Gathering, analysing and presenting information for evaluation through the prism of the TY Programme Cornelius Young (087) 26 99.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Key Stage 3 National Strategy
Advertisements

ProfessionalValues and Practice Look for differentiation. Monitor lesson plans (planning links). IEPs used Short evaluations should be encouraged (and.
Practical Learning: Achieving Excellence in the Human Services International Conference January 2008 Edinburgh International Conference Centre.
Managing the Statutory Requirements for Assessment April 2011.
School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
June 20, Your Presenters  Ken Mattingly – Rockcastle County  Jessica Addison – Todd County/KDE.
Using Assessment to Inform Instruction: Small Group Time
Playing board for the game Crooked rules
School Improvement Team (SIT)
(IN)FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT August Are You… ASSESSMENT SAVVY? Skilled in gathering accurate information about students learning? Using it effectively.
Effective support: working with others Effective support: working with others A Twilight Training Session by Gareth D Morewood, Director of Curriculum.
Consistency of Assessment
CHAPTER 3 ~~~~~ INFORMAL ASSESSMENT: SELECTING, SCORING, REPORTING.
Whose learning is it anyway?
1 © 2009 University of Wisconsin-Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Collecting Data This is STEP 3 of the five steps.
Maths matters: the Northern Ireland experience Katrina Godfrey Department of Education.
1 SESSION 1 using The New Performance Standards and New VDOE Requirements
Obtaining reliable feedback from students about teaching
Current Context Key Points-Draft Plan Good Practice
Year 6 PYP Exhibition Information Session 2015
Provision for EAL in Primary and Post-primary Schools - evaluation findings and conclusions Launch of the Intercultural Education Strategy Thursday 16.
Principles of Assessment
Why a foundation curriculum at Manchester Academy? Ease transfer and transition (pupils arrive from 35 different primary schools) Many students arrive.
Implementation & Evaluation Regional Seminar ‘04 School Development Planning Initiative “An initiative for schools by schools”
Adolescent Sexual Health Work Group (ASHWG)
Thinking Actively in a Social Context T A S C.
Raising Academic Standards for all School Development Planning Initiative.
Effective curriculum design and development Evidence from research For further school friendly resources visit For further.
Institutional Quality Standards for Gifted and Talented (IQS) An Explanation.
School Self – Evaluation
A big picture for Outstanding Citizenship. Three key questions 3 How well are we achieving our aims? 1 What are we trying to achieve? 2 How do we organise.
Special Educational Needs and Disability in our school
Health for Life Dunblane Cluster Schools Sexual Health and Relationships Education “A practitioner’s reflection on the successes and challenges of implementing.
TLE Challenge – Session 2
Planning for Continuing Professional Development – A Whole School Approach A step by step guide to planning CPD including a framework for Teacher Induction.
Developing and Leading Assessment at Gibson Primary School.
Strathkinness Primary School An introduction to the Curriculum for Excellence – 24 th March 2010 (Revised March 30 th 2010 with new links added)
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Active Learning Curriculum for Excellence Moira Lawson.
Professional Certification Professional Certification October 11, 2007 Standard: Effective Teaching Criteria 1(b) Using a variety of assessment strategies.
Workshops to support the implementation of the new languages syllabuses in Years 7-10.
Evelyn Wassel, Ed.D. Summer  Skilled in gathering accurate information about students learning?  Using it effectively to promote further learning?
A Focus on Health and Wellbeing Wendy Halliday Learning and Teaching Scotland.
NAIGS ANNUAL CONFERENCE Ian Richardson HMI Specialist Adviser for Science Date 5 July 2007.
ROSSHALL ACADEMY “Our School Our Future” Our Future”
Similarities to my current programme of work Teaching of relevant strategies to be used whenever pupils listen and talk with others (e.g. one person speaking.
Primary.  There was a greater level of improvement in Literacy than Numeracy for both FSME and Non-FSME pupils.  Boys showed a greater level of.
Mathematics Program Improvement Review. KWL Complete the following sections of the KWL Chart K – What you know? W – What you want to know? We will complete.
Monitoring Practice Quality First Teaching High Quality Interventions.
Mathematics Program Improvement Review. KWL Complete the following sections of the KWL Chart K – What you know? W – What you want to know? We will complete.
OBSERVING CHILDREN: A Tool for Assessment
1 © 2009 University of Wisconsin-Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Planning your evaluation This presentation provides.
Relating to others taking different roles in different situations interacting with diverse others in a range of learning contexts knowing when it is appropriate.
AssessmentAssessment. Assessment What are some of the components of assessment.
Development Team Day 5a October Aim To explore approaches to evaluating the impact of the curriculum on pupil learning.
THE PRACTICAL APPROACH School Self Evaluation. Workshop Objectives SSE The Positives of SSE A Good Place to Begin How to choose the Area Planning Together.
A Brief Overview of the Irish Inspectorate and its work in schools 29 October 2015 Dr. Suzanne Dillon Assistant Chief Inspector.
Module 3: Observation for Assessment
Multi-grade Workshop Improving teaching and learning IPPN Conference 2008.
Numeracy and Maths Parent Workshop September 2015.
2015 / 2016 and beyond.  1. High quality leadership drives school improvement  2. Quality of teaching and learning  3. Quality of maths provision 
Looking at Our School 2016 A Quality Framework for Post-Primary Schools A tool to support reflection, self-review and evaluation ETBI PRINCIPALS AND DEPUTY.
Ways of doing Needs Assessment
Information for Parents Key Stage 3 Statutory Assessment Arrangements
Personal Learning Planning Learning Logs and Pupil Achievement Folders
The Literacy Hub Introduction Literacy Toolkit
Human Resources Management: Module 2
Evaluating Provision for Students with Additional and Special Educational Needs in Post-Primary Schools Briefing for the Education Partners 4th September.
Evaluating Provision for Students with Additional and Special Educational Needs in Post-Primary Schools Briefing for the Education Partners 4th September.
Presentation transcript:

