T OWARD A C OLLABORATIVE A PPROACH TO S TAKEHOLDERS ’ I NVOLVEMENT IN ETD S C URATION Presenters: Daniel Gelaw Alemneh, Geneva Henry, & Shannon Stark L.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Capacity Building for Repositories Dr. Helena Asamoah-Hassan University Librarian, KNUST, Kumasi, Ghana at BioMed Open Access Africa Conference held at.
Advertisements

Engaging repository policy with preservation Steve Hitchcock and Neil Jefferies* Preserv 2 Project School of Electronics and Computer Science (ECS), Southampton.
Engaging repository policy with preservation Steve Hitchcock and Neil Jefferies* Preserv 2 Project School of Electronics and Computer Science (ECS), Southampton.
The Academic Computing Assessment Data Repository: A New (Free) Tool for Program Assessment Heather Stewart, Director, Institute for Technology Development,
Selecting a Data Sharing Repository. 2 Why Share Data? Enabling others to replicate and verify results as part of the scientific process Allows researchers.
Andrea Eastman-Mullins Information & Technology Coordinator University of North Carolina, Office of the President Teaching and Learning with Technology.
The Impact of Open Access in Scholarly Communications: Stakeholders Perspectives Digital Frontiers Annual Conference September 19, 2013 University of North.
Administration & Workflow
MIT’s DSpace A good fit for ETDs Margret Branschofsky Keith Glavash MIT LIBRARIES.
3. Technical and administrative metadata standards Metadata Standards and Applications.
Depositing and Disseminating Digital Resources Alan Morrison Collections Manager AHDS Subject Centre for Literature, Linguistics and Languages.
THE RUTGERS WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Mary Beth Weber Cataloging and Metadata Services Rutgers University Libraries August 3, 2007.
EEN [Canada] Forum Shelley Borys Director, Evaluation September 30, 2010 Developing Evaluation Capacity.
Institutional Repositories Tools for scholarship Mary Westell University of Calgary AMTEC Conference May 26, 2005.
The Tower Hotel, November 26, 2009 Research Data Management Infrastructure Programme Launch Event SUpporting Data Management Infrastructure for the Humanities.
Presented by Ansie van der Westhuizen Unisa Institutional Repository: Sharing knowledge to advance research
3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,
Management, marketing and population of repositories Morag Greig, University of Glasgow.
DATA MANAGEMENT SUPPORT FOR RESEARCHERS …………………………………………
ETD Document Preparation and Submission Process for Main Campus Spring
Social Science Data and ETDs: Issues and Challenges Joan Cheverie Georgetown University Myron Gutmann ICPSR – University of Michigan Austin McLean ProQuest.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Planning for Data Management Creating data management plans for your project.
Promotion of open access repositories Iryna Kuchma Open Access Programme Manager Attribution 3.0 Unported.
Libra: Thesis and Dissertation Submission. What is Libra? UVA’s institutional repository, providing online archiving and access for the scholarly output.
NRF advocacy role: the National Electronic & Thesis Dissertation Project Dr Daisy Selematsela and Henda van der Berg On behalf of NETD Project Steering.
5-7 November 2014 DR Workflow Practical Digital Content Management from Digital Libraries & Archives Perspective.
“Mapping the Southwest”: UNT-UTA Collaborative Project Daniel Gelaw Alemneh, Jerrell Jones, University of North Texas (UNT), and Ann Hodges University.
Elements of a Data Management Plan Bill Michener University Libraries University of New Mexico Data Management Practices for.
Preserving Digital Collections for Future Scholarship Oya Y. Rieger Cornell University
Data Governance Understanding the Issues and Rights Associated With Your Research Data Scholarly Communications Brown Bag Series 25 April 2012 Geneva Henry.
UVa Library Research Data Services
A survey based analysis on training opportunities Dr. Jūratė Kuprienė Framing the digital curation curriculum International Conference Florence, Italy.
