The most relevant course for me Prof. Christopher M. Clark & Prof. Suzanne Painter : Core course- PLCs, Designing RP, Reflective teaching, Collaborative learning, Concept of Critical friends, Respect, Cultivating a constructive classroom atmosphere, Ethics.

Significant ideas in other courses Dr.Wetzel,Dr. Todd Kisicki & Dr.Archambault, Technology module: Use of Technology for mentoring, communicating and feedback :Edmodo, Weebly, Photopeach,Google drive,hangout. B.J Stone, Classroom instruction that works: Strategies for better classroom transaction and management Ted Broussard, TAP rubric (Teacher observation and performance evaluation)

Some key features of TLP at ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY Co-teaching approaches Monitoring process very well structured: Full-time Site Coordinator Comprehensive performance observation process (3-4 times over the year) using TAP Rubric, including pre- and post- conferencing Year long clinical apprenticeship- Senior-year residency Collaborative learning :Social Constructivism PLCs Reading s

Preparation for better teacher trainees PLCs & Collaborative learning Use of rubric for better Teaching learning process. ”I teach AZ” programme supervision structure :Area supervisors, Mentor teachers Trainings to be based more on subject specific content Mandatory papers on Inclusive education More field experience Co- teaching Teacher training modules revision

School visits

Things we can look at adapting/ adopting from American schools Advisory period in a school day Setting of class objectives for each class period Teachers evaluation- TAP rubric (self, peers, managing authority) Reading posts Classroom as an interdependent community Total Physical Response (TPR)- language learning method (speech+ action) CPD meetings among teachers

Developing a Professional Learning Community (PLC) of Inclusive Educators A Pilot Project for Improving Teacher Education

OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECT Sensitizing and educating teachers on Inclusive Education. To orient and train Inclusive teachers on RTI and PLC. Enabling teachers to adjust instruction to meet children educational needs as a result of screening and progress monitoring. Identifying children with specific learning disabilities in need of special education.

Sl.n o Implementation activity Resources (Funding/ Material) Timeline 1. Joining organizations, meeting with Comm.&Secy,SCERT &School Education. N.A Jan 1st-2nd week 2. Implementation team setupN.A Jan 3rd week 3. Meeting with implementation team & pilot teachers Meeting expenditure Jan 4th week 4. Adopt G. P. S Lerie, Kohima (Inclusive school) as the pilot school. N.A Feb 1st week 5. Capacity building: Pre training and post training tests Training funds (SSA/ SCERT) Feb 2nd week 6. Tier 1 testsN.A Feb 3rd week 7. Meeting the 4 teachers along with the implementation team to discuss the case of the 4 students Meeting expenditure Feb 3rd week 8. The 4 teachers are asked to focus on 1 child each. N.AFeb 4 th week 9. Monitoring of students for more intensive instruction and support in Tier II. N.AFeb - March

Sl.n o Implementation activityResourcesTimeline 10. PLC meeting once a week- 4 teachers N.A March, April, May 11. Tier II students identified and intervention begins N.A March, April, May st Meeting with parents N.AMarch 13. PLC- Implementation team and 4 pilot teachers once a month Meeting expenditure March, April,May 14. Tier III identification N.AApril 15. Tier III intervention Fee for experts April, May nd meeting with parents N.AMay 17. Review and further planning Meeting expenditure May 18. Evaluation of pilot project N.AMay-June 19.Report writing N.AJune

1 st meeting of the Implementation team:

Training of Teachers from the Pilot school:

EXPECTED BENEFITS OO

Expected benefits Sensitization and awareness on Inclusive education Formation of Professional Learning Community (PLC) of Inclusive educators. Support group for parents and community. Teacher training.

“ I hope to be an agent of change with a story to tell”

THANK YOU