Internal Affairs Office of the Chief of Police Professional Standards Section Internal Affairs Unit.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
/0403 © 2004 Business & Legal Reports, Inc. BLRs Training Presentations Privacy Issues in the Workplace.
Advertisements

Corrective Actions.
Officer Involved Shooting Investigation Sergeant Greg Ventre Professional Standards Section Mr. Mark Piepmeier Hamilton County Prosecutor’s Office.
Lisa Endres General Counsel Oklahoma State Department of Education.
Escape Procedures Nevada Department of Corrections – Training Division.
INDIANA UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT AND GENERAL COUNSEL Indiana Access to Public Records Act (APRA) Training.
University of Oregon Oversight System. Goals of the U of O Civilian Oversight System 1) To build trust between the community/students and the University.
THE FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE TEXAS LABOR COUNCIL, INC. AND THE PROFESSIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSOCIATION PRESENT THE MANY WAYS LEGAL DEFENSE WORKS FOR.
Student Code of Conduct Revision Process Student Code of Conduct Committee Assistant principals, parents, interventionists, AEA representatives.
1 Nonjudicial Punishment (NJP). 2 Purpose of NJP Commander’s tool for maintaining good order and discipline Promotes behavior change in service- members.
1 PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS. 2 Texas Education Agency provides Notice of Procedural Safeguards Rights of Parents of Students with Disabilities Download this.
Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement June 6 - 9, 2010 Fredericton, New Brunswick.
Criminal law vs. employment law Garrity - statement compelled as condition of employment cannot be used against employee in criminal prosecution If criminal.
Open Meetings Briefing for Public Body Chairpersons Presented by the Office of the University Attorney Fall 2001.
HUMAN RESOURCES ISSUES American University March 9-14, 2003.
The Use of Counseling and Discipline to Improve Employee Productivity.
EMPLOYMENT LAW CONSIDERATIONS March 16, Difference between being an employer vs. a law enforcement officer Garrity – this case involves employees’
EMPLOYMENT LAW CONSIDERATIONS JULY 13, 2004 Professor Susan Carle.
Developed by Susan Carle under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 EMPLOYMENT LAW CONSIDERATIONS Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct with.
Discipline—You Can Do it Right
Ottawa Police Service Chief’s Complaint Investigations Insp. T. Youngson-Larochelle and S/Sgt. M. Marin.
Presented by Steven Russo, Chief of Investigations September 19, 2012 The State Auditor’s Whistleblower Program.
Disciplinary Policy INCA Community Services. Purpose O Every employee has the duty and the responsibility to be aware of and abide by existing rules and.
Reporting Requirements for School Staff Presented by Nancy Hungerford November 30, 2011 Presented by Nancy Hungerford November 30, 2011.
OPEN MEETING LAW GENERAL LAWS, CHAPTER 39, SECTIONS 23A-D.
The Martha’s Vineyard Public Schools Civil Rights Policy {Adoption Date}
Confidentiality and Public Information Act LISD Special Education Department Training SY
707 KAR 1:360 Confidentiality of Information. Section 1: Access Rights 1) An LEA shall permit a parent to inspect and review any education records relating.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
Mobile Audio/Video Recording Equipment Policy and Procedure Number PP
Police Internal Affairs
STATE OF ARIZONA BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS Mission Statement The mission of the Board of Chiropractic Examiners is to protect the health, welfare,
Chapter 19: Ethical Responsibilities Chapter 19 Ethical Responsibilities.
Session Title: FERPA: What You Need To Know Presented By: Jeffery Loggins Institution: Mississippi Valley State University September 15, 2015.
UMBC POLICY ON ESH MANAGEMENT & ENFORCEMENT UMBC Policy #VI
Why do I Have Miners’ Rights? 4 The Act gives miners and their representatives many rights because Congress wanted to encourage them to take an active,
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
MODULE 3 Composition & Roles. TAT TEAM APPROACH UPON COMPLETION OF THIS MODULE, PARTICIPANTS SHOULD UNDERSTAND: 3 – 2  Composition of the Threat Assessment.
© 2011 Delmar, Cengage Learning Part IV Control Processes in Police Management Chapter 14 Accountability.
Act 861 of Summary Act 861 of the 2012 Regular Legislative Session required the LDOE, in collaboration with BESE, to develop procedures and regulations.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
Joyce M. Hicks Director.  History and Mission of the OCC  Organizational Developments  Budget  Investigations  Legal Unit  Policy Work and Recommendations.
What Is Police Misconduct? Any action performed by a law enforcement officer that is criminal, unconstitutional, or against established rules, regulations,
“Kids First, New Mexico Wins!” NMPED Data Conference Spring 2016 Dan Hill General Counsel, Public Education Department Randi Johnson General Counsel, State.
1. On a blank sheet of paper… Write down one reason why you may be disciplined (written up) at work.
Investigations Section. Authorized in Section , Florida Statutes Section , Florida Statutes (F.S.) authorizes the Inspector General to conduct.
City of Key West Citizen Review Board Continuing Education City Charter Requirement 1.07(IV)(d)
LEGAL BACKGROUND …reasonable cause to know or suspect that a child has been subjected to abuse or neglect or who has observed the child being subjected.
Somerset ISD Online Acceptable Use Policy. Somerset Independent School District Electronic Resources Acceptable Use Policy The purpose of this training.
Texas Law Enforcement Recognition Program
Indiana Access to Public Records Act (APRA) Training
Mandatory Child Abuse Reporting
Harassment and Discrimination
Chapter 14 Accountability CJFS 4870 SPRING 2016
Garrity Warnings Administrative investigations
ALLEGATIONS OF ABUSE Internal Occurrence Reporting and Investigation.
Personnel Investigations
Missouri Association of Rural Education
Mandatory Child Abuse Reporting
Act 861 of 2012.
Mandatory Child Abuse Reporting
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
Doug Whitney– Department Judge Advocate
Connections Abuse Prevention Plan 2018.
Progressive Discipline
Internal Investigations For Small Police and Fire Departments
INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS AND CITIZEN COMPLAINTS
Act 861 of 2012.
Harassment and Discrimination
How to Conduct Investigations Rebekah R
Presentation transcript:

Internal Affairs Office of the Chief of Police Professional Standards Section Internal Affairs Unit

Purpose of Internal Affairs

Maintain public confidence in the department’s ability to properly investigate and adjudicate complaints and allegations of misconduct. Maintain departmental standards of conduct and performance. Maintain the rights of employees as well as the public. Identify training needs. Identify areas where policy and procedure need to be clarified, modified or updated.

Allegations of Misconduct Excessive Force Racial Profiling False Arrest Unlawful Search Violation of Rules Conduct Unbecoming Dishonesty* Discourtesy Neglect of Duty Traffic Slow Response Civil Rights Violation * “Brady Notifications” – District Attorney required to notify defendants/attorneys on court related matters when a “dishonesty” or “integrity” violation has been sustained on a law enforcement officer.

Internal Affairs Classifications

Information Inquiry Those concerns or complaints that are investigated, but do not rise to the level of an allegation of misconduct. This may also be used to answer a citizen’s concerns or questions about policy, procedure, or tactics used by the police department. i.e. Why was my kid handcuffed? Why was my car searched, emergency equipment operation

Informal An informal investigation completed by Internal Affairs on “less serious” allegations of misconduct. Memorandums and verbal statements are obtained from involved employees. i.e.-Violations of policy/procedure, discourtesy, unlawful search, neglect of duty;

Formal A formal investigation is conducted on more serious allegations of misconduct. Internal Affairs conducts taped interviews of all involved employees and witnesses. i.e. - violations of law, dishonesty, moral ethics, excessive force and when deemed necessary by IA or Staff

Divisional Discipline An informal investigation that may be completed by a first line supervisor at the divisional level rather than by the I.A. Unit. 1.Any informational inquiry. 2.Any informal complaint. 3.Employee involved traffic accidents (on-duty).