Gathering, analysing and presenting information for evaluation through the prism of the TY Programme Cornelius Young (087)

Professional Development Service for Teachers Assessment for Learning Oral Language Problem Solving Active Learning Portfolio Assessment Inclusion Differentiated Strategies Learning Styles ICT in Teaching & Learning Classroom Management Cooperative Learning Practical Maths Mental Maths Writing Reading Reading Recovery School Planning Maths Planning EAL Tús Maith Child Protection Spreag an Ghaeilge le Spraoi Post-primary Languages Post Primary Sciences Leaving Certificate Applied Transition Year Cultural & Environmental Subjects Business & Enterprise Subjects Leadership Development Reflective School Transfer from Primary to Secondary Leading Planning

How do you evaluate Transition Year in your School?

Evaluation Evaluation is: “A process of obtaining information and using it to form judgements which in turn are to be used in decision making” Evaluation may be : External - conducted by Inspectorate Internal - conducted by the School

What is School Self- evaluation?  “School self-evaluation (SSE) is a collaborative, reflective process of internal school review whereby the principal, deputy principal and teachers in consultation with the board of management, parents and students engage in reflective enquiry on the work of the school”.  It involves: –An evidence-based process –Making judgments about the work of the school –Bringing about improvements in students’ learning. School Self-evaluation Guidelines, 2012

School self-evaluation cycle Gather evidence Implement and monitor improvement plan Make judgements about strengths and concerns Write school self- evaluation report Devise school improvement plan

Internal Evaluation of T.Y. “The programme should be regularly reviewed and evaluated internally by the coordinating team in close co-operation with school management, staff, students, parents, work providers and community interests.” (Transition Year Guidelines , Dept. of Education)

School Self-evaluation How effective are you as a school organisation? How do you know this? Evidence Where do we want to be? Targets How do we get there? Action Plans How do we know we got there? Evidence

School Self-evaluation How effective is you Transition Year Programme? How do you know this? Evidence Where do we want to be? Targets How do we get there? Action Plans How do we know we got there? Evidence

Aims of theT.Y. Programme  Provide students with opportunities to develop their personal, intellectual, spiritual, social, physical and emotional life in a caring, stimulating and varied learning environment.  Provide a transition between Junior and Senior cycles.  Encourage students to achieve their potential in subject areas and learning experiences within the programme.  Provide a broad and balanced curriculum including the provision of additional support in the core subjects where possible.  Provide students with opportunities for personal and social development. Where do you start?

