Quality Reporting and Value-Based Payment: The Physician Practice July 31, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QRUR and Value Modifier:
Advertisements

Denise B. Webb State Health IT Coordinator May 9, 2013.
HIT “Ask the Experts” Roundtable: CMS Updates Thursday, April 25, ; Access Code #
QIO Update On Federal Initiatives Right Care Initiative Rotating University of Best Practices San Diego, CA September 10, 2012 Mary Fermazin, M.D., MPA.
TOPIC: All Gain, No Pain PQRS Reporting Dec. 19 th, 2012: 1:00 p.m. – 2:00 p.m. Presented by Jim Clifford, Senior Solutions Consultant at Wellcentive Moderator:
Overview of PQRS, VM, & the EHR Incentive Programs Angela M McCrea, MT, ASCP Maureen Schwarzer, BSN, RN Lynn Page, BSN, RN.
MO PC May 2011 This material was prepared by Primaris, the Medicare Quality Improvement Organization for Missouri, under contract with the Centers.
Clinical Quality Measures (CQMs) and Physician Privileging
Conflict of Interest Disclosures
Meaningful Use and the EHR Incentive Program Tribal Self-Governance Conference.
GOVERNMENT EHR FUNDING: MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 UPDATE October 25, 2012 Jonathan Krasner Healthcare IT Consultant BEI
CMS Proposals for Quality Reporting Programs Under the 2015 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule PQRS, EHR Incentive Program, Physician Compare,
Claims and the QCDR: Avoiding the Payment Adjustment
Medicare Quality Improvement and Provider Technical Assistance: An Overview of the Next Five Years December 8, 2014 Mary Fermazin, MD, MPA, Chief Medical.
Physician Value- Based Payment Modifier under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule 1 Physician Feedback and Value-Based Modifier Program American Medical.
1 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 2007 Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) Module One.
PQRS NYeC Practice Quality Resources & Registry June 8, 2015.
Physician Quality Reporting Initiative CSNS Provider Update Affordable Care Act Task Force Dr. Justin Singer, MD Dr. Nicholas Bambakidis, MD.
MEANINGFUL USE UPDATE 2014 Mark Huang, M.D. Chief Medical Information Officer Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Associate Professor Department of PM.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Montana Medicaid Electronic Health Records Incentive Program for Eligible Hospitals This presentation will focus on information related to your registration.
Moderator Kevin Larsen, MD Medical Director, Meaningful Use Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology Washington, D.C. Using.
Saeed A. Khan MD, MBA, FACP © CureMD Healthcare ACOs and Requirements for Reporting Quality Measures © CureMD Healthcare Saeed A. Khan MD, MBA, FACP.
PQRS 2013.
The CMS Value-Based Payment Modifier
Daniel T. Golder, DDS, MBA Chief Information Officer Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality This material is provided by the Oklahoma Foundation for Medical.
Making Data Count 2015 Nevada MGMA Annual Conference May 12, 2015 Erick Maddox, PMP, CPHIT HIE Director, HealthInsight Ellen DePrat, MSN, RN, NE, CPHQ.
New Jersey Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Professionals Overview.
M ARYLAND H EALTH Q UALITY AND C OST C OUNCIL Quarterly Meeting December 19, 2014.
HIT “Ask the Experts” Roundtable: CMS Payment Adjustments & ROI Andy Finnegan Thursday, November 14, Access Code #
American Joint Replacement Registry’s Orthopaedic Quality Resource Center a CMS approved Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR)
Prepared by: Health Technology Services Regional Extension Center A division of Mountain-Pacific Quality Health.
HP Provider Relations October 2011 Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program.
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program For Eligible Professionals Overview of the Proposed 2015 Modification Rule Kim Davis-Allen Outreach Coordinator
Universal Adoption of the EHR What is Meaningful Use and why should it be important to me?
The Value Modifier and Quality Resource Use Report (QRUR) The Medicare Report Card is Here for Physicians Christopher Rawlings, CPA, CMA, CHFP, MBA Associate.
SCHIE Mission To improve the quality and efficiency of health care for all stakeholders in the Santa Cruz community. To deliver technology assistance,
Discussion with BEACON Council ODJFS/OHP Medicaid Provider Incentive Program.
Making better healthcare possible ® Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Changing Seasons of Healthcare Conference WV-HFMA/WV-HIMSS September 27, 2012.
Cap.org v. # 2014 PQRS and VBM Programs Jonathan L. Myles, MD FCAP Chair, CAP Economic Affairs Committee Pathology Advisor, AMA-RUC Diana Cardona, MD FCAP.
MO HealthNet EHR Incentive Program MHA Meaningful Use Symposium April 27, 2012.
September 16, 2015 Antonio Vega Sandy Swallow
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome HIT Standards Committee
Meaningful Use and Merit Based Incentive Payment in 2019.
AAMC Contact: Mary Wheatley December Physician Fee Schedule Value Modifier.
Overview of the 2017 Value-Based Payment Modifier.
Meaningful Use: Stage 2 Changes An overall simplification of the program aligned to the overarching goals of sustainability as discussed in the Stage.
Behavioral Health and CMS Quality Programs January 26, 2015.
Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Reporting with MeHI’s Registry and Services February 10, 2015 Today’s presenters: Al Wroblewski, Client Services.
New Jersey Institute of Technology Enterprise Development Center (EDC) 211 Warren Street, Newark, NJ Phone: Fax:
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Updates eHealth Services and Support September 24, 2014 Today’s presenter: Nicole Bennett, Provider Enrollment and Verification.
The Impact of Proposed Meaningful Use Modifications for June 23, 2015 Today’s presenters: Al Wroblewski, Client Services Relationship Manager.
Final Rule Regarding EHR Certification Flexibility for 2014 Today’s presenters: Al Wroblewski, Client Services Relationship Manager Thomas Bennett, Client.
Getting Started with 2015 PQRS 2015 Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS)
The Hospital CAHPS Program Presented by Maureen Parrish.
Meaningful Use and PQRS How to help your practices avoid penalties April 25 th,2015 Washington D.C. Mark Norris Medical Records Services, LLC
MAPIR 5.7 Walk-Through Vermont Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program May 25, 2016.
Ben West CTO Health eFilings Effectively Complying with CMS Quality Data Management and Reporting Requirements.
Current CMS Quality Reporting Programs Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program (Meaningful Use) Value-Based.
MIPS Quality Component
MIPS in 2017 Jeffrey D. Lehrman, DPM, FASPS, FACFAS, MAPWCA
2015 Annual Quality Resource Usage Reports (QRUR)
Introduction to the Quality Payment Program & MIPS
Physician Feedback and Value-Based Modifier Program
MIPS in a deep dive JAMES R. CHRISTINA, DPM October 1, 2015
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #10 – Public Health Reporting Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July 21, 2016 Today’s presenter:
Presentation transcript:

