Testing and Deployment of the Water Vapor Sensing System II David Helms Office of Science and Technology NOAA National Weather Service Briefing on the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© Crown copyright Met Office E-AMDAR evaluation. Mark Smees & Tim Oakley, Met Office, May 2008.
Advertisements

6/12/20141 NoN Recommendations: Measurements and Infrastructure Meteorological Assimilation Data Ingest System (MADIS) –Update Current Services and Capabilities.
Observing Networks and Data Aircraft Humidity Sensor Enters the E-AMDAR Fleet A. Hoff (Deutscher Wetterdienst, Department of Observing Networks and Data)
A numerical simulation of urban and regional meteorology and assessment of its impact on pollution transport A. Starchenko Tomsk State University.
The Application of In-Situ Observations to Weather, Water, and Climate Issues Ken Crawford Vice Administrator Korea Meteorological Administration WMO Technical.
Federal Aviation Administration Project Status Update: R90 Tracon, STL ATCT, MCI ATCT, mold and moisture issues Presented to : CSA Terminal and Technical.
MMT Update September 7, 2006 NOAA/NWS Activities Dave Helms Office of Science and Technology.
0 Future NWS Activities in Support of Renewable Energy* Dr. David Green NOAA, NWS Office of Climate, Water & Weather Services AMS Summer Community Meeting.
EXECUTIVE ROUNDTABLE SERIES 1 TAMDAR: Civil Aviation Benefits Bruce L. Lev, Vice Chairman AirDat LLC Real-Time Global Aircraft Tracking, Data Management,
Recent performance statistics for AMPS real-time forecasts Kevin W. Manning – National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR Earth System Laboratory Mesoscale.
National Weather Service Protecting Lives and Property 1  Advancements in the  AMDAR Humidity Sensing  August 31, 2010  Advancements in the  AMDAR.
1 AirWare : R elease R5.3 beta AERMOD/AERMET DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352 Gumpoldskirchen AUSTRIA
Validating the moisture predictions of AMPS at McMurdo using ground- based GPS measurements of precipitable water Julien P. Nicolas 1, David H. Bromwich.
Robert LaPlante NOAA/NWS Cleveland, OH David Schwab Jia Wang NOAA/GLERL Ann Arbor, MI 22 March 2011.
Soil Water Potential Peter Cull ICT International.
Proposed plan for developing a Mexico AMDAR Program David R. Helms Office of Science and Technology NOAA Naitonal Weather Service AMDAR Regional Workshop.
Bryce Ford SpectraSensors
Methods Results Abstract Materials References Contributors: Aviance Carter, Marlon Doyle, AveriSeelig, AyannaStukes Dr. Shermane Austin, Dr. Leon Johnson.
Progress in Chamber Simulation Experiments At UCSD Laser Facility Farrokh Najmabadi Kevin Sequoia, Sophia Chen HAPL Meeting September 24-25, 2003 University.
Deutscher Wetterdienst Measurement Technology Humidity Measurements by Aircraft of the E-AMDAR Fleet TECO 2008 Axel Hoff Deutscher Wetterdienst Observing.
GLFE MEETING NO. 3 April 12, 2004 TAMDAR Future Deployment Plans & Sensor/Performance Improvements Mark Anderson.
AMDAR Global Status, Benefits and Development Plans* WMO CBS ET Aircraft Based Observations Bryce Ford * Adapted from Presentation at WMO Congress XVII,
Leah Kos Sara Lavas Lauryn Gonzalez Mentor: Dr. Michael Douglas, NSSL.
Slide 1 Impact of GPS-Based Water Vapor Fields on Mesoscale Model Forecasts (5th Symposium on Integrated Observing Systems, Albuquerque, NM) Jonathan L.
Insert Date 1 Spectra Sensors, Inc and WVSS II Meeting Background David Helms NOAA/NWS/OST.
© TAFE MECAT 2008 Chapter 6(b) Where & how we take measurements.
GLFE Status Meeting April 11-12, Presentation topics Deployment status Data quality control Data distribution NCEP meeting AirDat display work Icing.
Observations From the Global AMDAR Program Presentation to WMO TECO May 2005 by Jeff Stickland Technical Coordinator, WMO AMDAR Panel.
TAMDAR AERIBAGO Validation Experiment (TAVE) - Memphis Wayne Feltz, Erik Olson, John Short, Sarah Bedka, Kristopher Bedka, Tim Wagner, and Scott Cultice.
A4A Meteorology Work Group Airline Sharing of Automated Aircraft Weather Data Can Restricted Access & Public Access Co-exist? Kory Gempler FedEx Meteorology.
1 Short Course on Meteorological Applications of Aircraft Weather Data Introduction and Brief History January 14, 2007 David Helms
Accounting for Uncertainties in NWPs using the Ensemble Approach for Inputs to ATD Models Dave Stauffer The Pennsylvania State University Office of the.
