Chapter 11. Decentralization in Organizations Benefits of Decentralization Top management freed to concentrate on strategy. Top management freed to concentrate.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Segment Reporting, Decentralization, and the Balanced Scorecard
Advertisements

PowerPoint Authors: Susan Coomer Galbreath, Ph.D., CPA Charles W. Caldwell, D.B.A., CMA Jon A. Booker, Ph.D., CPA, CIA Cynthia J. Rooney, Ph.D., CPA Copyright.
Chapter 15: Performance Evaluation and Compensation
Decentralization in Organizations
Evaluation of Investment Centers Managerial Accounting Prepared by Diane Tanner University of North Florida Chapter 24.
RESPONSIBILITY ACCOUNTING
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin 11 th Edition Chapter 12.
9-1 PowerPoint Authors: Susan Coomer Galbreath, Ph.D., CPA Charles W. Caldwell, D.B.A., CMA Jon A. Booker, Ph.D., CPA, CIA Cynthia J. Rooney, Ph.D., CPA.
24 Performance Evaluation for Decentralized Operations Accounting 26e
McGraw-Hill /Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 10 Decentralization.
ROI, Residual Income, and Economic Value Added
Performance Measurement in Decentralized Organizations
Transfer Pricing. Key Concepts/Definitions A transfer price is the price charged when one segment of a company provides goods or services to another segment.
Segment Reporting and Decentralization Chapter Twelve.
Financial performance measures and transfer pricing
Performance Measures and Management Techniques
PowerPoint Authors: Susan Coomer Galbreath, Ph.D., CPA Charles W. Caldwell, D.B.A., CMA Jon A. Booker, Ph.D., CPA, CIA Cynthia J. Rooney, Ph.D., CPA Copyright.
Decentralized Performance Evaluation
Multiple Measures of Performance Multiple measures of performance may be most useful as a way of providing a focus on what factors have the most impact.
AC239 Unit 8 Chapter 24 Performance Evaluation for Decentralized Operations.
© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Segment Reporting, Decentralization, and the Balanced Scorecard Chapter 12.
Click to edit Master title style 1 Performance Evaluation for Decentralized Operations 23.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Performance Evaluation Chapter 10 1.
Accounting 3020 Chapter 12 – Segment Reporting, Decentralization, and Balanced Scorecard.
Prepared by: C. Douglas Cloud Professor Emeritus of Accounting Pepperdine University © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned,
Chapter 24 Responsibility Accounting and Performance Evaluation
ACCT 2302 Fundamentals of Accounting II Spring 2011 Lecture 15 Professor Jeff Yu.
PowerPoint Authors: Jon A. Booker, Ph.D., CPA, CIA Charles W. Caldwell, D.B.A., CMA Susan Coomer Galbreath, Ph.D., CPA Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill.
© 2012 McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Segment Reporting, Decentralization, and the Balanced Scorecard Chapter 13.
RESPONSIBILITY ACCOUNTING CHAPTER 22 & Decentralization  Decentralization is the freedom for managers at lower levels of the organization to make.
Contemporary accounting problems The first topic THE PART 2 Responsibility Accounting.
PowerPoint Authors: Susan Coomer Galbreath, Ph.D., CPA Charles W. Caldwell, D.B.A., CMA Jon A. Booker, Ph.D., CPA, CIA Cynthia J. Rooney, Ph.D., CPA Copyright.
© John Wiley & Sons, 2005 Chapter 15: Performance Evaluation and Compensation Eldenburg & Wolcott’s Cost Management, 1eSlide # 1 Cost Management Measuring,