Quality Reporting and Value-Based Payment: The Physician Practice July 31, 2015

VHQC Non-profit health quality consulting company since 1984 Virginia and Maryland’s Quality Innovation Network Quality Improvement Organization for CMS Virginia’s Regional Extension Center as designated by ONC Provides outreach, education, and comprehensive EHR services to providers and healthcare organizations

1)VHQC Introduction 2)Meaningful Use (MU) a.Timeline Highlights b.Payment Adjustments & Hardship Exception 3)Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) a.Incentive & Adjustments b.Reporting Methods c.PQRS Measure Information d.Measures Applicability Validation e.Quality and Resource Use Report (QRUR) 4)Value-Based Payment Modifier 5)Resources Agenda

EHR Incentive Program: Meaningful Use

Improved Quality and Outcomes Stage 1 Data capture and sharing Stage 2 Advanced clinical processes Stage 3 Improved outcomes  Better clinical outcomes  Improved population health outcomes  Increased transparency and efficiency  Empowered individuals  More robust research data on health system

To better align Stages 1 & 2 with Stage 3, CMS proposes: 1.Reducing the overall number of objectives to focus on advanced use of electronic health records (EHRs); 2.Removing measures that have become redundant, duplicative or have reached wide-spread adoption; 3.Realigning the reporting period beginning in 2015, so hospitals would participate on the calendar year instead of the fiscal year; and 4.Allowing a 90 day reporting period in 2015 to accommodate the implementation of these proposed changes in Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Meaningful Use in Stay Tuned for Changes!