Evaluation of the TYP  Mandatory part of ‘Writing the T.Y. Programme’  Affirms staff members –individually/collectively  Provides vital feedback and data  Encourages learning from experience  Facilitates continual improvement  Necessary for on-going course design  Identifies strengths and weaknesses  Initiates the reflective process.  Avoids staleness

Evaluation of the TYP  When to evaluate?  Who should be involved?  What should I evaluate?  What becomes of the Evidence?

PDST Samples  Evaluating a Transition Programme  Student End of Year Evaluation.  Student Evaluation of Specific Event  Student Evaluation of Work Experience  Teacher’s self /subject evaluation.  Parents Evaluation of T.Y.

VenueDate Athlone Ed Centre08/03/2013 Blackrock14/03/2013 Carrick on Shannon07/03/2013 Cork Education Support Centre15/03/2013 County Wexford Education Centre14/03/2013 Donegal13/03/2013 Drumcondra Education Centre11/04/2013 Dublin West16/03/2013 Dunmanway, West Cork07/03/2013 Ennis08/03/2013 Galway Education Centre14/03/2013 Kildare12/03/2013 Kilkenny Education Centre21/03/2013 Limerick06/03/2013 Mayo06/03/2013 Monaghan Education Centre21/03/2013 Navan Education Centre05/03/2013 Portlaoise Education Centre22/03/2013 Tralee15/03/2013 Data Gathering Workshops to support School Self- evaluation

Gathering and analysing data Evidence in schools

Data analysis  Think about analysis EARLY  Start with a plan  Code, filter, count  Analyse  Present/Report  Reflect – evaluate the evaluation

Often, it is better to use more than one method….  Mixed methods Log of activities and participation Self-administered questionnaires completed after module In-depth interviews with key informants Observation of workshops Survey of parents

Common data collection methods  Survey  Case study  Interview  Observation  Group assessment  Expert or peer reviews  Portfolio reviews  Minutes of meetings  Testimonials  Tests  Photographs, videotapes, slides  Diaries, journals, logs  Document review and analysis  Rating Scales  Focus groups  Document Review

Very often Quite often Only some- times Rarely or Never Learn a lot Learn quite a lot Learn a little Learn Nothing Answering the teacher’s questions Doing experiments Working on the computer Watching a video Listening to a tape Acting out or doing a role-play Taking notes while the teacher talks Taking notes from a book or worksheet Making things (like models)

Learning Preference Frequency AB DC E.g.: Project work

FocusingDevelopingEstablishingEnhancing Teachers promote positive attitudes to students and to learning There is an expectation on the part of teachers that all students will take an active part in learning Teaching uses a range of approaches that ensures all students take part. There is a culture of collaborative learning There is an expectation on the part of both teachers and students that learning is important and enjoyable and that everyone can improve Learning objectives are clear and appropriately challenging, and teaching is well focused A ‘can do’ culture is promoted Students know where they are in their learning and what they need to do to improve Teachers or practitioners are ambitious for students and expectations of learning are high Display emphasises and supports learning The layout of the classroom supports an inclusive, interactive teaching approach Learning and teaching resources promote student’s involvement and shared learning The learning process is valued – there is a supportive atmosphere that allows students to make and learn from mistakes. There is an emphasis on shared learning, analysis and discussion Learning objectives are explicitly shared with students Display reflects the learning process as well as the content and the product of Student’s learning Students get feedback on their learning in a range of ways. They know what ‘good’ looks like and are motivated to be ‘the best that I can be’ There are opportunities for reflection and discussion throughout the day and also, if appropriate, in the plenary of a lesson Opportunities for reflection at different points throughout the lesson, and throughout the day, support for students in peer and self-assessment Students talk as part of their learning and about their learning Students talking with adults and other students is a key feature of the learning process, and teaching approaches promote and guide this

1234 I concentrate on what I am expected to learn. I take notes of key points. I make an effort to understand rather than just get through it. I think through the problem carefully. I explain it to myself to understand it better. I identify blocks or difficulties with learning. I ask myself questions about what I’m learning. If there’s a problem I leave it and come back to it later. I look for someone who can help me. I explain to others what I am learning. I work hard at overcoming difficulties. I relate what I am learning to my experience. I am able to ignore distractions. I try to relate what I’m learning to things I’ve learned before. I work in a place where I am most comfortable but also alert. I try to make the subject matter interesting. I play background music while I am studying. I experiment with ways of memorising things well.

TIDY12345UNTIDY WARM12345COLD PARENT-FRIENDLY12345PARENT-UNFRIENDLY COLOURFUL12345DRAB AUTHORITARIAN12345DEMOCRATIC COMFORTABLE12345UNCOMFORTABLE ORDERLY12345DISORDERLY SENSITIVE12345INSENSITIVE STRICT12345EASY-GOING HIGH STRESS12345LOW STRESS PESSIMISTIC12345OPTIMISTIC TENSE12345RELAXED HELPFUL12345UNHELPFUL COMPETITIVE12345UNCOMPETITIVE FORMAL12345INFORMAL REACTIVE12345PROACTIVE LIKES CHANGE12345DISLIKES CHANGE STIMULATING12345BORING PUPIL-FRIENDLY12345PUPIL-UNFRIENDLY INFLEXIBLE12345FLEXIBLE CLEAR VALUES12345NO CLEAR VALUES AVOIDS CONFLICT12345 RESPONDS WELL TO CONFLICT ADVENTUROUS12345CAUTIOUS USES TIME WELL12345TIME USED BADLY RISK-TAKING12345AVOIDS RISKS OPEN TO NEW IDEAS12345SCEPTICAL OF NEW IDEAS IDEALISTIC12345PRAGMATIC PURSUES LONG-TERM GOALS12345 PURSUES SHORT-TERM GOALS LOOKS TO THE PAST12345LOOKS TO THE FUTURE

Data entry by computer  By Computer –Word (charts) –Excel (spreadsheet) –Google Drive

Why do I need an analysis plan?  To make sure the questions and your data collection instrument will get the information you want  Think about your “report” when you are designing your data collection instruments

Consider…  Resources available: Time, money, and staff to design, implement, and analyse the information.  Type of information you need. Numbers, percents, comparisons, stories, examples, etc.  Intrusions to work or participants. Which method is likely to be least onerous?  Advantages and disadvantages of each method.  The need for credible and authentic evidence.  The value of using multiple methods.  The importance of ensuring cultural appropriateness.

Analysing qualitative data “Content analysis” steps:  Highlight quotes/terms and note why important  Code quotes according to margin notes  Sort quotes into coded groups (themes)  Interpret patterns  Describe these patterns

Questionnaire design − Considerations  Kind of information: What do you want to know? Is the information already available?  Wording of questions and responses  Formatting the questionnaire  Pre-testing  Cover letters and introductions  When/where will the questionnaire be distributed?  How will returns be managed? How will the data be analysed?  Who is responsible for each task?

Kinds of information – What do you want to know?  Knowledge − what people know, how well they understand something  Beliefs − attitudes, opinions  Behaviors − what people do  Attributes/Demographics − what people are and what people have

Some key questions to ask:  Which pupils and pupil groups in your subject/teaching group are achieving well?  Are all pupils, including disadvantaged groups, fulfilling their potential or should they achieve more?  Do pupils, who did well in Junior Certificate, lose momentum and fail to make progress?  Are the most disadvantaged pupils, or those with SEN, making sufficiently rapid progress to catch up with their peers?  Are the most able pupils stretched and challenged sufficiently?  Are overall results at the end of TY concealing poor progress?

Questions? Cornelius Young   (087) 