Ames Research Center Cleveland New York Boston Washington Philadelphia TRACON TMA-MC Overview TMA-MC Overview Tom Davis, Chief, Terminal Area ATM Research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Block 1 Overview Rubén Oscar González Air Navigation Commissioner
Advertisements

1 PHARE Operational Scenarios J-P. Nicolaon, Operational Task Force Chairman EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre.
Total Airport Management CARE Innovative Study
UNIVERSITY of GLASGOW A Comprehensive Approach to ATM Incorporating Autonomous Aircraft ATM Research Group University of Glasgow.
DM 10/18/99 Conflict Prediction, Trial Planning and the Direct-To Tool elements of the Center/TRACON Automation System Dave McNally NASA Ames Research.
October 31, Metron Aviation, Inc. Dan Rosman Assessing System Impacts: Miles-in-Trail and Ground Delays.
Air Traffic Management
Traffic Management and FUA integration
Department Head for PBN Tools, Processes, and Criteria
Presented to: REACT Workshop By: Jay Merkle Date:25 June 2008 Federal Aviation Administration High Density Airport Time- based RNAV/RNP NextGen/JPDO Demonstrations.
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace Redesign Implementation Update Presentation to: Eastern Region Aviation Weather Conference By: Don Castonguay Air.
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
Information Requirements for Inter-Facility ATC Coordination Hayley J. Davison & R. John Hansman Massachusetts Institute of Technology International Center.
Investigating Air Traffic Control Communication & Coordination: Results of field studies Hayley J. Davison & R. John Hansman Massachusetts Institute.
Development of a Closed-Loop Testing Method for a Next-Generation Terminal Area Automation System JUP Quarterly Review April 4, 2002 John Robinson Doug.
Washington DC Metroplex March 5, 2015 Implementation.
Estimating Requirements and Costs of 4D ATM in High Density Terminal Areas Gunnar Schwoch DLR Institute of Flight Guidance Braunschweig, Germany ICNS 2012.
Ames Research Center 1October 2006 Aviation Software Systems Workshop FACET: Future Air Traffic Management Concepts Evaluation Tool Aviation Software Systems.
MIT Lincoln Laboratory Evans benefits ARAM1 jee 6/4/2015 Assessment of Aviation Delay Reduction Benefits for Nowcasts and Short Term Forecasts James Evans.
Airspace Concept Evaluation System- State of Development
Gate-to-Gate Project: Implementing Sequencing, Merging, and Spacing Captain Bob Hilb September 11, 2006.
Date: 18 February 2008 Federal Aviation Administration Collaborative Decision Making at the FAA/ATO A look at how CDM is applied in the U.S.
Air Traffic Control System Team #3. Introduction The purpose of air-traffic control is to assure safe separation between en-route aircraft and the safe.
Traffic Incident Management – a Strategic Focus Inspector Peter Baird National Adviser: Policy and Legislation: Road Policing.
Air traffic controllers (ATC) consideration and ATC solutions Session 5 Presentation 4.
Federal Aviation Administration FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (Public availability to be determined under 5USC 552) Data Communications Program DCL Benefits Modeling.
Revised March CSSI, Inc. Headquarters 400 Virginia Avenue, SW Suite 210 Washington, DC fax toll-free.
Exploring Control Strategies in ATC: Implications for Complexity Metrics Jonathan Histon & Prof. R. John Hansman JUP Meeting, June 21-22, 2001.
1/14 Development and Evaluation of Prototype Flight Deck Systems for Distributed Air-Ground Traffic Management ASAS Thematic Network - Workshop 3 Toulouse,
DM 4/4/02 Direct-To Controller Tool FAA/NASA Joint University Program Meeting NASA Ames Research Center April 4-5, 2002 Dave McNally Direct-To Project.
. Center TRACON Automation System (CTAS) Traffic Management Advisor (TMA) Transportation authorities around the globe are working to keep air traffic moving.
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL Presented by S.SUMESWAR PATRO Regd no:
Review Continuous Descent Operations Manual Roosevelt Pena (Dom Rep)
Study Continuous Climb Operations
Ames Research Center Terminal Area ATM Research Branch Moffett Field, California Todd Farley (650) Time-Based Metering.
A Perspective on NASA Ames Air Traffic Management Research Jeffery A. Schroeder Federal Aviation Administration* * Formerly NASA Ames.