1)First time attesters only: 90-day reporting period 2)Providers beyond their first year of Meaningful Use: FULL CALENDAR YEAR – follow CMS closely for changes MU Timeline Highlights 2015 Reporting Periods Stay Tuned for Changes!

1)Anticipated to be February 28, 2016 for the 2015 reporting period 2)2014 was the last year to start Medicare Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program and receive incentives. First time attesters in 2015 will not receive an incentive, but will avoid the 2017 payment adjustment. MU Timeline Highlights 2015 Reporting Periods

How do meaningful use payment adjustments work? -1% 2015 Payment Adjustment Avoided If Attested to MU for the 2013 reporting period OR Attested to MU for the first time by October 1, 2014 OR CMS approved a hardship exception application specific to 2015 payment adjustment -2% 2016 Payment Adjustment Avoided If Attested to MU for the 2014 reporting period OR Attested to MU for the first time by October 1, 2015 OR CMS approves a hardship exception application specific to 2016 payment adjustment -3% 2017 Payment Adjustment Avoided If Attested to MU for the 2015 reporting period OR Attested to MU for the first time by October 1, 2016 OR CMS approves a hardship exception application (form not yet released) specific to 2017 payment adjustment Stay Tuned for Changes!

1)Affect Medicare Part B payments 2)Follow the individual provider 3)CMS Payment Adjustment Tip sheet Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/Downloads/Pay mentAdj_HardshipExcepTipSheetforEP.pdf Payment Adjustments

1)Hardship exception applications are developed for each payment adjustment year 2)Hardship exception application for 2015 reporting period (to avoid 2017 payment adjustments) not yet released 3)Cannot use old hardship applications from previous years Hardship Applications

Online tool to help determine a provider’s year and stage of Meaningful Use s-and- Guidance/Legislation/EHRI ncentivePrograms/Particip ation-Timeline.html EHR Participation Timeline

Started MU Attestation Stage 2 Full calendar year $1,960 incentive Avoids 2017 payment adjustment Started MU Attestation Stage 2 Full calendar year $3,920 incentive Avoids 2017 payment adjustment Started 2013 In 2015 MU Attestation Stage 2 Full calendar year $7,840 incentive Avoids 2017 payment adjustment Started MU Attestation Stage 1 Full calendar year $7,840 incentive Avoids 2017 payment adjustment Medicare What stage am I in? *Stages shown are not reflective of providers who have skipped program years. Stay Tuned for Changes!

AIU MU Attestation Stage 2 Full calendar year $8,500 incentive Avoids 2017 payment adjustment for Medicare Part B claims AIU MU Attestation Stage 1 Full calendar year $8,500 incentive Avoids 2017 payment adjustment for Medicare Part B claims AIU MU Attestation Stage 1 Any 90 days $8,500 incentive Avoids 2017 payment adjustment for Medicare Part B claims Medicaid What stage am I in? * Stages shown are not reflective of providers who have skipped program years. Stay Tuned for Changes!

1)Are provider claims already subject to payment adjustment in 2015? 2)What stage should I be working on in 2015? 3)Does staff know if your reporting period has already started? 4)Does staff know how to utilize technology (EHR and patient portal) in a way that counts for meaningful use reports? Questions to ask now!

