This Briefing is: UNCLASSIFIED Headquarters Air Combat Command Air Combat Command’s Transformation of Environmental Remediation Margaret C. Patterson HQ ACC/CEVRP

1 Nov 04 U.S. Air Force Major Commands Air Education and Training Command (AETC) Air Combat Command (ACC) Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC) Air Mobility Command (AMC) Air Force Space Command (SPACECOM) Pacific Air Forces (PACAF) ) US Air Forces in Europe (USAFE) Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC)

1 Nov 04 Headquarters Air Combat Command Headquarters Air Combat Command Headquartered at Langley AFB in Hampton, Virginia

1 Nov 04 ACC Environmental Restoration Program 674 Total Sites 273 Active Sites 401 Closed Sites 45 Installation and HQ personnel Two major service centers Annual Budget – app. $50M 674 Sites TOTAL PROGRAM

1 Nov 04 Background Langley AFB VA Across the road from new world class fitness center Along main entrance road

1 Nov 04 Future First Planning “A process that fuses base development planning with environmental cleanup to optimize land use.” VISUALIZE CONCEPTUALIZE PLAN DESIGN CONSTRUCT DELIVER

1 Nov 04 Future First Planning (F2P) What is it? Cross functional approach to better utilize installation land Fuses facility construction and environmental clean-up with future land use planning Supports construction considerations on open/active restoration sites Why? AF land is limited…future needs must be the first step in all planning Old think restore, cap, post “no trespass”…new think “future need” How? Command Implementation Plan Contract through AFCEE, San Antonio TX Inventory open ERP sites and base development plans Implement at applicable sites command-wide Pilot Projects at 4-5 bases in FY04

1 Nov 04 Future First Planning What we’ve accomplished: Identified, awarded, and executed three pilot projects Expanded the program for FY05 Where we are: Institutionalize via Wing Infrastructure Development Outlook (WINDO) Continuing Education (Video, Environmental Symposium, Conferences) Process improvement Part of Integrated Planning Initiative

1 Nov 04 Integrated Planning - Zoning

1 Nov 04 Environmental Program Perspective For some, no need for change: Have achieved good results Presently on-target to meet Defense Planning Guidance goals Executing the current program with contract actions every year

1 Nov 04 Performance Based Restoration (PBR) What is it? Target: Site closure Minimizes contract actions PBR defines “what” is to be achieved, not “how” Why? Historically, emphasis on process, not progress Cost overruns and schedule slippages How? Command Acquisition Plan Targets seven major acquisitions across the command All actions will be performance based and fixed price Utilize private sector expertise to achieve desired end-state Objective – Close out the legacy restoration program

1 Nov 04 Step One – Whiteman AFB, MO FY04 Effort Tasks Investigation/Study Landfill Maintenance/Repair ROD Sites Closed Total Costs Pre-PBC 17 Sites Sites $5.6 Mil Additional Cost Savings If awarded in separate TOs (traditional approach) the costs would exceed $7.1 Mil Activities of 26 sites were consolidated into 1 Task Order compared to 10 or more TOs. Internal Management Cost Savings! Accelerated Schedule Achievements 11 Sites projected to achieve regulatory closure over a year ahead of schedule 9 Sites projected to achieve regulatory closure 6 months ahead of schedule PBC 26 Sites Sites $5.7 Mil

1 Nov 04 FY05 PBR Strategy Aggregate closeouts into one contract action: Involves LTM and NFA actions only Ellsworth/Mt Home/Nellis/Offutt combined effort Primarily targets groundwater issues Utilizes life cycle cost analysis Don’t just optimize: relook the remedy Langley, Shaw, Seymour Johnson as stand alone multi-site, multiple year actions Target Langley for delisting Cannon Dyess Minot D-M Holloman

1 Nov 04 PBR Results Five Base Closeout Optimize LTM – Eliminate 1/3 of LTM within 3 yrs Target site closeout on 40 sites Near-term investment, mid-term savings Seymour Johnson Regulatory closure of 16 sites with insurance 20% Reduction in schedule vs. government estimate Cost savings of 35% against FY04 Cost to Complete (CTC) Shaw AFB: Regulatory closure/source reduction 14 sites w/insurance 40% Reduction in schedule vs. government estimate 42% Cost savings against FY04 CTC Langley: Site Closure of 15 sites with insurance Develop draft delisting package (final contract task) 100% Increase in schedule (FY 07 to FY09 completion) Some funding reallocated for other PBR efforts 57% Cost savings against FY04 CTC

1 Nov 04 Actions Underway Ellsworth/Mt Home/Nellis/Offutt combined effort (Four base contract) Primarily targets groundwater issues Utilizes life cycle cost analysis Don’t just optimize: relook the remedy Prep Avon Park, Barksdale, and Beale for FY06-07 When complete: Significant reduction in number of contract actions per year More focus on project control and management Clear program objectives identified upfront

1 Nov 04 Execution Organize for Success Business lines (Triad/PBR, F2P/ Future Rqts) Engaged management approach Stabilize the Structure Formalizing internal processes Automated document flow Automated project tracking Set the Strategy Near-term objectives Strategic Plan for the program

1 Nov 04 Today Triad The mechanism for performing site investigations Focus on remediation objectives not completion of RI Performance Based Restoration Prep Avon Park, Barksdale, and Beale for FY06-07 Look at Geographically Separated Units Design, Build, Remediate, Restore (DBR2) contract vehicle Future First Planning Link remediation goals to integrated planning needs More partnered approach with contract support community

1 Nov 04 CEVR Organization Chart CEVR (Chavis) CEVRP (Holsinger) Holley Hopping Patterson Stark Swartz Vacant (Recruiting) Vacant CEVRO (Shifflett) Bartels Haggins Scott Young Vacant (Recruiting) Vacant Mgt Analyst (Royster)