. Traffic Flow Management System Benefits Flexibility for Future Growth: TFMS provides a modern software architecture to meet future growth and support.
Page Lufthansa ASAS It's Time for a paradigm change... Workshop May 2003, Rome
1 Automation Adoption and Adaptation in the Air Traffic Control, URET Case Study Tatjana Bolic.
1 September 28th, 2005 NASA ASAS R&D A IRSPACE S YSTEMS P ROGRAM Michael H. Durham Kenneth M. Jones Thomas J. Graff.
Computerised Air Traffic Management Tools - Benefits and Limitations OMAR BASHIR (March 2005)
An Automated Airspace Concept for the Next Generation Air Traffic Control System Todd Farley, David McNally, Heinz Erzberger, Russ Paielli SAE Aerospace.
Emerging Issues for Air Navigation Service Providers Rudy Kellar Vice President, Operations NAV CANADA September 2007.
FAA System-Wide Information Management Program Overview for SWIM-SUIT Public Lauch Donald Ward Program Manager FAA SWIM Program April 2007.
Presented to: NAS-Wide Simulation Workshop By: Kimberly Noonan, FAA NextGen and Ops Planning Date: January 28, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration NextGen.
Introducing Structural Considerations Into Complexity Metrics Jonathan Histon, MIT R. J. Hansman, MIT JUP Quarterly Review Meeting Princeton University.
Performance Based Navigation (PBN) Canadian Implementation Presentation to Air Transport Association of Canada 9 November 2010.
1 ATM System Wide Modeling Capabilities in Fast-Time Simulation 1 st Annual Workshop – NAS-Wide Simulation in Support of NextGen Dec. 10th – George Mason.
1 Panel on New Air Traffic Control and Management Technology February 23, 2007 The Potential and Realities of Research in Air Traffic Management Harry.
- Session 4: Interoperation José M. Roca Air/Ground Cooperative ATS Programme Eurocontrol.
RECITE A PRAYER…(15 SECONDS). ATM TOPIC 1. INTRODUCTION TO AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT,TYPE OF CONTROL AREAS & FLIGHT PLAN 2. AERODROME CONTROL 3. AREA CONTROL.
F066-B © 2008 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. MITRE-CAASD’s systemwideModeler State and Near-Term Plans Pete Kuzminski 10 December 2008.
ATC1 Air Traffic Control ATC2 Purpose of ATC Safety — Conflict Avoidance — Separation of aircraft Visual Flight Rules Instrument Flight Rules Efficiency.
Ames Research Center 1 FACET: Future Air Traffic Management Concepts Evaluation Tool Banavar Sridhar Shon Grabbe First Annual Workshop NAS-Wide Simulation.
MIT Lincoln Laboratory CIWS D. Meyer 10/21/05 Corridor Integrated Weather System (CIWS)
2 nd Workshop, April 2006 ASAS in Tomorrows Airspace Pierre Gayraud, THALES Bob Graham, EEC Tony Henley, BAe Systems Dr Anthony Smoker, IFATCA ASAS-TN2.
Presented to:GMU System-Wide Modeling Workshop By: Joseph Post, ATO NextGen & Ops Planning Date: 10 December 2008 Federal Aviation Administration FAA System-Wide.
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace Redesign Project and Implementation Update Presentation to: Congressional Staffers By: Steve Kelley, Airspace Redesign.
RSPA/Volpe Center Arrival/Departure Tradeoff Optimization at STL: a Case Study Dr. Eugene P. Gilbo tel.: (617) CDM.
M I T I n t e r n a t i o n a l C e n t e r f o r A i r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n Impact of Operating Context on the Use of Structure in Air Traffic.
Estimating the En route Efficiency Benefits Pool Dan Howell, Michael Bennett, James Bonn, CNA Corporation Dave Knorr, FAA AOZ-40 June 23, 2003.
RSPA/Volpe Center Arrival/Departure Capacity Tradeoff Optimization: a Case Study at the St. Louis Lambert International Airport (STL) Dr. Eugene P. Gilbo.
Presented to:Nextor NAS-Wide Modeling Workshop By: Joseph Post, NextGen Systems Analysis Date: January Federal Aviation Administration NextGen.
Federal Aviation Administration Integrated Arrival/Departure Flow Service “ Big Airspace” Presented to: TFM Research Board Presented by: Cynthia Morris.
Friends and Partners of Aviation Weather
Aircraft Sequencing Problem Near Terminal Area
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
Blocks 2 & 3 Overview Samuli Vuokila Air Navigation Commissioner
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
write on board in advance: handouts, names, Hoare quote
Presentation transcript:

Ames Research Center Cleveland New York Boston Washington Philadelphia TRACON TMA-MC Overview TMA-MC Overview Tom Davis, Chief, Terminal Area ATM Research Branch

Ames Research Center Traffic Management Advisor (TMA) Traffic Management tool to provide arrival traffic flow visualization and scheduling Assists controllers in balancing arrival demand with airport capacity while minimizing delays Develops a safe and efficient schedule for arrival traffic to maximize airport capacity Increases airport capacity, reduces arrival delays, and reduces controller workload by advising enroute sector controllers of the optimized schedule

Ames Research Center TMA Simplified System Description System control & communication Atmospheric data Arrival time prediction TMC Flow Visualization Controller advisories Flight plan data Radar Track & Speed Controller commands Operational ATC Computer Constraint Scheduling TMA Workstations

Ames Research Center TMA: Demand Prediction Estimated time of arrival (ETA) Routes –Follows AK route through the outer arc to the meter fix or –Direct to meter fix/direct to outer arc (fixed radial distance from meter fix) –Nominal path from meter fix to runway threshold Trajectory estimates (modern flight management system algorithms) –Current fuel optimal altitude, speed and descent profiles –Aircraft performance models (over 400 different model types) Input data –Flight plan –Air traffic control HOST flight plans, radar tracks and ground speed estimates –National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) winds, pressure and temperature aloft (hourly forecasts)

Ames Research Center Typical TMA Trajectory Profile Wpt 2 Wpt 3 Wpt Capture 10,000 ft 2. Accelerate to climb speed 3. Climb to Mach/CAS transition altitude with constant CAS 4. Climb to cruise altitude with constant mach 5. Accelerate to cruise speed 6. Level flight cruise at constant Mach 7. Constant Mach descent to descent CAS 8. Constant CAS descent to crossing altitude 9. Decelerate to crossing speed 9

Ames Research Center TMA: Scheduling - Constraints Airport configuration –Current and future airport configurations –Runway loading –Visual or instrument conditions Capacity and control constraints –Separation requirements Meter fix separation requirement Runway threshold (wake vortex or user defined) –Flow rates (number of aircraft/time interval) Airport Runway, meter fix, gate, TRACON –Dynamic configuration changes (blocked interval on runway or meter fix)

Ames Research Center TMA: Scheduling Algorithms Modified first-come-first-served (FCFS) –FCFS sequenced and separated at meter fix –Order of consideration at the runway Priority gate scheduling (aka “single gate free flow”) Close by airport departure scheduling (call for release) Runway allocation optimization –System delay reduction –Controller heuristics Delay/workload distribution –High/Low altitude, site adaptable –Center/TRACON dynamically adaptable

Ames Research Center TMA Flow Visualization: Controller & TMC Advisories Timelines (TGUI) - schedule, status and control information –Threshold, meter fix and departure airport ETA/STA –Configuration management and manual schedule adjustments Load Graphs (TGUI) - demand and schedule density information –Threshold and meter fix –Airport acceptance rate or user defined reference Flow control advisories to sector controllers DSR –Outer arc crossing time and countdown delay –Meter fix crossing time and countdown delay –Controller tactical swap and re-sequence

Ames Research Center TMC GUI Timeline Display

Ames Research Center TMC GUI Graphical Displays

Ames Research Center Planview GUI Display

Ames Research Center DSR Sector Controller Meter List

Ames Research Center Fort Worth Center Arrival Airspace 100 nm

Ames Research Center Measured Benefits of TMA-Single Center at ZFW/DFW Traffic Management Coordinator: – Improved efficiency via increases in airport acceptance rate – Improved forecasting of airport capacity and staffing level Sector Controllers: – Accurate and realizable metering advisories – Reduced workload from previous metering system (ASP) – Perceived reduction in metering duration from ASP Traffic Management System: – Increased capacity by ~5% – Reduced delays between 2-3 minutes / aircraft Operational status at ZFW/DFW –Operational since Oct –16 hrs/day ( ), 7 days/week

Ames Research Center What is TMA-MC? TMA-MC is an extension of the TMA Single-Center to regions where more than one facility is significantly involved in arrival traffic flow management –Incorporates system requirements and operational procedures for re-planning across multiple facilities –Enables transition to time-based metering –Scheduling information for airports and boundaries –Facilitates regional collaboration –Identifies and aids in alleviation of airspace resource congestion problems TMA-MC is a priority research project for FFP2, with a goal of providing capability in the field in the timeframe.

