Demonstration Problem

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alternative Algorithms
Advertisements

Flexible Budgets and Standard Costs
Inventories: Additional Issues
Name: Date: Read temperatures on a thermometer Independent / Some adult support / A lot of adult support
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Job Order Costing Chapter 4.
Demonstration Problem
Win Big AddingSubtractEven/Odd Rounding Patterns Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Last Chance.
Multiplication X 1 1 x 1 = 1 2 x 1 = 2 3 x 1 = 3 4 x 1 = 4 5 x 1 = 5 6 x 1 = 6 7 x 1 = 7 8 x 1 = 8 9 x 1 = 9 10 x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = 12 X 2 1.
Division ÷ 1 1 ÷ 1 = 1 2 ÷ 1 = 2 3 ÷ 1 = 3 4 ÷ 1 = 4 5 ÷ 1 = 5 6 ÷ 1 = 6 7 ÷ 1 = 7 8 ÷ 1 = 8 9 ÷ 1 = 9 10 ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = 12 ÷ 2 2 ÷ 2 =
Objectives: Calculate percentages using non-calculator methods. Calculate percentages less than 10% and values other than multiples of 10. Vocabulary:
1 1  1 =.
1  1 =.
CLASSIFY SIDES PYTHAGOREAN THEOREM CLASSIFY ANGLES SIMPLIFY RADICALS MISC
Year 6 mental test 15 second questions Numbers and number system Numbers and the number system, Measures and Shape.
Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?
£1 Million £500,000 £250,000 £125,000 £64,000 £32,000 £16,000 £8,000 £4,000 £2,000 £1,000 £500 £300 £200 £100 Welcome.
Welcome to Who Wants to be a Millionaire
Click to edit Master title style 1 1 Inventories 6.
Inventories and Cost of Goods Sold
Merchandise Inventory,
COST-VOLUME-PROFIT (CVP) ANALYSIS
Case Study.
INVENTORY AND OVERHEAD
ACC 3200 Chapter 3: Process Costing Process Costing.
Created for ENMU Tutoring/Supplemental Instruction Huff Fall 2011 By Jessica Huff.
ORDER OF OPERATIONS LESSON 2 DAY 2. BEDMAS B – Brackets E – Exponents D – Division from left to right M – Multiply from left to right A – Add from left.
$100 $200 $300 $400 $100 $200 $300 $400 $100 $200 $300 $400 $100 $200 $300 $400 $100 $200 $300 $400.
Order of Operations Lesson
Job Order and Process Costing
J J EOPARDY Lets Get Ready To Play Some.... Solve One Step Equations Solve Two Step Equations Solve Other Equations Word Problems to Equations
Analyzing Transactions
Introduction to Cost Behavior and Cost-Volume Relationships
Chapter 51 Inventory. Chapter 52 Comparison of Perpetual and Periodic Inventory Systems.
IAS 11 - Revenue recognition for construction contracts
An Introduction to International Economics
Life Tables STA 220.
7 - 1 ©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Flexible Budgets, Variances, and Management Control: I Chapter.
Inventories: Additional Issues
Cost-Volume-Profit Relationships
Chapter 4 Systems of Linear Equations; Matrices
MCQ Chapter 07.
Reporting and Interpreting Cost of Goods Sold and Inventory
Inventories: Measurement
Accounting for Inventories. Inventory Costs All expenditures incurred.
Merchandise Inventory,
Reporting & Interpreting Cost of Goods Sold & Inventory Libby, Libby & Short.
Merchandise Inventory,
1 CHAPTER 7 Cost of Goods Sold & Inventory. 2 Key Terms Inventory (beginning, ending) Cost of goods sold (COGS) Inventory cost flow assumptions Lower.
Inven - Cost - 1Inventory Basic Valuation Methods.
CHAPTER F9 Challenging Issues Under Accrual Accounting: Merchandise Inventory and Cost of Goods Sold © 2007 Pearson Custom Publishing.
Inventory May 2010©Kimberly Lyons 1. Goods purchased or produced for resale Merchandiser (retailer) purchases for resale Manufacturer produces for resale.
CENTURY 21 ACCOUNTING © 2009 South-Western, Cengage Learning LESSON 2-1 Using T Accounts.
Model and Relationships 6 M 1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Merchandising Activities Chapter 6.
Rickleton Primary School Calculation Policy
Subtraction: Adding UP
Equal or Not. Equal or Not
Slippery Slope
A Closer Look at Food Cost
Look at these sequences. What is happening? 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, , 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800,
Number bonds to 10,
Fractions Simplify: 36/48 = 36/48 = ¾ 125/225 = 125/225 = 25/45 = 5/9
Fundamentals of Cost Analysis for Decision Making
Partial Products. Category 1 1 x 3-digit problems.
PSSA Preparation.
One step equations Add Subtract Multiply Divide Addition X + 5 = -9 X = X = X = X = X = 2.
Demonstration Problem
Chapter Eight Inventory. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company.All rights reserved Inventory Assets a company holds that will ultimately be sold.
Presentation transcript:

