NRCS National Ecological Site Handbook Webinar April 18, 2013 George Peacock, Team Leader National Grazing Lands Team Central National Technology Support.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable Development and Evolution of the Criteria and Indicators.
Advertisements

Rangeland Health United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management.
Site Characterization Instructional Goal: Upon completion of this topic the participant will better understand the need to identify and evaluate various.
MLRA-SSO Responsibilities for Ecological Site Inventory Curtis Talbot Rangeland Mgt Specialist National Soil Survey Center March 24, 2011.
Division of State Lands’ Wetlands Program. Issues That Spawned State Wetlands Program (SB 3) Lack of detailed wetlands inventory information or guidance.
PROPOSED PRIORITIES FOR SCIENCE AND COLLABORATION OCTOBER 2012.
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
Part I: What’s the reference? ? 5 The rangeland health reference is based on what is possible (long-term ecological potential) for a particular.
The Downscaled Climate Projection Has Arrived – NOW WHAT?
TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
Ecological Sites and their Relationship to Soil Mapping Steve Campbell Soil Scientist USDA – Natural Resources Conservation Service West National Technology.
Relationship to E-Flows Riparian Areas Influences groundwater/surface water relationships Provides filters to improve water quality Provides habitat for.
Bureau of Land Management NAIP Information Meeting July 19 th, 2006.
Implementation workshop
Orientation to the Science K to 7 IRP Part 1: What Is Science K to 7?  How was Science K to 7 developed?  How has Science K to 7 changed since.
FOREST SERVICE GHG ISSUES AND INFORMATION NEEDS Elizabeth Reinhardt, FS Climate Change Office.
Watersheds Capture, Store And Safely Release Water.
Soil and Ecosystem Dynamics in Soil Survey
 Life in communities has changed over the years.  One of those changes is in transportation. Transportation is a way of moving people or things from.
PFC Assessment Approach & Definitions Creeks and Communities.
Environmental Risk Analysis
The Field Office Technical Guide and Other Technical Resources CNMP Core Curriculum Section 2 — Conservation Planning.
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
ECOLOGICAL SITES: DEVELOPMENT AND DESCRIPTION ESD Workshop Winnemuca NV 5 June 2012 Joel Brown USDA NRCS National Soil Survey Center /Jornada Experimental.
Proposed Revisions Parts 601, 608, 610.  Decision memo signed by Chief on March 27, 2012 on regionalizing soil survey  Need to have agency directives.
NRCS Ecological Site Handbook Webinar April 16, 2013 Susan Andrews, National Leader Soil Quality and Ecosystems Branch National Soil Survey Center and.
Rangeland Health Assessment and Monitoring (Framework for Ecological Site-Based Assessment and Monitoring in Mongolia) 7 July 2007 Ulan Bator, Mongolia.
Implementing Ecological Site Structure & Strategy Kendra Moseley Urbanik Region 1/2 ES QA Specialist February 5, 2015.
Success stories and lessons learnt from participation in international programmes/projects in the thematic field “Climate actions, environment, resource.
Land Treatment and the Conservation Planning Process CNMP Core Curriculum Section 3 — Land Treatment Practices.
Site Investigation and Storage Structure Sizing CNMP Core Curriculum Section 4 – Manure Wastewater Storage and Handling.
VIRTUAL ECOLOGICAL INQUIRY MODULE: A Collaborative Project Between TAMU-ITS Center and CAS-CNIC Presented by: X. Ben Wu and Stephanie L. Knight Department.
Defining Everglades Restoration Success* *i.e., “millions of crayfish” COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION PLAN John C. Ogden, Chief Scientist, Everglades.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
Wayne A. Robbie, Supervisory Soil Scientist USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region Albuquerque, NM Common Elements: Ecological Sites Descriptions and.
