Impact of intrinsic alignments on cosmic shear Shearing by elliptical galaxy halos –SB + Filipe Abdalla astro-ph/0608002 Intrinsic alignments and photozs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Realistic photometric redshifts Filipe Batoni Abdalla.
Advertisements

Tidal Alignments & Large Scale Structure Christopher Hirata Edinburgh, 22 Jul 2010 C.H., MNRAS 399:1074 (2009) – Redshift space distortions Elisabeth Krause.
Weak Lensing Tomography Sarah Bridle University College London.
Current Observational Constraints on Dark Energy Chicago, December 2001 Wendy Freedman Carnegie Observatories, Pasadena CA.
What can we learn from Gravitational Magnification with BigBOSS? Alexie Leauthaud LBNL & BCCP.
Cosmic Shear with HST Jason Rhodes, JPL Galaxies and Structures Through Cosmic Times Venice Italy March 27, 2006 with Richard Massey, Catherine Heymans.
Complementary Probes ofDark Energy Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Eric Linder Berkeley Lab.
Dark Energy with 3D Cosmic Shear Dark Energy with 3D Cosmic Shear Alan Heavens Institute for Astronomy University of Edinburgh UK with Tom Kitching, Patricia.
Galaxy-Galaxy lensing
Statistics of the Weak-lensing Convergence Field Sheng Wang Brookhaven National Laboratory Columbia University Collaborators: Zoltán Haiman, Morgan May,
Lens Galaxy Environments Neal Dalal (IAS), Casey R. Watson (Ohio State) astro-ph/ Who cares? 2.What to do 3.Results 4.Problems! 5.The future.
Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing: History, Theoretical Expectations & Simulations Tereasa Brainerd Boston University, Institute for Astrophysical Research.
Weak Gravitational Lensing and Cluster Counts Alexandre Refregier (CEA Saclay) Collaborators: Jason Rhodes (Caltech) Richard Massey (Cambridge) David Bacon.
Progress on Cosmology Sarah Bridle University College London.
Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing What did we learn? What can we learn? Henk Hoekstra.
Non-Gaussian signatures in cosmic shear fields
Cosmic Shear: Potential and Prospects Shear measurement Photometric redshifts Intrinsic alignments Sarah Bridle, UCL (London)
Weak Lensing 3 Tom Kitching. Introduction Scope of the lecture Power Spectra of weak lensing Statistics.
Eric V. Linder (arXiv: v1). Contents I. Introduction II. Measuring time delay distances III. Optimizing Spectroscopic followup IV. Influence.
Henk Hoekstra Ludo van Waerbeke Catherine Heymans Mike Hudson Laura Parker Yannick Mellier Liping Fu Elisabetta Semboloni Martin Kilbinger Andisheh Mahdavi.
Cosmic shear results from CFHTLS Henk Hoekstra Ludo van Waerbeke Catherine Heymans Mike Hudson Laura Parker Yannick Mellier Liping Fu Elisabetta Semboloni.
Complementarity of weak lensing with other probes Lindsay King, Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge University UK.
Intrinsic ellipticity correlation of luminous red galaxies and misalignment with their host dark matter halos The 8 th Sino – German workshop Teppei O.
Non-Gaussian signatures in cosmic shear fields Masahiro Takada (Tohoku U., Japan) July 6 th IAP Based on collaboration with Bhuvnesh Jain (Penn) (MT.
Cosmological studies with Weak Lensing Peak statistics Zuhui Fan Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University.
Center for Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics Great Lakes Cosmology Workshop VIII, June, 1-3, 2007 Probing Dark Energy with Cluster-Galaxy Weak Lensing.
Constraining cluster abundances using weak lensing Håkon Dahle Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Oslo.
MARK CORRELATIONS AND OPTIMAL WEIGHTS ( Cai, Bernstein & Sheth 2010 )
Adam Amara, Thomas Kitching, Anais Rassat, Alexandre Refregier.
Weak Lensing 2 Tom Kitching. Recap Lensing useful for Dark energy Dark Matter Lots of surveys covering 100’s or 1000’s of square degrees coming online.
The masses and shapes of dark matter halos from galaxy- galaxy lensing in the CFHTLS Henk Hoekstra Mike Hudson Ludo van Waerbeke Yannick Mellier Laura.
