Understanding and Using Standardized Tests

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ed-D 420 Inclusion of Exceptional Learners. CAT time Learner-Centered - Learner-centered techniques focus on strategies and approaches to improve learning.
Advertisements

Standardized Tests: What Are They? Why Use Them?
No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
Evaluation of the Iowa Algebra Aptitude Test Terri Martin Doug Glasshoff Mini-project 1 June 17, 2002.
Determining Validity For Oklahoma’s Educational Accountability System Prepared for the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Oklahoma State.
Standardized Tests What They Measure How They Measure.
Types of Tests. Why do we need tests? Why do we need tests?
Chapter Fifteen Understanding and Using Standardized Tests.
By: Michele Leslie B. David MAE-IM WIDE USAGE To identify students who may be eligible to receive special services To monitor student performance from.
© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 16 Classroom Assessment.
Copyright 2001 by Allyn and Bacon Standardized Testing Chapter 14.
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
Standardized Test Scores Common Representations for Parents and Students.
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
Understanding Validity for Teachers
Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring Nebraska Department of Education Response-to-Intervention Consortium.
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT TITLE I PARENT MEETING PRESENTATION.
The Alabama Reading and Mathematics Test Michele Hunter Supervisor of Curriculum and Instruction Mobile County Public Schools.
Chapter 14 Understanding and Using Standardized Tests Viewing recommendations for Windows: Use the Arial TrueType font and set your screen area to at least.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
Module 4 TED 356 Curriculum in Sec. Ed.. Module 4 Explain the current official federal and state standards, including professional and accrediting groups.
Topic 4: Formal assessment
Becoming a Teacher Ninth Edition
Classroom Assessment and Grading
High Stakes Testing EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.
Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.
The World of Assessment Consider the options! Scores based on developmental levels of academic achievement Age-Equivalent scores.
Chapter 3 Understanding Test Scores Robert J. Drummond and Karyn Dayle Jones Assessment Procedures for Counselors and Helping Professionals, 6 th edition.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
Presentation on The Elementary and Secondary Education Act “No Child Left Behind” Nicholas C. Donohue, Commissioner of Education New Hampshire Department.
Diagnostics Mathematics Assessments: Main Ideas  Now typically assess the knowledge and skill on the subsets of the 10 standards specified by the National.
Understanding the TerraNova Test Testing Dates: May Kindergarten to Grade 2.
Teaching Today: An Introduction to Education 8th edition
ED /Supporting English Language Learners in Literacy and Content Knowledge Development (SELL) December 9, 2010.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Understanding ITBS Scores A Guide for Parents Created By: Ginger Psalmonds/CST New Prospect Elementary.
IDEA and NCLB Standards-Based Accountability Sue Rigney, U.S. Department of Education OSEP 2006 Project Directors’ Conference.
MELS 601 Ch. 7. If curriculum can be defined most simply as what is taught in the school, then instruction is the how —the methods and techniques that.
Session 7 Standardized Assessment. Standardized Tests Assess students’ under uniform conditions: a) Structured directions for administration b) Procedures.
The Do’s and Don’ts of High-Stakes Student Achievement Testing Andrew Porter Vanderbilt University August 2006.
Chapter 15 Understanding Standardized Assessment.
Classroom Assessment, Grading, and Standardized Testing
Lecture by: Chris Ross Chapter 7: Teacher-Designed Strategies.
Special Ed CST Lehman College January 12, This is a criterion referenced test that is designed to measure your and skills in relation to an established.
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
Chapter 6 - Standardized Measurement and Assessment
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
Chapter 3 Selection of Assessment Tools. Council of Exceptional Children’s Professional Standards All special educators should possess a common core of.
Foundations of American Education: Perspectives on Education in a Changing World, 15e © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 11 Standards,
GEORGIA’S CRITERION-REFERENCED COMPETENCY TESTS (CRCT) Questions and Answers for Parents of Georgia Students February 11, 2009 Presented by: MCES.
Standardized Testing EDUC 307. Standardized test a test in which all the questions, format, instructions, scoring, and reporting of scores are the same.
6/14/2016 “A Horse of a Different Color” No Child Left Behind and Accountability The State Testing Program Louisiana.
Terra Nova By Tammy Stegman, Robyn Ourada, Sandy Perry, & Kim Cotton.
What you need to know About Title I Parent Meeting Presentation.
1 Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting Wilson Elementary School.
American Institutes for Research
Standardized Test Overview
What you need to know About Title I
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Understanding ITBS Scores
Data Usage Response to Intervention
Bursting the assessment mythology: A discussion of key concepts
Federal Policy & Statewide Assessments for Students with Disabilities
Understanding ITBS Scores
Ace it! Summer Conference 2011 Assessment
Understanding and Using Standardized Tests
TESTING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION GA 3113 lecture 1
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
EDUC 2130 Quiz #10 W. Huitt.
Presentation transcript:

Understanding and Using Standardized Tests Chapter 15 Understanding and Using Standardized Tests

Overview Standardized Tests Using Standardized Tests for Accountability Purposes: High-stakes Testing Standardized Testing and Technology 1

Standardized Tests Nature of Standardized Tests  Designed by people with specialized knowledge and training in test construction  Every person who takes the test responds to the same items under the same conditions  The answers are evaluated according to the same scoring standards  The scores are interpreted through comparison to the scores obtained from a group that took the same test under the same conditions or through comparison to a predetermined standard  Purpose is to get an accurate and representative sample of some characteristic a person possesses

Standardized Tests Uses of Standardized Tests  Identify students’ general academic strengths and weaknesses  Help create instructional plans  Select students for inclusion in special programs

Standardized Tests Criteria for Evaluating Standardized Tests  Reliability – How consistently test takers respond to test items  Validity – Accuracy of the inferences we draw about the test taker – Based on evidence for content validity, predictive validity, construct validity  Normed Excellence – How accurately the norm group represents the population of students for whom the test is intended  Examinee Appropriateness – Appropriateness for a particular group of students 2

Reliability Test-retest reliability Alternate-form reliability Administer the same test to the same people on two occasions and measure the extent to which the rankings change over time Alternate-form reliability Administer two equivalent forms of a test to the same group of students at the same time and compare the results Split-half reliability Administer a single test to a group of students, create two scores by dividing the test in half, and measure the extent to which the rankings change from one half to the other

Validity Content validity evidence Predictive validity evidence How well a test’s items reflect a particular body of knowledge and skill Predictive validity evidence How well a test predicts a student’s future behavior Construct validity evidence How well a test measures some internal attribute of a person  See Online Video Case “Assessment in the Elementary Grades: Formal and Informal Literacy Assessment”

Standardized Tests Types of Standardized Tests  Achievement Tests – Reveal how much of a subject or skill has been learned  Aptitude Tests – Reveal how much knowledge and skill a student could acquire with effective instruction

Types of Achievement Tests Assesses one’s competence in selected basic skill areas; often taken to graduate Competency test Single-subject test designed to identify specific strengths and weaknesses Diagnostic test Assesses how much one has learned in multiple school subjects Achievement battery Assesses how much one has learned in a particular school subject Single-subject achievement test Description Type of Test

Standardized Tests Types of Standardized Tests (cont’d)  Norm-referenced test – Test where one’s performance is evaluated with reference to a norm group  Criterion-referenced test – Test where one’s performance is evaluated with reference to some standard or criterion

Standardized Tests Interpreting Standardized Test Scores  Grade equivalent scores – Interprets test performance in terms of grade level  Percentile ranks – Score that indicates the percentage of students who are at or below a given student’s score  Standard scores – Score that is expressed in terms of standard deviations, such as z score or T score  Stanine score – Type of standard score that divides a population into nine groups. 7

The Normal Probability Curve 8

Relationship Among z Scores, T Scores, and Percentile Ranks Psychology Applied to Teaching. Snowman/Biehler. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 9

