---Shane Grimes ---Dan Hartz ---Veronica Hobbs PROMOTING YOUR STRENGTHS IN THE EVALUATION PROCESS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professional Development for School Leaders Technical Assistance Phase 3 Implementation and Documentation.
Advertisements

Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results.
Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines. The single most influential component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school.
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Teacher Evaluation and Pay for Performance Michigan Education Association Spring 2011.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
Department of Employee Relations June Unsatisfactory performance and/or behavior of non-instructional staff can be addressed through progressive.
Teacher evaluation in NJ: 2013 PRESENTERS’ NAMES REBUTTAL WRITING TRAINING.
Union Representation A guide to a member’s right to union representation.
Performance Management Guide for Supervisors. Objectives  Understand necessity of reviews;  To define a rating standard across the Foundation for an.
Teacher Evaluation Model
Tenure and Promotion for Extension Faculty: Tips for the Evaluated and the Evaluators Larry Smith Executive Senior Vice Provost Utah State University Annual.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Performance Based Teacher Evaluation March 10, 2006.
Chapter 16 Becoming a Better Teacher by Becoming a Reflective Teacher.
Skills for Effective Parent Advocacy
Employment Forms To begin employment at Wallace Community College and to ensure you will receive your paycheck, complete the forms located on the.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Classified Staff Performance Appraisal
RESIGNATION LETTERS. Job Resignation Do’s and Don’ts  Do know how to resign from your job gracefully and professionally.  Don’t get caught off-guard,
Common Sense Customer Service All the people we come into contact with during the day are our customers. Customers include students, parents, visitors,
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
Unit 2: Managing the development of self and others Life Science and Chemical Science Professionals Higher Apprenticeships Unit 2 Managing the development.
Time Management and Crucial Conversations for Principals.
An Educational Computer Based Training Program CBTCBT.
Developing an accessibility strategy. In this talk we will discuss an accessibility strategy an accessibility policy getting started - steps to consultation.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
AN ASSESSMENT SYSTEM FOR EVALUATING STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES IN COOPERATIVE EDUCATION James E. Colbert, Jr., Ph.D. Lander University Greenwood, SC.
Guidance Documents November 2011 Brought to you by: Department of Planning and Budget.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
Initial Referrals NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Department November 24 th, 2008.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
The Facts About Schoolsite Councils The Roles and Responsibilities of a Schoolsite Council.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
Secaucus Reflect Live Observation Process Observer Guide.
Tier III Implementation. Define the Problem  In general - Identify initial concern General description of problem Prioritize and select target behavior.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
WLUSA/OSSTF Annual Performance Review Process Human Resources & WLUSA| 2015.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) Toronto District School Board January 20, 2015.
Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Chapter 48 Employment Strategies.
DPI PDP Verification Refresher Growing the Profession: Educator PDP Verification The Top Ten Things to Remember When Reviewing Educators’ PDPs for.
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education September 2010.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Ohio Principal Evaluation System Pike County Joint Vocational School March 7,
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Appraisal Training for Central Office and Campus-Based Non-Teacher Employees September 2013 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
Teacher Licensure PI-34 Wisconsin’s New Process. New License Stages  Initial Educator 5 year, non-renewable  Professional Educator 5 year renewable.
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
RESPONSIBILITIES & PROCEDURES
Avon Grove School District October 2009
Parent Communication with Purpose
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
New Teacher Evaluation Process
Approved Evaluator Training Provider Application Process
Faculty Promotions Information Meeting
11/30/2018 Approved Evaluator Training Provider on the Colorado State Model Evaluation System Application Process November 2016.
Survey Results Overview
Roles, Goals & Performance Expectations
Employment Strategies
Procedures for school teams to address struggling students
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module Two: Developing the Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLOP)
Presentation transcript:

---Shane Grimes ---Dan Hartz ---Veronica Hobbs PROMOTING YOUR STRENGTHS IN THE EVALUATION PROCESS

1.Bad things happen to good people. 2.We all have room for improvement. 3.The evaluation process may be flawed. 4.Some administrators do have shortcomings. 5.How we react in every situation will greatly impact the outcome. IMPORTANT POINTS TO PONDER

Your Rights to Representation 1.Do you know your Weingarten Rights? 2. Are you familiar with the Buddy System? 3. Who has to request/provide representation? 4. How do the new categories (Highly Effective, Effective, Improvement Necessary, and Ineffective) affect me? 5.What are the new timelines for dismissal due to a negative evaluation? 6.What are my obligations to non-members on representation? REPRESENTATION/EVALUATION