Demonstration Problem Accounting What the Numbers Mean 9e Demonstration Problem Chapter 5 – Problem 27 Cost Flow Assumptions – FIFO and LIFO Using Periodic and Perpetual Systems

Problem Definition The inventory records of Kuffel Co. reflected the following information for the year ended December 31, 2010: Number Unit Total Date Transaction of Units Cost Cost 1/1 Beginning inventory. . . . . . . . . . 150 $30 $4,500 2/22 Purchase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 33 2,310 3/7 Sale. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (100) -- -- 4/15 Purchase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 35 3,150 6/11 Purchase. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140 36 5,040 9/28 Sale. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (100) -- -- 10/13 Purchase. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 38 1,900 12/4 Sale. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (100) -- --

Problem Definition Assume that Kuffel Co. uses a periodic inventory system. Calculate cost of goods sold and ending inventory under FIFO and LIFO. Assume that Kuffel Co. uses a perpetual inventory system. Calculate cost of goods sold and ending inventory under FIFO and LIFO. Explain why the FIFO results for cost of goods sold and ending inventory are the same in your answers to parts a and b, but the LIFO results are different.

Problem Solution Solution approach: Calculate goods available for sale in units and dollars, and ending inventory in units. These amounts are the same for both FIFO and LIFO under either a periodic or perpetual inventory system.

Problem Solution Calculation of goods available for sale: Beginning inventory. . . . . . . . . . 150 @ $30 = $ 4,500 Beginning inventory is a distinct layer - separate from each purchase layer added during the period. The number of units of each layer of inventory is multiplied by the cost per unit to get total costs.

Problem Solution Calculation of goods available for sale: Beginning inventory. . . . . . . . . . 150 @ $30 = $ 4,500 Purchases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 @ 33 = 2,310 90 @ 35 = 3,150 140 @ 36 = 5,040 50 @ 38 = 1,900 Each of the purchases during the period is treated as a separate layer of inventory.

Problem Solution Calculation of goods available for sale: Beginning inventory. . . . . . . . . . 150 @ $30 = $ 4,500 Purchases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 @ 33 = 2,310 90 @ 35 = 3,150 140 @ 36 = 5,040 50 @ 38 = 1,900 Goods available for sale. . . . . . . 500 $16,900 Beginning inventory plus the total purchases made during the period equals goods available for sale.

Problem Solution Calculation of goods available for sale: Beginning inventory. . . . . . . . . . 150 @ $30 = $ 4,500 Purchases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 @ 33 = 2,310 90 @ 35 = 3,150 140 @ 36 = 5,040 50 @ 38 = 1,900 Goods available for sale. . . . . . . 500 $16,900 Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (300) Ending inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 units The number of units sold is subtracted from goods available to arrive at ending inventory (in units).

Problem Solution FIFO periodic: Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . 150 @ $30 = $ 4,500 To calculate the FIFO cost of goods sold amount, you must identify the first-in 300 units and their associated costs. Start with beginning inventory of 150 units…

Problem Solution and then add succeeding layers… FIFO periodic: Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . 150 @ $30 = $ 4,500 70 @ 33 = 2,310 and then add succeeding layers…

Problem Solution FIFO periodic: Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . 150 @ $30 = $ 4,500 70 @ 33 = 2,310 80 @ 35 = 2,800 until the first-in 300 units and their associated costs have been identifed.

Problem Solution FIFO periodic: Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . 150 @ $30 = $ 4,500 70 @ 33 = 2,310 80 @ 35 = 2,800 $ 9,610 Cost of goods sold under FIFO periodic represents the cost of the first 300 units that were added to inventory.

Problem Solution FIFO periodic: Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . 150 @ $30 = $ 4,500 70 @ 33 = 2,310 80 @ 35 = 2,800 $ 9,610 Ending inventory. . . . . . . . 10 @ 35 = $ 350 Ending inventory includes the cost of 10 of the 90 units purchased on 4/15 since the cost of only 80 of these units were added to cost of goods sold.

