Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 33 FRENCH CRIMINAL PROCEDURE GERMAN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW & PROCEDURE April 8, 2002.
Advertisements

Courts and the Quest for Justice. In Theory: Courtroom Ideals  Courts have extensive powers in our criminal justice system.  The courts legitimacy is.
The Bill of Rights and the Criminal Trial Process.
Chapter Two LAW and CRIME
Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević Session 8, 7 May 2014.
The Government must respect ALL legal rights of all people. It must treat people fairly.
The Organization of the Criminal Justice System
Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht, Zimbelman © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except.
Chapter 13: Criminal Justice Process ~ Proceedings Before Trial Objective: The student should be able to identify the required procedures before a trial.
Police Powers April 22, 2015.
Cje Karolina Kremens, LL.M., Ph.D. Wojciech Jasiński, Ph.D. Department of Criminal Procedure Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics University of.
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 29 GERMAN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE III FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE March 26, 2002.
Introduction to Common Law. Families of legal systems Civil Law Common Law Mixed (Civil and Common Law elements.) Religious or customary law – (e.g.,
© 2006 Rule of Law and Fair Trial Federal Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Austria Rule of Law and Fair Trial.
Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević G10, room 6, Tue 15:30-16:30 Session 9, 16 Dec 2014.
Legal Aspects of Criminal Investigation: Arrest, Search and Seizure
INTRODUCTION TO THE LAW OF EVIDENCE
Civil v. Criminal cases. Due process Constitutional protection from unfair laws and government action. Our government may not take away our lives, liberty,
15.3 The American Legal System
Unit Five Lesson 31 How do the Fourth and Fifth Amendments Protect Against Unreasonable Law Enforcement Procedures.
The 4th & 5th Amendments Search & Seizure Search & Seizure Rights Against Self Incrimination Rights Against Self Incrimination.
Chapter 2 The criminal investigation process. In this chapter, you will look at the role of police and the courts in the criminal investigation process.
© 2011 South-Western | Cengage Learning GOALS LESSON 1.1 LAW, JUSTICE, AND ETHICS Recognize the difference between law and justice Apply ethics to personal.
The Juvenile Justice System
Comparative Law Spring 2003 The Last Class! English Criminal Procedure Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Professor Fischer April.
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 32 FRENCH CRIMINAL PROCEDURE April 5, 2002.
Introduction to Constitutional Law Unit 4. CJ140-02A – Introduction to Constitutional Law Unit 4: The Fourth Amendment CJ140-02A– Class 4 Part 1.
Law Reform Commission Criminal Process Pre-Trial Procedures Pierre Rosario DOMINGUE Chief Executive Officer Wednesday, May 7,
JUDICIAL BRANCH. LEARNING OBJECTIVE I can describe the TYPES OF LAWS.
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 28 GERMAN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE II March 25, 2002.
THE TRIAL. For next time:  Read page in Pakes.
Criminal Justice process Introduction to Criminal process.
Comparative Law Spring 2001 Class 38 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Professor Fischer April 21, 2002.
Federal Courts There are two separate court systems in the United States: 1) Federal and 2) State *Most cases heard in court are heard in State courts.
Fight Against Corruption - Integrative Feedback of Domestic and International Activities OHRID, 15th – 16th October 2010 REPUBLIC OF CROATIA Ministry of.
The Judicial Branch. Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman Understanding the Federal Judiciary The Framers viewed the federal.
1. Criminal pre-trial procedures refer to the;  initial arrest of the suspect,  the granting of bail  Released without charge  Remanded in custody.
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 27 GERMAN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE March 22, 2002.
Georgia The Second Wave of Democratic Reforms 2009.
MEXICAN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AN OVERVIEW OF A COMPLEX AND CONTROVERSAL SUBJECT.
Chapter 10 The Criminal Process. A.k.a. Procedural criminal law Two most essential elements of Canadian Criminal Process are: - Truth - Justice.
Detention and Questioning under PACE When a suspect is arrested the basic procedure is that they should be taken as soon as practicable to a designated*
The Investigation.  Right to remain silent  Right to an attorney  No interrogation should take place before they read  Are a result of the US Supreme.
Chapter 4.2 Other Guarantees in the Bill of Rights.
EMLYN A. RICKETTS, ESQ. Criminal Procedure: The Investigative Phase.
Comparative Law Spring 2003 Professor Susanna Fischer FRENCH ADMINISTRATIVE/MISCELLANEOUS COURTS FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE March 18, 2003.
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 30 GERMAN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE III FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE March 27, 2002.
Civics & Economics Top 100 What every student should know to pass the Civics & Economics EOC Goal 6.
PROCESSES OF CRIMINAL LAW: BEFORE THE TRIAL Law 12.
Fourth Amendment And Probable Cause. By the end of this presentation you should be able to understand; ◦Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution ◦How.
The Bill of Rights and the Criminal Trial Process.
The Trial Chapter 9. Trials in the Early Modern Period Very often trial was by torture the Rack water torture other torture the Star Chamber a 15 th and.
Criminal Justice Process: Proceedings Before Trial – Chp 13 Booking – Formal process of making a police record of an arrest -Give private info such as:
Prosecution and investigative authorities in Romania Current status and future reforms Monica Otava Prosecutor Prosecutor’s Office Attached to the High.
CHAPTER 13 – CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS: PROCEEDINGS BEFORE TRIAL.
© 2014 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All Rights Reserved Class Name, Instructor Name Date, Semester Lasley & Guskos,
Trial Procedures Business Law Chapter 6. Trial Procedures Civil Cases are brought by individuals Civil Cases are brought by individuals Injured party.
Situation Analysis Access to Court Decisions in Georgia
Chapter 2 The criminal investigation process
Due Process Court Systems and Practices.
Restrictions, including those restrictions permitted by the European Convention on Human Rights Police powers of stop and search.
Procedures for a CRIMINAL case
Civics & Economics Top 100 What every student should know to pass the Civics & Economics EOC Goal 6.
What every student should know to pass the Civics & Economics EOC
THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS: THE INVESTIGATIVE PHASE
Class Name, Instructor Name
2nd Biennial conference on the STOP program
Presentation transcript:

Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002

Wrap-Up: French Civil Procedure

DEC. 2000: FRENCH LAWYERS STRIKE OVER LEGAL AID

French Criminal Procedure Is French criminal procedure inquisitorial or adversarial?

French Criminal Procedure: Inquisitorial or Adversarial? Elements of both

3 Stages of French Criminal Procedure 1. Police investigation/prosecution (mainly inquisitorial) 2. Judicial investigation (mainly inquisitorial) 3. Trial (both adversarial and inquisitorial)

Adversarial vs. Inquisitorial Are supporters of adversarial systems more or less trusting of governmental power?

Adversarial vs. Inquisitorial Are supporters of adversarial systems more or less trusting of governmental power? In general, less trusting of governmental power, and afraid that it leads to corruption and shoddy work.

Sources of French Criminal Procedure Code of Criminal Procedure 1958 European Convention on Human Rights (Art. 55 of the 1958 Constitution – legislation must conform with international treaties such as the right to a fair trial starting with the date a person is charged with a criminal offense) Legislation, such as that adopted in response to the Truche report Which is treated as the principal source by the Cour de Cassation?

Truche Report of July 1997 The Truche Commission was established by President Chirac to suggest reforms to increase public confidence in French criminal procedure The Truche report was issued in 1997 Suggested various legislative reforms to increase openness and transparency, reduce investigating judge’s power and strengthen independence of public prosecutor

Loss of Public Confidence Why did the French public lack confidence in the French criminal procedure system?

A Hallmark of French Criminal Procedure: Secrecy The early stages of the criminal procedure (investigative stage) are conducted in secret Who is bound by the obligation of secrecy? Note that trial hearing generally takes place in public, though the Cour de Cassation refused to annul a decision of Cour d’ Appel of Grenoble that was not open to the public

Secrecy and Art. 11 of Code of Criminal Procedure Any person who participates in the procedure during police and judicial investigation has obligation of secrecy and is subject to civil criminal and disciplinary sanctions for violating it. That is, the public prosecutor, the investigating judge, police, experts, interpreters, court clerks and defense lawyers NOT ordinary witnesses and civil party and does not apply to public facts (like arrest, police custody) How about journalists?

Truche Report and Media Restrictions What restrictions on media reporting of criminal proceedings did the Truche Report recommend?

Truche Report and Media Restrictions What restrictions on media reporting of criminal proceedings did the Truche Report recommend? Prohibitions on naming people charged or held in custody Prohibitions on pictures of suspects in handcuffs Prohibition on opinion polls on guilt or innocence Recommendation for media watchdog

Police Investigation What are the 2 kinds of police in France?

Police Investigation What are the 2 kinds of police in France? 1. Crime prevention police (la police administrative) – national police (urban areas – Home Office) and gendarmes (suburbes, rural areas – Ministry of Defense) 2. Criminal investigation police (la police judiciare)

Police Investigations What should the police do if they are informed of the commission of an offense?

2 kinds of investigations 1. Expedited investigation (suspect caught red handed or shortly after offense committed; or suspect found in possession of incriminating objects shortly after commission of offense; or offense committed in private home) 2. Ordinary investigation

What is the difference between the expedited investigation and ordinary investigations?

Advantages of Expedited Investigations In expedited investigations, police have increased powers of search and seizure, hearing witnesses and placing suspects in custody Special restrictions on searching certain professionals or media organs In ordinary investigations, police can’t search or seize property without person’s consent, and do not have the power of arrest. Only powers are to place suspects in police custody or to order witnesses to come to police station to be questioned

Power of Arrest in an Expedited Search What is the standard of suspicion required for making an arrest in an expedited search?

Power of Arrest in an Expedited Search What is the standard of suspicion required for making an arrest in an expedited search? If serious incriminating evidence justifies their being charged

Regulation of Police Custody Are there restrictions on placing people in police custody under current French law? Are these restrictions adequate?

Restrictions on Police Custody Prior to 1958 Code no such restrictions Police custody may be used only for suspects not witnesses Suspects may only be interrogated by police for 24 hours unless prosecutor extends to 48 hours. Very exceptionally (if suspected of terrorism or drugs, 98 hours of detention is posible) No fixed time limits on police questionoing

1999 European Court of Human Rights Condemnation of France for torture Selmouni case – Ahmed Selmouni (joint Moroccan/Dutch national) awarded 500,000 FF in damages for torture and brutality suffered while in French police detention ECHR also found that France had failed to try Selmouni within a reasonable time.

Amnesty International Concerns Amnesty International has reported concerns about French police brutality, particularly toward those of non-European origin and asylum seekers as well as impunity granted by courts to brutal police officers (See Amnesty International 2001 Report (Jan – Dec 2000 at: eurcountries/FRANCE?OpenDocument) eurcountries/FRANCE?OpenDocument Many have concerns about excessive detention before trial in France