Human Research Ethics and Obtaining Ethics Approval

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The School Research Ethics Committee Welsh School of Architecture.
Advertisements

Research Skills Participant Recruitment. The Recruitment Process. Before trying to recruit participants you should: Consider research from the point of.
EHS Ethics Briefing Session January 13 th EHS Ethics Briefing Session. Dr. Barry Coughlan Assistant Director of Clinical Psychology Department.
Ethics in Field Research Philip Verwimp 27 February, 2014.
April 2011S B Chetwynd – Research ethics, Information and Consent 1 Research Ethics, Information and Consent Dr Sue Chetwynd Associate Fellow Warwick University.
Human Research Ethics - what are they and where can we get some?
Good Clinical Research Practice Guidelines For Informed Consent Presented by Catherine May Acting Research Practice Development Officer The Office of Research.
The Consent Process: It’s More Than Just a Form A “10 Minute Training” Brought to you by Cyndi Long, MS, RD, CCRC CU Sports Medicine.
Ethical Considerations when Developing Human Research Protocols A discipline “born in scandal and reared in protectionism” Carol Levine, 1988.
Human Research and Ethics Dr Michèle de Courcy Chair, Faculty of Education HEAG University of Melbourne.
Human Research and Ethics University of Melbourne.
Evaluating Risk 1 IRB CELT Presentation Colleen Donaldson – IRB Administrator Julie Wilkens – IRB Coordinator.
Obtaining Informed Consent: 1. Elements Of Informed Consent 2. Essential Information For Prospective Participants 3. Obligation for investigators.
DO NO HARM IRRB Presentation Purposes Responsibilities Processes NLU IRRB Home page.
Use of Children as Research Subjects What information should be provided for an FP7 ethical review?
Research Ethics Levels of Measurement. Ethical Issues Include: Anonymity – researcher does not know who participated or is not able to match the response.
ETHICS AND RESEARCH SHARON BESSELL RESEARCH METHODS POGO 8196
8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR (a)
Scientific Data Management for the Protection of Human Subjects Robert R. Downs NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC) Center for International.
Research Methods for the Social Sciences: Ethics Ryan J. Martin, Ph.D. Thomas N. Cummings Research Fellow March 9, 2010.
Research Ethics Dr Jennie Louise Discipline of Philosophy
Human Subject Research by Students at William Paterson University March 2015.
Draft Ethical Guidelines Institute for Employment Studies Social Research Association.
Psychology 291 – Lab 4 Ethics October 9, 2012
University of Western Sydney Comments on your HREC Application.
Protecting Human Participants in Research. Research with Humans 2 Contact Information Susanne Santi Senior Manager, Research Ethics 1027 Needles Hall.
Ethics and ethical research
The Research Ethics Review Process at SJGHC [Presented at Research Readiness Education Program, SJOGHC Subiaco, 12 August 2015] Ms Gorette De Jesus Executive.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Human Subject Protections: Working with the IRB Erin McClure, PhD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
Welcome to PSY2005 Week 2 - Ethics.
Negotiating access, ethics and the problems of ‘inside’ research.
May I have your permission please? The consent process: What, Where, When, Who and Why Valerie Smith OHRP IRB Program Manager
“What’s Ethics Got To Do With It” Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Gary Kent Head Governance Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
Chapter 18 Ethical Precautions in Music Therapy Research.
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
“ Research with human subjects ” SUA IRB Committee OrientationIRB Committee.
Human Subjects Protections Research Ethics. Basic Assumptions about How Research Should be Conducted Subjects should be protected from harm. Subjects.
Andrew Thornton Chairman, HREC Royal Adelaide Hospital Low and Negligible Risk Research Update - Ethics.
Retha Britz Copyright 2013 All rights reserved for this presentation 1 Other important considerations for RECs Retha Britz.
Ethical Research Research Project. Immobilienblasen blame-for-subprime-mess.htm.
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
Ethics in Evaluation Why ethics? What you have to do Slide deck by Saul Greenberg. Permission is granted to use this for non-commercial purposes as long.
Ethical Guidelines in Research Ethics refers to doing what is morally and legally right in conducting research. Research ethics deals primarily with the.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
AssessPlanDo Review QuestionYesNo? Do I know what I want to evaluate and why? Consider drivers and audience Do I already know the answer to my evaluation.
Copyright c 2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.1 Chapter 5 Research Ethics All researchers, even students, have a responsibility to conduct ethical research.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Human Subject Protections: Working with the IRB Erin A McClure, PhD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
 The purpose of IRB is to ensure the rights of research subjects are protected  In accordance with the ethical standards of the U.S. Department of Health.
Application for Ethics Approval for BEd/BSSc Honours Projects Tianyuan Li, Chairperson of the PS Departmental Ethics Committee (June 2015)
 Empowered by the University to insure we are in compliance with Federal regulations  Guided by the standards in the Belmont Report and regulations.
Research ethics.
Application for Ethics Approval for MSocScP(SCS) Research Projects Tianyuan Li, Chairperson of the PS Departmental Ethics Committee (May 2015)
Research Ethics Dr Nichola Seare Aston Health Research & Innovation Cluster.
Susan Sonne, PharmD, BCPP Chair, MUSC IRB II
Back to Basics – Approval Criteria
Chapter 5 Research Ethics
Research Ethics: a short guide for PhD students 2017/18
ST3004: Research Methods Ethics and Writing your Proposal
Research Ethics Matthew Billington
The Importance of Ethics and the Protection of Subjects By Westley R
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN THE CONDUCT OF HEALTH SCIENCES RESEARCH
Research Methods Assignment 2
Research Ethics and Integrity Officer
Preparation for a Major Paper
Dr. Sarah Quinton, UREC Chair,
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Institutional data, headers etc
Presentation transcript:

Human Research Ethics and Obtaining Ethics Approval Division EASS Autumn School Janet Bryan

Why we need to consider research ethics and obtain ethics approval UniSA Research Services: “It is important that research involving human participants is conducted in a way that protects all people involved in the research: the researcher, the participants of the research, and the University”

Useful resources for preparing your ethics application UniSA policy http://www.unisa.edu.au/policies/policies/resrch/res02.asp University Human Research Ethics webpage http://www.unisa.edu.au/res/ethics/human.asp National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (NHMRC, 2007) http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/e35syn.htm Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/r39syn.htm

Principles and Themes of Ethical Research

Principles of ethical conduct in research Research merit and integrity – research is valuable and is conducted with integrity Justice – provides a fair distribution of benefits and burdens of research Beneficence – minimise risk to participants Respect – regard for the welfare, rights, beliefs, perceptions, customs and cultural heritage of participants

Themes in research: Risk and benefit Potential benefits of research should justify any risks. Identifying risk: Does the research lead to harm (physical, psychological, social, economic or legal), discomfort or inconvenience? Gauging risk: What kind, severity and likelihood of harm, discomfort or inconvenience? Judgements should be made on available evidence.   Minimising risk: design the research aims and methods to minimise risk. Managing risk: include procedures for dealing with risk and for monitoring it during the course of the research.

Themes in research: Consent Informed Consent The provision of information about purpose, methods, demands, risks, inconveniences, discomforts, and possible outcomes so that an informed voluntary choice can be made Those not participating should be able to do so without consequence Consideration of the capacity to make a voluntary choice

Obtaining Ethics Approval

What requires ethics approval? Any research involving contact with human participants: Clinical research Research involving data collected by interviews, questionnaires, focus groups, observation Action research projects Use of human tissue Access to medical or other records which are not publicly available, which identify individuals and which contain personal information

How to obtain ethics approval UniSA has 2 levels of ethics committees, the University Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) and Divisional ethics committees (DEASS HREC)

DEASS HREC DEASS HREC website: http://www.unisa.edu.au/easacademicservices/committees/ethics/ Assesses the majority of Honours and Masters by Coursework student application Submission made any time but check meeting times Note the recess from 7th-25th July. Deadline before recess is Tues 10th June Submission via email to: lianne.quin@unisa.edu.au

University HREC UniSA Ethics committee website: http://www.unisa.edu.au/res/ethics/human.asp Note meeting and submission dates The information and forms required to submit an ethics application are the same for both Div and Uni committees

Preparing an ethics application Use the following: The Guidelines for Preparing Ethics Protocols is very useful as it takes you through the completion of an ethics application step-by-step The Ethics Protocol Proforma which contains the coversheet, checklist and proforma.

Ethics coversheet Records contact details of the researcher (you), the title of your project and supervisors signature Note that supervisors are responsible for signing to say that they have read the application and they think it is completed in accordance with UniSA’s protocol guidelines

Ethics checklist Identifies any issues that need to be approved by the University HREC rather than the Divisional Ethics Committee. Covers things like: The nature of the sample Risks to participants and researchers Variations to the consent procedures the type of methodology used Whether other organisations will be involved Reporting procedures Payment of participants. If you answer “yes” to any of these questions it will most likely need to be approved by to University HREC

Ethics proforma Write in plain English Answer the questions! Remember the ethics committee is assessing your project with regard to the principles and themes for ethical research Number your responses in line with the numbering on the proforma If multiple ethics approvals required, don’t use another organisation’s proforma

Section 1. Research Aims 1.1 Aims of research, what you project is aiming to do 1.2 The need for and value of the research: Research involving humans must be valuable and the value should outweigh risks.

Section 2. Research Methodology 2.1 Research questions and hypotheses 2.2 Outline design and methods. Committee needs to ensure your methods will produce valid results. Include all copies of research tools 2.3 Indicate whether your project is part of a larger one

Section 3. Research participants Participants must be volunteers, free to choose without consequence, must be fully informed, Student participants must not be subjected to academic, personal or financial pressure. UniSA procedures on gaining approval to access research participants: www.unisa.edu.au/res/ethics/human.asp#access

Research participants 3.1 Who will be approached/recruited. How many? The number of participants should be justifed 3.2 Selection and exclusion criteria. These need to be justified to ensure equality of participation 3.3 How will participants be recruited? Provide copies of advertisements, flyers etc.

Research participants 3.4 How you will provide detailed information about your study to participants? The information Sheet provides all information required for participants to make informed consent. Refer to guidelines for Information Sheet 3.5 How you will obtain consent. Usually by requesting a consent form be signed, use Consent Form template. Signing signifies participants know what’s expected, what potential risks are, that they are free to withdraw without prejudice. Return of anonymous questionnaire also signifies consent.

Research participants 3.6 Acknowledge any unequal power relationship with you as a researcher and detail how you will reduce the obligation to take part. 3.7 How will participants’ confidentiality be preserved? Separate identifying information from data as soon as possible 3.8 Identify any potential risks and detail how these will be minimised.

Research participants 3.9 Indicate how any safety implications for the researcher will be addressed. 3.10 Detail and justify any reimbursement for participation. Can be reimbursed for costs of travel, parking and other expenses incurred due to participation.

Section 4. Recording, reporting, storage and access to data and results 4.1 Describe how data will be recorded. Need explicit consent to audio or video record (include on consent form) 4.2 Describe how, where and in what form data will be stored. Data must be securely stored for 7 years 4.3 Specify who will have access to the data. Data must not be used and disseminated in any way not agreed upon by participants.

Section 5. Ownership of research 5.1 Detail who will own the data. Students normally own the data they collect. Authorship may be shared, must reflect the proportion of work undertaken.