Physician Quality Reporting System Program

1)Individual Eligible Professionals (EPs) and group practices that do not satisfactorily participate and report in the 2015 PQRS program year will be subject to a 2% penalty downward payment adjustment in )Penalty applied to all of the EP’s Part B covered professional services under Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) during the payment adjustment year 2)EPs are identified by their individual national provider identifier (NPI) and tax identification number (TIN) Payment Adjustments PQRS Performance Year PQRS Payment Year Negative Adjustment Rate % % %

Reporting Methods Select measures and begin reporting by submitting Quality Data Codes on claims Claims Entity that collects clinical data from an EP or Group and submits to CMS on behalf of the EP/Group. Refer to the 2015 Participating Registry Vendors Qualified Registry EP generates files from their EHR – EP uploads to CMS at year end EHR-Direct Data electronically shared with DSV – DSV uploads to CMS at year end EHR-Data Submission Vendor CMS approved entity that collects & submits data on behalf of EP- refer to 2015 Participating Qualified Clinical Data Registry Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) Secured internet-based application available in the PQRS portal to pre-registered users GPRO Web Interface Supplemental to other reporting mechanisms CAHPS – Certified Survey Vendor

Individual Reporting EHR Direct Product that is Certified Electronic Health Record Technology (CEHRT) EHR Data Submission Vendor that is CEHRT Qualified PQRS registry Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) Medicare Part B Claims Group Reporting EHR Direct Product that is CEHRT EHR Data Submission Vendor that is CEHRT Qualified PQRS registry GPRO Web Interface (25+ providers) Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey for PQRS- supplemental to other reporting mechanisms Individual or Group Reporting

GPRO Registration 1)Three GPRO group sizes: a EPs b.25 – 99 EPs c.2 – 24 EPs 2)Reporting mechanisms & requirements vary depending on the group size at time of registration 3)The reporting mechanism selected during registration will be the only PQRS submission method available to the group and all individual NPIs that bill Medicare under the group’s TIN for PQRS during the reporting year Group Practice Reporting

Consider important factors when selecting 2015 PQRS measures for reporting: 1.Clinical conditions usually treated 2.Types of care typically provided, e.g. preventive, chronic, acute 3.Settings where care is usually delivered, e.g. office, ED, surgical suite 4.Quality Improvement goals for Other quality reporting programs in use or being considered 6.Review specifications for the selected reporting option for each measure under consideration Measure Selection

Review the 2015 PQRS Measures List available in the Measure Codes section of the CMS-PQRS website 1. Assessment-Instruments/PQRS/MeasuresCodes.htmlhttp:// Assessment-Instruments/PQRS/MeasuresCodes.html 2.Not all measures are available under each PQRS reporting option 3.The GPRO Web interface reporting option has set measures, all of which must be reported 4.Avoid individual measures that do not or may infrequently apply to the services provided 5.PQRS measure set and resulting measure specifications change from year to year Measure Selection

1)New Cross-Cutting Measures Requirement: a.Applies to PQRS claims and registry reporting options b.EPs and groups are required to report one cross-cutting measure if they have at least one Medicare patient face-to-face encounter PQRS Measure # Cross-Cutting Measure Title 321 CAHPS for PQRS Clinician/Group Survey 047Care Plan 240 Childhood Immunization Status 374 Closing the Referral Loop Receipt of Specialist Report 236 Controlling High Blood Pressure 001Diabetes: Hemoglobin A1c Poor Control 130 Documentation of Current Medications in the Medical Record 318 Falls: Screening for Fall Risk 182 Functional Outcome Assessment 400 Hepatitis C: One-Time Screening for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) for Patients at Risk 046Medication Reconciliation 131Pain Assessment & Follow-Up 111Pneumonia Vaccination Status for Older Adults 110 Preventative Care & Screening: Influenza Immunization 128 Preventive Care & Screening: BMI Screening and Follow-Up Plan 134 Preventive Care & Screening: Screening for Clinical Depression & Follow-Up Plan 317 Preventive Care & Screening: Screening for High Blood Pressure & Follow-Up Documented 226 Preventive Care & Screening: Tobacco Use: Screening & Cessation Intervention 402 Tobacco Use and Help with Quitting Among Adolescents Measure Selection