1 1 Scholarly Publishing & Academic Resources Coalition an initiative of the Association of Research Libraries Institutional Repository.
PREMIS Rathachai Chawuthai Information Management CSIM / AIT.
Digital preservation activities at the NLW Sally McInnes 18 September 2009.
Implementing an Institutional Repository: Part III 16 th North Carolina Serials Conference March 29, 2007 Resource Issues.
Choosing Between Data Sharing Repositories for Engineering Linking Open Data cloud diagram, by Richard Cyganiak and Anja Jentzsch.
Providing the ETDs of Today for the Researchers of Tomorrow Martin Halbert, Katherine Skinner, Matt Schultz 2012 CNI Fall Membership Meeting Washington,
Ensuring Long-term Access to Electronic Theses and Dissertations: Local vs. Global Lifecycle Management Daniel Gelaw Alemneh, University of North Texas.
Jimma University (Ethiopia) July 7, 2015 By Daniel Gelaw Alemneh University of North Texas ETD Lifecycle Management Workshop This workshop series is made.
PLN Members and the ARL Digital Preservation Survey Preliminary Findings Gail McMillan Director, Digital Library and Archives Virginia Tech Matt Schultz,
JISC/CNI Conference Edinburgh, 26th June 2002 Challenges of Digital Preservation – do we have a road map? Maggie Jones.
State of Georgia Release Management Training
Institutional Repositories July 2007 Intellectual property management : the DISA experience Dr D Peters DISA: Digital Innovation South Africa.
Managing Access at the University of Oregon : a Case Study of Scholars’ Bank by Carol Hixson Head, Metadata and Digital Library Services
Open Access and Institutional Repositories. Accra, June 2007 Institutional repositories in SA research institutions: the DISA experience Dr D Peters.
Institutional Repositories July 2007 DIGITAL CURATION creating, managing and preserving digital objects Dr D Peters DISA Digital Innovation South.
A Project of the University Libraries Ball State University Libraries A destination for research, learning, and friends.
How to Implement an Institutional Repository: Part IV A NASIG 2006 Pre-Conference May 4, 2006 Policy Issues.
BENEFITS OF AN INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORY THE REPOSITORY AT ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY.
Chang, Wen-Hsi Division Director National Archives Administration, 2011/3/18/16:15-17: TELDAP International Conference.
Grant Writing for Digital Projects September 2012 IODE Project Office IODE Project Office Oostende, Belgium Oostende, Belgium Sustainability and.
Transitioning to Electronic and Open Access: the ETD Program at Caltech Katherine Johnson Digital Repositories Coordinating Librarian California Institute.
5. Presentación general de la iniciativa REDD+ SES 5. Presentation of the REDD+ SES Initiative.
Katherine Skinner, Martin Halbert & Matt Schultz Educopia Institute and MetaArchive Cooperative NDSA Infrastructure Committee
Digital Preservation MetaArchive Cooperative, Digital Preservation Policy Planning Workshop Boston College, Boston, MA October 26, 2010.
Practical Aspects of Preservation Peter Simpson Development Officer Arts and Humanities Data Service.
Outline of Talk What is eResearch and why does it matter? The South African SARIS project Challenging the current scholarly communication system eResearch,
The New Now: Institutional Repositories and Academia Institutional Repository USM April 17, 2015 Marilyn Billings Scholarly Communication Librarian.
Writing a data management plan (DMP) Stephen Grace and David McElroy Writing a DMP workshop, UEL 5 March 2015.
Beyond the Repository: Research Systems, REF & New Opportunities William J Nixon Digital Library Development Manager.
Managing Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETD) Data
Managing Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETD) Data
Digital Asset Management Part 15: Summary
Best Practices for Electronic Theses and Dissertations
How to Implement an Institutional Repository: Part IV
Getting Started with Data Management
Digital Project Lifecycle Curating Across the Curriculum
Daniel Gelaw Alemneh and
How to Design and Implement Research Outputs Repositories
Presentation transcript:

T OWARD A C OLLABORATIVE A PPROACH TO S TAKEHOLDERS ’ I NVOLVEMENT IN ETD S C URATION Presenters: Daniel Gelaw Alemneh, Geneva Henry, & Shannon Stark L IFECYCLE M ANAGEMENT OF ETD S :

Agenda  Introduction and Project Overview  Guidance Documents Overview  Guide to Options for ETD Programs  Guidelines for Implementing ETD Programs - Roles & Responsibilities  Guidelines for Collecting Usage Metrics & Demonstrations of Value for ETD Programs  Overview of Formats, Complex Content Objects, and Format Migration Scenarios for ETDs  Overview of PREMIS Metadata & Lifecycle Event Record-Keeping for ETDs  Guide to ETD Program Cost Estimation and Planning  Briefing on Access Levels and Embargoes of ETDs  Briefing on ETD Copyright Issues and Fair Use  Summary and Future Plans

Project Overview  Project Name: Lifecycle Management of ETDs  IMLS National Leadership Grant  Duration: October 2011 – September 2013  Project Objective  To promote best curatorial practices and to increase the capacity of academic libraries to reliably preserve ETDs  Deliverables  Guidance Documents for Lifecycle Management of ETDs  Lifecycle Management Tools  Educational Materials  Workshop

Guidance Documents

Steering Committee Chair: Martin Halbert Options for ETD Programs

 Serves as a basic guide for decision- makers to key options in creating or overhauling an ETD service program  Describes Option Pros and Cons  Restricted or Open Access?  Implement a repository or lease a commercial service?  Where does responsibility fall?  This document will reference and integrate all the other documents in the series

Steering Committee Chair: Xiaocan (Lucy) Wang Implementing ETD Programs

 Types of Stakeholders:  Internal  External  Roles and Responsibilities:  Program Planning  Program Implementation Creation, Submission and Ingestion Access Archiving and Preservation  Program Assessment

Steering Committee Chair: Yan Han Collecting Usage Metrics & Demonstrations of Value for ETD Programs

 Collecting Usage Metrics  Quantitative approaches  Qualitative approaches  Demonstrating ETD value in terms of:  Benefits to scholarly communications  Benefits to university  Benefits to students  Evaluation and use of data  Analysis and interpretation of statistics  Comparisons with other collections (licensed, open access, etc.)

Steering Committee Chair: Bill Donovan Formats, Complex Content Objects, and Format Migration Scenarios for ETDs

 ETD Formats issues and considerations  Complex multimedia content objects  Metadata  Hyperlinks  Research data  Guidance for what format to be used  Text  Images  Audio  Video  Others  Format migration scenarios  Versioning  Fixity checking  Migration from one repository or system to another

Steering Committee Chair: Daniel Gelaw Alemneh Metadata & Lifecycle Event Record-Keeping for ETDs

 Overview of ETDs practices  Repository platforms, tools, standards, and guidelines  Metadata for ETDs lifecycle management  Supporting Graduate students (restriction, embargoes)  Supporting Graduate Schools (submission requirements)  Facilitating access, use, reuse, copyright management, and preservations activities  Issues and considerations  What information need to be captured? When?  Who creates metadata?  Quality assurance mechanisms

Steering Committee Chair: Gail McMillan ETD Program Cost Estimation and Planning

 Overview of the costs of the entire life cycle of ETDs  cost components in the initial (i.e., set up) stages of operation,  during the early stages of development over a yearly time frame  Context and costs associated with the full range of ETD initiatives  born digital vs. digitization of analog  new (i.e. initial set up) vs. an existing initiative,  university-wide vs. a single university unit strategy.  Anticipated Expenses  Putting the process (submission, approval, access: SOP) in place  Maintenance for ensuring the long-term access

Steering Committee Chair: Geneva Henry Access Levels and Embargoes

 What are access restrictions for ETDs?  Embargoes  Restricted access based on permissions  Why restrict access?  A multitude of reasons given  Need to understand policies and consistency in applying them  How are access restriction decisions made and enforced?  Look at whether or not decisions are on a case- by-case basis or based on general policy  Understand how enforcement occurs and what notification, if any, there is upon release

Steering Committee Chair: Patricia Hswe Copyright Issues and Fair Use

 Overview of ETD copyright and fair use  What can be copyrighted and what is not copyright protected?  International copyright considerations  Who provides copyright and fair use guidance?  Graduate students need to know who to consult with on these issues  Is the guidance for students, their advisors?  What are the institution’s policies regarding intellectual property rights?  Do student’s own their copyright or does the university?  Are there funder mandates impacting the copyright? Publisher concerns?

Summary and Directions

Summary  Project completion scheduled for end of 2013  Nine guidance documents will be produced  Educational Materials and Workshops  Software tools for Lifecycle Management  Presentation at USETDA conference in Boston in June:  Workshop at International ETD conference in Lima, Peru in September:  Training materials will be available in 2013, including workshop syllabi, training handouts and exercises and PowerPoint presentations

Project Contacts  PI: Dr. Martin Halbert  Co-PI: Katherine Skinner  Project Manager: Matt Schultz  Assistant Coordinator: Shannon Stark  Project Wiki: