Accountability Policy Update (Districts) Changes to Bulletin 111 From Sept 2003 – June 2004 Louisiana Department of Education.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Understanding the New Graduation Rate Sample Presentation 1.

Advertisements

Cohort Graduation Exit Code Review December 18, 2014.

Student Learning Targets (SLT)

No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.

‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.

What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.

Pershing Pershing Annual Meeting Title I AYP/School Improvement.

Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.

Accountability Cleanup - or - How I Learned to Improve My SPS Without Really Trying January 29-30, 2008.

Louisiana School Turnaround Specialist Program

Alaska’s New Accountability System for Schools 1.

Accountability Policy Update (Schools) Changes to Bulletin 111 From Sept 2003 – June 2004 Louisiana Department of Education.

District Accountability Update May February 2007.

Understanding Massachusetts’ new accountability measures November 2012.

Flexibility in Determining AYP for Students with Disabilities Background Information—Slides 2—4 School Eligibility Criteria—Slide 5 Calculation of the.

MINNEAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS. Instructional Core Adapted from Harvard University PELP Framework.

Fontana Unified School District Student Achievement Data September 17, 2008 Instructional Services Assessment & Evaluation.

Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?

Title I Annual Meeting Presented by: SCHOOL NAME HERE.

Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.

Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.

Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.

A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.

Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations.

ESEA Waiver and Accountability Status School Committee Presentation September 24, 2013.

Cowen Institute Data/Accountability Overview. Measuring Performance RSD created to address Academic Failure Success/Failure needs to be judged on whether.

Adequate Yearly Progress Kansas State Department of Education 2007 Fall Assessment Conference Judi Miller,

1 Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) Steve Martin, CMT Program Manager Bureau of Research, Evaluation, and Student Assessment Connecticut State Department.

School Accountability Update July 2005-March 2006.

The elements of the proposed accountability model are subject to change.

Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.

Appoquinimink School District A Bright Horizon for MHS Corrective Action Plan 3 Year Plan December, 2007.

Star Rating Part 2 Growth, Graduation Rates and College and Career Readiness.

No Child Left Behind Education Week

School Accountability Update Fall 2006 – Summer 2007.

AYP Accountability Participation Proficiency Attendance Rate Graduation Rate AAI Subgroups Safe Harbor Uniform Averaging Confidence Interval School Improvement.

Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.

Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.

NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.

1 Cohort Graduation Rate October 1, 2010 Jonathan Wiens and Sara Berscheit Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.

Governor Edward G. Rendell GERALD L. ZAHORCHAK, D.ED., ACTING SECRETARY PSSA and AYP Results STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IN PENNSYLVANIA.

School Accountability Update September 2006 – April 2007.

The Importance of MSIS Data for Assessment Reporting and Accountability Office of Research & Statistics Mississippi Department of Education July 2004.

On the horizon: State Accountability Systems U.S. Department of Education Office of Elementary and Secondary Education October 2002 Archived Information.

1 Mississippi Statewide Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress Model Improving Mississippi Schools Conference June 11-13, 2003 Mississippi Department.

District Accountability Update July 2004-March 2005.

School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.

AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.

Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.

What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.

Anderson School Accreditation We commit to continuous growth and improvement by  Creating a culture for learning by working together  Providing.

Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.

Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!

Update on Accountability March “…to ensure that all children have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high-quality education.

Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]

Communication Webinar:

Accountability in California Before and After NCLB

Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools

2012 Accountability Determinations

ABCs/AYP Background Briefing

Accountability Codes and Data Certification

Presented by Joseph P. Stern

AYP and Report Card.

Meeting the challenge Every Classroom Every Student Every Day

Adequate Yearly Progress: What’s Old, What’s New, What’s Next?

Presentation transcript:

Accountability Policy Update (Districts) Changes to Bulletin 111 From Sept 2003 – June 2004 Louisiana Department of Education

District Accountability Results Districts will be provided three sets of accountability results  District Performance Score (DPS) – calculated like a school performance score  District Responsibility Index (DRI) – made up of 4 district-level indicators  District Subgroup Component – used to determine if the district’s subgroups made Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Bulletin 111, Section 4301

District Performance Score Labels (Bulletin 111, Section 4311) Performance LabelDPS Academically Unacceptable Below 45.0 Academic Warning One Star Two Stars Three Stars Four Stars Five Stars140 and above

Changes to DRI Indicator #4 Calculation changed to Percent of State Core Classes Taught by Certified Teachers Definition of a low Performing School - a school whose SPS is below 80.0 Definition of Certified teachers – includes standard certificates and 12-hour rule Bulletin 111, Section 4309

District Responsibility Index Labels Changed DRI LabelDRI Value Highly Responsive120 and above Adequately Responsive Responsive Minimally Responsive Unresponsive Bulletin 111, Section 4311

District Subgroup Component AYP Districts are evaluated for Subgroup Component AYP in the same manner as schools (Steps 1-10) Bulletin 111, Section 4310

District Consequences Districts that receive a DRI label of Unresponsive and/or fail to achieve Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) in the Subgroup Component  Year 1 - Self-assessment submitted to LDE  Year 2 – District Improvement Plan  Year 3 – Audit by LDE  Year 4 – BESE action on Audit Bulletin 111, Section 4313

LAA 1% Proficient Cap The Percent of LAA students that are classified proficient in a district cannot exceed 1% of the students in the assessed grades Bulletin 111, Section 703

Reconfiguration/Reconstitutions Districts should consult with the LDE to determine the effects of major reconstitutions/reconfigurations Bulletin 111, Section 3303

Routing Option I Data Scores, attendance and dropout data for students in Option I routing schools will be sent back to the student’s home-based district Bulletin 111, Section 3503

District Accountability Data Corrections Districts should appeal incorrect data or results during the School appeal window, with the exception of summer school data Districts will be given an extra opportunity to appeal summer school results for 30 days after these scores are available Bulletin 111, Section 4317