1)2015 PQRS Implementation Guide a.Provides guidance about how to select measures for reporting, how to read and understand a measure specification, and outlines the various reporting methods available for 2015 PQRS b.Details how to implement claims-based reporting of measures to facilitate satisfactory reporting of Quality-Data Codes (QDCs) by EPs c.Provides decision trees to assist EPs with selecting reporting method 2)2015 PQRS Measures List a.Identifies & describes the measures used in PQRS, including all available reporting methods, PQRS & National Quality Forum (NQF) numbers, National Quality Strategy (NQS) domains, & measure developers Both resources are available at: Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/PQRS/MeasuresCodes.htmlhttp:// Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/PQRS/MeasuresCodes.html Measures & Reporting Resources

1)Satisfactory Claim and Registry-Based Reporting a.Report each measure for at least 50% of the Medicare Part B FFS patients seen during the reporting period to which the measure applies b.Report at least 9 measures covering 3 NQS domains c.Measures with a 0% performance rate would not be counted 2)Measure Applicability Validation (MAV) Process a.Claims-based MAV: applies to EPs reporting less than 9 measures OR 9 or more measures with less than 3 domains b.Registry-based MAV: applies to EPs and group practices reporting less than 9 measures OR 9 or more measures with less than 3 domains Measure Applicability Validation

Value-Based Payment Modifier

1)Aligned with and is based on participation in PQRS 2)Assesses both quality of care furnished and the cost of that care under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) 3)Payment adjustment made on a per claim basis to Medicare payments for items & services furnished 4)Applied at TIN level & applies to all physicians billing under that TIN 5)Phased in: Value-Based Payment Modifier Performance Year VM Payment Adjustment Year Group Size AffectedEPs affected by penalty CY 2013CY 2015Physician Groups ~ 100+ EPsPhysician EPs CY 2014CY 2016Physician Groups ~ 10+ EPsPhysician EPs CY 2015CY 2017Physician Groups & Solo Practices ~ 2+ EPs Physician EPs CY 2016CY 2018Physician Groups & Solo Practices ~ 2+ EPs Physician and Non- Physician EPs

The quality measurement component of the Value Modifier includes three outcome measures that CMS calculates from FFS Medicare claims: 1)two composite measures of hospital admissions for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions a.acute conditions (bacterial pneumonia, urinary tract infection, dehydration) b.chronic conditions (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, diabetes) 2)one measure of 30-day all-cause hospital readmissions. 3)CAHPS surveys required in some cases Value Modifier Outcome Measures

The cost measures include: 1)Total per capita costs measure (annual payment standardized and risk-adjusted Part A and Part B costs) 2)Total per capita costs for beneficiaries with four chronic conditions (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, coronary artery disease, diabetes) 3)Medicare spending per beneficiary for all A and B costs during the 3 days before and 30 days after a Medicare inpatient hospital stay Value Modifier Cost Measures

Groups of 2-9 Eligible Professionals and Solo Practitioners PQRS/Value-Based Payment Modifier: What Medicare Professionals Need to Know in /18/ Incentives and Payment Adjustments: VM 2017 Calculation 30 Cost/QualityLow Quality Average Quality High Quality Low Cost+0.0%+1.0x+2.0x Average Cost+0.0% +1.0x High Cost+0.0% +.0.0%

Groups of 10 or More Eligible Professionals PQRS/Value-Based Payment Modifier: What Medicare Professionals Need to Know in /18/ Incentives and Payment Adjustments: VM 2017 Calculation 31 Cost/QualityLow Quality Average Quality High Quality Low Cost+0.0%+2.0x+4.0x Average Cost-2.0%+0.0%+2.0x High Cost-4.0%-2.0%+0.0%

1)QRUR - annual reports that provide physicians and physician groups with: a.Comparative information about the quality of care furnished and the cost of that care to the practice’s Medicare FFS patients – based on PQRS and claims data b.Beneficiary-specific information to help coordinate and improve the quality and efficiency of care furnished c.Displays your performance related to the CMS Value-Based Payment Modifier - Value Modifier (VM) program 2)Access report via CMS secure portal - must first sign up for IACS account. Instructions at: Fee-for-Service-Payment/PhysicianFeedbackProgram/Obtain QRUR.html Quality & Resource Use Report