Problem Solution FIFO periodic: Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . 150 @ $30 = $ 4,500 70 @ 33 = 2,310 80 @ 35 = 2,800 $ 9,610 Ending inventory. . . . . . . . 10 @ 35 = $ 350 140 @ 36 = 5,040 50 @ 38 = 1,900 Ending inventory also includes the cost of the other layers that were not added to cost of goods sold.

Problem Solution FIFO periodic: Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . 150 @ $30 = $ 4,500 70 @ 33 = 2,310 80 @ 35 = 2,800 $ 9,610 Ending inventory. . . . . . . . 10 @ 35 = $ 350 140 @ 36 = 5,040 50 @ 38 = 1,900 $ 7,290 $16,900 Cost of goods sold plus ending inventory equals goods available of sale.

Problem Solution LIFO periodic: Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . 50 @ $38 = $ 1,900 To calculate the LIFO cost of goods sold amount, you must identify the last-in 300 units and their associated costs. Start with the last purchase made during the year…

Problem Solution and then work backwards adding more layers… LIFO periodic: Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . 50 @ $38 = $ 1,900 140 @ 36 = 5,040 90 @ 35 = 3,150 and then work backwards adding more layers…

Problem Solution LIFO periodic: Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . 50 @ $38 = $ 1,900 140 @ 36 = 5,040 90 @ 35 = 3,150 20 @ 33 = 660 until the last-in 300 units and their associated costs have been identified.

Problem Solution LIFO periodic: Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . 50 @ $38 = $ 1,900 140 @ 36 = 5,040 90 @ 35 = 3,150 20 @ 33 = 660 $10,750 Cost of goods sold under LIFO periodic represents the cost of the last 300 units that were added to inventory.

Problem Solution LIFO periodic: Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . 50 @ $38 = $ 1,900 140 @ 36 = 5,040 90 @ 35 = 3,150 20 @ 33 = 660 $10,750 Ending inventory. . . . . . . . 150 @ 30 = $ 4,500 Ending inventory includes the cost of the beginning inventory...

Problem Solution LIFO periodic: Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . 50 @ $38 = $ 1,900 140 @ 36 = 5,040 90 @ 35 = 3,150 20 @ 33 = 660 $10,750 Ending inventory. . . . . . . . 150 @ 30 = $ 4,500 50 @ 33 = 1,650 plus the cost of the first 50 units that were purchased on 2/22.

Problem Solution LIFO periodic: Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . 50 @ $38 = $ 1,900 140 @ 36 = 5,040 90 @ 35 = 3,150 20 @ 33 = 660 $10,750 Ending inventory. . . . . . . . 150 @ 30 = $ 4,500 50 @ 33 = 1,650 $ 6,150 $16,900 Cost of goods sold plus ending inventory equals goods available of sale.

Problem Definition Assume that Kuffel Co. uses a periodic inventory system. Calculate cost of goods sold and ending inventory under FIFO and LIFO. Assume that Kuffel Co. uses a perpetual inventory system. Calculate cost of goods sold and ending inventory under FIFO and LIFO. Explain why the FIFO results for cost of goods sold and ending inventory are the same in your answers to parts a and b, but the LIFO results are different.

Problem Solution b. FIFO perpetual: Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . 100 @ $30 = $ 3,000 To calculate the FIFO cost of goods sold amount under perpetual, apply the same FIFO rules but identify the first-in 100 units and their associated costs for each of the three sales transaction as they occur throughout the year. The sale of 100 units on 3/7 is assumed to have come from beginning inventory…

Problem Solution b. FIFO perpetual: Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . 100 @ $30 = $ 3,000 50 @ 30 = 1,500 50 @ 33 = 1,650 while the sale on 9/28 is assumed to have exhausted the 50 units remaining from beginning inventory plus the first 50 units of the 70 units purchased on 2/22...

Problem Solution b. FIFO perpetual: Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . 100 @ $30 = $ 3,000 50 @ 30 = 1,500 50 @ 33 = 1,650 20 @ 33 = 660 80 @ 35 = 2,800 and the 12/4 sale is assumed to have exhausted the remaining 20 units from the 2/22 layer plus the first 50 units of the 4/15 layer.

Problem Solution b. FIFO perpetual: Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . 100 @ $30 = $ 3,000 50 @ 30 = 1,500 50 @ 33 = 1,650 20 @ 33 = 660 80 @ 35 = 2,800 $ 9,610 Cost of goods sold under FIFO perpetual represents the cost of the first 300 units that were added to inventory – the same result as FIFO periodic!

Problem Solution b. FIFO perpetual: Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . 100 @ $30 = $ 3,000 50 @ 30 = 1,500 50 @ 33 = 1,650 20 @ 33 = 660 80 @ 35 = 2,800 $ 9,610 Ending inventory. . . . . . . . 10 @ 35 = $ 350 Ending inventory includes the cost of 10 of the 90 units purchased on 4/15 since the cost of only 80 of these units were added to cost of goods sold.

