A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ISS meeting, (1) R. Garoby (for the SPL study group) SPL-based Proton Driver for Facilities SPL-based Proton Driver for Facilities at CERN:
Advertisements

USR-WS (Beijing) Oct. 30 – Nov. 1, 2012 K. Soutome (JASRI / SPring-8) on behalf of SPring-8 Upgrade Working Group Injection Scheme for the SPring-8 Upgrade.
Masahito TOMIZAWA and Satoshi MIHARA Accelerator and proton beam.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007 Injection System with a Booster in Separate Tunnel T. Shaftan for the NSLS-II team.
1 Proton Upgrades at Fermilab Robert Zwaska Fermilab March 12, 2007 Midwest Accelerator Physics Collaboration Meeting Indiana University Cyclotron Facility.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, MW AGS proton driver (M.J. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas,
Prepare DORIS for particle physics again F.Brinker, DESY, March 31 st 2008 Injector chain to Doris and Petra Situation at the IP-region Beam optic Work.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Beam loading compensation 300Hz positron generation (Hardware Upgrade ??? Due to present Budget problem) LCWS2013 at Tokyo Uni., Nov KEK, Junji.
F MI High Power Operation and Future Plans Ioanis Kourbanis (presented by Bruce Brown) HB2008 August 25, 2008.
Getting Beam to NuMI (It’s a worry!) Peter Kasper.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy AGS Upgrade and Super Neutrino Beam DOE Annual HEP Program Review April 27-28, 2005 Derek I. Lowenstein.
Compton/Linac based Polarized Positrons Source V. Yakimenko BNL IWLC2010, Geneva, October 18-22, 2010.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
EDM2001 Workshop May 14-15, 2001 AGS Intensity Upgrade (J.M. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S.Y. Zhang) Proton.
Injection Into Low Lifetime USRs R. Hettel, SLAC USR Accelerator R&D Workshop Huairou (Beijing), China October 31, 2012.
J-PARC Accelerators Masahito Tomizawa KEK Acc. Lab. Outline, Status, Schedule of J-PARC accelerator MR Beam Power Upgrade.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS II: Accelerator System Overview NSLS II Advisory Committees October 18/19, 2006 Satoshi Ozaki.
Fourth-Generation Sources at Third-Generation Facilities John W. Lewellen Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory.
Workshop on New Aspects of Quark Nuclear Physics with Polarized Photons, Feb , Honolulu Possibility of bright, polarized high energy photon sources.
FLASH II. The results from FLASH II tests Sven Ackermann FEL seminar Hamburg, April 23 th, 2013.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
9/24-26/07 e- KOM Slide 1/20 ILC Polarized e- source RDR Overview A. Brachmann.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
MEIC Electron Ring Injection from CEBAF
Fermilab and Muons Proton Driver (for ν-Factory, μ + -μ - Collider, …) David Neuffer Fermilab.
Preliminary MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme Jiquan Guo for the MEIC design study team Oct. 5,
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
High Intensity Booster Operations William Pellico PIP II collaboration Nov. 9 th 2015.
SPring-8 upgrade : a fast kicker system for beam injection Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute (JASRI) SPring-8 T. Nakamura CFA Beam Dynamics.
Early Beam Injection Scheme for the Fermilab Booster: A Path for Intensity Upgrade Chandra Bhat Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory DPF2015, ANN ARBOR,
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
S. Bettoni, R. Corsini, A. Vivoli (CERN) CLIC drive beam injector design.
Page 1 Polarized Electron Sources for Linear Colliders October, 2010 A. Brachmann, J. C. Sheppard, F. Zhou SLAC SLAC October 18-22, 2010.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
F Project X: Recycler 8.9 GeV/c Extraction D. Johnson, E. Prebys, M. Martens, J. Johnstone Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.
MAX IV linac overview and scope of automation Sara Thorin.
Injection System Update S. Guiducci (LNF) XVII SuperB Workshop La Biodola, Isola d'Elba, May 29 th 5/29/111.
Neutrino Factory by Zunbeltz, Davide, Margarita, Wolfgang IDS proposal.
November 17, 2008 A. Brachmann Slide 1 ILC polarized Electron Source R&D Update LCWS 2008 A. Brachmann, J. Sheppard, F. Zhou - SLAC National Accelerator.
F Sergei Nagaitsev (FNAL) Webex meeting Oct ICD-2 chopper requirements and proposal #1.
FCC-ee injector complex including Booster Yannis Papaphilippou, CERN Thanks to: M.Aiba (PSI), Ö.Etisken (Ankara Un.), K.Oide (KEK), L.Rinolfi (ESI-JUAS),
High intensity electron beam and infrastructure Paolo Valente * INFN Roma * On behalf of the BTF and LINAC staff.
ESLS Workshop Nov 2015 MAX IV 3 GeV Ring Commissioning Pedro F. Tavares & Åke Andersson, on behalf of the whole MAX IV team.
Multi-bunch Operation for LCLS, LCLS_II, LCLS_2025
Sara Thorin, MAX IV Laboratory
Bocheng Jiang SSRF AP group
Alternative/complementary Possibilities
SLS Timing Master Timo Korhonen, PSI.
Considerations on RF systems of SPPC collider and its injector chain
Status and prospects of VEPP-5 Injection Complex
Status of the CLIC main beam injectors
Challenges for High Charge Operation of the APS Injection System
SuperB project. Injection scheme design status
Compton effect and ThomX What possible future?
CLIC source update CLIC main beam injectors reminder
Progress towards Pulsed Multi-MW CERN Proton Drivers
Status of the CLIC Injector studies
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
JLEIC electron injection demo
JLEIC electron injection demo
Polarized Positrons in JLEIC
J. Seeman Perugia Super-B Meeting June 2009
Injection design of CEPC
JLEIC ion fullsize booster (2256m) space charge limit (Δν=0
JLEIC CCR Path Length and Gap Formation
Optimization of JLEIC Integrated Luminosity Without On-Energy Cooling*
Updated MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme
JLEIC Ion Beam Formation options for 200 GeV
Presentation transcript:

A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Injector Requirements for APS Operations Nick Sereno, Operations Analysis Group / AOD

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 2 Outline APS injector top-up requirements. Present APS injector configuration and operation. Injector operating envelope considerations. Direct injection. -Bunch purity data taken for direct injection using rf gun 2. -Simulation of linac macropulse capture using a subharmonic booster rf cavity. -Long drive pulse laser assisted rf thermionic guns. Interleaving for simultaneous LEUTL and top-up operation. Conclusion.

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 3 APS Injector Top-up Requirements Top-up allows running the SR with low effective emittance and therefore lifetime (~6 hours). Single-pulse injection occurs every 2 minutes. Injector charge / pulse depends on lifetime and injection efficiency (~80-90 %). This mode is the most demanding on the injectors. Typically top-up requires nC/cycle to support top-up. The single injected pulse must land in one of 23 single buckets (singlets) with good bunch purity for timing experiments.

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 4 Standard Storage Ring Operation Modes 23 singlets (24 soon) each separated by 150 ns. -Primary operating mode. -Lifetime ~ 6 hours, requires top-up for low-emittance lattice. -Booster provides 7 GeV and nC/cycle depending on lifetime and injection efficiency. -Bunch purity requires the particle accumulator ring (PAR). 324 bunch operation. -Allows injector studies during storage ring operations. -Long lifetime of ~ hours so top-up not required even with low-emittance top-up lattice. -Fill every 12 hours to 0.5 nC/cycle for each fill-on-fill.

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 5 Injector Configuration and Operation for Storage Ring Operations Booster PAR L5 To Storage Ring PAR Parameters - Injection Rate: 2 – 30 Hz Extraction Cycle: 2 Hz Injection Pulses: 1-5 Extracted Charge: 0.3 – 5 nC Injection Energy: 325 MeV Fundamental rf : h = 1 Harmonic rf: h = 12 Booster Parameters – Injection Cycle: 2 Hz Extraction Cycle: 2 Hz Charge: nC/pulse Extraction Energy: 7 GeV L4 RG2 RG1 LINAC Parameters - Pulse Rate: 2 – 30 Hz Injection Pulses: 1-5 Extracted Charge: 0.3 – 1 nC Extraction Energy: 325 MeV RG2 Macropulse Length – ns RG1 Macropulse Length – 30 ns L2

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 6 Injector Safety / Operating Envelope Summary Rep rates are 60 pps for linac/leutl and 2 Hz for par/booster. When using PAR and booster there is a factor of 3 margin to support top-up. Design booster subharmonic cavity to operating envelope for direct injection. MachineSafety EnvelopeOperating Envelope Linac (LEUTL), (700 MeV, 60 pps) (1kW), 24 nC / Pulse(825 W), 19.7 nC / Pulse PAR, (500 MeV, 2 Hz)(20 W), 20 nC / Cycle(10 W), 10 nC / Cycle Booster, (7.7 GeV, 2 Hz)(308 W), 20 nC / Cycle(154 W), 10 nC / Cycle Safety envelope based on highest allowable average beam power, highest average repetition rate and highest possible operating energy (Safety Assessment Document Ch. 5).

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 7 Injector Configuration and Operation for Direct Injection Using rf Gun2. Booster PAR L5 To Storage Ring Booster Parameters – Injection Rate: 2 Hz Extraction Rate: 2 Hz Charge: 0.3 – 2.2 nC/cycle Extraction Energy: 7 GeV L4 RG2 RG1 LINAC Parameters - Injection Rate: 2 Hz Extracted Charge: 0.3 – 2.2 nC/cycle Extraction Energy: MeV RG2 Macropulse Length – ns. L2

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 8 Direct Injection – Storage Ring Bucket Pattern

