AY 2011 Unit Review Process Process – Timeline Rev. 10-6-11.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Advertisements

10 th Anniversary Whos Here and Whos Not? Tom Hale & Joanna Hadley-Evans Messiah College.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Communicate Coordinate Collaborate Hawaii Strategy Institute 2011.
A Procedure for Major Consulting Services Contracts February 8, 2008.
Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
Prepare Understand the accommodation process & choose level of engagement. Engage Follow procedures for receiving accommodations.
Using WEAVE Online Nathan Lindsay & Dan Stroud September 4, 2013.
Periodic Department Review A System of Affirmation LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
CRC Protocol Documents Protocol Submissions Amendments Publications Study Closure.
Enhancing Education Through Technology Round 9 Competitive.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
NOVEMBER 19, 2014 LCAP Update. Goals 1. Placerville schools will promote high academic achievement for all students while preparing them for 21 st century.
Auditor Responsibilities January 16, 2014 State Training Webinar 2014 CSP Contract Compliance Audit 1 AD14002.
HOW TO PROPOSE A COURSE OR CURRICULUM Tina Good, College Curriculum Committee Updated Fall 2014.
GS On line Application Form November-2008 Click to continue.
IT 499 Bachelor Capstone Week 9.
Enterprise IT Decision Making
Community Services Programme Strand 1 & 3 Business Planning Re-contracting April 2014.
Periodic Program Review for Academics Affirming Excellence in Education LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
COD Institutional Effectiveness Process (IEP) Planning, Assessment, Allocation Learn More.
The initial step in the implementation and administration of the ESL program is the establishment of an ESL Review Team (ESLRT) that is responsible for.
2015 JABSOM Promotion and Tenure Dossier Mentoring Program Presented by the JABSOM Faculty Development Program June 2 – July 28, 2015 (Tuesdays, weekly)
IT 499 Bachelor Capstone Week 8. Adgenda Administrative Review UNIT Seven UNIT Eight Project UNIT Nine Preview Project Status Summary.
AY 2011 CTE Instructional Program Review Process Data Description Process – Timeline Rev
2015 ARPD Unit Review Process
School Improvement Plans & EESACs Charter Schools August 6, 2010 Charter Schools August 6, 2010.
AY 2009 Unit Review Data Delivery Plan Data Description Process – Timeline Rev
Revised 10/20/04Version 2.4Page 1 of 22 People First Manual Timesheet Training Guide Section 2 -- Training Scenarios.
COMMUNICATION ENGLISH III October 4/5 th Today Introduction to Discussion Board. More Task 2 info. Surveys.
Managing TAA CCCT Grant 1 Today’s goal – The purpose of today’s training is to help you understand what the purpose of the grant is, how it came to KCTCS.
AY 2007 Comprehensive & Annual Program Review Data Delivery Plan Data Description Process – Timeline Rev
Office of Research Integrity and Compliance March 2011.
The Initiative For School Empowerment and Excellence (i.4.see) “Empowering teachers, administrators, policy makers, and parents to increase student achievement.”
Special Education/504 & GT Program Plans Colorado Charter School Institute BOOT CAMP September 1, 2015.
AY 2012 Unit Review Process Process – Timeline Rev
Submitting Course Outlines for C-ID Designation Training for Articulation Officers Summer 2012.
2014 ARPD Unit Review Process ARPD Process Rev. 9Dec14.
Timothy S. Brophy Director of Institutional Assessment.
AY 2011 LBRT Instructional Program Review Process Data Description Process – Timeline Rev
AY 2006 Annual Program Review Data Delivery Plan Data Description Process – Timeline Rev
AY 2012 CTE Instructional Program Review Process Data Description Process – Timeline Rev
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Program Assessment Technical Assistance Meetings December 2009.
Budget Formulation 2017/2018 A review of the 2017 process and the 2018 process. Office of Budget and Performance Management November 2015.
AY 2013 Unit Review Process Process – Timeline Rev
AY 2012 LBRT Instructional Program Review Process Data Description Process – Timeline Rev
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
CM220 College Composition II Friday, January 29, Unit 1: Introduction to Effective Academic and Professional Writing Unit 1 Lori Martindale, Instructor.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
Policy Lifecycle Policy Created Published & Communicated Periodic ReviewRevised or Retired 10/4/2010 Policy Development Process-v4.b.
AY 2010 LBRT Instructional Program Review Data Delivery Plan Data Description Process – Timeline Rev
Assessing the Operations at Your Institution: Purposes + Planning + Processes = Performance Arizona Assessment Conference Yavapai College, Prescott, Arizona.
SLO P ROCESSES G UIDE This guide is a compilation of a series of SLO presentations over the last several years. This guide will serve as a review or for.
NEW STUDENT TECHNOLOGY TECHNOLOGY AND YOU NAC 1/301 Phone: Created by: Marie Brewer.
Class of 2018 Family Connection: Senior year
2017 JABSOM Promotion and Tenure Dossier Mentoring Program
Office 365 Security Assessment Workshop
School Community Council Roles and Responsibilities
The ACT with Writing and ACT WorkKeys - Alabama
2016 JABSOM Promotion and Tenure Dossier Mentoring Program
Curriculum Development Updates
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Maryland Online IEP System Instructional Series - PD Activity #5
Hands-On: FSA Assessments For Foreign Schools
Strategic Enhancement
Fort Valley State University
Accreditation follow-up report
UQ Course Site Design Guidelines
New FY21 Program Submissions
Presentation transcript:

AY 2011 Unit Review Process Process – Timeline Rev

Purpose The primary purpose of this presentation is to describe the process we follow for both Comprehensive reviews, and the system required Annual Unit Reviews. We have been asked to produce an annual unit review for each and every one of our instructional programs and units. The reviews are required of each system CC and the results will be taken to the U of H Board of Regents for their purview. If you are normally scheduled to do a comprehensive or are “Jumping” you will complete a comprehensive review this year. Additionally, every instructional and non-instructional program will do an Annual Program Review this year. Not sure if you’re scheduled for a comprehensive review or not? Click here for the Click here for the Comprehensive Program-Unit Review Cycle and ScheduleComprehensive Program-Unit Review Cycle and Schedule 2

What’s a Jumper? A Jumper is a locally defined term that is used to describe an instructional program or non-instructional program (unit) that has decided to jump out of their normally scheduled slot for their comprehensive program reviews and into this years cycle. Why would anyone want to do that? Jumping into this years comprehensive cycle means that you have an opportunity to be considered for any budgetary decisions that will be made in this years budget process. Jumpers will still have to do their comprehensive review on their next scheduled review. Jumping does not affect the existing schedule—you are voluntarily doing an extra review for your unit to be considered in this budget cycle. 3

What are we doing to improve our program review process? Upon conclusion of every program/unit review cycle, the IR Office takes extra care to ensure that we are improving our program/unit review process on campus. This is accomplished by sending out questionnaires specific to the groups, and by meeting with various groups across campus and collecting feedback. Your suggestions for improving this process are then posted on the Assessment Website and linked here for your convenience Program-Unit Process Improvement Summary 2010 Program-Unit Process Improvement Summary Based upon the feedback we received from everyone last year from our program-unit review process improvement focus groups, the following changes have been made and have been incorporated into the planning of this year’s review: Timeline for program/unit reviews reevaluated. Reviews due this year November 18 th to Joni. The requirement for listing your unit outcomes and their assessments have been added to the Unit Review Comprehensive Template. We will continue to use our college website as the delivery method for your program-unit review documentation. We will continue the practice of providing program-unit review training and presentation materials. 4

What are we doing to improve our program review process (continued)? Continue practice of providing training specific to your group (i.e. a presentation just for units) Suggestions were made that more people, time, and money be made available for program-unit reviews, and that there is a need for focus groups to collect information from our students/community. Mary Goya has agreed to try to get something organized for the college along the lines of a dedicated focus group consultant. More details to follow through the Assessment Committee. Some sub-units had expressed anxiety last year over having to turn in an annual review to their unit in addition to having to complete their comprehensive review. Upon further investigation of the cause for this, it was discovered that there is an interest by some sub-units to be ungrouped from their unit for the purpose of annual reviews. Instead of a blanket solution for ALL programs and units, as listed in the summary, please contact me if you would like to entertain the idea of being responsible for your own annual reviews, as is currently in place for the Academic Support Unit. 5

Does my unit have to complete an Annual Review? All units have to do an annual review, however some sub units may be combined into one single review. Those units/sub units that have been approved to be combined into a singular annual review are listed here: Administrative Affairs may turn in one annual review, which will include the contributions from the Business Office, Budget & Fiscal Management, Planning Operations & Maintenance, and Human Resources. The Dean of Instruction (DOI) has elected to not combine units. Therefore, the following singular unit reviews are required: Academic Computing Unit, Learning Center, Library, and the Academic Support Unit. The Office of Continuing Education and Training (OCET) may turn in one annual review, which will include the contributions from Apprenticeship, IEP, and Workforce/Community Development/Skills Development. The Office of Student Services (OSS) will complete one annual review online, which will include the contributions from Admissions & Registration, Counseling, Financial Aid, Student Life, Records & Data Management, and the Information Center. University of Hawaii Center at West Hawaii will turn in one singular annual review. 6