Problem Solution b. FIFO perpetual: Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . 100 @ $30 = $ 3,000 50 @ 30 = 1,500 50 @ 33 = 1,650 20 @ 33 = 660 80 @ 35 = 2,800 $ 9,610 Ending inventory. . . . . . . . 10 @ 35 = $ 350 140 @ 36 = 5,040 50 @ 38 = 1,900 Ending inventory includes all layers that were not added to cost of goods sold.

Problem Solution b. FIFO perpetual: Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . 100 @ $30 = $ 3,000 50 @ 30 = 1,500 50 @ 33 = 1,650 20 @ 33 = 660 80 @ 35 = 2,800 $ 9,610 Ending inventory. . . . . . . . 10 @ 35 = $ 350 140 @ 36 = 5,040 50 @ 38 = 1,900 $ 7,290 $16,900 Cost of goods sold plus ending inventory equals goods available of sale.

Problem Solution b. LIFO perpetual: Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . 70 @ $33 = $ 2,310 30 @ 30 = 900 To calculate the LIFO cost of goods sold amount under perpetual, apply the same LIFO rules but identify the last-in 100 units and their associated costs for each of the three sales transaction as they occur throughout the year. The sale of 100 units on 3/7 is assumed to have come from the then last-in 100 units… try it!

Problem Solution b. LIFO perpetual: Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . 70 @ $33 = $ 2,310 30 @ 30 = 900 100 @ 36 = 3,600 By the time the sale of 100 units occurred on 9/28 the last-in 100 units would have been redefined based on the most recent purchase transaction.

Problem Solution b. LIFO perpetual: Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . 70 @ $33 = $ 2,310 30 @ 30 = 900 100 @ 36 = 3,600 50 @ 38 = 1,900 40 @ 36 = 1,440 10 @ 35 = 350 By the time the sale of 100 units occurred on 12/4 the last-in 100 units would have been redefined again based on the most recent purchase transactions.

Problem Solution b. LIFO perpetual: Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . 70 @ $33 = $ 2,310 30 @ 30 = 900 100 @ 36 = 3,600 50 @ 38 = 1,900 40 @ 36 = 1,440 10 @ 35 = 350 $10,500 Cost of goods sold in LIFO perpetual represents the cost of the last-in 100 units that were added to inventory at the time each sale transaction occurred throughout the year. Total cost of goods sold differs from LIFO periodic.

Problem Solution Ending inventory in LIFO perpetual is what is left. b. LIFO perpetual: Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . 70 @ $33 = $ 2,310 30 @ 30 = 900 100 @ 36 = 3,600 50 @ 38 = 1,900 40 @ 36 = 1,440 10 @ 35 = 350 $10,500 Ending inventory. . . . . . . . 120 @ 30 = $ 3,600 80 @ 35 = 2,800 Ending inventory in LIFO perpetual is what is left.

Problem Solution b. LIFO perpetual: Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . 70 @ $33 = $ 2,310 30 @ 30 = 900 100 @ 36 = 3,600 50 @ 38 = 1,900 40 @ 36 = 1,440 10 @ 35 = 350 $10,500 Ending inventory. . . . . . . . 120 @ 30 = $ 3,600 80 @ 35 = 2,800 $ 6,400 $16,900 Cost of goods sold plus ending inventory equals goods available of sale.

Problem Definition Assume that Kuffel Co. uses a periodic inventory system. Calculate cost of goods sold and ending inventory under FIFO and LIFO. Assume that Kuffel Co. uses a perpetual inventory system. Calculate cost of goods sold and ending inventory under FIFO and LIFO. Explain why the FIFO results for cost of goods sold and ending inventory are the same in your answers to parts a and b, but the LIFO results are different.

Problem Solution c. Under FIFO, the periodic and perpetual inventory systems always result in the same dollar amounts being assigned to ending inventory and cost of goods sold – once first-in, always first in – and the timing of the application of the FIFO rules makes no difference. (continued)

Problem Solution (concluded) Under LIFO, the “last-in cost” changes each time another inventory item is purchased. Thus, the timing of the application of the LIFO rules is relevant, and different results will occur under the periodic and perpetual systems.

Accounting What the Numbers Mean 9e David H. Marshall Wayne W. McManus You should now have a better understanding of the FIFO and LIFO cost flow assumptions under the periodic and perpetual systems. Remember that there is a demonstration problem for each chapter that is here for your learning benefit. David H. Marshall Wayne W. McManus Daniel F. Viele