Performance Evaluation for Decentralized Operations Student Version.
Financial and Managerial Accounting Wild, Shaw, and Chiappetta Fifth Edition Wild, Shaw, and Chiappetta Fifth Edition McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013.
Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Segment Reporting and Decentralization Chapter Twelve.
Responsibility Accounting Topic Seven by Dr. Ong Tze San
AC239 Managerial Accounting Seminar 8 Jim Eads, CPA, MST, MSF Performance Evaluation for Decentralized Operations 1.
PowerPoint Authors: Susan Coomer Galbreath, Ph.D., CPA Charles W. Caldwell, D.B.A., CMA Jon A. Booker, Ph.D., CPA, CIA Cynthia J. Rooney, Ph.D., CPA Copyright.
PPT 10-1 ADVANCED MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING. PPT 10-2 Decentralization and Transfer Pricing.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
Decentralization Chapter 10. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2002 Irwin/McGraw-Hill 2 Decentralization in Organizations Benefits of Decentralization.
Performance Evaluation Chapter 15 Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
PowerPoint Authors: Susan Coomer Galbreath, Ph.D., CPA Charles W. Caldwell, D.B.A., CMA Jon A. Booker, Ph.D., CPA, CIA Cynthia J. Rooney, Ph.D., CPA Copyright.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin 11 th Edition Chapter 12.
Performance Evaluation for Decentralized Operations
12A-1 PowerPoint Authors: Susan Coomer Galbreath, Ph.D., CPA Charles W. Caldwell, D.B.A., CMA Jon A. Booker, Ph.D., CPA, CIA Cynthia J. Rooney, Ph.D.,
Shahadat Hosan Faculty (Part time), MBA Program Stamford University Bangladesh Segment Reporting.
Chapter 10 Decentralization Chapter 10: Decentralization.
SEGMENT REPORTING, DECENTRALIZATION, AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD Chapter 11 PowerPoint Authors: Susan Coomer Galbreath, Ph.D., CPA Charles W. Caldwell,
Direct Cost Variance and Management Control Lecture 17 1 Readings Chapter 10,Cost Accounting, Managerial Emphasis, 14 th edition by Horengren Chapter 5,
CORNERSTONES of Managerial Accounting, 5e. © 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part,
Segment Reporting, and Decentralization
Responsibility Accounting and Performance Evaluation
Performance Measurement in Decentralized Organizations
Performance Measurement and Transfer Pricing
Performance Measurement in Decentralized Organizations
Decentralization and Performance Evaluation
Performance Measurement in Decentralized Organizations
MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING Eighth Canadian Edition GARRISON, CHESLEY, CARROLL, WEBB Prepared by: Robert G. Ducharme, MAcc, CA University of Waterloo, School.
Transfer Pricing Appendix 11A.
Responsibility Accounting
Performance Measurement in Decentralized Organizations
DECENTRALIZATION Chapter 9
Decentralization May 27, 2009 Chapter 10: Decentralization.
Power Notes Chapter 22 Performance Evaluation for Decentralized Operations Learning Objectives 1. Centralized and Decentralized Operations 2. Responsibility.
Decentralization, Profitability and ROI
Decentralization, Profitability and ROI
Power Notes Chapter M7 Performance Evaluation for Decentralized Operations Learning Objectives 1. Centralized and Decentralized Operations 2. Responsibility.
Performance Evaluation for Decentralized Operations
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 11