Ames Research Center TMA-MC: Who are the players? TMA Operational Expertise Algorithm Development Software Development Human Factors Requirements Definition NE Airspace Procedures NE Corridor Controller-in-the-loop, Real-time Simulation Benefits Analysis Controller Training Field Demonstration/Testing Technology Transfer AOZ (FFP2) Air Traffic Tech Ctr. MITRE

Ames Research Center TMA-MC Approach Focus upon a region where multi-facility issues are significant Develop an evolutionary process toward a full Multi-Center capability which closely matches and enhances the TMA-SC Evaluate TMA-MC in simulation at NASA, the FAA Technical Center and at selected field sites (e.g. ZNY, ZDC, ZOB, ZBW, and PHL) Conduct TMA-MC field site activities in two phases: –Multi-Facility Collaboration (Release 1) –Automated Flow Management Advisor (Release 2)

Ames Research Center Development Phases Release 1: Multi-facility Collaboration –Utilize TMA prediction and time-based scheduling to provide TMCs in multiple facilities with consistent, accurate arrival information –Utilize TMA graphical displays to facilitate regional collaboration to solve predicted problems –Investigate how to transition to the use of time-based metering in the complex NE environment –Investigate potential system benefits associated with collaboration Release 2: Collaboration and Metering –Utilize TMA prediction and time-based scheduling Enable free-flow of heavily saturated sectors while metering others Transition to full time-based metering in all affected facilities –Develop operational procedures for collaborative metering affecting multiple facilities Determine hierarchy for decision-making across multiple facilities Determine benefits of metering in complex environments

Ames Research Center Challenges of TMA-MC in NE Complex airspace –Multiple facilities, second-tier centers affecting flow –Narrow sectors, restricted controllability –Tower enroute –Crossing traffic flows –Metering Potential benefits –Accurate prediction: a window into the future –Enhanced collaboration –Smoother traffic flow –Reduced holding

Ames Research Center Arrival airspace comparison While the original TMA, which is an intra-Center tool, is well suited to Dallas arrival operations… Philadelphia arrivals require a new, inter- Center version of TMA… Multi-Center TMA

Ames Research Center TMA-MC System Architecture ZOB-TMA ZDC-TMA ZNY-TMA CTAS (TMA) Network ETAs, STAs ZOB HostZNY HostZDC Host ZBW-TMA ZBW Host ETMS Local ARTS ETMS ATCSCC TMA Local ARTS

Ames Research Center Human-in-the-loop simulations Conducted 4 simulation activities (January – June, 2001) –Real time –Controller-in-the-loop –TMCs & controllers from each facility –Traffic scenarios based on recorded live data –Simulated traffic flown by pseudo-pilots Objectives –Familiarize controllers with time-based metering operations –Assess feasibility of doing time-based metering into Philadelphia

Ames Research Center Highlights from simulations It’s more difficult to conform to metering times in the Philadelphia arrival airspace than it is in the Dallas/Ft. Worth arrival airspace –Greater complexity –Smaller sectors –Heavy crossing traffic –Diverse mix of traffic New requirements for Multi-Center TMA –Expanded metering horizon –Redistribution of delay to outlying sectors –Multiple metering fixes along an arrival stream

Ames Research Center Philadelphia arrival sectors New TMA-MC requirements –Offload interior sectors –Expand metering horizon Small, complex sectors Heavy crossing traffic

Ames Research Center “Conventional” metering horizon n.m. radius

Ames Research Center Expanded metering horizon for PHL Improved schedule conformance More acceptable to controllers Error begins to accumulate in trajectory computations

Ames Research Center Upstream metering reference points Upstream metering points effectively split the arrival metering problem into two phases –Reduces error buildup –Improves schedule stability and reliability

Ames Research Center Schedule - Key Milestones Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Government Fiscal Year TMA-MC Software Development Award (CTO-3) Initiate TMA-MC controller simulations TMA-MC Software Design Review (4/16/01) TMA-MC Software Implementation Plan (5/16/01) Initiate Site Surveys Complete initial TMA-MC controller simulations TMA-MC Release 1 FAATC Simulation TMA-MC Release 1 Site Installation (5/02) TMA-MC Release 1 Field Evaluation Conduct TMA-MC Release 2 controller simulations TMA-MC Release 2 FAATC Simulation TMA-MC Release 2 Site Installation (3/03) TMA-MC Release 2 Field Evaluation Technology Transfer to FAA ongoing Transition to IDU NASA/AATT Project Complete