Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee 2013-2014 Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Classroom Assessment for Learning Focus for Today Key 2: Clear Targets.
Advertisements

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
June 20, Your Presenters  Ken Mattingly – Rockcastle County  Jessica Addison – Todd County/KDE.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Russell County Schools December 8, 2010 Pam Wilson.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Linking Assessment Targets to Instructional Tasks and DOK This.
(IN)FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT August Are You… ASSESSMENT SAVVY? Skilled in gathering accurate information about students learning? Using it effectively.
Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2013–2014 This material was developed for.
Current Comfort Level with Learning Targets
Volume Group 5 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013 This material.
Implementing Common Core Mathematics in Long Beach Unified School District Successes & Challenges Anne Oberjuerge K-5 Math Curriculum Leader Becky Afghani.
Principles of High Quality Assessment
The Research and Practice of Classroom Assessment Principles and Strategies of Formative Assessment.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project
Deconstructing/Unpacking a North Carolina Standard
How Do You Know Students Learned What You Just Taught? Lee Ann PruskeRosann Hollinger Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialists, Milwaukee Public.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Shape Group 1 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013 This material.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer 2013 Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics.
Kristen Rossheim Academic Coach Imagine Town Center North Florida, Sunshine and South Carolina Regional Forum August 7th, 2014 Powerful Expectations Setting.
Clear Purpose: Assessment for and of Learning: A Balanced Assessment System “If we can do something with assessment information beyond using it to figure.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Exploring Claim 2, 3, and 4 This material was developed for.
Coaching Case 3 Group 4 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Leadership of self linked with a system of formative assessment Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckmann Connie Laughlin.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Let’s Talk Assessment Rhonda Haus University of Regina 2013.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Classroom Assessment for Student Learning: Doing It Right – Using It Well.
Next Generation Science Cadre Facilitators: Jennifer Spencer Katrina Slone.
Evelyn Wassel, Ed.D. Summer  Skilled in gathering accurate information about students learning?  Using it effectively to promote further learning?
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer Institute 2012 What are Fractions? Part 1 Common Core Leadership.
Coaching Case 10 Group 6 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project
Understanding Angle Group 3 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Welcome Principals Please sit in groups of 3 2 All students graduate college and career ready Standards set expectations on path to college and career.
Connecting the Characteristics Margaret Heritage UCLA/ CRESST Attributes of Other Characteristics of Effective Instruction and Assessment for Learning.
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 2: Balanced Assessment.
Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2013–2014 This material was developed for.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Ratio and Proportional Relationships April 23, 2013 Common.
Part 2: Division of Fractions Balancing Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge Tuesday December 13, 2011 Common Core Leadership in Mathematics (CCLM) Common.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Ko-Kou and the Peacock’s Tail
Classroom Discussions to Support Problem Solving
Exploring Symmetry Core Mathematics Partnership
Number Talks: Building Fluency with Division
Standards for Mathematical Practice
Equality Project Part A Observations
Smarter Balanced Assessment Items
Number Talks: Focusing in Computational Fluency
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
Number Talks: Developing Computational Fluency
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
The Power of A Number String Purposeful Number Talks
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
The Power of A Number String Purposeful Number Talks (part 2)
Understanding Ratios as Percents
Principles and Strategies of Formative Assessment
Moving From Multiplicative Comparisons to Proportional Reasoning
A Language-Rich Math Class
Student Work Presentation and Reflection Project Due: July 31
CCSS Training 9/24/14.
Student Work Analysis: Looking for Growth in Thinking
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Claim 1: Concepts and Procedures
Presentation transcript:

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2013–2014 This material was developed for the Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics project through the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Center for Mathematics and Science Education Research (CMSER). This material may be used by schools to support learning of teachers and staff provided appropriate attribution and acknowledgement of its source. You may not use this work for commercial purposes. This project was supported through a grant from the Wisconsin ESEA Title II Improving Teacher Quality Program.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Review and Focus: Formative Assessment Strategies Common Core Leadership in Mathematics (CCLM)

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Learning Target and Success Criteria Learning Target: What is the difference between an activity and a learning target?

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Review: A Balanced Assessment System Key IssuesFormative Context (FOR)Summative Context (OF) Key decision(s) Decision Makers Information needed Levels Classroom Assessment (pg. 21) Interim/Benchmark Assessment Annual Testing

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Seven Strategies of Assessment for Learning Look over the 7 strategies of Assessment for Learning, which strategies were a focus for our Formative Assessment assignment this summer? In triads, share some of your take-aways from the Formative Assessment assignment.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Formative Assessment Assignment What were your take-aways? LessonLearning Target CCSSM shorthand summary Assessment Item Lessons

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Take - Aways Learning Targets Assessments

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee “Students can hit any target they can see that holds still for them.” ~Rick Stiggins

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Clear learning targets shift us away from what we, as teachers, are covering towards what our students are learning.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Classifying Targets Knowledge Reasoning Skill Targets Product Targets What are the characteristics that distinguish these types of learning targets?

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Knowledge Targets Factual information: verbs such as names, lists, identifies, recalls Procedural knowledge: knowing a protocol or memorizing a series of steps Conceptual understanding; can explain the concept clearly E.g., Identify tenths in decimal form on a number line. Indicate the approximate location of thirds, fourths, and fifths on a number line.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reasoning Targets Specify thought processes students are to apply effectively e.g., solve problems, make inferences, defend judgments. Ability to apply knowledge in authentic contexts Engage in reasoning using their knowledge E.g., Compare fractions, decimals and mixed numbers by identifying their relative position on a number line.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Skill Targets Real time demonstration Physical performance E.g., Use a protractor to draw acute and obtuse angles. Use a compass to draw concentric circles.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Product Targets  Creation of a product What is the intended learning? E.g., Create a table, lab report, make a graph, scatter plots.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Formative Assessment Table In Triads, examine and offer feedback to your partners on their learning targets. Spend some time in your discussion on: 1.the classification of the learning target 2.the student-friendly language 3.the target as an activity or a learning

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Writing a Learning Target Grade Level groups (Triads) 1.Read the designated lesson. 2.Individually: choose the standard that aligns best to the lesson. List the activities students will do. From the activities write a learning target. Classify your target. 3. Share and discuss your target with your triad. 4. If time, share you target with another grade level group.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee In Classroom Practice Targets Should: Be posted daily for students to see. Be used throughout the lesson by students to monitor their learning, and by teachers to guide their instruction. Forecast: How do you know students reached the target?

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Teacher’s Role in Assessment FOR Learning 1.Identify the standard. 2.Deconstruct it to enabling targets. 3.Transform to student friendly version. 4.Create accurate classroom assessments. 5.Use with students to track growth.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Learning Target What is the difference between an activity and a learning target?