The Planetary Boundary Layer (PBL) is essentially what it says- ‘a layer that bounds the planet,’ specifically this planet, Earth. The PBL is one of two.
Wu Sponsors: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) New York.
Evaluation of the WVSS-II Sensor Using Co-located In-situ and Remotely Sensed Observations Sarah Bedka, Ralph Petersen, Wayne Feltz, and Erik Olson CIMSS.
WMO Aircraft-Based Observations Programme Strategy and Implementation Plan to 2025 WMO; Observing and Information Systems Department.
2006(-07)TAMDAR aircraft impact experiments for RUC humidity, temperature and wind forecasts Stan Benjamin, Bill Moninger, Tracy Lorraine Smith, Brian.
Observations From the Global AMDAR Programme Presentation to WMO TECO December 2006 by Michael Berechree Technical Coordinator, WMO AMDAR Panel.
Project goals Evaluate the accuracy and precision of the CO2 DIAL system, in particular its ability to measure: –Typical atmospheric boundary layer - free.
MADIS Airlines for America Briefing Meteorological Assimilated Data Ingest System (MADIS) FPAW Briefing Steve Pritchett NWS Aircraft Based Observations.
NOAA Council on Long-Term Climate Monitoring (CLTCM) Eighth Meeting in Chicago, Illinois, March The Council identified three strategic issues.
More on Wind Shear Statistics: Intercomparison of Measurements from Airborne DWL and Ground-based Sensors S. Greco and G.D. Emmitt Simpson Weather Associates.
DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW LETTUCE ICE FORECAST SYSTEM FOR YUMA COUNTY Paul Brown Mike Leuthold University of Arizona.
Meteorological Observatory Lindenberg Results of the Measurement Strategy of the GCOS Reference Upper Air Network (GRUAN) Holger Vömel, GRUAN.
Provision of AMDAR Data for the Region David R. Helms Office of Science and Technology NOAA National Weather Service AMDAR Regional Workshop Mexico City,
October 02, st IHOP_2002 Water Vapor Intercomparison Workshop Status of intercomparisons and the next steps  Characterize moisture measuring techniques.
Layered Water Vapor Quick Guide by NASA / SPoRT and CIRA Why is the Layered Water Vapor Product important? Water vapor is essential for creating clouds,
WMO AMDAR Programme Overview Bryce Ford - presenting on behalf of WMO and NOAA FPAW Nov 1, 2012.
The Ross Island Meteorology Experiment (RIME): An International Collaborative Investigation of Antarctic Meteorology and Climate David Bromwich Polar Meteorology.
Comparison of Radiosonde and Profiler Data with ACARS Data for Describing the Great Plains Low-Level Jet Ross W. Bradshaw Meteorology Program, Dept. of.
SiSPAT-Isotope model Better estimates of E and T Jessie Cable Postdoc - IARC.
What aircraft and instruments might I use for my research and do I find out about it/them? Jeff Stith Photo by Grant Gray, EOL.
Performance Comparison of an Energy- Budget and the Temperature Index-Based (Snow-17) Snow Models at SNOTEL Stations Fan Lei, Victor Koren 2, Fekadu Moreda.
1 Short Course on Meteorological Applications of Aircraft Weather Data Future Plans – Opportunities for the Private Sector January 14, 2007 Kevin Johnston.
Evaluations of AMDAR Observations using Co-Located Radiosonde and Inter-Aircraft Comparisons Lee Cronce 1, Ralph Petersen 1, Erik Olson 1, Wayne Feltz.
FPAW Surface Observations Panel August 8, 2012 Dr. Curtis H. Marshall NWS/Office of Science and Technology The National Mesonet Program.
TAMDAR Status FPAW Forum November 11, The patented TAMDAR sensor Measures and derives: Ice presence Median and peak turbulence Winds aloft Indicated.
GOES Users’ Conference IV May 1-3, 2006 Broomfield, CO Prepared by Integrated Work Strategies, LLC 1 GOES USERS’ CONFERENCE IV: Discussion Highlights Numerical.
A. FY12-13 GIMPAP Project Proposal Title Page version 26 October 2011 Title: WRF Cloud and Moisture Verification with GOES Status: New GOES Utilization.
The NCAR Microwave Temperature Profiler: Data Applications from Recent Deployments Julie Haggerty, Kelly Schick, Chris Davis National Center for Atmospheric.
The application of Models-3 in national policy Samantha Baker Air and Environment Quality Division, Defra.
Impact of soil moisture on near-surface atmospheric layers
“Consolidation of the Surface-to-Atmosphere Transfer-scheme: ConSAT
NPOESS Airborne Sounder Testbed (NAST)
Mark A. Bourassa and Qi Shi
Progress in Weather Observations
Assorted Observation Systems
Friends and Partners NBAA 2003
Meteorological Measurements for Improved Air Quality Modeling
Presentation transcript:

Testing and Deployment of the Water Vapor Sensing System II David Helms Office of Science and Technology NOAA National Weather Service Briefing on the U.S. Aircraft Observation Program for the Japan Meteorological Agency

Outline Project Background 2008 Sensor Re-Design Sterling Upper-Air Test Facility (SUATF) Assessment Factory Test and Calibration Protocols Follow-up Testing and Assessment: –SUATF Cabin Environment Simulation Testing –DWD Chamber Tests –NOAA P-3 Flight Tests –CIMSS AERIBAGO Field Test –Statistical Model Inter-Comparisons –Ad Hoc GPS-Met and Radiosonde IPW Inter-Comparisons Deployment Timeline Next Steps 2

Project Background: What is the Benefit? Infrastructure Needs: Mesoscale observations above and below the atmosphere’s lowest ten meters are particularly inadequate. The highest priority observations needed to address current inadequacies are: Height of the planetary boundary layer Soil moisture and temperature profiles High resolution vertical profiles of humidity Measurements of air quality and related chemical composition above the surface layer Second tier national observing gaps: Direct and diffuse solar radiation Vertical profiles of wind Sub-surface temperature profiles (e.g., under pavement) Icing near the surface Vertical profiles of temperature Surface turbulence parameters Recommendation: Collect atmospheric profiles nationally at approximately 400 sites (~125 km resolution) to continually monitor lower tropospheric conditions. “Ground Up” Report Link:

Project Background WVSS R&D completed under contract through UCAR, WVSS I first flown on 30 United Parcel Service (UPS) B-757 aircraft in WVSS II “alpha” version replaced WVSS I sensors in 2005 WVSS II “beta” replaced “alpha” version in 2006

SSI 2008 Sensor Re-Design Improve the laser head seal. –Eliminated moisture intrusion into the laser head cavity (wet bias). –Improved the sensor stability over time (long term sensor stability). Modified the signal processing circuit to improve the thermal insensitivity. –Improved the observed dry bias by component and circuit upgrades. –Improved the performance over changing temperature by temperature measurement upgrades. Improved the laser thermal control loop. –Improved the laser wavelength stability by an improved thermal control loop. Upgrades to the processor from the petrochemical board experiences. –Improvements to noise levels and thermal insensitivity. Upgrade the thermal management of the system. –Isolate the SEB from the fuselage structure to improve the thermal environment for the electronics and laser head. –Isolate the laser head from the sample cell to improve the thermal environment for the laser head. –Upgrade the gas temperature monitor and gas temperature management to assure that the gas temperature is correct in the concentration computation. –Increased thermal heating of the gas heating system. Added a test connector to the exterior of the SEB –Allows SSI to perform the final functional and calibration testing after the SEB is completely assembled and enclosed. –Provides for a post installation functional test to assure that the units are working after installation. SSI recommends a breakout box for this testing.

