring 2009.
Global Initiative to Improve Agricultural and Rural Statistics October 22/23, 2008 Expert meeting.
May 12 th Monitoring and Project Control. Objectives Anticipated Outcomes Express why Monitoring and Controlling are Important. Differentiate between.
MONITORING AND EVALUATION A GENERAL OVERVIEW A PRESENTATION AT ISSER 28 June, 2013 By Bruno B. Dery.
Evidence and Information for Policy Health Metrics Network Strengthening Country-Level and Global Tracking of Health Outcomes.
TRACKING RESULTS IN AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT IN LESS-THAN-IDEAL CONDITIONS A Sourcebook of indicators for monitoring and evaluation World Bank.
M & E: WHAT, WHY A ND HOW ? S. Venkatraman UIS-AIMS, UNESCO Bangkok.
Lesson 2: Project: Evaluation, Monitoring, Auditing Macerata, 22 nd October Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.
Tracking of GEF Portfolio: Monitoring and Evaluation of Results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Aaron Zazueta March 2010 Hanoi, Vietnam.
MARKETS II M&E FRAMEWORK AND CHALLENGES Joseph Obado.
Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa Accra, Ghana, 9-11 July 2009 Tracking National Portfolios and Assessing Results.
UNDAF M&E Systems Purpose Can explain the importance of functioning M&E system for the UNDAF Can support formulation and implementation of UNDAF M&E plans.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Western and Central Africa Dakar, May 2007.
Monitoring & Evaluation: The concepts and meaning Day 9 Session 1.
MAINSTREAMING MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Can education be effectively managed without an M & E system in place?
Aaron Zazueta Chief Evaluation Officer 2013 EVALUATION IN THE GEF.
TANZANIA’S MONITORING SYSTEM: CHALLENGES AND WAY FORWARD BY EKINGO MAGEMBE POVERTY MONITORING OFFICER (MoF-TANZANIA )
MAFF Workshop on INTERNATIONAL BEST Monitoring & Evaluation (M&E) PRACTICES 24 August 2010.
Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Managing for Development Results Results-Oriented Monitoring.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
A short introduction to the Strengthened Approach to supporting PFM reforms.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Governance Indicators at AfDB Stephen Bahemuka May, 2012 African Development Bank.
Changing the way the New Zealand Aid Programme monitors and evaluates its Aid Ingrid van Aalst Principal Evaluation Manager Development Strategy & Effectiveness.
SESSION 3: SETTING PRIORITIES – COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE AND OPTIONS ANALYSIS.
ACTED AME Appraisal, Monitoring and Evaluation. Summary 1/ ACTED AME department 2/ AME Responsibilities 3/ AME throughout project cycle 4/ Involvement.
Module 1 Program Evaluation and Its Practice. 2 Overview n What is evaluation? n Definitions of program evaluation n What can be evaluated? n What is.
Comprehensive M&E Systems: Identifying Resources to Support M&E Plans for National TB Programs Lisa V. Adams, MD E&E Regional Workshop Kiev, Ukraine May.
Session 13: Monitoring and Evaluation PubH325 Global Social Marketing Donna Sherard, MPH November 30, 2009.
Project Monitoring and Evaluation A useful Tool for Research Projects’ Administrators and Managers Folajogun V. Falaye. (Professor of Educational Research.
ICT4D: Evaluation Dr David Hollow DSV, University of Stockholm.
The USAID Agency-wide Climate Change Evaluation Agenda: Unpacking Overarching Concepts Nancy Peek, Research Associate, Development and Training Services,
Development Account: 6th Tranche Strengthening the capacity of National Statistical Offices (NSOs) in the Caribbean Small Island Developing States to fulfill.
Session 1 S3.1 session day 5 4 training delivered by lead partners Habitat for Humanity, RedR and Shelter Centre on 2 nd to 9 th July 2011 in Thailand.
Marelize Gorgens The World Bank An M&E strategy Monitoring & Evaluation strategy Master & Execute Money and Energy is a waste of M&E that we do not M&E.
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
Module 1: Introducing Development Evaluation
Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
Building a Culture of Learning
AFRICAN COMMISSION ON AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS
UNDP-UNEP POVERTY & ENVIRONMENT INITIATIVE (PEI): MID-TERM REVIEW
منهج الإطار المنطقي وإطار الرصد والتقييم وإطار النتائج
WHAT is evaluation and WHY is it important?
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
Data for PRS Monitoring: Institutional and Technical Challenges
Presentation transcript:

A Sourcebook for Monitoring and Evaluating Agricultural and Rural Development Measuring Results in less-than-ideal Conditions Global Donor Platform for Agriculture and Rural Development (GDPRD) World BankFAO

Definitions Monitoring can be defined as: “A continuing function that uses systematic collection of data on specified indicators to provide management and the main stakeholders of an ongoing development intervention with indications of the extent of progress and achievement of objectives and progress in the use of allocated funds”. Thus monitoring embodies the regular tracking of inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes and impacts of development activities at the project, program, sector and national levels. This includes the monitoring of a country’s progress against the millennium development goals (MDGs), or other national measures of development success. Evaluation can be defined as “the process of determining the worth or significance of a development activity, policy or program ….. to determine the relevance of objectives, the efficacy of design and implementation, the efficiency or resource use, and the sustainability of results. An evaluation should (enable) the incorporation of lessons learned into the decision-making process of both partner and donor ”

Purpose Sourcebook for development practitioners working in Agricultural and Rural Development (ARD) and provide them with certain basic tools to help with the selection and use of core indicators for monitoring and evaluating projects and programs. Fieldtested in 5 countries (Cambodia,Nicaragua, Nigeria, Senegal, Tanzania) Historic review of M&E Project-program;Provider-user; poverty-PRS-whole-govt New directions: governance; devolution;community

Analytical Framework –Logframe –Performance –Results Early outcomes (service delivery) Later outcomes (Yields??, living standards) –Impact

Data Framework –Review tools Database systems Survey types –Capacity Institutional Framework –Whole-of-Government network –NSS Issues –Devolution and subnational data systems –M&E for Governance and accountability –Community-level M&E Action Plan