1.If your evaluation (or observation) is negative, or contains misleading statements, or reflects a decline in the level of evaluation to which you are accustomed, you must answer to said evaluation. 2.You must answer to your evaluation in a proper manner, with the help of your Association. 3.Un-rebutted negative evaluations and/or poorly fashioned responses could lead to your eventual dismissal. ASK FOR ASSISTANCE! 4.DO – Know your rights! DON’T – appear argumentative or inflexible! WRITING REBUTTALS TO NEGATIVE EVALUATIONS

1.From your local – Your local President(s), Grievance Chair, and/or Building Representative can help you maintain a positive, businesslike relationship with your evaluator. 2.From your UniServ Director –It is a good idea to contact a Local Representative first, if you need further assistance your Local Representative will direct you to the UD. 3.Editing – Please remember, sometimes emotion overrides objectivity when one deals with their own evaluation; it is difficult for the staff member to be objective when questioned about performance. Ask for editing help from others! 4.NEVER submit anything in writing to the administration without first having someone you trust check your work! ASK FOR ASSISTANCE

1.Understand the Evaluator/Issue. 2.Create a positive and professional tone. 3.Tighten up your format. 4.Never send a response to the administration without having a trusted colleague or an Association official check it for you. 5.Length – Keep it short and simple. 6.Use of words and terms – Don’t use personal characterizations of the evaluator. Instead, focus on your good qualities. Use words like inaccurate, misjudged, misunderstood, error, misread, out of context, etc. when referring to the evaluation. 7.Your response should look more thoughtful and professional than the evaluation report which generated it. A neutral third party examining the rebuttal should conclude that you are knowledgeable, professional, calm, competent, and rational. 8.Write the rebuttal (and your supporting evidence). Let it sit. Allow a colleague to review and revise if necessary. TIPS ON WRITING THE REBUTTAL

1.Opening – Please consider this my formal response to your Post Observation Summary Report, dated _____. 2.Positive Remarks – Thank your evaluator for noticing any positive aspects of your performance. 3.Concerns – Address those items that have caused you concern. Remain positive. 4.Strategies – Ask for recommendations for improvement. Cautiously add your own ideas for improvement. 5.Address Inaccuracies –Request deletions or clarifications of any information that is not true, has not been observed, or cannot be proven. 6.Summary – Summarize with a statement such as, “I work very had to do a good job for my students and will continue to do so.” Make sure that improvements and the timeline for implementation are attainable and that you are not being “set-up for failure.” Thank the evaluator for his/her time. 7.Documentation – Be sure to keep a copy for yourself and for your Association Representative of all documents. SAMPLE

1)Indiana Code is the chapter that deals with Staff Performance Evaluations. 2)Per IC – A school corporation shall implement the evaluation plan beginning with the school year. 3)The plan must include objective measure of student achievement and growth to significantly inform the evaluation. 4)The plan must include an annual designation of each certificated employee in one of the following rating categories: A) Highly Effective, B) Effective, C) Improvement Necessary, D) Ineffective. 5)The plan must include an explanation of the evaluator’s recommendations for improvement. If an “Improvement Plan” is created, it can last no longer than 90 days. (IC b) SEA 001

1)Per IC (b) – An individual may evaluate a certificated employee only if the individual has received training and support in evaluation skills. 2)Per IC – (a) A copy of the completed evaluation, including any documentation related to the evaluation, must be provided to a certificated employee not later than 7 days after the evaluation is conducted. 3)An “Improvement Plan” must require the use of the certificated employee’s license renewal credits in professional development activities intended to help the certificated employee achieve an effective rating on the next evaluation. SEA 001 (CONTD.)

1)A teacher who receives a rating of Ineffective may file a request for a private conference with the superintendent or the superintendent’s designee not later than 5 days after receiving notice that the teacher received a rating of Ineffective. (IC c) 2)Per IC – A student may not be instructed for 2 consecutive years by 2 consecutive teachers, each of whom was rated as Ineffective under this chapter in the school year immediately before the school year in which the student is placed in the respective teacher’s class (or in the school year in which the teacher most recently instructed students and received an Ineffective rating). 3)If it is not possible for a school corporation to comply with this section, the school corporation must notify the parents of each applicable student indicating the student will be place in a classroom of an Ineffective teacher. SEA 001 (CONTD.)

1)Per IC – Before August 1 of each year, each school corporation shall provide the results of the staff performance evaluations, including the number of certificated employees placed in each performance category, to the IDOE. The results provided may not include the names or any other personally identifiable information regarding certificated employees. 2)Before September 1 of each year, the IDOE shall report the results of staff performance evaluations to the state board, and to the public via the department’s Internet web site, for: the aggregate of certificated employees of each school and school corporation; and the aggregate of graduates of each teacher preparation program in Indiana. SEA 001 (CONTD.)

1)Ask for assistance! 2)Do not attend meetings with the administration without representation! 3)When in doubt, utilize your Association! THANK YOU! SUMMARY