Jeannie Couper, MSN, RN-BC Seton Hall University May 9, 2012
Ways of knowing, comparing, contrasting, and doing Effective communication and quantitative thinking Integration and application of knowledge Society, culture, and diversity Values, ethics, citizenship Critical thinking and problem solving
Student Learning Outcomes – Leveled Course Objectives Assessment Plans & Resources Assessment Activities: Surveys, ePortfolios, Standardized testing Review of Evidence- what are implications of findings? Implement revisions in program, course, and teaching strategies based on evidence University’s Mission, Philosophy, Program Outcomes
Goals of Postsecondary Students Assessment Evaluate learning Compare institutions’ effectiveness Ensure institutional accountability and transparency Provide direction for institutional improvement Predict student success in workforce Current Systematic Assessment Strategies: NILOA – National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment NSSE- National Survey of Student Engagement VSA- Voluntary System of Accountability Insufficient evidence to predict success
No established standard learning outcomes among schools Is it possible to actually develop a culture of evidence Not a fair comparisons of institutional effectiveness Questionable authenticity of testing results Need more authentic ways to evaluate the student No single strategy embraced
Focus on indicators linked to student success in context of mission Evaluate quality of data Use appropriate clearly defined performance indicators; Suggestions: Establish base for indicators Enhance student engagement via effective educational practices Focus on learning and conditions to support learning Use findings to guide policy and improvement Improvement Transparency Accountability
Banta, T.W., Griffin, M., Flateby, T.L., & Kahn, S. (2009). Three Promising Alternatives for Assessing College Students’ Knowledge and Skills. Retrieved from Hutchings, P. (2011). What new faculty need to know about assessment. Retrieved from learningoutcomesassessment.org/assessmentbrief.htm Kuh, G. D. (2008). Why integration and engagement are essential to effective educational practice in the twenty-first century. Peer Review, 10(4), Miller, R. & Leskes, A. (2005). Levels of assessment: From the student to the institution. Association of American Colleges and Universities. Retrieved from Liu, O.L. (2011). Outcomes assessment in higher education: Challenges and future research in the context of Voluntary System of Accountability. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(3), 2-9. Miller, R. & Leskes, A. (2005). Levels of assessment: From the student to the institution. Association of American Colleges and Universities. Retrieved from National Survey of Student Engagement. (2009). Using NSSE Data to Improve Undergraduate Education. Lessons from the Field. Volume 1. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research. Retrieved from Nelson Laird, T.F., Shoup, R., Kuh, GD., & Schwarz, M. J. (2008). The effects of discipline on deep approaches to student learning and college outcomes. Research in Higher Education 49(6), 469–494. Principles of undergraduate learning (2007). Indiana University Purdue. Retrieved from Struck, P. (2011). Listening on presidential and board leadership in student learning. Retrieved from The VSA and Student Learning Outcomes: Evaluation and Next Steps. Retrieved at