Ground-Truthing the Habitat Inventory for the Fraser River: Status Report and Lessons Learned March 2007 Fraser River Estuary Management Program.
UNICEF’s work and planned activities for the production of data on children with disabilities Claudia Cappa, Data and Analytics Section, UNICEF, NY.
STRATIFICATION PLOT PLACEMENT CONTROLS Strategy for Monitoring Post-fire Rehabilitation Treatments Troy Wirth and David Pyke USGS – Biological Resources.
Inventory and Monitoring Terrestrial Fauna Inventory and Monitoring Terrestrial Fauna Linking Field Activities to Budget Processes.
A Strategy for Coupled Vegetation and Soil Sampling to Develop Ecological Site Descriptions Brandon Bestelmeyer Arlene Tugel George Peacock Homer Sanchez.
Riparian Proper Functioning Condition A process for assessment A defined condition A starting point A common language An interdisciplinary team approach.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
Ecological Sites and the MLRA SSO Leader George Peacock, Team Leader Grazing Lands Technology Development Team Central National Technology Support Center.
Atlin/Taku Land Use Planning Update Presentation to Multiparty Workshop #3 March 6, 2009.
SCIENCE in California’s Natural Community Conservation Plans (NCCPs) California Department of Fish and Game Brenda S. Johnson, Ph.D.
Vegetation Mapping An Interagency Approach The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and the USDA Forest Service Mark Rosenberg: Research.
Interpreting Ecological Sites for Grazing Management.
Proposed Agriculture Courses Board of Education October 6, 2015.
Soil Mapping/Sample Collection
Conceptual Modeling as a Tool for Developing a Watershed Management Plan An aid to understanding linkages Barbara Washburn California Watershed Assessment.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Mount Buller Geography Unit 3 Fieldwork 2010 Format of the SAC A written and media booklet is developed in and out of class over the next 3 weeks. This.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
What’s the Reference?. Applying the Technique: 6 Steps 1. Identify the Evaluation Area 2. Obtain or develop Reference Worksheet 3. Obtain or develop Evaluation.
USFS Hierarchy Finer Scale Units for Missouri ELTs=ESDs=HGM.
Ecological Sites on Rangeland
George Peacock, Team Leader Grazing Lands Technology Development Team Central National Technology Support Center 2010 Southern Regional Cooperative Soil.
Ecological Sites on Rangeland. A0po&list=PL7CD3CD7A9350A858.
Ecological Site Descriptions Foundation for Resource Management Decisions George Peacock Grazing Lands Technology Institute USDA-NRCS.
Conservation Strategy Revisions: 1. Grassland Conservation Strategy Natural Temperate Grassland Button Wrinklewort Ginninderra Peppercress Baeuerlan’s.
SUSTAINING ENVIRONMENTAL CAPITAL (SEC) INITIATIVE Providing resources for applying ecosystem services in public land & water management.
Soil Quality Assessment and the Plant Materials Program Susan S. Andrews, Arlene J. Tugel, Ann Lewandowski, and Mike Hubbs, NRCS Soil Quality Institute.
DG ENV Environmental assessment procedures for energy infrastructure projects of common interest (PCIs)
California Department of Public Health / 1 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH Standards and Guidelines for Healthcare Surge during Emergencies How.
U.S Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Designing an Integrated Monitoring Program for Coniferous Forests: beyond the forest and the trees.
4FRI Biophysical Monitoring Indicators: Assigning Metrics of Success (or Failure) 4FRI Landscape Strategy & Science and Monitoring Working Groups –
IST 210 Database Design Process IST 210, Section 1 Todd S. Bacastow January 2004.
Rangeland NRI: 2002 and Beyond Presentation given to NRCS State Conservationists NRI Exec. Committee Northwest Watershed Research Center, Boise.
Physical and Human Geography
Describing and Monitoring Rangelands:
Presentation transcript:

NRCS National Ecological Site Handbook Webinar April 18, 2013 George Peacock, Team Leader National Grazing Lands Team Central National Technology Support Center and Susan Andrews, National Leader Soil Quality and Ecosystems Branch National Soil Survey Center

ESD Standards Purpose: PURPOSE: Provide standards, guidelines, definitions, policy, responsibilities, and procedures for conducting the collaborative process of ESD development.  Interdisciplinary  Interagency  Non-governmental organizations  Universities  Other partners PURPOSE: Provide standards, guidelines, definitions, policy, responsibilities, and procedures for conducting the collaborative process of ESD development.  Interdisciplinary  Interagency  Non-governmental organizations  Universities  Other partners

NRCS National Ecological Site Handbook (NESH) Developed cooperatively between Soil Science and Resource Assessment (SSRA) and Science and Technology (S&T) Deputy Areas  National Soil Quality and Ecosystems Branch  National Grazing Lands Team  National Technology Support Centers  State Staffs  Soil Survey Regional Offices  Other SSRA and S&T Staff Developed cooperatively between Soil Science and Resource Assessment (SSRA) and Science and Technology (S&T) Deputy Areas  National Soil Quality and Ecosystems Branch  National Grazing Lands Team  National Technology Support Centers  State Staffs  Soil Survey Regional Offices  Other SSRA and S&T Staff

Major Sections of the NESH Section I – Policy and Procedures Section II – ES Concept and Description Development Section III – Delineation and Mapping, Hierarchies, and Other Vegetation Classification and Stratification Schemes Glossary References Section I – Policy and Procedures Section II – ES Concept and Description Development Section III – Delineation and Mapping, Hierarchies, and Other Vegetation Classification and Stratification Schemes Glossary References

Webinar Overview Brief overview of draft NESH: Released - National Bulletin Released - National Bulletin Section II – ES Concept & Description Development Section II – ES Concept & Description Development Brief preview of Section III Brief preview of Section III Comments due by May 15 th to or Comments due by May 15 th to or

NESH Section II Contents Section II – ES Concept & Description Development Part 400 – ES Characterization Concepts Part 500 – Steps for ES Differentiation & Development Part 501 – Sampling Methods (reserved) Part 502 – ES Naming Protocols Part 503 – Ecological Site Keys Part 504 – Contents of ESDs Part 506 – Data Storage (reserved) Section II – ES Concept & Description Development Part 400 – ES Characterization Concepts Part 500 – Steps for ES Differentiation & Development Part 501 – Sampling Methods (reserved) Part 502 – ES Naming Protocols Part 503 – Ecological Site Keys Part 504 – Contents of ESDs Part 506 – Data Storage (reserved)

NESH Section II, Part 400 ES Characterization Concepts Part – Purpose Part – Definition Part – Defining the ES Concept   Identification and characterization of ESs are based on the premise that:   composition, structure, and function of plant communities (and ecosystem functions) are regulated along energy, moisture, and nutrient gradients and disturbance regimes   Gradients occur due to differences in microclimate, geology, lithology, topography and soil characteristics Part – Purpose Part – Definition Part – Defining the ES Concept   Identification and characterization of ESs are based on the premise that:   composition, structure, and function of plant communities (and ecosystem functions) are regulated along energy, moisture, and nutrient gradients and disturbance regimes   Gradients occur due to differences in microclimate, geology, lithology, topography and soil characteristics

  Environmental gradients   Natural disturbance regimes   Environmental gradients   Natural disturbance regimes ES concept is based on reference conditions (Reference State) which formed as a result of interacting NESH Section II, Part Defining the ES Concept

Section II, Parts Part Interpreting Ecological Dynamics   Ecological dynamics describe changes to vegetation and soils, and the causes of those changes   State-and-Transition Models (STMs) illustrate ecological dynamics of an ES Part – Components of an STM Part Interpreting Ecological Dynamics   Ecological dynamics describe changes to vegetation and soils, and the causes of those changes   State-and-Transition Models (STMs) illustrate ecological dynamics of an ES Part – Components of an STM

Section II, Part Role of STMs   STMs are conceptual diagrams with narratives to describe:   Reference and alternative states,   Processes of plant community shifts within states,   Transitions between states, and   Restoration to a previous state.   The goal in producing STMs is to provide a conceptual understanding of:   Ecological dynamics that can occur on an ES   Drivers and mechanisms of ecosystem change   Management actions that can be used to influence change   STMs are conceptual diagrams with narratives to describe:   Reference and alternative states,   Processes of plant community shifts within states,   Transitions between states, and   Restoration to a previous state.   The goal in producing STMs is to provide a conceptual understanding of:   Ecological dynamics that can occur on an ES   Drivers and mechanisms of ecosystem change   Management actions that can be used to influence change

Section II, Parts Part – General Guidelines for Developing STMs   All states and community phases that are typical and known to occur should be described   Include “at-risk community” phases   Where time scales of community pathways or transitions are known, they should be described Part Recognizing a State Change Versus a Different ES   As long as the soil and physiographic characteristics remain unchanged, a new ES is not merited.   The inability to restore an alternative state to reference state due to lack of knowledge, technology, or cost does not warrant a new ES. Part – General Guidelines for Developing STMs   All states and community phases that are typical and known to occur should be described   Include “at-risk community” phases   Where time scales of community pathways or transitions are known, they should be described Part Recognizing a State Change Versus a Different ES   As long as the soil and physiographic characteristics remain unchanged, a new ES is not merited.   The inability to restore an alternative state to reference state due to lack of knowledge, technology, or cost does not warrant a new ES.

NESH Section II, Part 500 Steps for ES Differentiation and Developments of ESDs Purpose Differentiation and description of ecological sites (ESs) involve several steps: preliminary stages, iterative stages, and final stages. Strong interdisciplinary participation is critical to the ESD development process Purpose Differentiation and description of ecological sites (ESs) involve several steps: preliminary stages, iterative stages, and final stages. Strong interdisciplinary participation is critical to the ESD development process

Preliminary Stages   Establish Local Work Groups   Define Geographic/Ecological Extent   Gather Background Information   Evaluate Existing Data   Conduct Reconnaissance (Low Intensity Traverses)   Develop STMs   Develop Sampling Strategy   Sampling Methods   Establish Local Work Groups   Define Geographic/Ecological Extent   Gather Background Information   Evaluate Existing Data   Conduct Reconnaissance (Low Intensity Traverses)   Develop STMs   Develop Sampling Strategy   Sampling Methods

Iterative Stages   Data Collection (Medium Intensity Sampling)   Data Analysis   Define Differentiating Characteristics of ES   Field Test the ES Concept   Data Collection (Medium Intensity Sampling)   Data Analysis   Define Differentiating Characteristics of ES   Field Test the ES Concept

Final Stages   Data Collection (High Intensity Sampling)   Type Location Data   Develop Management Interpretations   Correlation (process)   Data Collection (High Intensity Sampling)   Type Location Data   Develop Management Interpretations   Correlation (process)

NESH Section 2, Part 501 Sampling Methods Part 501 – RESERVED  Will provide sampling design, methods, and attributes recommended for data collection  Will differentiate between methods at various levels of data collection intensity Part 501 – RESERVED  Will provide sampling design, methods, and attributes recommended for data collection  Will differentiate between methods at various levels of data collection intensity

NESH Section 2, Part 502 ES Naming Protocols Instructions for a standardized naming  Common name  Unique to MLRA or LRU  Minimum number of descriptors (e.g., soil, landscape, climate)  Secondary plant community name  Scientific and common names  Three strata; two species per stratum Instructions for ES ID  Includes MLRA, LRU and 3-digit site # State and community phase names  Reference and representative – Labeling STMs Exhibits Instructions for a standardized naming  Common name  Unique to MLRA or LRU  Minimum number of descriptors (e.g., soil, landscape, climate)  Secondary plant community name  Scientific and common names  Three strata; two species per stratum Instructions for ES ID  Includes MLRA, LRU and 3-digit site # State and community phase names  Reference and representative – Labeling STMs Exhibits