I belong to a non-instructional unit…which template do I use? Again, All Units (and some sub units) are required to submit an annual review. Additionally, if you are on the schedule for a comprehensive review or are jumping you will also need to complete a comprehensive review. UHCC Annual reviews have been developed by our UHCC Deans. Therefore, specific training on these reviews should come from the Dean’s that created them. For example, Mike Leialoha will work with his Administrative Services team, Joni Onishi will work work with her Academic Support Team, etc. If you are on the schedule this year for a comprehensive unit review or are jumping you will be using the comprehensive unit review template below. Comprehensive Unit Review Template Comprehensive Unit Review Template For annuals, if you are writing your unit review in support of Administrative Services you will use: UHCC Administrative Services Unit Review Template UHCC Administrative Services Unit Review Template UHCC Administrative Services Unit Review TemplateUHCC Administrative Services Unit Review Template For annuals, if you are writing your unit review in support of Student Support Services you will use the online submission tool: 2011 Student Services Annual Report of Program Data 2011 Student Services Annual Report of Program Data (data not provided by the UH System will be provided by IR) An On-line Executive Summary is also required with the submission. 7

I belong to a non-instructional unit…which template do I use? Continued For annuals, if you are writing THE unit review for Academic Support (not the sub-units) you will use: Academic Support Services Program Review Procedures and Measures Academic Support Services Program Review Procedures and Measures 2011 Annual Report of Academic Support Services Program Data 2011 Annual Report of Academic Support Services Program Data Academic Support Unit FTE Academic Support Unit FTE An Executive Summary is also required with the submission. For annuals in Academic Support, Sub-Units please use: 2011 Annual Report of Academic Support Services Program Data 2011 Annual Report of Academic Support Services Program Data (paste your sub-units section of the completed spreadsheet into the template below) Annual Unit Review Template Annual Unit Review Template For annual reviews in all other units you will use: Annual Unit Review Template Annual Unit Review Template 8

Comprehensive & Annual Unit Review Timeline Develop training materials for all LA, Instruction, and Units Provide Annual Program Review Training to Campus Package and Delivery of all Program & Unit Reviews to System Office Publish all Program & Unit Reviews to Assessment Website All program and unit reviews (Comprehensive and Annual) due to Interim VCAA or UHCC ARPD website by EOB Friday November 18th. Collect and deliver needed data to Student Support Services Build out 2011 program review page on the assessment website and publish all updated materials Plan this year’s program review based on suggested improvements from last year’s review Review and edit all PR (not CERC) documentation Develop and administer PR Process Improvement Sessions (questionnaire, schedule meetings, collect feedback) Work with AC and Interim VCAA to determine what feedback needs to be taken back to UHCC IPRC Schedule Training for all LA, Instruction, and Units Sept 22nd Dec 15th Oct Sept-Oct Jan 27th Dec 20th Jan 25th SeptSept - Oct Sept Nov 18Oct 9 Collect and deliver needed data to Academic Support Services Oct Summarize PR Process Improvement Feedback, communicate results to groups, publish to web. Jan 5th

AY 2011 Comprehensive & Annual Unit Review Process Step 1Write your unit review using the appropriate template or online submission. Step 2Send your documents (one Word document per review) to Interim VCAA Joni Onishi by no later than end of business, Friday November 18th, Step 3Interim VCAA will ensure that all required documents have been received and that they are adequate. Step 4Interim VCAA will forward all approved reviews to the Institutional Research Office for further processing. Step 5The Annual reviews will be sent to the System Office for review by the UH Board of Regents. Comprehensive reviews will be forwarded along as appropriate following CERC guidelines. Step 6All reviews will finally be converted to PDF and posted to the Assessment Web Site. 10

Questions? The intention of this presentation was to provide a single source for all of the documentation related to the Comprehensive & Annual Unit Review process. I have linked all of the documents you should need directly into this presentation. If you need more information on this process please feel free to contact me: Shawn Flood Shawn Flood Shawn FloodShawn FloodMahalo! 11

CERC Comprehensive Unit Review Template & Process Mary will now discuss the comprehensive unit review template, and briefly the current CERC process. Comprehensive Unit Review Template Comprehensive Unit Review Template If you need assistance contact me: Mary Goya, Professor Early Childhood Education Assessment Coordinator (part time) ( is best) Phone: Mahalo! 12