Percentage of Cases in Each Stanine 10

Standardized Tests Misconceptions About the Nature and Use of Standardized Tests  A test measures what its name implies  All tests with the same title are the same  a test score accurately reflects what people know and can do  Two tests that claim to measure the same thing can be used interchangeably  Tests are scored by adding up the number of items a person answered correctly  Percent correct scores are equivalent to letter grades (as in 70% = C, 80% = B, 90% = A)  Multiple-choice questions are useful only for measuring the lower levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy  One can tell if a test item is useful just by making a subjective evaluation

Using Standardized Tests for Accountability Purposes: High-Stakes Testing High stakes testing is… Using standardized test scores, either by themselves or in conjunction with other data, to determine whether students get promoted to the next grade or graduate from high school, whether teachers and administrators receive financial rewards or demotions, and whether school districts receive additional state funds or lose their accreditation.

Using Standardized Tests for Accountability Purposes: High-Stakes Testing The Federal Initiative: No Child Left Behind (NCLB)  Requirements of NCLB – Standards: States must have challenging content and achievement standards in math, reading/language arts, science – Testing: Annual testing of students in grades 3-12 in math, reading/language arts, science – Adequate yearly progress (AYP): States must demonstrate each year that an additional percentage of all students have reached the proficient level – Reporting: States and school districts must report how every group of students has performed on the annual assessment – Accountability: Rewards or punishments given to successful or failing schools

Using Standardized Tests for Accountability Purposes: High-Stakes Testing Problems Implementing NCLB  States may weaken standards to meet AYP  States may lower the score that determines proficiency for same reason  Some states allowed larger minimum subgroup size  Law ignores long-standing learning problems of minorities, LEP students, and students with disabilities  Few students receive free tutoring mandated by the law  State departments of education lack the resources to carry out their responsibilities

Using Standardized Tests for Accountability Purposes: High-Stakes Testing Arguments in Support of High-Stakes Testing Programs  Goal Clarity  Improved Quality Control  Beneficial Effects for Teaching  Beneficial Effects for Students

Using Standardized Tests for Accountability Purposes: High-Stakes Testing Arguments Critical of High-Stakes Testing Programs  Structural Limitations  Misinterpretation and Misuse of Test Results  A One-Size-Fits-All Approach to Motivation  A One-Size-Fits-All Approach to Standards Undesirable Side Effects  See Online Video Case “Foundations: Aligning Instruction with Federal Legislation”

Using Standardized Tests for Accountability Purposes: High-Stakes Testing Research on the Effects of High-Stakes Testing Programs  Effect on Achievement  Effect on Motivation  Effect on Teachers and Teaching  Effect on the Curriculum Effect on the Dropout Rate  Use of School Choice and Supplemental Instructional Services

Using Standardized Tests for Accountability Purposes: High-Stakes Testing Recommendation for Improving High-Stakes Testing  Each state should adopt only those content standards that represent the most important knowledge and skills that students need to learn  A state’s content standards should clearly describe exactly what is being assessed so teachers can create lessons that directly address those standards  Scores on a state assessment should be reported on a standard-by-standard basis for each student, school, and district  States should provide school districts with additional assessment procedures to assess those standards that the required assessment does not cover  States should monitor the curricula of school districts to ensure that instruction addresses all content standards and subjects, not just those assessed by the required state test

Using Standardized Tests for Accountability Purposes: High-Stakes Testing Recommendations for Improving High-Stakes Testing (cont’d)  State assessments should be designed so that all students have an equal opportunity to demonstrate which of the state’s standards they have mastered  All tests should satisfy the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing of the American Educational Research Association and similar test quality guidelines  Teachers and principals should receive professional development training that helps them use test results to optimize children’s learning  States should continually seek to improve the quality of their assessments

Standardized Testing and Technology Using Technology to Prepare Students for Assessments  Some state web sites provide content and performance standards, examples of items, practice tests, and test preparation programs of for-profit companies Using Technology to Assess Mastery of Standards Computer-based testing programs  Computer-based essay scoring Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT)  Computers determine sequence and difficulty level of test items 13