NESH Section 2, Part 503 Ecological Site Keys – Optional tool for identification and differentiation of ESs  Primarily based on abiotic factors  Scale is MLRA or subunit, e.g., LRU or subsection – Factors used in ES keys  Soil  Topography  Climate – ES key types  Dichotomous  Flow charts  Matrices Exhibits – Optional tool for identification and differentiation of ESs  Primarily based on abiotic factors  Scale is MLRA or subunit, e.g., LRU or subsection – Factors used in ES keys  Soil  Topography  Climate – ES key types  Dichotomous  Flow charts  Matrices Exhibits

NESH Section II, Part 504 Contents of ESDs Purpose and Background Information   Describes each element contained in an ESD General Information   ES name   ES ID number   Hierarchical Framework Relationships   ES Concept narrative Physiographic Features Climatic Features Purpose and Background Information   Describes each element contained in an ESD General Information   ES name   ES ID number   Hierarchical Framework Relationships   ES Concept narrative Physiographic Features Climatic Features

NESH Section II, Part 504 Contents of ESDs Influencing Water Features Representative Soil Features State and Community Phase section   Ecological Dynamics of the ES   STM Diagram   Photos Influencing Water Features Representative Soil Features State and Community Phase section   Ecological Dynamics of the ES   STM Diagram   Photos

NESH Section II, Part 504 Contents of ESDs State and Community Phase – cont. Reference State   Narrative   Community Phase s   Species Productivity   Total Annual Production   Canopy or Foliar Cover   Structure   Ground Surface Cover   Overstory Canopy Cover   Understory   Phase Growth Curves State and Community Phase – cont. Reference State   Narrative   Community Phase s   Species Productivity   Total Annual Production   Canopy or Foliar Cover   Structure   Ground Surface Cover   Overstory Canopy Cover   Understory   Phase Growth Curves Alternative States   Narrative   For data-supported Community Phases, complete appropriate sections identified for Reference State Alternative States   Narrative   For data-supported Community Phases, complete appropriate sections identified for Reference State

NESH Section II, Part 504 Contents of ESDs ES Interpretations   Wildlife Habitat   Domestic and Feral Animals   Hydrology Functions   Recreational Uses   Wood Products   Other Products ES Interpretations   Wildlife Habitat   Domestic and Feral Animals   Hydrology Functions   Recreational Uses   Wood Products   Other Products

NESH Section II, Parts Supporting Information   Associated Sites   Similar Sites   Agency/State Correlation   Type Locality   Relationship to Established Frameworks and/or Other Classifications   Other References Supporting Information   Associated Sites   Similar Sites   Agency/State Correlation   Type Locality   Relationship to Established Frameworks and/or Other Classifications   Other References Rangeland Health Reference Sheet ESD Signatures (see Part 300) Rangeland Health Reference Sheet ESD Signatures (see Part 300)

Section II, Part 506 Data Storage Reserved  Will provide details of how to manage and store hard copy and electronic information.

NESH Section III Contents Section III – Delineation and Mapping, Hierarchies, and Other Vegetation Classification and Stratification Schemes (all reserved) Part 600 – Related Stratification Schemes* Part 700 – Delineation and Mapping of ESs Part 800 – Benchmark ESs Part 900 – ES Relationships with Other Classification and Mapping Hierarchies GlossaryReferences *Placeholder until pilots are completed in out-years Section III – Delineation and Mapping, Hierarchies, and Other Vegetation Classification and Stratification Schemes (all reserved) Part 600 – Related Stratification Schemes* Part 700 – Delineation and Mapping of ESs Part 800 – Benchmark ESs Part 900 – ES Relationships with Other Classification and Mapping Hierarchies GlossaryReferences *Placeholder until pilots are completed in out-years

Summary Today’s webinar gave an overview of Section II – Ecological Site Concept and Description Development Comments are due May 15th on both Sections Send comments or suggestions to Susan Andrews and/or George Peacock at: Today’s webinar gave an overview of Section II – Ecological Site Concept and Description Development Comments are due May 15th on both Sections Send comments or suggestions to Susan Andrews and/or George Peacock at: