Supporting children and families returning home from care: Counting the costs LISA HOLMES, DIRECTOR, CENTRE FOR CHILD AND FAMILY RESEARCH.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Impact and Avoidance of Delay in Decision Making.
Advertisements

Costs and outcomes of effective reunification LISA HOLMES, DIRECTOR, AND REBECCA BROWN, SENIOR RESEARCH ASSOCIATE, CCFR.
Kinship Care – Client Complexity Preliminary Research Findings ACWA Presenters: Marita Scott & Lynne McCrae.
Managing the risks and benefits of contact. The Legal Context The Children Act local authorities must promote and support contact between LAC and.
117_PAT_CM_ Putting It All Together During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training.
Returning or placing children overseas – Issues and solutions Children and Families Across Borders (CFAB) Andy Elvin CEO Formerly known as International.
Denver Family Integrated Drug Court
Foster Care Reentry after Reunification – Reentry in One or Two years – what’s the difference? Terry V. Shaw, MSW Daniel Webster, PhD University of California,
Child Welfare and Education Two Systems Working Together for Foster Youth.
Cost benefit modelling for working with troubled families Mark Tuckett:Sheffield City Council Lovedeep Vaid:Centre for Economic and Social Inclusion.
July 9, Current.  County initially funded part time coordinator  State funding began paying for full time agent and part time coordinator.
Improving strategic commissioning information.  Are we really doing the strategic bit?
Educational Outcomes of Looked After Children: Extending Evidence from a Pilot Study in the London Borough of Camden Dr Kimberley Bradbury Prof. Alastair.
Concurrent Permanency Planning. Contents n Definitions n Goals n Target Populations n Categories n Activities.
Improving Health & Lives Learning Disabilities Observatory
Reunification – Old and New Information Diana J. English PhD Child Welfare League of America May 30, 2007.
Risks of Reentry into the Foster Care System for Children who Reunified Terry V. Shaw, MSW University of California, Berkeley School of Social Welfare.
Costs and outcomes for children’s services in Scotland: a tool to analyse routinely collected data Helen Trivedi Research Associate Centre for Child and.
Private Fostering “Someone else’s Child”
Intervention and review Effective interventions in neglect cases P19 1.
1 The Cost Calculator for Children’s Services: Better Decision Making in Commissioning and Education Services Jean Soper, Loughborough University and Si.
Measuring a Collaborative Effort a Child Welfare – Drug & Alcohol Family Preservation example Family Design Resources, Inc.  Fawn Davies  Deborah W.
Private Fostering – “Someone else’s Child”
SSRG annual workshop Balancing and Managing Risk 8th April 2008 Costing Children’s Services: Availability of Child Level Data Samantha Culley Centre for.
1 Child Welfare Improvement Overview House Appropriations Subcommittee Kathryne O’Grady, Deputy Director Michigan Department of Human Services September.
Integrated Therapy Service for Children and Young People Frances Rowe, Service Manager – October 2013.
1 Data Revolution: National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW) John Landsverk, Ph.D. Child & Adolescent Services Research Center Children’s.
Educational Solutions for Workforce Development Education to support implementation of the National Delivery Plan for Children and Young People.
Is all contact between children in care and their birth parents ‘good’ contact? Stephanie Taplin PhD NSW Centre for Parenting & Research 2006 ACWA Conference.
Individualized Service Plan Who attends the ISP?
NiaTx Project  Big Aim:  Reduce (re-) hospitalizations due to gaps in service delivery when consumers’ needs are immediate, multiple, and/or exceed.
Youth Mental Health and Addiction Needs: One Community’s Answer Terry Johnson, MSW Senior Director of Services Senior Director of Services Deborah Ellison,
1 Health and Social Care Integration Stephen Moore Interim Director of Health and Social Care.
Emerging trends, Opportunities and Challenges for community service organisations: The Victorian Government agenda for vulnerable children and their families.
C hildren and F amily Research Center University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign School of Social Work TM Return to Care: What are the Factors Involved.
Care planning and permanence Improving outcomes for looked after children.
Practical messages from research on the costs of care provision Harriet Ward, Lisa Holmes and Jean Soper Centre for Child and Family Research Loughborough.
Understanding Permanence Bruce Clark and Janet Boddy CAFCASS and University of Sussex.
Strengths and Difficulties Training South Cumbria November 2014.
The Social and Family Backgrounds of Infants in Care: Predicting Subsequent Abuse Dr. Paul Delfabbro School of Psychology University of Adelaide.
Learning Disabilities Mortality Review (LeDeR) Programme Pauline Heslop Programme Manager 1.
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © There are approximately 500,000 foster youth in care at any given time in the United.
The Children’s Aid Society of Brant Preliminary Findings Crown Ward Review 2011 February 28-March 10, 2011.
Placement Stability & Permanence. What is Permanence 'a sense of security, continuity, commitment and identity a secure, stable and loving family.
An Introduction to Specialist CAMHS in Somerset Mark Conway Schools Link Pilot Manager and Specialist CAMHS Clinician.
Learning Disabilities Mortality Review (LeDeR) Programme
Mental Health Five Year Forward View
Safeguarding babies and very young children from abuse and neglect: experiences on entering education Harriet Ward, Georgia Hyde-Dryden, Rebecca Brown,
Child / Adult Y – Guernsey Serious Case Review
Analysing and using information
Care into practice: the legal framework
Centre for Child and Family Research, Loughborough University
Society for Social Work & Research New Orleans 1/14/2017
Family Preservation Services
Executive Director of Children’s Services
Managing the risks and benefits of contact
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaires
Discharge to Assess Helen Krysinski.
Analysing and using information
POLICY AND LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK – ADOPTION AND FOSTERING
Catherine Comiskey and Karen Galligan Date 24h /10/2017
Placement Stability & Permanence
CAMHS transition panel & transition passport
Are you really listening?
Working in partnership
Placement Stability & Permanence
Social Services Publications
The Impact and Avoidance of Delay in Decision Making
MILESTONE study flow diagram
Graded Care Profile 2 Awareness session Why do we need it? What is it?
Presentation transcript:

Supporting children and families returning home from care: Counting the costs LISA HOLMES, DIRECTOR, CENTRE FOR CHILD AND FAMILY RESEARCH

Introduction  NSPCC commissioned the Centre for Child and Family Research (CCFR) at Loughborough University to provide evidence to inform debates about the cost effectiveness and potential costs avoided of providing appropriate assessment, support and services to families on return home from care 2

Aim  To estimate the costs to the public purse if services to support successful reunification are provided to all children and families following a care episode, based on their needs, and to compare these costs with the costs associated with re-entry to care 3

Methods  Secondary analysis  Unit cost estimations based on existing published unit costs  Bottom up approach  Distinction between support and service costs 4

Methods  Secondary analysis  Series of assumptions based on existing research evidence  Assessment, support and services  Three levels of support for families with different needs  National dataset for looked after children in England (SSDA 903) 5

Cost estimations  Return home from care costs  Supported as open ‘child in need cases’  Support from ongoing case worker (up to twelve months)  Services  Parenting support  Adult mental health services  Drug and alcohol services  Child and adolescent mental health services  High, Medium and Low level of needs 6

Cost estimations  HIGH SUPPORT NEEDS (53%)  SUPPORT  Open child in need case for 12 months  Proactive case management including ongoing support and monitoring  SERVICES  Adult mental health services (60%)  Drug and alcohol services (50%)  Parenting support (80%)  CAMHS (45%) 7

Cost estimations  MEDIUM SUPPORT NEEDS (16%)  SUPPORT  Open child in need case for 9 months  Proactive case management including ongoing support and monitoring  SERVICES  Parenting support (80%)  CAMHS (45%)  Both less frequently than High Support Needs 8

Cost estimations  LOW SUPPORT NEEDS (31%)  SUPPORT  Open child in need case for 6 months  Proactive case management including ongoing support and monitoring  SERVICES  No additional services provided (assumed that these would have been provided prior to return home) 9

Cost estimations  Return home from care costs  Children ceased being looked after (returned to live with parents or relatives)  10,080 (DfE, 2013)  Average cost per case (across different levels of support needs)  £5,627 per case 10

Cost estimations  Re-entry to care  47% (Farmer et al., 2011)  Does not capture additional costs associated with oscillating in and out of care  Estimated costs likely to be an underestimation 11

Cost estimations  Re-entry to care  National dataset for looked after children in England (SSDA 903)  Type of placement; placement provider and location; legal status; placement stability  Existing unit costs to support looked after children (Ward, Holmes and Soper, 2008) 12

Cost estimations  Re-entry to care  National dataset for looked after children in England (SSDA 903)  Type of placement; placement provider and location; legal status; placement stability  Existing unit costs to support looked after children (Ward, Holmes and Soper, 2008) 13

Cost estimations  Re-entry to care  Children returning to care  4,738 ( 47% of 10,080 from DfE, 2013)  Average cost per case  £61,614 14

Use of the cost estimations  Breakeven point  19% more reunifications in England (900 children nationally) were successful in a year, this would equate to a national breakeven point as a result of the costs avoided from these children no longer needing to re-enter care 15

Use of the cost estimations  Project commissioned to inform debates  Next steps  Explore variations between local authorities  Availability and use of child/family level data  Longitudinal analysis of different care trajectories 16

Further information Contact Details: Lisa Holmes, Director, CCFR Report available: abuse/research-and-resources/supporting-children- families-returning-home-from-care-counting-costs/ 17