NOAA Sterling Upper-Air Test Facility Assessment WVSSII EdgeTech Chilled Mirror Thunder Scientific 4500

WVSSII and Reference Sensors tested to within 5.1% of each other at the Sterling Upper-Air Test Facility SUATF Assessment Results: WVSSII vs. Reference Sensor Test Results: September 3-5, 2008

Modified enclosure for improved assembly and testing Infant burn in of all units (laser and SEB) Factory Testing and Calibration Protocols Extensive SSI internal testing. Functional Pressure/Temperature cycling Purge and leak testing Heater system testing Calibration (Pressure and Temperature) Post Installation testing –Breakout box Long term testing (2 units – 1 year to 18 months) Will test 100% of the units.

Calibration Changes to the Pressure/Temperature Matrix Previous WVSSII calibration was not tailored to individual sensors, but rather used 16 different pre-generated matrices, selecting the one of 16 P/T matrices which most closely optimized senor output. Despite 2008 improved sensor electronics, the WVSSII performance at the factory and on NWS test stand was not performing to required standards. SSI conducted an analysis of the P/T calibration methodology and made the following changes: Software allows for calibration of non-linear values below 3,000 PPMV Improved accuracy of the P/T matrix mapping by using a single matrix tied to each sensor’s 3 rd degree polynomial calibration coefficients Computed rather than stored P/T matrix. Advantage of P/T matrix is that the software is the same for every system with the only difference being in the coefficients of the terms of the equation.

WVSSII Design Change Impact : 2006 verses 2008 Performance Input gas 1000 PPMV calibrated gas over temperature from -15 to + 35 Deg. C for 2006 and 2008 versions of WVSSII 2008 unit includes the upgraded spectrometer, upgraded electronics, vacuum sealed laser head, a corrected P/T matrix and a P/T matrix point- to-point interpolator. 2006: >25% Variance 2008: <3% Variance

WVSSII Contract Milestones Completed Tasks: –NOAA Solicitation: August 2006 –Contract Award to ARINC/SSI/SWA: June 2007 –Critical Design Review: March 19, 2008 –Parts Ordered: June 1, 2008 –Government Chamber Tests: July and September, 2008 –Production Readiness Review: October 28, 2008 Future Milestones: –Receive Special Type Certificate (STC) and Parts Manufacturing Authority (PMA) for B-737, B-757: March 2009 –Production Run: Build/Test 80 WVSSII units: March 2009 –Install 31 WVSS II on Southwest B-737: April-June 2009 –Replace 25 WVSSII on UPS B-757: April-June 2009

Remaining WVSSII Test Objectives Sterling Upper-Air Test Facility: –Cabin Bay Simulation Test: SEB environmental temps from -5C to 30C –Re-test units using expanded test protocol points and latest EPROM calibration coefficients Conduct flight test on NOAA P-3 with reference sensor DWD/KLM will provide independent testing opportunities (chamber and extended flight tests) CIMSS/AERIBAGO Field Test: –1 week test after first WVSSII units installed on B-757 (May 2009) –1 week test after all WVSSII units installed on B-757 (August 2009) Develop a monitoring database of AMDAR and GPS-Met Integrated Precipitable Water (IPW) at co-incident time/space “pairs” Assess ARINC monitoring web page for WVSSII

WVSSII Installations: by June 2009 Generating ~800 Soundings/Day Southwest Airlines B-737 Schematics for WVSSII Installation United Parcel Service B-757 WVSSII Installation

NOAA posted a second Water Vapor Request For Proposals (RFP) for contract solicitations on November 10, 2008, with a December 10, 2008 closing date. NOAA options within this RFP include: –Extending or expanding the AirDat contract for data access to its TAMDAR observations –Increasing the number of WVSSII sensors installed on AMDAR equipped aircraft –Other options, as determined by RFP solicitations Despite budget pressures, NOAA continues to receive support for its aircraft water vapor program, and the potential exists for growth in future budget years. Success of the NOAA aircraft water vapor program will be enhanced with greater programmatic coordination with our National Meteorological Service partners in AMDAR and with U.S. Federal Agencies (DOT/FAA in particular). Future NOAA/NWS Water Vapor Program

Contact Info: David Helms NOAA/NWS Office of Science and Technology Aircraft Water Vapor Science Lead Phone: x193 NOAA AMDAR Web Page: Questions??? AMDAR Flight Level Winds WVSSII Sounding