Decentralization in Organizations Benefits of Decentralization Top management freed to concentrate on strategy. Top management freed to concentrate on strategy. Lower-level managers gain experience in decision-making. Lower-level managers gain experience in decision-making. Decision-making authority leads to job satisfaction. Decision-making authority leads to job satisfaction. Lower-level decisions often based on better information. Lower-level decisions often based on better information. Lower level managers can respond quickly to customers.

Decentralization in Organizations Lower-level managers may make decisions without seeing the “big picture.” Lower-level managers may make decisions without seeing the “big picture.” May be a lack of coordination among autonomous managers. May be a lack of coordination among autonomous managers. Lower-level manager’s objectives may not be those of the organization. Lower-level manager’s objectives may not be those of the organization. May be difficult to spread innovative ideas in the organization. May be difficult to spread innovative ideas in the organization.

Decentralization and Segment Reporting segment A segment is any part or activity of an organization about which a manager seeks cost, revenue, or profit data. A segment can be... Quick Mart An Individual Store A Sales Territory A Service Center

Cost, Profit, and Investments Centers Cost Center A segment whose manager has control over costs, but not over revenues or investment funds. Cost

Cost, Profit, and Investments Centers Profit Center A segment whose manager has control over both costs and revenues, but no control over investment funds. Revenues Sales Interest Other Costs Mfg. costs Commissions Salaries Other

Cost, Profit, and Investments Centers Investment Center A segment whose manager has control over costs, revenues, and investments in operating assets. Corporate Headquarters

Return on Investment (ROI) Formula ROI = Net operating income Average operating assets Cash, accounts receivable, inventory, plant and equipment, and other productive assets. Cash, accounts receivable, inventory, plant and equipment, and other productive assets. Income before interest and taxes (EBIT) Income before interest and taxes (EBIT)

Return on Investment (ROI) Formula Net operating income Sales Average operating assets × ROI = We can modify our original formula slightly: MarginTurnover ×

Controlling the Rate of Return Three ways to improve ROI...  Increase Sales  Reduce Expenses  Reduce Assets

Residual Income - Another Measure of Performance Net operating income above some minimum return on operating assets

Residual Income

Motivation and Residual Income Residual income encourages managers to make profitable investments that would be rejected by managers using ROI.

Process time is the only value-added time. Delivery Performance Measures Wait Time Process Time + Inspection Time + Move Time + Queue Time Delivery Cycle Time Order Received Production Started Goods Shipped Throughput Time

Manufacturing Cycle Efficiency Value-added time Manufacturing cycle (th’put) time = Wait Time Process Time + Inspection Time + Move Time + Queue Time Delivery Cycle Time Order Received Production Started Goods Shipped Throughput Time Delivery Performance Measures

The Balanced Scorecard Management translates its strategy into performance measures that employees understand and influence. Performance measures Customers Learning and growth Internal business processes Financial

The balanced scorecard lays out concrete actions to attain desired outcomes. A balanced scorecard should have measures that are linked together on a cause-and-effect basis. If we improve one performance measure... Another desired performance measure will improve. The Balanced Scorecard Then

The Balanced Scorecard: From Strategy to Performance Measures Financial Has our financial performance improved? Customer Do customers recognize that we are delivering more value? Internal Business Processes Have we improved key business processes so that we can deliver more value to customers? Learning and Growth Are we maintaining our ability to change and improve? Performance Measures What are our financial goals? What customers do we want to serve and how are we going to win and retain them? What internal busi- ness processes are critical to providing value to customers? Vision and Strategy

The Balanced Scorecard: Non-financial Measures The balanced scorecard relies on non-financial measures in addition to financial measures for two reasons:  Financial measures are lag indicators that summarize the results of past actions. Non-financial measures are leading indicators of future financial performance.  Top managers are ordinarily responsible for financial performance measures – not lower level managers. Non-financial measures are more likely to be understood and controlled by lower level managers.

Employee skills in installing options Number of options available Time to install option Customer satisfaction with options Number of cars sold Contribution per car Profit Learning and Growth Internal Business Processes Customer Financial The Balanced Scorecard ─ Jaguar Example

The Balanced Scorecard and Compensation Incentive compensation should be linked to balanced scorecard performance measures.

The Balanced Scorecard for Individuals A personal scorecard should contain measures that can be influenced by the individual being evaluated and that support the measures in the overall balanced scorecard. The entire organization should have an overall balanced scorecard. Each individual should have a personal balanced scorecard.

Transfer Pricing Appendix 11A

Key Concepts/Definitions A transfer price is the price charged when one segment of a company provides goods or services to another segment of the company. The fundamental objective in setting transfer prices is to motivate managers to act in the best interests of the overall company.

Three Primary Approaches There are three primary approaches to setting transfer prices: 1.Negotiated transfer prices 2.Transfers at the cost to the selling division 3.Transfers at market price 4.And if all else fails: Dictated

Negotiated Transfer Prices A negotiated transfer price results from discussions between the selling and buying divisions. Advantages of negotiated transfer prices: 1.They preserve the autonomy of the divisions, which is consistent with the spirit of decentralization. 2.The managers negotiating the transfer price are likely to have much better information about the potential costs and benefits of the transfer than others in the company. Upper limit is determined by the buying division. Lower limit is determined by the selling division. Range of Acceptable Transfer Prices

Negotiated Transfer Prices The selling division’s lowest acceptable transfer price is calculated as:: The buying division’s highest acceptable transfer price is calculated as: If an outside supplier does not exist, the highest acceptable transfer price is calculated as:

Grocery Storehouse – An Example Assume the information as shown with respect to West Coast Plantations and Grocery Mart (both companies are owned by Grocery Storehouse).