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 9 Direct Injection Bucket Pattern Summary Gun 2 Kicker Setpoint (kV) Storage Ring Buckets with more than 10 counts SR Buckets Containing more than 95 % of the Beam 24.9 (2.2 nC/Cycle)156 (16.7 ns) 22.5 (1.8 nC/Cycle)125 (13.9 ns) 20.0 (1.0 nC/Cycle)114 (11.1 ns) 18.9 (0.5 nC/Cycle)114 (11.1 ns)

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 10 Booster Subharmonic Cavity ELEGANT Simulations Use the existing booster momentum ramp rate (325 MeV -> 7 GeV in 223 ms). Simulate using a single 352 MHz rf cavity system and a low frequency rf system at a subharmonic of 352 MHz. Include beam loading in the simulations. Tune 352 MHz system on resonance when the bunch is short enough to be completely captured (~2.5 ns). Use 110,000 particles to demonstrate at least 1 part in 100,000 bunch purity (1 part in 1,000,000 desired). Include radiation damping and quantum excitation. May require bunch cleaning at low energy before 352 MHz system is turned on.

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 11 Direct Injection Simulation Using Subharmonic Cavity

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 12 Direct Injection Simulation Cont.

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 13 Direct Injection Using Subharmonic Booster Cavity Parameter Tradeoffs Subharmonic Cavity Parameters To Achieve ~2.5 ns bunch length at ~3 GeV From Elegant Simulation Frequency (MHz) Subharmonic Number Subharmonic Gap Voltage (kV) Linac Macropulse Length at GeV (ns) Minimum Bunch Length (ns)

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 14 Direct Injection Using rf Guns Driven by a Long Pulse Laser Operations/exp. Issues. Idea driven by subharmonic cavity parameter tradeoffs. Design to 10 nC / pulse booster operating envelope. 5 ns macropulse implies 2 amps off the cathode. What are the limits here? Could use 117 MHz subharmonic capture cavity with 5 ns macropulse. Bunch cleaning in the booster probably required but easier with subharmonic capture.

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 15 Direct Injection Using rf Guns Driven by a Long Pulse Laser Operations/exp. Issues Cont. What is the lifetime of cathodes under drive pulse laser conditions? What is the drive laser lifetime? Emittance measurements. Want to use the ITS to demonstrate as many operations issues as possible. Eventually test idea using gun 2 after test stand demonstration. Repeat storage ring bunch purity measurements. Gun 1 needs to be modified to have the same performance as gun 2. Gun 1 and PAR in the meantime can still be backup to gun2.

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 16 Interleaving Injector Configuration With PC Gun and PAR for top-up Booster PAR L5 To Storage Ring PAR Parameters - Injection Rate: 6 Hz Extraction Rate: 2 Hz Injection Pulses: 1-3 Extracted Charge: 0.3 – 3 nC/cycle Injection Energy: 325 – 450 MeV Booster Parameters – Injection Rate: 2 Hz Extraction Rate: 2 Hz Charge: nC/cycle Extraction Energy: 7 GeV L4 RG2 RG1 LINAC Parameters - Pulse Rate: 6 Hz Injection Pulses: 1-3 Extracted Charge: 0.3 – 1 nC Extraction Energy: MeV L2 L1 PCG To LEUTL

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 17 Interleaving Injector Configuration With Direct Injection Using the PC Gun Booster PAR L5 To Storage Ring Booster Parameters – Injection Rate: 2 Hz Extraction Rate: 2 Hz Pulses: 1-5 Charge: nC/cycle Extraction Energy: 7 GeV L4 RG2 RG1 LINAC Parameters - Pulse Rate: 6 Hz Injection Pulses: 1-3 Extracted Charge: 0.3 – 3 nC/cycle Extraction Energy: MeV L2 L1 PCG To LEUTL

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 18 PC Gun/LEUTL and Top-up Options Interleaving using the PAR. -Use the PAR to accumulate the PC gun beam. -Can run PC gun at relatively low charge required for FEL experiments. -Can use almost the full linac energy (PAR design energy is 450 MeV). -Requires a PAR kicker upgrade to go to the full PAR energy. -May need pulsed quads for matching the PC gun beam into PAR. Direct injection into the booster. -No subharmonic cavity required. -High charge required (at least 3 nC/cycle every 2 minutes). -Can use full energy of the linac. -Demonstrated direct booster injection only in studies. Need to resolve timing issue of laser and 352 MHz.

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 19 Conclusion Top-up represents puts the most severe requirements on the injector in terms of charge/cycle. Existing rf guns + PAR meet and exceed top-up requirements and provide the boundary condition for proposed injector modifications. Direct injection has been demonstrated using RG2 and can be used to fill the SR in the event the PAR is down. Subharmonic capture has been simulated for the booster. Can long drive pulse laser be used to shorten the rf gun macropulse?

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 20 Conclusion Cont. PC gun could in principle be used to support top-up / LEUTL operations. Interleaving using the PC gun and PAR is the least severe on PC gun for top-up operations. May require pulsed quads to match beam into the PAR. Need to run PC gun at least 3 nC / pulse for direct injection top-up. Direct injection has been demonstrated using PC gun but timing issue needs to be resolved.