The Structure Formation Cookbook 1. Initial Conditions: A Theory for the Origin of Density Perturbations in the Early Universe Primordial Inflation: initial.
Cosmology with Gravitaional Lensing
Refining Photometric Redshift Distributions with Cross-Correlations Alexia Schulz Institute for Advanced Study Collaborators: Martin White.
HST ACS data LSST: ~40 galaxies per sq.arcmin. LSST CD-1 Review SLAC, Menlo Park, CA November 1 - 3, LSST will achieve percent level statistical.
Cosmic shear and intrinsic alignments Rachel Mandelbaum April 2, 2007 Collaborators: Christopher Hirata (IAS), Mustapha Ishak (UT Dallas), Uros Seljak.
KIAS, Nov 5, 2014 Measuring the Cosmic Shear in Fourier Space Jun Zhang ( 张骏 ) (Shanghai Jiao Tong University) Collaborators: Eiichiro Komatsu (MPA), Nobuhiko.
3rd International Workshop on Dark Matter, Dark Energy and Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry NTHU & NTU, Dec 27—31, 2012 Likelihood of the Matter Power Spectrum.
Latest Results from LSS & BAO Observations Will Percival University of Portsmouth StSci Spring Symposium: A Decade of Dark Energy, May 7 th 2008.
Weak Lensing Alexandre Refregier (CEA/Saclay) Collaborators: Richard Massey (Cambridge), Tzu-Ching Chang (Columbia), David Bacon (Edinburgh), Jason Rhodes.
Weak Gravitational Flexion from HST GEMS and STAGES Barnaby Rowe with David Bacon (Portsmouth), Andy Taylor (Edinburgh), Catherine Heymans (U.B.C.), Richard.
Eyal Neistein Dec 2012 MS workshop Modeling galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing with the Millennium simulation Eyal Neistein TMoX group, MPE.
Hudson IAP July 4 Galaxy- Galaxy Lensing in CFHTLS Hudson (Waterloo) 2/3 Canadian 2/3 French.
Probing Cosmology with Weak Lensing Effects Zuhui Fan Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University.
Elinor Medezinski Johns Hopkins University Galaxy Galaxy Lensing in CLASH clusters.
Investigating dark matter halos of galaxies from the COMBO-17 survey Martina Kleinheinrich (Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Heidelberg) & Hans-Walter.
Gravitational Lensing
Cosmological Weak Lensing With SKA in the Planck era Y. Mellier SKA, IAP, October 27, 2006.
Probing dark matter halos at redshifts z=[1,3] with lensing magnification L. Van Waerbeke With H. Hildebrandt (Leiden) J. Ford (UBC) M. Milkeraitis (UBC)
COSMIC MAGNIFICATION the other weak lensing signal Jes Ford UBC graduate student In collaboration with: Ludovic Van Waerbeke COSMOS 2010 Jes Ford Jason.
Measuring Cosmic Shear Sarah Bridle Dept of Physics & Astronomy, UCL What is cosmic shear? Why is it hard to measure? The international competition Overview.
Cosmological Inference from Imaging Surveys Bhuvnesh Jain University of Pennsylvania.
Xi An, May 20, 2014 Measuring the Cosmic Shear in Fourier Space Jun Zhang ( 张骏 ) (Shanghai Jiao Tong University) Collaborators: Eiichiro Komatsu (MPA),
Cosmological constraints on neutrino mass Francesco De Bernardis University of Rome “Sapienza” Incontro Nazionale Iniziative di Fisica Astroparticellare.
Quantifying Dark Energy using Cosmic Shear
Quantifying Dark Energy using Cosmic Shear
Thomas Collett Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
Thomas Collett Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
Cosmology with gravitational lensing
Impact of intrinsic alignments on cosmic shear
STEP: THE SHEAR TESTING PROGRAMME
Observational limits on dark energy
Weak lensing tomography: the good, the bad and the ugly
P5: February 22, 2008 Weak Gravitational Lensing
Some issues in cluster cosmology
Intrinsic Alignment of Galaxies and Weak Lensing Cluster Surveys Zuhui Fan Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University.
Chengliang Wei Purple Mountain Observatory, CAS
The impact of non-linear evolution of the cosmological matter power spectrum on the measurement of neutrino masses ROE-JSPS workshop Edinburgh.
Cosmology with Photometric redsfhits
ν Are we close to measuring the neutrino hierarchy? Filipe B. Abdalla
Presentation transcript:

Impact of intrinsic alignments on cosmic shear Shearing by elliptical galaxy halos –SB + Filipe Abdalla astro-ph/ Intrinsic alignments and photozs – SB + Lindsay King arXiv: Cluster counts and cosmic shear – double counting? –Masahiro Takada & SB arXiv: Sarah Bridle, UCL (London)

Cosmic shear (2 point function)

Gravitationally sheared Gravitationally sheared Lensing by dark matter causes galaxies to appear aligned Cosmic shear Face-on view

Intrinsic alignments (II) Croft & Metzler 2000, Heavens et al 2000, Crittenden et al 2001, Catelan et al 2001, Mackey et al, Brown et al 2002, Jing 2002, Hui & Zhang 2002

Tidal stretching causes galaxies to align Adds to cosmic shear signal Intrinsically Aligned (I) Intrinsically Aligned (I) Intrinsic alignments (II) Face-on view

Intrinsic-shear correlation (GI) Hirata & Seljak 2004 See also Heymans et al 2006, Mandelbaum et al 2006, Hirata et al 2007

Galaxies point in opposite directions Partially cancels cosmic shear signal Gravitationally sheared (G) Intrinsically aligned (I) Intrinsic-shear correlation (GI) Face-on view

Cosmic shear two point tomography

Cosmic shear tomography

Cosmic Shear Intrinsic Alignments (IA) Normalised to Super-COSMOS Heymans et al 2004

If consider only w then IA bias on w is ~10% If marginalise 6 cosmological parameters then IA bias on w is ~100% (+/- 1 !) Intrinsic Alignments (IA)

Elliptical galaxy-galaxy lensing Bridle & Abdalla

Background galaxy is gravitationally sheared tangentially around foreground lens Elliptical galaxy-galaxy lensing Face-on view Bridle & Abdalla

Contribution to ellipticity correlation function: Average shear around circular annulus Does not average to zero →net contamination

z 1 =0.3 z 2 =0.8 Average over population visible to R=24 Cosmic shear signal Shear correlation function Bridle & Abdalla

Average over population visible to R=24 Cosmic shear signal Change in cosmic shear signal for  w = 0.05 z 1 =0.3 z 2 =0.8 Shear correlation function Bridle & Abdalla

Removal of intrinsic alignments Intrinsic – intrinsic (II) –Weight down close pairs (King & Schneider 2002, Heymans & Heavens 2003, Takada & White 2004) –Fit parameterized models (King & Schneider 2003) Shear – intrinsic (GI) –Fit parameterized models (King 2005, Bernstein DETF) –Redshift weighting (Schneider talk) Redshift quality is crucial!

Perfect redshifts Scale dependence of IA (# bins) Least flexible model considered FoM is improved! Reasonable model? (14 IA pars) Similar FoM to no IA case Very flexible (100 IA pars) FoM is roughly halved No Intrinsic Alignments Redshift dependence of IA (# bins) 2 3 5

Scale dependence of IA (# bins) Perfect redshifts Redshift dependence of IA (# bins) 2 3 5

Scale dependence of IA (# bins) Realistic photozs σz=0.05(1+z) Redshift dependence of IA (# bins) 2 3 5

Photoz error σz / (1+z) No Intrinsic Alignments FoM / FoM(specz) (e.g. Hu 1999, Ma, Hu, Huterer 2006, Jain et al 2007, Amara & Refregier ) Relatively flat

Photoz error σz / (1+z) Reasonable model? (14 IA pars) Very flexible (100 IA pars) FoM / FoM(specz)

Photoz error σz / (1+z) FoM / FoM(specz) A factor of ~3 better photozs required! (1+z)0.08 (1+z)

Conclusions Lensing by elliptical galaxy halos contributes to shear-intrinsic term (GI) 3x better photozs required to remove intrinsic alignments Cluster counts and lensing power spectra very complementary AD

END

Shearing by elliptical galaxy halos Plan: –Calculate shear from elliptical halo –Calculate contribution to shear correlation fn –Average over a population of lenses –Compare with cosmic shear signal –Consider effect of halo profile –Investigate redshift dependence Bridle & Abdalla 2007

Average over population visible to R=24 Cosmic shear signal z 1 =0.3 z 2 =0.8 NFW ^ Shear correlation function

Average over population visible to R=24 NFW ^ Singular isothermal ellipsoid Cosmic shear signal z 1 =0.3 z 2 =0.8 Shear correlation function

M 200 =1x10 12 h -1 M o z lens =0.3 z source =0.8 Shear correlation function Bridle & Abdalla

How good to photozs need to be to remove intrinsic alignments? Plan: –Remove GI, II by marginalising over some flexible model –Look at the effect of GI, II on dark energy errors –Dependence on flexibility of model? –Dependence on photoz errors? Bridle & King 2007

σz / (1+z)

Dark energy from cluster counts and lensing: including the full covariance Plan: –Motivation: combining constraints –Shear power spectrum is from halos –Calculate covariance between cc and cs –Compare with toy model –Calculate signal to noise –Calculate effect on dark energy error bars Takada & Bridle 2007

A toy model Cluster counts Lensing power spectrum

Toy model Full calculation

Toy model Cross correlation coefficient r 10% 100%

Toy model Full calculation Cross correlation coefficient r 10% 1% 100%