Grocery Storehouse – An Example If West Coast Plantations has sufficient idle capacity (assume 3,000 crates) to satisfy Grocery Mart’s demands (1,000 crates), without sacrificing sales to other customers, then the lowest and highest possible transfer prices are computed as follows: Selling division’s lowest possible transfer price: Buying division’s highest possible transfer price: Therefore, the range of acceptable transfer prices is $10 – $20.

Grocery Storehouse – An Example If West Coast Plantations has some idle capacity (assume 500 crates) and must sacrifice other customer orders (500 crates) to meet Grocery Mart’s demands (1,000 crates), then the lowest and highest possible transfer prices are computed as follows: Buying division’s highest possible transfer price: Therefore, the range of acceptable transfer prices is $17.50 – $ Selling division’s lowest possible transfer price:

Grocery Storehouse – An Example If West Coast Plantations has no idle capacity (0 crates) and must sacrifice other customer orders (1,000 crates) to meet Grocery Mart’s demands (1,000 crates), then the lowest and highest possible transfer prices are computed as follows: Selling division’s lowest possible transfer price: Buying division’s highest possible transfer price: Therefore, there is no range of acceptable transfer prices.

Evaluation of Negotiated Transfer Prices If a transfer within a company would result in higher overall profits for the company, there is always a range of transfer prices within which both the selling and buying divisions would have higher profits if they agree to the transfer. If managers are pitted against each other rather than against their past performance or reasonable benchmarks, a noncooperative atmosphere is almost guaranteed. Given the disputes that often accompany the negotiation process, some companies rely on some other means of setting transfer prices.

Transfers at the Cost to the Selling Division Many companies set transfer prices at either the variable cost or full (absorption) cost incurred by the selling division. Drawbacks of this approach include: 1.The selling division will never show a profit on any internal transfer. 2.Cost-based transfer prices do not provide incentives to control costs.

Transfers at Market Price A market price (i.e., the price charged for an item on the open market) is often regarded as the best approach to the transfer pricing problem. 1.A market price approach works best when the product or service is sold in its present form to outside customers and the selling division has no idle capacity. 2.A market price approach does not work well when the selling division has idle capacity.

Service Department Charges Appendix 11B

Operating Departments Carry out the central purposes of an organization Service Departments Provide support that facilitates the activities of operating departments The Need for Cost Allocations

First Stage Allocations Service department costs are allocated to operating departments. Service Department (Cafeteria) Service Department (Accounting) Service Department (Personnel) Operating Department (Molding) Operating Department (Assembly) The Products

The Need for Cost Allocations Service Department (Cafeteria) Service Department (Accounting) Service Department (Personnel) Operating Department (Molding) Operating Department (Assembly) The Products Second Stage Allocations Operating department overhead costs and allocated service department costs are applied to products.

Selecting Allocation Bases Individuals impacted Personnel: Number of employees Receiving: Units handled Security: Square footage Power: Kilowatt hours Cafeteria: Number of employees Custodial: Square footage Accounting: Staff hours Criteria

Selecting Allocation Bases Amount of space or equipment Personnel: Number of employees Receiving: Units handled Security: Square footage Power: Kilowatt hours Cafeteria: Number of employees Custodial: Square footage Accounting: Staff hours Criteria

Selecting Allocation Bases Benefits received by the operating department Personnel: Number of employees Ship/Receiv- ing: Units handled Security: Square footage Power: Kilowatt hours Cafeteria: Number of employees Custodial: Square footage Accounting: Staff hours Criteria

Allocating Costs by Behavior Variable Costs Charge to operating departments at a budgeted rate times the usage of the allocation base. Fixed Costs Allocate budgeted amounts to operating departments in proportion to the peak-period capacity required by the operating department.

Pitfall 1 Using sales dollars as an allocation base Allocation Pitfalls to Avoid Result Departments that increase revenues are penalized by receiving more allocated costs.

Pitfall 2 Allocating fixed costs using a variable activity allocation base Allocation Pitfalls to Avoid Result Total fixed costs do not change, but departments that increase activities to support increased revenues are penalized by receiving more allocated costs.

End of Chapter 11