Types Of Investigations Memorandums & Taped Interviews

Memorandums (Informal) A. Memorandums are requested from all employees who may have information about the allegation; B. Memorandums are returned within five working days of notification; C.The memorandum is forwarded to I.A through the employee’s chain of command; D.Employees must be specific and detailed when addressing the allegation(s) of misconduct.

Formal Interviews (taped) Interviews are recorded and transcribed; “Formal Advisements” are given to employees only; “Garrity Advisements” are given if applicable; –Allegations involving potential criminal conduct; Maximum of two personnel conduct the IA interview; No legal representation allowed in IA interviews; Employees cannot refuse to answer questions;

Formal Advisement The employee is required to truthfully disclose all pertinent information known to to them regarding the incident in question (even if not asked about); If subsequent to the interview, the employee receives or recalls additional relevant information, they must notify Internal Affairs immediately;

Advisement (cont.) The employee must cooperate fully with the administrative investigation; While the investigation is ongoing, the employee is not allowed to discuss the investigation with anyone else; Failure to comply with terms of the advisement may result in additional discipline/termination;

EMPLOYEE RIGHTS DURING AN INTERNAL AFFAIRS INVESTIGATION

Garrity v. New Jersey 385 U.S. 493 (1967) An officer may be compelled (ordered) by his/her superiors to answer questions that are related to his/her duties or fitness for duty. Failure to answer such questions may form the basis of his/her dismissal. The answers may not be used against him/her in a criminal trial. Similarly, an officer may be compelled to testify at a disciplinary board hearing or before a grand jury if the statements are restricted to non-criminal purposes.

Administrative vs. Criminal Investigation Formal Advisement vs. Garrity Advisement; Legal representation not allowed in administrative hearings; Administrative investigations cannot be shared with the criminal investigation; –Criminal investigation details will be included in the administrative investigation; During the criminal investigation, you are allowed legal representation and may be read Miranda Rights, if applicable;

Investigation Findings Sustained- Actual Misconduct Misconduct Not Based on Complaint- Actual misconduct, not alleged in the original complaint, but disclosed during the investigation Unfounded- The allegation is false or not factual Not Sustained- There is not enough evidence to prove or disprove the allegation Exonerated- The incident occurred, but the employee acted lawfully and properly

DISCIPLINE

The completed investigation is reviewed by the involved employee’s chain of command. The employee’s chain of command determines the findings and the discipline, if there is sustained misconduct. Internal Affairs makes no recommendations regarding discipline

Types of Discipline Verbal Counseling Employee Log Entry Training Written Reprimand Suspension Demotion Resignation Discharge Discharge w/Criminal Charges

PURGE POLICY All personnel investigation files are kept in their entirety for 4 years plus current. At the expiration of this time period, all files are destroyed except those with a finding of: A sustained misconduct which results with the discipline of a written reprimand or above. The exception to the purge policy is any case with pending civil litigation will not be purged.

City Owned Property

City owned desks, lockers, offices, equipment (to include cell phones and computers), work areas, uniforms, and vehicles are the sole property of the City of Lakewood and subject to inspection at any time deemed necessary by the Chief of Police or his designee. Private property can be stored in these areas, however, privacy shall not be expected. No one, not acting in his official capacity, shall be authorized in the search of areas assigned to others.

What is discoverable? Telephone conversations Car-to-car conversations/ messages (MDC) Sector logs I-Tracker (vehicle speeds, times, locations) Internet Use Radio traffic City owned cell phones (call logs, text messages, etc) Booking/Holding cell video and audio Pay entry records

Performance Audit System (PAS) -WHAT IS IT? Sometimes referred to as “Early Warning System”; A tool to assist supervisors in monitoring employee performance; A system that tracks and reviews incidents of risk to the involved employee(s)

Activation of the P.A.S 2 excessive force complaints in 12 months 5 internal investigations in 12 months 3 preventable traffic accidents in 12 months 3 sustained I.A. complaints in 12 months 2 notices of intent to sue in 12 months