Experimental Challenges and Techniques for Future Accelerators Joachim Mnich DESY XI ICFA School on Instrumentation in Elementary Particle Physics San.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bruce Kennedy, RAL PPD Particle Physics 2 Bruce Kennedy RAL PPD.
Advertisements

TIME 2005: TPC for the ILC 6 th Oct 2005 Matthias Enno Janssen, DESY 1 A Time Projection Chamber for the International Linear Collider R&D Studies Matthias.
First results from the ATLAS experiment at the LHC
Freiburg Seminar, Sept Sascha Caron Finding the Higgs or something else ideas to improve the discovery ideas to improve the discovery potential at.
Bruce Kennedy, RAL PPD Particle Physics 2 Bruce Kennedy RAL PPD.
CLIC CDR detector benchmarks F. Teubert (CERN PH Department) From discussions with: M.Battaglia, J.J.Blaising, J.Ellis, G.Giudice, L.Linssen, S.Martin,
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Nailing Electroweak Physics (aka Higgs Hunting) with the Next Linear Collider Bob Wilson High Energy Physics Group CSU Physics Research Evening November.
Strategies for Future Acclerators Barry Barish Elba 23-May-06.
A. Bay Beijing October Accelerators We want to study submicroscopic structure of particles. Spatial resolution of a probe ~de Broglie wavelength.
GDE expectations from the SRF community Barry Barish Cornell SRF Mtg 15-July-05.
Neil Collins Birmingham Masterclass Tuesday 24 April 2007 ATLAS and the LHC.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
LCFI A Vertex Detector for the International Linear Collider  International Linear Collider (ILC): consensus that ILC will be next major particle accelerator.
Part II ILC Detector Concepts & The Concept of Particle Flow.
Dean Karlen University of Victoria & TRIUMF APS NW Section Meeting 2005 Victoria, Canada.
The International Linear Collider Barry Barish iThemba Cape Town 21-Oct-05.
3-March-06ILCSC Technical Highights1 ILC Technical Highlights Superconducting RF Main Linac.
Paris 22/4 UED Albert De Roeck (CERN) 1 Identifying Universal Extra Dimensions at CLIC  Minimal UED model  CLIC experimentation  UED signals & Measurements.
The International Linear Collider Barry Barish IUPAP General Assembly Cape Town 26-Oct-05.
Technology Breakthroughs and International Linear Collider Barry Barish AAAS Annual Meeting Washington DC 19-Feb-05.
The CMS Muon Detector Thomas Hebbeker Aachen July 2001 Searching for New Physics with High Energy Muons.
February 19th 2009AlbaNova Instrumentation Seminar1 Christian Bohm Instrumentation Physics, SU Upgrading the ATLAS detector Overview Motivation The current.
PhD students meeting 01/27/2010 Philippe Doublet 1 Designing a detector for a future e - e + linear collider Precision measurements based on Particle Flow.
Linear Collider Physics School 2009 – CLIC Detector Michael Hauschild - CERN, 22-Aug-2009, page 1 CLIC Detector (What is the difference between an ILC.
20-Jan-09 Madrid, Spain Global Design Effort 1 Barry Barish Madrid, Spain 20-Jan-09 Designing the ILC ATF-2 Final Doublet System.
Status of ILC Barry Barish Caltech / GDE 17-Aug-07.
 k0k0 ++ -- -- p ILC Technical Design Report Physics and Detectors – Detailed Baseline Design Juan A. Fuster Verdú, IFIC-Valencia PAC Meeting, KEK.
Photon Collider at CLIC Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk LCWS 2001, Granada, Spain, September 25-30,2011.
SuperKEKB to search for new sources of flavor mixing and CP violation - Introduction - Introduction - Motivation for L= Motivation for L=
Nick Hadley Run II Physics (I) Nick Hadley The University of Maryland New Perspectives 2000 Fermilab - June 28, 2000.
What are we made of ? Neutrinos Building a Particle Collider The ring is 27km round and on average 100m underground CERN – LEP, LHC.
The ILC and DESY 5th Workshop on Scientific Cooperation JINR, Dubna January 2005 R.-D. Heuer, DESY and Hamburg Univ.
Physics Opportunities and Experimental Techniques for the Next Large Scale Facility in Accelerator Particle Physics The International Linear Collider Marco.
FZÚ, J. Cvach, LCWS051 LCWS 05 1.LHC a ILC 2.Top 3.Higgs 4.Polarizace.
Precise Measurements of SM Higgs at the ILC Simulation and Analysis V.Saveliev, Obninsk State University, Russia /DESY, Hamburg ECFA Study Workshop, Valencia.
10 October 2002Stefania Xella - RAL The next linear collider Stefania Xella Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
The International Linear Collider and the Future of Accelerator-based Particle Physics Barry Barish Caltech Lomonosov Conference 20-Aug-2015 ILC.
High gradient acceleration Kyrre N. Sjøbæk * FYS 4550 / FYS 9550 – Experimental high energy physics University of Oslo, 26/9/2013 *k.n.sjobak(at)fys.uio.no.
P ARTICLE D ETECTORS Mojtaba Mohammadi IPM-CMPP- February
1Frank Simon ALCPG11, 20/3/2011 ILD and SiD detectors for 1 TeV ILC some recommendations following experience from the CLIC detector study
Karsten Büßer Instrumentation of the Forward Region of the TESLA Detector International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics Aachen, July 19th.
1 Physics Input for the CLIC Re-baselining D. Schulte for the CLIC collaboration.
Detector for a Linear Collider 8th Topical Seminar on Innovative Particle and Radiation Detectors Siena, 21 – 24 October 2002 Joachim Mnich RWTH Aachen.
Alors, c’est fini! Et maintenant?. Machine Upgrade in Stages Push LHC performance without new hardware –luminosity →2.3x10 34 cm -2 s -1, E b =7→7.54.
Sep/19/2008 Su Dong Stanford Student Orientation: Accelerator based Particle Physics1 Accelerator Based Particle Physics Su Dong Stanford Student Orientation.
The Standard Model of the elementary particles and their interactions
LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 1 Tracking Performance in CLIC_ILD and CLIC_SiD e + e –  H +
From the Standard Model to Discoveries - Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Dawn of the LHC Era Dimitri Bourilkov University of Florida CMS Collaboration.
Detector for a Linear Collider 8th Topical Seminar on Innovative Particle and Radiation Detectors Siena, 21 – 24 October 2002 Joachim Mnich RWTH Aachen.
Higgs Factories: Present and Future Chris Tully Princeton Higgs Physics Beyond Discovery April 26,
1 Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Fergus Wilson, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2) 3.Collider Experiments.
Prospects for Beyond Standard Model Physics at CLIC Lucie Linssen, CERN on behalf of the CLIC detector and physics collaboration (CLICdp) 1 Particles and.
Higgs Summary Alexei Raspereza On behalf of Higgs Working Group ECFA Workshop, Warsaw 12/06/2006 Outline  Current Status  Contributions in Warsaw  Theory.
Backup slides Z 0 Z 0 production Once  s > 2M Z ~ GeV ÞPair production of Z 0 Z 0 via t-channel electron exchange. e+e+ e-e- e Z0Z0 Z0Z0 Other.
Simulation Plan Discussion What are the priorities? – Higgs Factory? – 3-6 TeV energy frontier machine? What detector variants? – Basic detector would.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Past Present Future The High Energy Frontier R.-D. Heuer, CERN Joint EPS-ECFA meeting, July 18, 2009.
Photon-Photon Colliders ( Photon-Photon Colliders (  C) Mayda M. Velasco.
Electroweak physics at CEPC
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
Particle Colliders at CERN present and future
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
Detectors for Linear Colliders - ILC and CLIC -
Report about “Forward Instrumentation” Issues
Linear Colliders Linear Colliders 4 lectures
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 6th May 2009 Fergus Wilson, RAL.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL
Presentation transcript:

Experimental Challenges and Techniques for Future Accelerators Joachim Mnich DESY XI ICFA School on Instrumentation in Elementary Particle Physics San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina January 2010

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 2 Outline >Lecture 1  Future particle physics at the energy frontier: case for a Linear Collider  Linear Collider Concepts  Experimental Challenges  Detector Concepts >Lecture 2  R&D for detector components  Vertex detector  Tracking detectors  Calorimeters

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 3 >Particle Physics entering Terascale  Start of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN >Expect answers to fundamental questions  Origin of mass (Higgs)  Mystery of Dark Matter  Supersymmetry  Extra space dimensions  Grand Unification Elementary Particle Physics: Challenges and Visions

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 4 Future of Particle Physics at the Energy Frontier >LHC and its upgrades  Luminosity  Energy (?) >Electron-Positron Linear Collider  ILC (supra-conducting technology)  CLIC (two-beam acceleration)  Muon collider (?) >Here: emphasis on detector challenges for Linear Collider LHC

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 5 Comparison Proton and Electron Colliders  Precision is main motivation for a new electron positron collider  Complementarity to proton machines, e.g. SppS/Tevatron and LEP

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 6 Comparison Proton and Electron Colliders

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 7 Electron Positron Collider strive for few /cm 2 /s (comparable to LHC) Recall: /cm 2 /s corresponds to 100 fb -1 per year

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 8 Linear Collider Concepts  Summary:  ILC ready to go ahead, but limited in energy reach ( ≤ 1 TeV)  CLIC in very early state, but may pave the way for higher energy

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 9 Higgs

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 10 Higgs  Introduction

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 11 Higgs Couplings  Introduction

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 12 Verification of the Higgs Potential  Introduction  Text… H H H H H H H g HHH g HHHH  Measurement of double Higgs-strahlung: e + e –  HHZ  g HHH / g HHH = 0.22  Measurement of g HHHH not possible

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 13 Giga-Z  Production of 10 9 Z-Bosonen at √s = 91 GeV  100-fold LEP I statistics  polarisation (as SLC)  30 fb -1 = 1/2 year Comparison today‘s SM-Fits with Giga-Z: Comparison to direct Higgs mass measurement

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 14 Outline Supersymmetry  If m SUSY < 2 TeV  Discovery at the LHC Template mass spectra: Advantages of an electron positron collider:  tune cms energy: turn on SUSY particles one-by one  mass measurement at the kinematic threshold  polarisation of electrons and positrons separation of SUSY partners, e.g.:  Scalar partners of fermions  Fermionic partners of bosons   2 Higgs-doublets SUSY will be the New Standard Model

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 15  Introduction

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 16  Electron-positron collider  centre-of-mass energy up to 1 TeV centre-of-mass energy  luminosities > /cm 2 /s  Designed in a global effort  Accelerator technology: supra-conducting RF cavities  Elements of a linear collider: The International Linear Collider

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 17 International Linear Collider (ILC) Positron polarisation

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 18 ILC Time Schedule  2006: Baseline Configuration Document  2007: Reference Design Report

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 19 Challenges  Quest for the highest possible accelerator gradient  ILC goal: 35 MV/m  Huge progress over the last 15 years  25-fold improvement in perfomance/cost  Major impact on next generation light sources:  XFEL designed for ≥ 25 MV/m 10% prototype for ILC  Recall: LEP II used 7 MV/m Single cell Development (schematic) of gradient in SCRF cavities

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 20 RF gun FEL experimental area bypass 4 MeV150 MeV450 MeV1000 MeV undulatorscollimator bunch compressor Laser bunch compressor accelerator modules FLASH: Prototype for XFEL and ILC  1 GeV electron LINAC based on SCRF  used for ILC studies and as light source (free electron laser)

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 21 Challenges  Getting to 35 MV/m:

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 22 Cavity Quality (Q value)  Superconducting cavity: Q>10 10  A church bell (300 Hz) with Q=5 x would ring – once excited – longer than one year!

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 23 Challenges  Luminostity:  make beams as small as possible at IP 6 nm × 600 nm  and make them collide!!!

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 24 Beam Beam Interactions Simulation of two LC bunches as they meet each other Andrei Sergey, SLAC

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 25 Challenges

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 26 Comparison LHC and ILC

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 27 ILC Physics Motivation  ILC will complement LHC discoveries by precision measurements  Here just two examples: 1) There is a Higgs, observed at the LHC  e + e − experiments can detect Higgs bosons without assumption on decay properties Higgs-Strahlungs process (à la LEP)  identify Higgs events in e + e − → ZH from Z → µµ decay  count Higgs decay products to measure Higgs BRs  and hence (Yukawa)-couplings

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 28 ILC Physics Motivation  Measure Higgs self-couplings e + e –  ZHH to establish Higgs potential Note: small signal above large QCD background 2) There is NO Higgs (definite answer from LHC!)  something else must prevent e.g. WW scattering from violating unitarity at O(1 TeV)  strong electroweak symmetry breaking? → study e + e – → WWνν, Wzeν and ZZee events  need to select and distinguish W and Z bosons in their hadronic decays! BR (W/Z → hadrons) = 68% / 70%  Many other physics cases: SM, SUSY, new phenomena, … Need ultimate detector performance to meet the ILC physics case

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 29 Impact on Detector Design  Vertex detector: e.g. distinguish c- from b-quarks  goal impact parameter resolution σ rφ ≈ σ z ≈ 5  10/(p sin Θ 3/2 ) µm 3 times better than SLD  small, low mass pixel detectors, various technologies under study O(20×20 µm 2 )  Tracking:  superb momentum resolution to select clean Higgs samples  ideally limited only by Г Z → Δ(1/p T ) = 5∙10 -5 /GeV (whole tracking system) 3 times better than CMS Options considered:  Large silicon trackers (à la ATLAS/CMS)  Time Projection Chamber with ≈ 100 µm point resolution (complemented by Si–strip devices)

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 30 Tracker Resolution

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 31 Impact on Detector Design  Calorimeter: distinguish W- and Z-bosons in their hadronic decays → 30%/√E jet resolution! → Particle Flow or Dual Readout calorimeter 2 times better than ZEUS  WW/ZZ → 4 jets:

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 32 Detector Challenges at the ILC  Bunch timing: - 5 trains per second bunches per train separated by 307 ns  no trigger  power pulsing  readout speed  14 mrad crossing angle  Background:  small bunches  create beamstrahlung → pairs backgound not as severe as at LHC but much more relevant than at LEP VTX TPC

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 33 Two Detectors Additional complication: One interaction region, but two detectors:

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 34 Two Detectors: Push Pull Additional complication: One interaction region, but two detectors: push pull operation anticipated

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 35 Detector Push-Pull

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 36 The CLIC Two Beam Scheme No individual RF power sources -> CLIC itself is basically a ~50 km long klystron... Two Beam Scheme: Drive Beam supplies RF power 12 GHz bunch structure low energy (2.4 GeV MeV) high current (100A) Main beam for physics high energy (9 GeV – 1.5 TeV) current 1.2 A Two Beam Scheme Drive Beam supplies RF power 12 GHz bunch structure low energy (2.4 GeV MeV) high current (100A) Main beam for physics high energy (9 GeV – 1.5 TeV) current 1.2 A Drive beam A from 2.4 GeV -> 240 MeV (deceleration by extraction of RF power) Main beam A from 9 GeV -> 1.5 TeV 12 GHz – 68 MW

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 37 CLIC 3 TeV Overall Leyout Main Beam Generation Complex Drive Beam Generation Complex

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 38 Comparison ILC and CLIC

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 39 CLIC Time Structure ns 0.5 ns >Bunch Spacing  ILC: 337 ns, enough time to identify events from individual BX  CLIC: 0.5 ns, extremely difficult to identify events from individual BX  need short shaping time of pulses  power cycling with 50 Hz instead 5 Hz at ILC  larger power dissipation? does silicon tracker need to be cooled? (not cooled in SiD)

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 40 Why Time Stamping? >Overlay of physics events with background events from several bunch crossings  degradation of physics performance >Main background sources from beamstrahlung  e+e- pairs from beamstrahlung photons low pT, can be kept inside beam pipe with high magnetic field, B > 3 T  hadrons from 2-photon collisions (beamstrahlung photons) can have high pT, reach main tracker and confuses jet reconstruction typically ~O(1) hadronic background event per BX with pT > 5 GeV tracks K. Desch et al., TESLA-NLC study from 2004 reconstruction of H → +- Higgs mass reconstruction from HZ -> bbqq

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 41 Summary of CLIC Challenges + R&D >Time stamping  most challenging in inner tracker/vertex region  trade-off between pixel size, amount of material and timing resolution >Power pulsing and other electronics developments  in view of CLIC time structure >Hadron calorimetry  dense absorbers to limit radial size (e.g. tungsten)  PFA studies at high energy  alternative techniques, like dual/triple readout >Background  innermost radius of first vertex detector layer  shielding against muon background more difficult at higher E >Alignment and stability

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 42 Main Differences CLIC as compared to ILC >Higher energy results in more dense particle jets  Improved double track resolution  Calorimeters with larger thickness and higher granularity >Much shorter bunch spacing  CLIC 0.5 ns wrt. ILC 337 ns  Requires time stamping  Impact on pulsed power electronics >Smaller beam sizes and higher energy  Result in more severe background

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 43 Time Lines ILC Timeline LHC Results CLIC Feasibility Study Technical Design Report 2012

Joachim Mnich | Detectors at Future Colliders | ICFA Seminar Bariloche January 2010 | Page 44 End of Lecture 1