Pomona Unified School District Standard Practices for Data Analysis Silvia San Martin Teacher Specialist Research and Assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
1 R-2 Report: Read and write at the end of third grade Work session on Strategies to meet Results Targets A presentation to the Board of Education by Brad.
Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.
Agenda - January 28, 2009 Professional Learning Community – Jefferson HS Learning by Doing What does the data tell us? ITED results SIP Goals Data Questions.
A Guide to Implementation
How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Central Union High School District Board of Trustees Meeting April 16, 2013.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
School District of University City Jackson Park Elementary School SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Joylynn Wilson, Superintendent Monica Hudson, Principal.
MATHEMATICS Support for Single Plan for Student Achievement.
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
Standards Aligned System April 21, 2011 – In-Service.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Stone-Robinson Math Information Night Dr. Nicholas King, Principal December 9, 2014.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
Jackson Public School District Holistic Accountability in Action.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
Building Leadership Teams Driving Continuous Improvement Throughout the School! Session #3 January 2012.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Hollywood High School Testing Data Results WASC Goals and Instructional Focus October 6, 2009.
Division Liaison Update Division Liaison Meeting The College of William and Mary January 7, 2013.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
DeAnn Huinker, UW-Milwaukee MMP Principal Investigator 26 August 2008 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under.
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
THE KEY TO CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP The key to predictable results in improving student achievement requires connecting curriculum, assessment and instruction.
PLC Action Teams, Instructional Services, 2008 Every individual in our school community is essential, every resource is vital, and every minute is precious.
English Language Arts Single Plan for Student Achievement.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
To Test or Not to Test?...that is the question! By: Sandy Church and Linda Lerch.
Mt. Diablo Unified School District Elementary Mathematics Adoption Buy Back Day Thursday, August 27, 2009.
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Cultural Shifts: Rethinking what we do and why we do it Together, we can make a difference.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
LANSING, MI APRIL 11, 2011 Title IIA(3) Technical Assistance #2.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
LAUSD Student Data ELD Implementation Report 2006.
The PLC Team Learning Process Review Step One: Identify essential (key) learning standards that all students must learn in each content area during each.
Assessment Design. Four Professional Learning Modules 1.Unpacking the AC achievement standards 2.Validity and reliability of assessments 3. Confirming.
P.R.I.D.E. School Professional Day :45 am- 3:30 pm.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Setting SMART Goals for The central purpose of the Professional Learning Community (PLC) is for the teacher to develop a new understanding.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 3 Study: Analyze Data Set Goals and Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice.
EVAAS and Expectations. Answers the question of how effective a schooling experience is for learners Produces reports that –Predict student success –Show.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
On The Right Road Moving Forward From a Lowest Achieving School to a High Progress Rewards School Fitzgerald High School Ben Hill County.
Building RTI Capacity Through the Lens of a Coach Curriculum and Instruction Department.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental IV: Multi-Tiered System of Supports.
“. BEAR VALLEY ELEMENTARY API: OVERALL AYP : ELA % of students scoring prof or adv on CST.
ABC School Data Wall Our priorities for District Goals – 1) Ensure individual students continuously exhibit academic and personal.
Transition to the Common Core LVUSD. The Challenge The Common Core curriculum itself will not look radically different from the lessons teachers.
ILEADR Consultants: Brie Beane & Amanda Goulds. Prior to RtI  Academic Ranking- 55 th  Graduation Rate- 61% (53rd)  SAT- 57 th  Dropout Rate- 6.5%
Single Plan For Student Achievement January 27, 2016 Los Angeles Unified School District Local District Northwest “Building Academic Excellence Through.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
K-6 Benchmark Assessment Inservices
Single Plan For Student Achievement
Presentation transcript:

Pomona Unified School District Standard Practices for Data Analysis Silvia San Martin Teacher Specialist Research and Assessment

Assumptions “Schools are rational entities.” Deciding What to Teach and Test - Developing, Aligning and Auditing the Curriculum -Fenwick W. English

We will be gathering your responses via the i-clicker during the general session Your responses are completely anonymous Used to review prior knowledge and check for understanding

A stranger falls down and breaks his leg. You should: A. Call for help. B. Laugh. C. Break the other leg. D. Pretend you're a doctor and try to set the leg. Test Run

Has Module 1 been completed at your school site? A. Yes B. No

Has Module 2 been completed at your school site? A. Yes B. No

Has every teacher identified and submitted the names of their targeted students? A. Yes B. No

Context and Purpose The purpose for reviewing the Modules is more about an honest analysis of our entire faculty’s goal setting approach and processes than a “ HOW TO” on filling out forms. If you require assistance in the either please see me before the end of the day, or call.