Summary Incentives and Payment Adjustments

Eligibility for All Programs PQRSValue ModifierEHR Incentive Program Eligible for Incentive Subject to Payment Adjustment Included in Definition of "Group" Subject to VM Eligible for Medicare Incentives Eligible for Medicaid Incentive Subject to Medicare Payment Adjustment Medicare Physicians Doctor of MedicineXXXXXXX Doctor of OsteopathyXXXXXXX Doctor of Podiatric MedicineXXXXX X Doctor of OptometryXXXXX X Doctor of Oral SurgeryXXXXXXX Doctor of Dental MedicineXXXXXXX Doctor of ChiropracticXXXXX X Practitioners Physician AssistantXXX X Nurse PractitionerXXX X Clinical Nurse SpecialistXXX Certified RN AnesthestistXXX Certified Nurse MidwifeXXX X Clinical Social WorkerXXX Clinical PsychologistXXX Registered DieticianXXX Nutrition ProfessionalXXX AudiologistsXXX Therapists PhysicalXXX OccupationalXXX Qualified Speech-LanguageXXX

1)Incentives for Meaningful Use end in )Medicare eligible professionals who do not meet the requirements for meaningful use by 2015 and in each subsequent year are subject to payment adjustments to their Medicare reimbursements that start at 1% per year, up to a maximum 5% annual adjustment. Incentives and Payment Adjustments: MU 35

1)Phased-in approach 2)Two year look back period 3)By 2017, all solo practitioners and eligible professionals in groups of any size will be subject to a 2% downward adjustment if they do not report PQRS data for )Failure to report PQRS data automatically results in a downward adjustment in the value modifier for physicians for 2017 in groups with 10 or more eligible professionals 5)Solo practitioners and groups of 2-9 eligible professionals who report PQRS data in 2015 will only receive a neutral or upward adjustment in the value modifier in 2017, since 2015 is their first performance year Incentives and Payment Adjustments: PQRS

1)Phased-in approach 2)Groups of 100 or more eligible professionals are subject to an upward, neutral or downward adjustment in 2015 based upon performance year )Groups of 10 or more eligible professionals are subject to an upward, neutral or downward adjustment in 2016 based upon performance year )Solo practitioners and groups of 2-9 are only subject to a neutral or upward adjustment in 2017, since 2015 is their first performance year 5)In any size group, failure to report PQRS will result in an automatic downward adjustment in PQRS and the Value Modifier in 2017 based upon performance year 2015 Incentives and Payment Adjustments: VM 37

38 Based on this example: For every $100,000 in Medicare funds, your practice risks losing up to $9,000 in payment adjustments.** **Calculation is based on estimate for the 2017 payment year. The Value Modifier adjustment is dependent upon group size Payment Adjustment Example Performance Year 2015, Payment Adjustment Year 2017 Meaningful Use -3% PQRS -2% Value Modifier -4% -9% Payment Adjustment

1)QualityNet Help Desk: a or 8:00 am – 8:00 pm EST b.IACS registration questions c.IACS login issues d.PQRS portal password issues e.PQRS feedback report availability and access f.PQRS Program questions 2)VM Help Desk: a ~ option 3 or b.Value-Based Payment Modifier Program questions 3)EHR Incentive Program Information Center: a or b.EHR Incentive Program (Meaningful Use) Help Desk Resources

Stay Connected Connect with us for the latest, up-to-date

Questions

Contact VHQC Jennifer Chenault-Walker Manager, Program Operations Sandra Gaskins Improvement Consultant QIN QIO This material was prepared by VHQC, the Medicare Quality Innovation Network Quality Improvement Organization for Maryland and Virginia, under contract with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), an agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents presented do not necessarily reflect CMS policy. VHQC/11SOW/6/17/2015/2177