Finding a Home at the NSF for Your Chemical Biology Proposal George L. Kenyon April 30, 2009 Scripps Research Institute.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CAREER WORKSHOP APRIL 9, 2014 Putting a Face on the CAREER Peer Review Process Ross Ellington Associate Vice President for Research FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY.
Advertisements

1 NEST New and emerging science and technology EUROPEAN COMMISSION - 6th Framework programme : Anticipating Scientific and Technological Needs.
Broader Impacts: Meaningful Links between Research and Societal Benefits October 23, 2014 Martin Storksdieck I Center for Research on Lifelong STEM Learning.
Session 5 Intellectual Merit and Broader Significance FISH 521.
Funding Opportunities at NSF Jane Silverthorne International Arabidopsis Consortium Workshop January 15, 2011.
Federal Research Funding Agencies The Holy Grail of Academics.
NSF Research Proposal Review Guidelines. Criterion 1: What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity? How important is the proposed activity.
Merit Review and Proposal Preparation Mark Courtney Division of Environmental Biology
NSF Merit Review and Proposal Preparation Mark Courtney, Ph.D Adjunct, Department of Biology New Mexico State University 24 September 2008.
An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.
Cedric L. Williams, Ph. D. Professor Dept. of Psychology and Graduate Program in Neuroscience University of Virginia Charlottesville, VA Council on Undergraduate.
NSF East Asia and Pacific Summer Institutes (EAPSI) Shelley Hawthorne Smith UA Graduate College Office of Fellowships and Community Engagement
NSF Merit Review Criteria Revision Background. Established Spring 2010 Rationale: – More than 13 years since the last in-depth review and revision of.
The Proposal Review Process Matt Germonprez Mutual of Omaha Associate Professor ISQA College of IS&T.
NSF Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grants Improve dissertation research – Provide funds not normally available to graduate students significant data-gathering.
DIMACS/CCICADA/DIMATIA/Rutgers Math REU
How to Write Grants Version 2009.
Research Grant Proposal Writing: Bucknell Trends and Faculty Perspectives Mike Malusis, Tom Solomon, and Rick Rosenberg Engineering Faculty Learning Series.
National Science Foundation Directorate for Biological Sciences Susan J. Lolle, Program Director Developmental Systems Cluster, Division of Integrative.
NSF on the web- An indispensable resource
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
EAS 299 Writing research papers
NSF Office of Integrative Activities Major Research Instrumentation Program November 2007 Major Research Instrumentation EPSCoR PI Meeting November 6-9,
CAREER WORKSHOP APRIL 9, 2014 Required Elements of the Proposal Beth Hodges Director, Office of Proposal Development FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY.
Broader Impacts Workshop NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program Associate Dean Mulligan Award Info Myths and Facts Letter of Support Dr. Marianne Smith,
The BIO Directorate Microbial Biology Emphasis BIO Advisory Committee April, 2005.
CAREER WORKSHOP APRIL 6, 2015 Selecting a Program Michael Shatruk Chemistry & Biochemistry FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY Ken Knappenberger Chemistry & Biochemistry.
A Roadmap to Success Writing an Effective Research Grant Proposal Bob Miller, PhD Regents Professor Oklahoma State University 2011 Bob Miller, PhD Regents.
Partnerships and Broadening Participation Dr. Nathaniel G. Pitts Director, Office of Integrative Activities May 18, 2004 Center.
 Unsolicited proposals  1x year:  preproposals (4 pages);  invited full (~30 pages)  Some special competitions  E.g., sustainability, climate investment.
NSF CAREER Program & CAREER Proposals Claudia Rankins Program Director, Directorate of Education and Human Resources NSF CAREER Program.
NSF CAREER Program & CAREER Proposals Claudia Rankins Physics (PHY) NSF CAREER Program.
Biomedical Science and Engineering Funding Opportunities at NSF Semahat Demir Program Director Biomedical Engineering Program National Science Foundation.
Funding Opportunities and Challenges at NSF Jesús M. de la Garza, Ph.D. Program Director Division of Civil and Mechanical Systems Directorate for Engineering.
CAREER WORKSHOP APRIL 9, 2014 Selecting a Program Anant Paravastu Chemical Engineering FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY Ken Knappenberger Chemistry and Biochemistry.
Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Program Erica Brown, PhD Director, NIH AREA Program National Institutes of Health 1.
1 NEST New and emerging science and technology EUROPEAN COMMISSION - 6th Framework programme : Anticipating Scientific and Technological Needs.
Promoting Diversity at the Graduate Level in Mathematics: A National Forum MSRI October 16, 2008 Deborah Lockhart Executive Officer, Division of Mathematical.
 How the knowledge created advances our theoretical understanding of the study topic, so that others interested in similar situations but in a different.
Funding your Dreams Cathy Manduca Director, Science Education Resource Center Iowa State University, 2005.
Workshop for all NSF-funded PIs regarding new NSF policies and requirements. America COMPETES Act contains a number of new requirements for all those funded.
Integrating Broader Impacts into your Research Proposal
National Science Foundation Overview. Agenda Our Legacy: About NSF Our Work: Programs & The Merit Review Process Our Opportunities: Working at the NSF.
NSF Programs for Faculty Scripps Research Institute April 30, 2009 George Kenyon NSF Division of Chemistry
CAREER WORKSHOP APRIL 6, 2015 Required Elements of the NSF Proposal Beth Hodges Director, Office of Proposal Development FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY.
NSF Opportunities for International Collaboration Richard H. Nader, Ph.D. Office of International Science and Engineering National Science Foundation.
Pepperdine University Sponsored National Science Foundation Grant Writing Workshop February 26, 2005.
The Review Process o What happens to your proposal o Two Review Criteria.
BESAC Workshop on Opportunities for Catalysis/Nanoscience May 14-16, 2002 William S. Millman Basic Energy Sciences May 14, 2002 Catalysis and Nanoscience.
NSF Peer Review: Panelist Perspective QEM Biology Workshop; 10/21/05 Dr. Mildred Huff Ofosu Asst. Vice President; Sponsored Programs & Research; Morgan.
1Mobile Computing Systems © 2001 Carnegie Mellon University Writing a Successful NSF Proposal November 4, 2003 Website: nsf.gov.
NSF Funding Opportunities Anthony Garza. General Funding Opportunities Standard proposals or investigator-initiated research projects (submission once.
1 Grant Applications Rachel Croson, PhD Dean, College of Business UT Arlington (formerly DD SES/SBE NSF)
Improving Research Proposals: Writing Proposals and the Proposal Review Process Heather Macdonald (based on material from Richelle Allen-King, Cathy Manduca,
Images: Images are extremely important to publicize the results of NSF investments. In general, graphs, spectra, and reaction diagrams are not compelling.
Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences Nancy Lutz, Program Director Economics NSF Day Conference SUNY Albany, October 2011.
Data Infrastructure Building Blocks (DIBBS) NSF Solicitation Webinar -- March 3, 2016 Amy Walton, Program Director Advanced Cyberinfrastructure.
Inspired by Biology From Molecules to Materials to Machines An NSF-supported assessment of the emerging scientific opportunities at the interface between.
NSF Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Program February 25, 2016.
Navigating NSF Programs Esin Gulari Dean, College of Engineering & Science Clemson University.
The National Science Foundation Independent Federal Agency Support for all fields of fundamental science and engineering.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2016
CARER Proposal Writing Workshop November 2004
FISH 521 Further proceedings Peer review
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2018
Welcome and thanks for coming.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2017
NSF Funding Melissa A. Moss Professor, Dept. Chemical Engineering
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2019
Presentation transcript:

Finding a Home at the NSF for Your Chemical Biology Proposal George L. Kenyon April 30, 2009 Scripps Research Institute

A NSF “Experiment” at the Chemistry- Biology Interface Main responsibilities of this position are to: Facilitate and develop best practices for the review of proposals at the chemistry-biology interface, and keep proposals from “falling through the cracks”. Facilitate the interactions between the MCB and CHE divisions Interact with the community to help identify the best program for their proposals. “Experiment” - January 2008: Professor Wilfredo (Freddy) Colon joined the NSF as a rotator program director with a 50:50 appointment between the Division of Chemistry (CHE) and the Division of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences (MCB).

Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences Division of Mathematical Sciences Division of Mathematical Sciences Division of Chemistry Division of Chemistry Division of Physics Division of Physics Division of Materials Research Division of Materials Research Division of Astronomical Sciences Office of Multidisciplinary Activities (OMA) ASTCHEDMRDMSPHY

Directorate for Biological Sciences (BIO) Division of Integrative Organismal Systems Division of Integrative Organismal Systems Division of Environmental Biology Division of Environmental Biology Division of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences Division of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences Emerging Frontiers Emerging Frontiers Division of Biological Infrastructure DBIDEBEFIOSMCB

CHE Analytical and Surface Chemistry Inorganic, Bioinorganic, and Organometallic Chemistry Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry Physical Chemistry Integrated Chemistry Activities MCB Cellular Systems Cluster Genes and Genomes Systems Cluster Biomolecular Systems Cluster Structure of CHE and MCB Most biochemistry proposals are submitted to the BMS in MCB cluster whereas most chemical biology proposals are submitted to CHE.

Biochemistry and Chemical Biology at the NSF Biochemistry - the study of the chemistry and chemical processes in living organisms. Most biochemistry proposals are submitted to the Biomolecular Systems Cluster in MCB and are reviewed in the Molecular Biochemistry or Metabolic Biochemistry review panels supplemented with ad-hoc reviews. Some biochemistry proposals that are more chemistry-oriented are submitted to CHE and are reviewed by different methods, depending on the Program. Chemical Biology - involves the application of the tools and methods of chemistry to the study and manipulation of biological systems Most chemical biology proposals are submitted to a CHE program. Some chemical biology proposals are submitted to other divisions in the BIO Directorate, usually MCB. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology proposals are sometimes co-reviewed and co-funded by CHE and MCB

CHE Analytical and Surface Chemistry Inorganic, Bioinorganic, and Organometallic Chemistry Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry Physical Chemistry Integrated Chemistry Activities MCB Cellular Systems Cluster Genes and Genomes Systems Cluster Biomolecular Systems Cluster Structure of CHE and MCB chemical biology?

Recent Activities and Changes at the NSF to Address Proposals at the CHE-BIO Interface Wrote a commentary to inform the community about the present and future of chemical biology at the NSF: Chemical Biology at the US National Science Foundation, Nature Chemical Biology 4, New CHE-MCB review panel was created to facilitate the review of proposals at the che-bio interface, including chemical biology. Workshop on chemical biology is being planned for 2009 – to discuss leading edge, future trends, proposal review mechanism, funding opportunities, and education CHE is proposing to create a new program, Chemistry of Life Processes, that will serve as a home to chemical biology proposals.

CHE Town Hall Meeting When: March 23, 2009 Where: Convention Center, Exhibit Hall 3 What Time: 4:30 - 6:30 PM Main Agenda: Introduce Proposed New Programs of the Chemistry Division Chemical Synthesis Chemical Structure, Dynamics and Mechanisms Chemical Measurement and Imaging Theory, Models and Computational Methods Environmental Chemical Sciences Chemistry of Life Processes Chemical Catalysis Macromolecular / Supramolecular / Nanochemistry

Draft of Program Description: The program supports research of novel chemistry in biological systems and the advancement of basic chemical research and transformative technologies through creative applications that address significant aspects of life processes. The program also encourages research projects that exploit biological systems to advance fundamental and enabling aspects of chemistry. Proposals that are compatible with the program are those that advance the knowledge and practice of chemistry. Proposals that focus on addressing a biological question and that do not primarily use chemical approaches are more appropriate for the Division of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences (MCB). Proposals that address biomedical problems are more appropriate for the NIH. Program Contact: Wilfredo Colon, (703) , questions, comments, or suggestions to Proposed Program: Chemistry of Life Processes

Examples of Research Interest that would fit the Chemistry of Life Processes Program Research of interest to the program includes fundamental chemistry centered projects at the interface with biology. Some examples include, but are not limited to: synthetic methods for site-specific modifications of biomacromolecules; the application of advanced spectroscopic techniques to study energy transformations in biological systems; metal speciation, coordination and function; chemical (bottom-up) synthetic biology; chemical basis of ligand-biomacromolecule recognition; studies of enzyme and ribozyme catalysis that focus on the chemistry; the design and synthesis of riboswitches and small molecules that modulate biological systems.

Finding a Home: Submit to CHE or MCB? Advise #1: Understand the key differences between CHE and MCB – MCB is mainly interested in the fundamental biological problem or question being addressed (i.e. the impact on Biology) – CHE is mainly interested in the novelty and significance of the chemical approach (i.e. the impact on Chemistry) – CHE and MCB do not support disease related proposals. Advice #2: Determine the focus and impact of your proposal – If the proposal is traditional biochemistry and the main focus is to understand the relationship between structure and function - submit to MCB – If the proposal focuses primarily on the chemical details or chemical approaches (e.g. synthesis, imaging/sensor, metal coordination, spectroscopy) - submit to CHE – Submit the proposal to the program that would be impacted the most by the research. Where is the greatest impact: the chemistry or the biology? Advice #3: If in doubt about the best program for your proposal, consult with program director Advice #4: Address both review criteria: the intellectual merit and broader impact – Understand the meaning of “broader impact” and take it seriously.

Review Criteria Criterion 1: intellectual merit? (The focus is one the science) Advancement of knowledge and understanding? How qualified is the investigator(s)? Impact of prior work? Exploration of creative, original or potentially transformative concepts? (since Jan. 2008; revolutionizing entire disciplines; creating entirely new fields; or disrupting accepted theories and perspectives) How well conceived and organized? Resources? Criterion 2: broader impacts? (The focus is on the people) Promotion of teaching, training, and learning? Broadening participation? Enhancement of infrastructure? Dissemination? Benefits to society? The Project Description must describe, as an integral part of the narrative, the broader impacts resulting from the proposed activities.

Summary Most proposals at the chemistry-biology interface may be submitted to CHE or MCB, depending on the focus of the proposal and the impact of the research. The proposed Chemistry of Life Processes program will provide a common and clear home for chemical biology proposals. Communicate with Program Directors if there is any doubt about the most appropriate program for your proposal. If you want your proposal to be co-reviewed by another division/program, you may identify a second program in Fastlane at the time of submission. Take the broader impact criteria seriously. If your proposal does not fit the program, the PDs will try to transfer it to the appropriate program, and will do their best to obtain a competent and fair review.