Module 1 Accountability Systems Federal and State systems – Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) – Title III Accountability (English Learners) – Academic Performance Index (API)

Module 2 Analyzing Data and Setting Targets Performance Analysis Targeted Gains Curricular Focus Attachments A, B, and C

Which statement best describes how the entire faculty approached Module 2 this year? A. An opportunity to reflect and set goals that will guide instructional practices throughout the year. B. Reflected on the data but need guidance in maintaining the focus throughout the year. C. Faculty just wanted to complete the paperwork and turn it in to fulfill requirement. D. Module 2 was completed only by a select team of teachers and administrators.

Which of the following outcomes of Module 2 do you feel have the greatest impact on your site’s PLC work throughout this year? A. Identifying instructional strategies to be implemented across the grade level or the department. B. Determine curricular content clusters focus areas. C. Select students for targeted intervention and proficiency. D. Inform the ongoing work of PLC

Attachment A Look at past year and reflect on pacing and teaching strategies used Concerns and trends with subgroups Did we really FOCUS on the curricular focus areas from the previous year? Did our strategies work? Should be completed before Attachment B Module 2

Which of the following is not a content cluster area in ELA on the CST? A. Word analysis and Vocabulary B. Reading Fluency C. Reading Comprehension D. Writing Conventions E. Writing Strategies

A. Estimation,Percents and Factoring B. Mathematical Reasoning C. Algebra and Functions D. Measurement and Geometry E. Statistics, Data Analysis, Probability Which of the following is not a content cluster area in Grade 5 Mathematics on the CST?

A. Mathematical Reasoning B. Exponents, Powers, Roots C. Quantitative Relationships & Evaluating Expressions D. Measurement and Geometry E. Statistics, Data Analysis, Probability Which of the following is not a content cluster area in Grade 7 Mathematics on the CST?

A. Quadratics& Polynomials B. Graphing & Linear Equations C. Deductive and Inductive Reasoning D. Number Properties,Operations& Linear Equations Which of the following is not a content cluster area in Algebra on the CST?

Attachment B Identify curricular focus areas based on findings from Attachment A Select appropriate strategies for identified focus areas Module 2

A. Yes B. No Should we be looking at our new students to identify curricular focus areas on Attachment B?

Attachment B Question No. Tests at the different grade levels, while they have the same content clusters, are not built exactly the same and are weighted differently. An example is the difference in student performance in 2 nd and 3 rd grade. The difference in performance on these two exams is attributed to the construction and weighting of the clusters. Module 2

Attachment C Determine how many focus students there will be per teacher Select from your current students English Learners Informs the ongoing work of PLCs Module 2

APSA Section VI

Informing the Work of PLCs District-Wide Assessments

Why are the DWAs important? A. I don’t think they are important B. I am not sure, please explain C. I know why they are important, but our staff struggles with how to use them (formative, summative, for grading etc.) D. I know why they are important and our staff uses them regularly and appropriately

Purpose of District-Wide Assessments Teach the standards Informs the curriculum design Used to help Identify teaching strategies Summarize growth of students in content areas Provide diagnostic information Provide accountability information

What is not the intended purpose of the DWA? Not a Test Preparation Program Not entirely summative Does not use the same metric as the CST and does not correlate exactly to CST

Why is the DWA Valuable? Standards-Aligned Used for placement, reclassification Provides common data for PLCs/STPT Item analysis reports Timely data for interventions

Module 3 : STPT / PLC Ongoing Data-Driven Instruction Also Known As: Structured Teacher Planning Time (STPT) or Professional Learning Communities (PLC) Monitoring student learning using DWA and other formative assessments Professional development tied to learning goals Teams meet 1-5 times per month Classroom walkthroughs can provide qualitative data for this process

How often did our PLC teams meet last year? A. WHAAAAT ? We were supposed to meet? B. We met after the benchmarks but department meetings are reserved for information dissemination C. We met after the benchmarks,and also focused our weekly department meetings with conversations around instructional goals and sharing strategies

Module 4 Module 4: Closing the Achievement Gap Using the Academic Plan for Student Achievement Data analysis and APSA Smart Goals Monitor progress of all students and appropriate interventions have been initiated with the specific activities identified in APSA Review trend data used to identify achievement gaps

Module 4 Revisits the APSA Uses 3 year data for all subgroups as it relates to API, AYP and DWA Examines the movement between the performance Bands Focuses primarily on closing the Achievement Gap for our underserved subgroups. In Depth

In which modules do you need additional support to ensure that the work of your site’s PLCs is data-driven? A. Module 1 B. Module 2 C. Module 3 D. Module 4

Key Actions In order to increase the likelihood of success with the content of the sessions presented today, sites must have completed – Module 2 Attachments A, B, and C