Thailand Training Program in Seismology and Tsunami Warnings, May 2006 Forecasting Earthquakes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Earthquake Hazards Landslides, Liquefaction, Dam Failure, Ground Rupture and Structural Collapse.
Advertisements

SEISMIC HAZARD Presentation is based on: Allen, R., Earthquake hazard mitigation: New direction and opportunities, in "Treatise on Geophysics”, Bilham,
Loma Prieta Earthquake Mourad Amouri Nicolas Rodriguez.
WHAT COULD BE THE NEXT EARTHQUAKE DISASTER FOR JAPAN  A difficult question, but ---  It is the one that was being asked long before the March 11, 2011.
Earthquakes Presented you to by the Hazard Committee Madeline Galac Nicole Barstrom.
Tom Heaton Caltech Geophysics and Civil Engineering.
Seismic/Eruption Teaching Modules Lawrence W. Braile Sheryl J. Braile Teaching About Earthquakes.
Earthquake Predictibility, Forcasting and Early Warning Bill Menke October 18, 2005.
Locating the source of earthquakes Focus - the place within Earth where earthquake waves originate Epicenter on an earthquake– location on the surface.
Lisa Wald USGS Pasadena U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Earthquake Hazards Program Earthquakes 101 (EQ101)
Earthquakes. Figure 11.8 Figure 11.9A Figure 11.9B.
Earthquakes-Pt.2 Earthquake Processes (mechanisms/causes) Effects of earthquakes (damage) Earthquake risk and prediction Responses to earthquake hazards.
Sri Lanka Earthquake & Tsunami Warning Training Program Session I.1 Introduction to Earthquake Science: A Historical Perspective April 3, 2006 CETRAC,
NA-Pa Plate Boundary Wilson [1960] USGS Prof. Paper 1515.
2007 NSTA: St. Louis, Missouri Earthquake Prediction and Forecasting: A Case Study of the San Andreas and New Madrid Faults Sponsored by: IRIS (Incorporated.
Forecasting Earthquakes ・ Difference between Predictions and Forecasts ・ Earlier Efforts in Earthquake Prediction ・ Long-term Probability Estimates.
Earthquake Predictions & Tectonic Environments
Earthquake scaling and statistics
Paleoseismic and Geologic Data for Earthquake Simulations Lisa B. Grant and Miryha M. Gould.
Time-independent hazard-random process in time: used for building design, planning, insurance, probability Time-dependent hazard-a degree of predictability,
Faults and Earthquakes. Some Important Earthquakes Lisbon, Portugal Killed 70,000, Raised Waves in Lakes all over Europe First Scientifically Studied.
Earthquakes Source: NPS Source: USGS.
Engineering Geology and Seismology
Earthquakes Most destructive forces on Earth. But it is buildings and other human structures that cause injury and death, not the earthquake itself 1988.
Earthquake Hazards. Hazards are produced from the response of energy released Amount and duration are related to the amount of energy released.
Class lectures available
Lisa Wald USGS Pasadena U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Earthquake Hazards Program Earthquakes 101 (EQ101)
Daily Review #4 Describe the 4 different pieces of evidence to support continental drift How does convection cause a plate to move? Discuss your answer.
Kenneth W. Hudnut USGS, Pasadena, CA West Newport Beach Association Public Forum, Newport Beach City Hall March 5, 2003 Coping with ‘quakes.
Earthquake Science (Seismology). Seismometers and seismic networks Seismometers and seismic networks Earthquake aftershocks Earthquake aftershocks Earthquake.
Research opportunities using IRIS and other seismic data resources John Taber, Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology Michael Wysession, Washington.
Zack Bick Erin Riggs Alicia Helton Cara Dickerson Presentation by:
Using IRIS and other seismic data resources in the classroom John Taber, Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Earthquake Hazards Program Earthquakes 101.
Earthquake Seismology Lars Ottemöller University of Bergen, Norway.
Warm Up 11/1 Which of the following is NOT a characteristic of S waves? a. They cannot be transmitted through water or air. b. They shake particles at.
Earthquake forecasting using earthquake catalogs.
Tsunami and Earthquake Hazard 10/27/ pgs and pg. 376 IN: Can seismologists predict earthquakes? Why or why not?
SEISMIC HAZARD. Seismic risk versus seismic hazard Seismic Hazard is the probability of occurrence of a specified level of ground shaking in a specified.
A (re-) New (ed) Spin on Renewal Models Karen Felzer USGS Pasadena.
Earthquake Predictability Test of the Load/Unload Response Ratio Method Yuehua Zeng, USGS Golden Office Zheng-Kang Shen, Dept of Earth & Space Sciences,
PREDICTION Paleoseismology: Documenting and evaluating past events. 1.) Usually done with looking at offset layers in sediments in trenches 2.) Calculate.
California Project Seismicity in the oil and gas fields Tayeb A. Tafti University of Southern California July 2, 2013.
Earthquakes, Volcanoes, and a Modern Journey to the Center of the Earth Michael Wysession Professor of Geophysics, Dept of Earth and Planetary Sciences.
The influence of the geometry of the San Andreas fault system on earthquakes in California Qingsong Li and Mian Liu Geological Sciences, 101 Geol. Bldg.,
Forecasting Earthquakes
19.4 – Earthquakes & Society. Damages  Death and injuries  Collapse of buildings  Landslides  Fires  Explosions  Flood waters.
Can we forecast an Earthquake??? In the next minute there will be an earthquake somewhere in the world! This sentence is correct (we have seen that there.
Forecasting Earthquakes ・ Difference between Predictions and Forecasts ・ Earlier Efforts in Earthquake Prediction ・ Long-term Probability Estimates.
Earthquakes 101 (EQ101) Lisa Wald USGS Earthquake Hazards Program
Internal structure of the San Andreas fault at Parkfield, California Martyn J. Unsworth, Peter E. Malin, Gary D. Egbert, and John T. Booker Geology, April.
The Time-Predictable Recurrence Model The original models (Shimazaki & Nakata 1980) Complications and pitfalls (Thatcher 1984) Modern examples Relevance.
Understanding Earth Sixth Edition Chapter 13: EARTHQUAKES © 2011 by W. H. Freeman and Company Grotzinger Jordan.
Objectives Relate earthquake activity to plate tectonics Define earthquake, and identify the focus and epicenter of an earthquake. Describe the types.
Metrics, Bayes, and BOGSAT: Recognizing and Assessing Uncertainties in Earthquake Hazard Maps Seth Stein 1, Edward M. Brooks 1, Bruce D. Spencer 2 1 Department.
Earthquake Forecasting and Prediction. Parkfield, CA.
TOWARDS PRE-EARTHQUAKE PLANNING FOR POST-EARTHQUAKE RECOVERY (PEPPER) EXAMPLES: TOKAI, JAPAN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster.
Earthquakes.
Ch.5, Sec.3 – Earthquakes & Society - seismologists cannot predict when earthquakes will happen, but we can use earthquake hazard maps to predict where.
Marina District after Loma Prieta Earthquake, 1989
Geologic Hazards Geologic Hazards are those Earth processes that are harmful to humans and/or their property. Includes: Earthquakes Volcanic eruptions.
Earthquakes.
Kinematic Modeling of the Denali Earthquake
SAN ANDREAS FAULT San Francisco Bay Area North American plate
EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS, PATTERNS, AND RISK
Understanding Earth Chapter 13: EARTHQUAKES Grotzinger • Jordan
VII. Earthquake Mitigation
Warm-up Week 12 Day 2 Explain the difference between a seismograph and a seismogram. Order the three kinds of seismic waves from fastest to slowest.
Tsunami and Earthquake Hazard 10/26/15
Presentation transcript:

Thailand Training Program in Seismology and Tsunami Warnings, May 2006 Forecasting Earthquakes

・ Difference between Predictions and Forecasts ・ Early Efforts in Earthquake Prediction ・ Long-term Forecasting

Earthquake Predictions versus Forecasts Predictions have specific times, locations, and magnitudes for future earthquakes. Forecasts are more long-term estimates of earthquake occurrences with probability information.

Short-term (minutes to weeks) Intermediate (months to 10 years ) Long-term (> 10 years) Forecast Loading Cycle Interseismic Preseismic Coseismic Postseismic

1. Time 2. Location 3. Magnitude What is needed in an earthquake prediction ? Allen, 1996 Frequency of Occurrence of Earthquakes Descriptor Magnitude Average Annually Great8 and higher 1 Major Strong Moderate Light ,000 (estimated) Minor ,000 (estimated) Very Minor ,300,000 (estimated)

1. Time 2. Location 3. Magnitude 4. Indication of confidence (window) 5. Prediction must be presented in accessible form for later evaluation 6. Chance earthquake occurs anyway as a random event What is needed in an earthquake prediction ? Allen, 1996

‘Now, when will earthquake prediction be possible and an efficient Forewarning service available ? …if we start the project presented here we should be able to answer the question with sufficient certainty within ten years.’ The Japanese Blueprint (Tsuboi et al, 1962) ‘Based on an assessment of worldwide observations and findings over the past few years, it is the panel’s unanimous opinion that the development of an effective earthquake prediction capability is an achievable goal. …with appropriate commitment and level of effort, the routine announcement of reliable predictions may be possible within ten years…’ Panel of the US National Research Council (Allen et al., 1976) Optimism in the 1960 ’ s and 1970 ’ s In actuality: Can only forecast earthquakes and mitigate hazard

‘Predicted’ ・ 1973 Blue Mountain Lake ・ 1975 Haicheng, China ・ 1978 Oaxaca, Mexico ・ 1978 Izu, Japan ‘ Not Predicted’ ・ 1976 Tangshan, China (M ,000 est. casualties) ・ 2004 Parkfield, California Successes and Failures

Blue Mountain Lake, NY

‘Dilatancy’

Scholz et al., 1973 Dilatancy hardening

Prediction of the 1975 Haicheng, China Earthquake (M7.3) Prediction based on foreshocks and animal behavior saved many lives

Short-Term Crustal Deformation Precursor (M 8.1 Tonankai Earthquake 1944) Mogi, 1984

Short-Term Electromagnetic Precursor 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake Fraser-Smith, et al., 1990

1978 Oaxaca, Mexico (Ohtake et al., 1981) Intermediate-Term: Seismicity Patterns ‘Mogi Doughnut’ Dilatancy Hardening

Mogi, 1985 Intermediate-Term: Crustal Deformation 1964 Niigata earthquake

Wakita, 1981 Intermediate-Term: Water and Chemical M 7.0 Izu earthquake 1978

‘Successfully’ Predicted ・ 1973 Blue Mountain Lake ・ 1975 Haicheng, China ・ 1978 Oaxaca, Mexico ・ 1978 Izu, Japan

Parkfield Earthquake Prediction Experiment 95% probability that M5.5 to 6 will occur Based on Recurrence pattern Characteristic waveforms

Bakun and McEvilly, Repeating Characteristic Earthquakes - M5 foreshock 17 minutes before 1934 and 1966 events

Not Predicted ・ 1976 Tangshan, China (M ,000 est. casualties) ・ 2004 Parkfield, California For short-term prediction, there have been more negative results than positive results: Other precursors have not been consistently seen

Why has there been lack of continued success in observing precursors? Animal experiments have failed Original observations were hindsight Instrumentation Geology dependent (including lights and piezoelectric effects) Predictive algorithms have not worked (at least short-term) Earthquakes may be non-characteristic No connection to tides or planetary alignment No psychics have made consistent predictions

Short-term minutes to weeks Intermediate-term months to 10 years Long-term > 10 years Earthquake Forecasting

Recurrence times of earthquakes to forecast future earthquakes Using historic data Using geologic data

Shimazaki and Nakata, 1980 Earthquake Cycle Periodic Time-predictable Slip-predictable

History of Nankai Earthquakes

PALEOSEISMOLOGY Trenching faults to find geological evidence of past earthquakes Pallet Creek site on the San Andreas fault

Periodic Time-predictable Slip-predictable Shimazaki and Nakata, 1980 Earthquake Cycle

100 years Conditional Probability Probability

Well defined recurrence interval Wide range of recurrence intervals (Large variability) (Small variability) Variability in Repeating Earthquakes

Probabilistic Earthquake Forecasting for California Hector Mines Landers 1992 Parkfield 2004 Loma Prieta 1989

USGS National Hazard Maps

Earthquake Hazards Ground Shaking Surface Faulting Landslides and Liquefaction Avalanches and soil (mud flows)

NEIC Catalog Seismicity (M>4.5) What about Thailand? ・ Low Seismicity ・ No Historical Earthquakes ・ Active Faults (?) ・ Probability is low for future earthquakes But earthquakes can happen in low probability regions and offshore

Will we be able to predict earthquakes in the future ? Long-term: Probably Intermediate term: Maybe Short-term: Maybe Future Outlook

Don ’ t forget that the precursor to a tsunami is the earthquake.

Parkfield Earthquake Prediction Experiment

Loading or deformation cycle –Four phases Interseismic Preseismic Coseismic Postseismic

For short-term precursors, there are currently more ‘negative’ results than ‘positive’results. Kanamori et al., 1996 Johnston and Linde, 2002

Distance Measurements on the San Andreas fault Matsushiro strainmeter Earthquake Prediction Research in the 1970 ’ s

Laser Distance Measurements

M 6.8 Nisqually 2001 Ground Shaking

Surface faulting Bei-Fung Bridge near Fung-Yan city, 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake

1964 Niigata Earthquake Liquefaction