Acoustical parameters ISO 3382

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

BellRigner – 1/30/2012 Match the graph to the function: f(x) = x 3 – 2x + 2 g(x) = -2x h(x) = x 4 – 2 i(x) = -x 3 – 1 A B C D.
You have been given a mission and a code. Use the code to complete the mission and you will save the world from obliteration…
Sound Quality Assessment IR measurements and AQT
Reverberation time. Reverberation time (1) Lets consider a room containing an active sound source, and lets abruptly interrupt the emission of sound energy.
Angelo Farina Dip. di Ingegneria Industriale - Università di Parma Parco Area delle Scienze 181/A, Parma – Italy
Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
1 Chapter 40 - Physiology and Pathophysiology of Diuretic Action Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
Properties Use, share, or modify this drill on mathematic properties. There is too much material for a single class, so you’ll have to select for your.
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
and 6.855J Cycle Canceling Algorithm. 2 A minimum cost flow problem , $4 20, $1 20, $2 25, $2 25, $5 20, $6 30, $
We need a common denominator to add these fractions.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
Multiplying binomials You will have 20 seconds to answer each of the following multiplication problems. If you get hung up, go to the next problem when.
0 - 0.
1 1  1 =.
1  1 =.
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt Time Money AdditionSubtraction.
ALGEBRAIC EXPRESSIONS
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt ShapesPatterns Counting Number.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULTIPLYING MONOMIALS TIMES POLYNOMIALS (DISTRIBUTIVE PROPERTY)
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
MULTIPLICATION EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 3. WHAT EVER YOU DO TO ONE SIDE YOU HAVE TO DO TO THE OTHER 2. DIVIDE BY THE NUMBER IN FRONT OF THE VARIABLE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
FACTORING Think Distributive property backwards Work down, Show all steps ax + ay = a(x + y)
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
Year 6 mental test 10 second questions
Learning to show the remainder
ZMQS ZMQS
Researches and Applications for Automotive Field Andrea Azzali, Eraldo Carpanoni, Angelo Farina University of Parma.
ABC Technology Project
1 Undirected Breadth First Search F A BCG DE H 2 F A BCG DE H Queue: A get Undiscovered Fringe Finished Active 0 distance from A visit(A)
© S Haughton more than 3?
VOORBLAD.
15. Oktober Oktober Oktober 2012.
Effects on UK of Eustatic sea Level rise GIS is used to evaluate flood risk. Insurance companies use GIS models to assess likely impact and consequently.
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Lets play bingo!!. Calculate: MEAN Calculate: MEDIAN
Past Tense Probe. Past Tense Probe Past Tense Probe – Practice 1.
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Januar MDMDFSSMDMDFSSS
Week 1.
Number bonds to 10,
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
Figure Essential Cell Biology (© Garland Science 2010)
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
PSSA Preparation.
Essential Cell Biology
How Cells Obtain Energy from Food
© 2006, François Brouard Case Real Group François Brouard, DBA, CA January 6, 2006.
SYN-AUD-CON Acoustic Test and Measurement Seminar The Early Sound Field: Properties, Perceptual Attributes, and Measurement Methods NEIL THOMPSON SHADE.
ACOUSTICS part – 4 Sound Engineering Course
Presentation transcript:

Acoustical parameters ISO 3382 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382)

ISO 3382 acoustical parameters 09/13/2003 ISO 3382 acoustical parameters 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382) AES 115th Convention - New York, NY

From Impulse Response to Sound Decay 09/13/2003 From Impulse Response to Sound Decay Schroeder’s backward integral Makes it possible to reconstruct the decay of a stationary source by backward integration of the measured impulse response 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382) AES 115th Convention - New York, NY

Schroeder’s BW Integration 09/13/2003 Schroeder’s BW Integration Pressure Impulse Response Stationary Sound Decay (in dB) Energetic Impulse Response (in dB) 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382) AES 115th Convention - New York, NY

Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382) Reverberation time T20 Lp (dB) -5 dB 45 dB -25 dB Time (s) T20 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382)

ISO 3382 Reverberation Time(s) Early Decay Time (EDT): extrapolated from 0 to -10 dB Reverberation Time T10: extrapolated from -5 to -15 dB Reverberation Time T20: extrapolated from -5 to -25 dB Reverberation Time T30: extrapolated from -5 to -35 dB 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382)

Early – Late energy evaluation 09/13/2003 Useful Energy Detrimental Energy 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382) AES 115th Convention - New York, NY

Early-Late parameters Clarity Index C80 (symphonic music): Optimal Value = +/- 1 dB Clarity Index C50 (speech): Optimal Value = +/- 1 dB 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382)

Early-Late parameters Definition Index D: Center Time tS: 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382)

Other acoustical parameters SPL at 10 m Strenght: IACC: 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382)

Other acoustical parameters Lateral Fraction: LFC: 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382)

Spatial analysis by directive impulse responses The initial approach was to use directive microphones for gathering some information about the spatial properties of the sound field “as perceived by the listener” Two apparently different approaches emerged: binaural dummy heads and pressure-velocity microphones: Binaural microphone (left) and Pressure-velocity microphone (right) 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382)

IACC “objective” spatial parameter It was attempted to “quantify” the “spatiality” of a room by means of “objective” parameters, based on 2-channels impulse responses measured with directive microphones The most famous “spatial” parameter is IACC (Inter Aural Cross Correlation), based on binaural IR measurements Left pL(t) Right pR(t) 80 ms 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382)

Lateral Fraction (LF) spatial parameter Another “spatial” parameter is the Lateral Fraction JLF This is defined from a 2-channels impulse response, the first channel is a standard omni microphone, the second channel is a “figure-of-eight” microphone: Omni ho(t) Figure of 8 h8(t) 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382)

Are binaural measurents reproducible? Experiment performed in anechoic room - same loudspeaker, same source and receiver positions, 5 binaural dummy heads 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382)

Are IACC measurements reproducible? 90° incidence - at low frequency IACC is almost 1, at high frequency the difference between the heads becomes evident 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382)

Are IACC measurements reproducible? Diffuse field - huge difference among the 4 dummy heads 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382)

Are LF measurents reproducible? Experiment performed in the Auditorium of Parma - same loudspeaker, same source and receiver positions, 4 pressure-velocity microphones 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382)

Are LF measurents reproducible? At 7.5 m distance, the results already exhibit significant scatter 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382)

Are LF measurents reproducible? At 25 m distance, the scatter is even larger 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382)

The Aurora Acoustical Parameters plugin 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382)