A New IDEA! Meeting the Needs of Students With Disabilities Who Experience Homelessness Patricia A. Popp, Ph.D. Past President, NAEHCY Project HOPE-VA,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School & Community Collaboration Through McKinney-Vento.
Advertisements

DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL SERVICES PROJECTIONS PREPARED BY KIM CULKIN, DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL SERVICES MARCH 2013.
Parent Educational Advocacy Training Center
Working with Parents of a Child with Disabilities Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D.
Which of the following is not a duty of the local liaison? a)Identifying homeless children and youth b)Coordinating with community agencies c)Assisting.
Understanding the IEP Process
State Coordinators’ Meeting March,
1 When Two Laws Go Walking: IDEA and McKinney-Vento Serving Students With Disabilities Experiencing Homelessness NAEHCY Annual Conference November 2013.
From Here to Here Transition from Infant and Toddler Connection Programs to ECSE School Division Programs.
A New IDEA! Meeting the Needs of Students With Disabilities Who Experience Homelessness Patricia A. Popp, Ph.D. Past President, NAEHCY Project HOPE-VA,
Serving Young Children With Disabilities Who Are Homeless: IDEA and McKinney-Vento Hand in Hand National Early Childhood Conference December 12, 2005 Diana.
Surrogate Parent Training
Yes No Is the student 18 years old or older? ? Surrogate Parent Decision-Making Flowchart.
McKinney-Vento: A Key to Success McKinney-Vento Liaison Training 2013.
Scenarios Unaccompanied Youth Issues and Ethics. 2 Scenario One: Jeremy Jeremy, 15, recently showed up with his friend, Billy, at Vento High School, where.
1 Unsticking Some Sticky Situations: An IDEA-MV Roadmap for the Brave AZ Homelessness Conference, October 2012 Patricia Julianelle,
2/16/12 Marilyn Bertolucci Coordinator of Special Education Services.
IDEA (Special Education) & 504 The interface with School Health Services ******* Cheri Dotson, Retired SFPS Lead Nurse
LAW REVIEW By Monica Soto SERP301A September 11, 2006.
Accommodation Plans.  Civil Rights legislation for persons with disabilities indicates that schools must afford students with disabilities equal opportunities.
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
Working Together Works! Homeless Education and Special Education as Partners NAEHCY Annual Conference Crystal City, VA November 2, 2008 Patricia A. Popp,
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Special Education Policies, Practices, and Programs
1 Special Education for Students with Disabilities in NYC Public Schools This presentation was prepared for CIDNY by Jaclyn Okin Barney, Esq. Center for.
Special Education: The Basics Rachel J. Valleley, Ph.D. Munroe Meyer Institute.
MNU 7063 Ethical & Legal Issues in Sped Session 1 Tuesday, January 7, 2014 Dr. Judy Martin.
Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.
Getting Oriented to Exceptionality and Special Education There is no single accepted theory of normal development, so relatively few definite statements.
McKinney ‐ Vento and IDEA: Working Together to Support Students With Disabilities NAEHCY Annual Conference Crystal City, VA October 31, 2008 Paula J. Burdette,
Students with Special Needs What do I do now? Dr. Jeff Allen & Christine Holecek Business & Marketing Conference July 25-29, 2005.
Labeling  Allows students with disabilities to receive services  Labels may be stigmatizing or result in discrimination  View children by their abilities.
Special Education Law If you are not in compliance with the law you can lose your teaching license and be subjected to lawsuits! The link below will take.
Improving Student Outcomes Through Transition Planning: From Institutional Care to Public Schools.
1 When Two Laws Go Walking: IDEA and McKinney-Vento Serving Students With Disabilities Experiencing Homelessness NAEHCY Annual Conference November 2012.
Serving Homeless Children and Youth with Disabilities Presented by Diana Bowman and Christina Dukes National Center for Homeless Education The U.S. Department.
Special Education NEGOTIATING the ARC: WORKING in COLLABORATION TO EDUCATE OUR CHILDREN Leslie A. Jones September 13, 2007.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
Child Find and Children who are Homeless JENNIFER HILER WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION DIVISION OF INDIVIDUAL LEARNING.
Kimberly Cole What do you know about IDEA? Complete the left side of the paper now. At the end of class- complete the right side.
Legal Aspects of Special Education and Social Foundations The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
Ottawa Area Intermediate School District March, 2012 Adapted from Allegan Area ESA.
SURROGATE PARENT Information for Local District Administration Developed by Oakland Schools 2007.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA 2004) For Families and Advocates Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act.
Placement ARC Chairperson Training 1 Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) To the maximum extent appropriate, children with disabilities, including children.
Working Together Works! Serving Children With Disabilities Who Are Homeless or in Out of Home Care NAEHCY Annual Conference Denver, Colorado November 2009.
The McKinney-Vento Act: A Brief Overview What Schools and Education Service Centers Need to Know Prepared by the Texas Education Agency, Region 10 Education.
1 McKinney-Vento and Special Education  Overview  Revocation of Consent  FAQ’s  Resources.
Patricia A. Popp, State Coordinator Project HOPE-Virginia NAEHCY Conference November 2009.
Chapter Two Policies, Practices, and Programs. Key Special Education Court Cases  Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas (1954)  PARC v. Commonwealth.
Pathfinder Parent Center South Valley Special Education Unit John Porter, Director
Historical and Legal Perspectives of Assistive Technology BJ Gallagher, Ph.D., CCC-SLP.
Intersection of Fostering Connections and McKinney-Vento What is the connection? How do we connect? Susie Greenfelder, Education Planner MI Department.
SURROGATE PARENT Information for Local District Administration.
Shelton Special Education November 7, 2012 Molly Baasch.
2/23/06 SURROGATE PARENT TRAINING Laurie VanderPloeg Kent ISD.
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
Unlocking Potential! Meeting the Needs of Students with Disabilities Who Are Homeless or in Out-of-Home Care Patricia A. Popp, Ph.D. Past President, NAEHCY.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
Legal Foundations of Special Education Special Education Paraprofessional Workbook Module 1.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
Required Services and Procedures for Students with Disabilities Presented by Scott Hall and Ty Manieri 2010 Oregon Special Education Fall Conference Eugene,
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
Section 504 training.
Shelton Special Education
Legal Foundations of Special Education
The Role of Education/Special Education Decision Makers
IEP Basics for Parents and Families
Do You Need Help Writing 504 Plans?
Presentation transcript:

A New IDEA! Meeting the Needs of Students With Disabilities Who Experience Homelessness Patricia A. Popp, Ph.D. Past President, NAEHCY Project HOPE-VA, The College of William and Mary Patricia Julianelle Pro Bono Counsel, NAEHCY

Federal Laws for Serving Children with Special Needs  Voc. Rehabilitation Act of Section 504 Protection against discrimination if federal funding  Vocational Education Act of 1976 Access to vocational education  Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 Equal opportunity in employment, public accommodations, transportation, state & local government, & telecommunications

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)  Education of All Handicapped Children Act (EHA) - P. L  EHA Amendments - P. L Secondary and transition issues  IDEA of P. L  IDEA Amendments of P. L  Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 – P. L

IDEA 2004 Align with NCLB Stronger accountability for results Simplify paperwork & increase flexibility Doing what works Increase choices and meaningful involvement for parents Response to intervention Discipline procedures

IDEA Implementation & Guidance  Federal legislation USDE Regulations (OSEP) OSEP/OSERS Policy Letters/Memos  State Regulations  Litigation (Schaffer v Weast)

Who are children with disabilities? 1. Children with: ­ Learning disabilities (watch: RtI) ­ Mental retardation ­ Emotional disturbance (disability or disorder) ­ Other health impairment ­ Orthopedic impairment ­ Severe disabilities ­ ­ Autism ­ ­ Traumatic brain injury ­ ­ Hearing impairment or Deafness ­ ­ Visual impairment or Blindness ­ ­ Multiple disabilities ­ ­ (Developmental delay) 20 USC 1401(3); 34 CFR 300.8

Is there a disability? School/medical records Report cards Standard assessments IEP Child study minutes Evaluation begun…but…. Parent/student comments Behavior Teacher observations Observations / evaluations by community health and mental health providers

Possible Interventions Prior to Special Education  Classroom interventions  Mentors, tutoring  School counselors  Consult special education team  Behavior management interventions

Who are children with disabilities? 2. Children who need special education and related services by reason of their disability. 1401(3); 300.8

What is special education? Specially-designed instruction, at no cost to parents, to meet the unique needs of a child with a disability. 1401(29);

What are related services? Transportation and developmental, corrective, and other supportive services required to assist a child with a disability to benefit from special education, including:  speech-language services  audiology services  interpreting services  psychological services  Physical and occupational therapy   early identification   counseling services   school health services   social work services   parent counseling and training 1401(26);

Starting the Process 1. The student must be age 3 – 21 (Part B); suspected of having a disability; who may need special education and related services. 2. The “parent” must request a special education evaluation, in writing. 1414(a)(1); (b) 3. The parent should keep a signed, dated copy of the request.

Managing the Process 4. The parent must advocate to ensure the student receives all needed evaluations, promptly. Um, what does promptly mean? IDEA now says within 60 days or within state timeframes. 1414(a)(1)(c); (c)

Those timeframes apply to students who change LEAs while evaluations are pending, UNLESS (i) the new LEA is “making sufficient progress to ensure a prompt completion of evaluations,” AND (ii) “the parent and the LEA agree to a specific time when the evaluation will be completed.” 1414(a)(1)(C)(ii); (d)(2)

ALSO, schools must coordinate with prior schools “as necessary and as expeditiously as possible to ensure prompt completion of full evaluations.” 1414(b)(3)(D); (c)(5)

The Dreaded IEP 5. If evaluations show that the student needs special education and related services due to a disability, the school must develop an Individualized Education Program (IEP) for the student within 30 days. The IEP is the blueprint for the student’s education. 1414(d); , Parents must advocate to ensure an appropriate IEP is developed, including all the related services the student needs and educational goals.

7. Parents must advocate to ensure the IEP is fully and consistently implemented. Um, how should IEPs be implemented when a child changes LEAs?  If the IEP is current, the new LEA must immediately provide appropriate services. 1414(d)(2)(C)(i); (e)

Um, what does appropriate services mean?  “Services comparable to those described” in the previous IEP,  In consultation with parents. 1414(d)(2)(C)(i); (e)

The new LEA must promptly obtain the child’s records from the previous school, and the previous school must promptly respond to records requests. 1414(d)(2)(C)(ii); (g) SEAS (Special Education Automation System): private web-based data system

OK, then what? The new LEA can either adopt the old IEP, or develop a new one. If it’s a new state, the LEA can conduct new evaluations. 1414(d)(2)(C)(i); (e)

Hot Tips from the Pats  Get independent evaluations, if necessary.  Be prepared for the IEP meeting; know what you want and why. If the parent can’t get to the meeting, ask to use videoconferencing or a conference call; the parent has the right to be there. 1414(f); ,

Hot Tips cont.  “Lack of instruction” is not grounds to refuse to evaluate a student; it must be considered as part of evaluation process (SLD) or part of eligibility determination. 1414(b)(5) ,  Know your rights. You can dispute the services the school offers. The IDEA contains strong dispute resolution procedures.  Get a lawyer or advocate if necessary.

Who can sign for special education services for a minor?  parent,  foster parent,  guardian,  person who is acting in the place of a parent and with whom the child is living; can be a non-relative ( “include”),  a person legally responsible for the child. 1401(23); (a)(4)

Um, what if a student doesn’t have any of those people? The LEA must assign a “surrogate parent” if:  no such adult can be identified,  no such adult can be located,  the student is a ward of the State, or  the student is an unaccompanied youth under McKinney-Vento. 1415(b)(2);

OK, then how are surrogates assigned?  The LEA must have a system to determine if a child needs a surrogate parent and to assign a surrogate parent within 30 days after the need is determined. 1415(b)(2);

Who can be a surrogate?  Surrogate parents can’t be employees of SEAs, LEAs, or other agencies involved in the education and care of the child, and can’t have any conflicting interests.  They must have knowledge and skills necessary to be a good surrogate. 1415(b)(2);

BUT for unaccompanied youth, the following people can be temporary surrogates:  Staff of emergency shelters, transitional shelters, independent living programs, and street outreach programs;  State, LEA, or agency staff involved in the education or care of the child ; preamble to regulations

Discipline 101: Don’t try this at home!  If a school wishes to expel or suspend a student with a disability for more than 10 days in a school year (consecutive or cumulative), a special procedure applies.  The procedure is called a “manifestation determination review.”  The manifestation determination is a hearing to decide if the behavior resulted from the disability. 1415(k);

 If the behavior did NOT result from the disability, the student can be disciplined the same as other students, BUT the school must provide appropriate educational services.  If the behavior DID result from the disability or the school’s failure to implement the IEP, the student must be returned to his/her regular school program, and the school must develop and implement a behavioral intervention plan. 1415(k);

Discipline 201  Schools can place students in “appropriate interim alternative programs” regardless of a manifestation review for up to 45 days for possession of a weapon or illegal drugs, for causing serious bodily injury to someone at school, or if a hearing officer decides remaining in the current placement is “substantially likely to result in injury.” 1415(k);

When do these rules apply?  When students have IEPs,  When the school “had knowledge” the student had a disability.  If a special education evaluation is requested while a student is under discipline, the evaluations must be expedited. If the child is determined to have a disability, appropriate education must be provided. 1415(k);

Um, what does “have knowledge” mean?  The parent has expressed concern in writing that the student needs special education services;  The parent has requested an evaluation of the student; or  A teacher, or other school personnel, has expressed specific concern about a pattern of behavior demonstrated by the student, directly to the director of special education or another LEA supervisor. 1415(k);

Special Education Process Flow Chart 10 admin. days (state determines) 60 calendar days (IDEA 2004) 30 calendar days (state determines)

The Little Ones: IDEA Part C  Provides services to infants and toddlers under age 3 who have a disability (includes developmental delay, physical or mental condition likely to produce a developmental delay, and those at-risk for developmental delays, at a state’s discretion). 1434

 School must do a multidisciplinary evaluation and needs assessment, including the family’s needs and goals.  School must promptly develop and implement an individualized family service plan (IFSP), evaluated once a year and reviewed every 6 months, or more often as appropriate. 1436

What services might be available?  family training, counseling, and home visits;  speech-language services;  occupational and physical therapy;  psychological and social work services;  service coordination services;  health services necessary to enable the infant or toddler to benefit from the other early intervention services;  social work services;  assistive technology devices and services; and  transportation and related costs that are necessary to enable an infant or toddler and family to receive another service.

 Part C programs must make services available to infants and toddlers with disabilities who are homeless, and their families. 1434(1)  There is a right to a hearing, confidentiality, and to decline any services.  Surrogate parent rules also apply to Part C. 1439

A New IDEA! CAN’T IDEA AND MCKINNEY- VENTO JUST GET ALONG? IDEAMcKinney-Vento No IEP from our LEA, no services Immediate enrollment without documents No parent, no servicesImmediate enrollment of unaccompanied youth Placement through local IEPSchool of origin Who’s going to pay for this?Yeah, who’s going to pay for this?

YES! Now more than ever…  IDEA now specifically defines “homeless children” to include all children and youth considered homeless by McKinney-Vento. 1402(11);  New rules on records transfer, timelines, and expediting evaluations for transferring students.  New rules on implementing previous IEPs.

 IDEA now specifically requires each public agency to ensure that the rights of unaccompanied homeless youth are protected (a)  New rules on surrogate parents for unaccompanied youth  Special education placements must be “as close as possible to the child’s home, unless the parent agrees otherwise.”

And get a load of this…  Any state receiving IDEA funds must ensure that the requirements of the McKinney-Vento Act are met for all children with disabilities in homeless situations in the state. 1412(a)(11)(A)(iii); (a)(3)

Child Find  The State must ensure that all students with disabilities residing in the State who need special education are identified, located, and evaluated.  This requirement specifically applies to students experiencing homelessness, including infants and toddlers. 1412(a)(3)(A), 1435;

Key to Collaboration  Every state’s IDEA Advisory Panel and Part C Interagency Coordinating Council must include McKinney-Vento personnel 1412(a)(21); (a); 1441(b)(1)(K)

Key Collaborators  Special Education personnel  State  Local  Parent Training and Information Centers  Protection and advocacy centers

Resources  NASDSE (nasdse.org – pdf available)  Project FORUM (1999 proceedings)  2004 QTA Brief  Side by Side comparison of the IDEA & IDEA 2004  CEC (  CEC Today – March 2003  Project HOPE-VA (  Information briefs – special ed., ECSE  National Dissemination Center for Children With Disabilities  (Includes fact sheets)  NAEHCY, NCHE and NLCHP  Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA) of 2004: Provisions for Children and Youth with Disabilities Who Experience Homelessness;  National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center 

Resources (cont’d)  Parent Training and Information Centers  (888)  The Child Advocate   Free legal resources for students with disabilities  National Disability Rights Network (   Resources for parents of students with disabilities, from USDE   Center for Law and Education   USDE Office of Special Education Programs   USDE Office for Civil Rights 

Case Study 1: Sarah Sarah is 16 years old. According to Sarah, she has just moved in with a friend’s family who reside in the district. Sarah left home (in a neighboring district) after an altercation with her mother, who has a history of substance abuse. Sarah’s friend’s father heard about immediate enrollment under the McKinney- Vento Act, so he came to you (the liaison). Sarah wants to enroll in school and has shared that she received special education services, but cannot explain what the disability is or the kinds of support provided. You have no records from the previous school, yet. Since the altercation, Sarah and her friend’s father have not been able to locate Mom.

Discussion  What are the first 3 things you would do in this situation?  Can Sarah enroll immediately? What options would you offer her? How would your answer change if her previous school were in another state?  Can Sarah receive special education services immediately? How will the school decide what services to provide? How would your answer change if her previous school were in another state?  Who should be contacted for information? Who should be contacted to plan Sarah’s education program?

Case Study 2: Ben Ben has been through more in his 8 years than most have in their whole life. In November, I (his teacher) referred him to the “Child Study” team due to his academics, social interactions, and behavior. I was told that “he just has a lot going on in his life” and they would revisit his case in February. In those four months, Ben made no academic progress (if anything he regressed) and continued to "spiral out of control." In February, the Child Study team finally evaluated Ben for special education services. On April 12th, we met with his legal custodian to go over the results. Ben qualified for learning disabilities in all subject areas. He qualified for OT for fine and gross motor skills. It was also decided that he would benefit from counseling due to emotional distress. I don't understand why this whole process had to take so long. Why didn't the testing start back in November? Why was all this time wasted?

Discussion  Should the process take this long? Diagram what an appropriate process would look like.  What could be done to prevent/reduce such delays?  What school, school district, and community resources could have helped Ben? How would you approach those resources to seek help?

Case Study 3: Mariela and Eddie Mariela attends Village Academy, a high school for students with special needs. Mariela’s local school district placed her in Village Academy, which is located in a neighboring school district. Last week, Mariela ran away from her abusive home. She and her 1-year old son are now living in a third school district, intermittently with her boyfriend and in a local shelter. The driver of Mariela’s school bus reported to the school that she was no longer living at home. Her original school district has refused to send a bus to her boyfriend’s house and is refusing to pay for Village Academy. Village Academy called the school district where Mariela is living to seek payment, but they also refused to pay. Mariela is now out of school. Her son Eddie, who has always seemed moody, has now started throwing violent tantrums and screaming for hours at a time. Mariela used drugs during the early months of her pregnancy, and is worried that they may have affected Eddie.

Discussion  What educational challenges are Mariela and Eddie facing? What are some potential legal issues confronting them and the school district?  Considering Eddie’s behavior, what type of disabilities might he have? What additional information would you want to know and consider?  How could the IDEA help Mariela and Eddie get appropriate special education services? What has the school done wrong under the IDEA? How could the McKinney-Vento Act help Mariela and Eddie get appropriate services?  What school, school district, and community resources can help Mariela and Eddie? How would you approach those resources to seek help?

Case Study 4: Ricky Levinsky Ricky Levinsky and his parents are living in a shelter, 15 miles from their former home. Before the move, Ricky had been retained in 7th grade and struggled with poor grades. At the request of his parents, the school had started evaluating Ricky for special needs. Ricky’s parents would like him to remain at the same school, so the evaluations can be completed. However, the school says that he must attend the school near the shelter, since the IDEA requires the local school to handle special education matters. Ricky’s parents enrolled him in the local school, but due to losing their housing and changing schools, Ricky ended up missing several weeks of school. His parents asked the new school to continue the evaluations, but the school psychologist refused, saying Ricky’s problems are probably just the result of “lack of instruction.”

Discussion  Considering Ricky’s behavior, what type of disabilities might he have? What additional information would you want to know and consider?  How could the IDEA help Ricky get appropriate special education services? What have the schools done wrong under the IDEA? What would an appropriate special education process look like in Ricky’s case?  How could the McKinney-Vento Act help Ricky get appropriate services?  What school, school district, and community resources can help Ricky? How would you approach those resources to seek help?